...chilling...
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214750021001268
Highlights
• Additive or synergistic toxicity may occur following multivalent vaccination.
• Infant deaths post-vaccination are often misclassified as SIDS or suffocation in bed.
• Of all reported SIDS cases post-vaccination, 75 % occurred within 7 days (p < 0.00001).
• Inflammatory cytokines in the infant medulla act as neuromodulators causing prolonged apneas.
• Adjuvants that cross the BBB may induce fatal disorganization of respiratory control.
If that is a fact that is plain old premeditated murder.
Really? Those MF'ers.
Source linked in the image says something quite different: examining VAERS reports of death post-vaccination, "For child death reports, 79.4% received >1 vaccine on the same day." In other words, 3/4 kids who died following vaccination had more than one vaccine administered on the day they were vaccinated. It does not claim what the image claims. The report actually begins by claiming that vaccines are extremely safe but adverse events occur on rare occasions.
" "For child death reports, 79.4% received >1 vaccine on the same day." "
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214750021001268
• Additive or synergistic toxicity may occur following multivalent vaccination.
• Infant deaths post-vaccination are often misclassified as SIDS or suffocation in bed.
• Of all reported SIDS cases post-vaccination, 75 % occurred within 7 days (p < 0.00001).
Every one of those claims is different from the one in the image.
"Every one of those claims is different from the one in the image."
...why is this important...
...what is the bottom line...
The importance is the clarity and accuracy of the message. Is the claim in the image even present in the source material?
I’m totally here for the message and support it (my child is completely unvaccinated), but thank you for pointing this out.
I was about to post the discrepancies but checked the comments first.
Accuracy matters. It only hurts us when we try to have these difficult conversations with people, then cannot substantiate our claims, however minimal the discrepancy may be.
some people could care less if they are credible or not. they just want to know who speaks the in group jive and slap some skin, jack!
"The importance is the clarity and accuracy of the message. Is the claim in the image even present in the source material?"
...thank you for taking the time to clarify your original assertion...
...carry on...
lol. good one. misinfo is necessary
This does bring up an interesting question.
If it is two or more vaccines that 79.4% of SIDS cases had, then it is true that 79.4% of SIDS cases did have one vaccine on the same day. It’s just not a fully accurate representation of the situation, but it’s also not false.
However, a few things occur from that. If vaccines aren’t actually safe or beneficial, which is a possibility, then it’s inaccurate in a positive direction.
It’s totally possible to look at this meme as a troll, which opens up a conversation into some very important issues we haven’t been able to discuss. If someone is good at that approach, and if vaccines aren’t safe, that aspect could open up some good avenues of discussion - “talking past the sale”, as it were.
Not saying trolling is right or wrong, but a certain Papi Trumo does it all the time, and it does seem to work.
Two threads with lots of info on this:
If they’re intentionally murdering us, is the bigger issue that a meme should say “two” vaccines instead of “one” to be fully accurate, or that they’re definitely murdering us and lying about it, and we need to figure out how to get ground-level eyes looking at this in earnest to figure out precisely what’s going on and get the word out? Why aren’t they telling us about these correlations?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=BH6Prr1nvJY&t=140
Frustrating that someone downvoted you, Lawjic. I just made a similar post to yours.
The fastest way to lose a debate is to overstate one's argument. I'm sorry if people don't like hat Lawjic is saying, but he/she is absolutely correct. The statement made in the image and the linked data are incongruent.
Agreed, these deaths are only being reported to VAERS because they had a vaccine close to death. This isn't looking at ALL sids deaths as the image claims.
https://wwwlncbi.nlm.hih.gov/m/pubmed/26221988/
...link has been moved...
The link wasnt written correctly
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26021988/
"The link wasnt written correctly"
God bless you for your participation.
...stay cool Patriot...
But you will never hear this in USA Today!
This is pretty misleading information
Most babies nowadays get vaccinated, like it or not, so I’m not surprised that most babies who die of SIDS got vaccinated.
The important figure you’d want to find is “what percentage of babies who get vaccinated die of SIDS”
It’s usually multiple vaccines. Rarely just one.
Way past time to do something about this. Let’s see what RFK does now that he has the authority. Is there also the ability to charge those in the pharmaceutical/pediatric industry?
& the rest had a vaccine in one of the previous 4 days
Well the "S" is for "Sudden"ly
The word "coincidence" does not apply.
"The word "coincidence" does not apply."
...there are no coincidences...
EDIT: THE ASSERTION MADE IN THE IMAGE ABOVE IS NOT CORRECT.
The actual background data is in this link (after doing a bit of digging): https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6771280/
The article in the screenshot has been moved, but the supporting data is in the reference document at the beginning of my post.
What's being asserted here in the image is not supported by this data. Here's the key line from the paper:
For child death reports, 79.4% received >1 vaccine on the same day. The most common vaccines in children were DTaP-HepB-IPV + Hib + PCV7 or PCV13 (n = 127 [8.7%]) followed by HepB vaccine given alone (n = 115 [7.8%]).
What's being said here is that from the VAERS report database, of all the infants who died shortly after being vaccinated, 79.4% died one day or less after getting vaccinated.
This is obviously horrific. But we lose arguments when we make unsubstantiated claims and I am now very concerned that people who don't see this comment are taking this image and posting it on X. There's no faster way to lose a debate than to overstate one's argument.