He is blessed for sure. I know of no one else in this world like him. I think he said they did a survey and determined he's got 50+ years of supply down below.
Most US oil is not suitable to be converted into gasoline, thus is is shipped off to Europe so they can burn it in their furnaces for winter and we import zillions of barrels of sweet crude from the middle east. If we sell this new windfall for a nice markup then we might put a small dent in out national debt, but I think President Trump already has a way to deal with the debt that doesn't include raping our natural resources and selling it off to the highest bidder.
Pennsylvania, California, Alaska, and Texas EACH have more oil and gas than Saudi Arabia. The US has enough coal for 100 years of power at 2x current generation rate. Nuclear power can quadruple base load in 10 years if “enviro-tards” are neutralized. It is our energy and we have the authority and intent to use it. Also, most “natural resources” like oil, gas, and water are self-renewing at different rates. How exactly do you “rape” something that is self-renewing? I think you meant “harvest”. /s
Just the known oil and gas reserves have enough energy for the next 300 - 500 years.
But there's mo' money in pretending the globe is warming and we're all choking on toxic exhaust fumes and about to run out of oxygen if we don't fork over the carbon tax to Them Who Know Better What to Do With Your Money Than You Do.
I was referring to plundering our natural resources like a drunk liberal would plunder a innocent lady on the street and then say "it's her fault for being pretty". Rape, plunder, renewal,.... I'm not for leaving scars on the surface or fracking underground and spoiling the water table, but I'm in favor of mining our assets in a way which leaves as little residue as possible. Maybe is mis-chose that particular word, but I just don't want President Trump to release the hounds to trash the earth simply for the sake of a profit. There is a line which I think we can draw to get the resources without spoiling the land in the process. Reclamation comes to mind, and that should be in the monetary equation before a spade of dirt is overturned.
Fair point. Obviously, globalist corporations in the past have INTENTIONALLY been allowed/encouraged (IMO) to create as much environmental destruction as possible so that it could later be used as justification to restrict national resource development. Engineered problem + Propaganda = Desired result (poor nations, stolen resources, destroyed environment, restricted development). Cloward-Piven 101: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy
Globalist corporations steal and have no interest in nations or development to benefit The People. National (or nationalist) corporations pay fair market price (generally) to acquire assets and develop them for the nation while making a profit. We shall judge by fruits, not words.
Plunder? Exactly what should we do it? If you were thirsting in the desert and had one gallon of water the worst thing you could do is conserve the water. If we need to use the resources to become solvent again the thats what we should do.
Trump wrote a book called other people's money. This debt will be erased. Just watch.
We are already bankrupt and still using currency that has zero value. We've beenninsolvent as a nation for almost 40 years. It's the deep states corporate debt, not ours.
The way money is actually created in our current system means the national debt will never get paid down until the Federal Reserve ceases to exist.
The Fed only releases new money by lending it into the economy, 9/10 times by buying Treasury debt, worsening the problem, so we can't just print to fix it.
Taxing inherently slows the economy down, because you are destroying the M1 money supply by sending it back to the Federal Reserve. So, by the time you've paid the first trillion off the next 36 trillion is that much harder. Rinse and repeat, until you are trying to pull blood from a stone.
It really comes down to "End the Fed", and everything between now and then is kind of moot.
Why is there always only 10 more years of Peak Oil Predictions? Because they only tell you about 10-years at a time to keep the price high. If they really told you how much oil there actually is, then the price would necessarily drop do to it's overwhelming abundance.
"Peak Oil" theory is based on a faulty understanding of petroleum. It's called a "fossil fuel" because (they) want you to think that it is a finite resource that came from ancient vegetation and animals (dinosaurs etc.). But recently a new theory has come about called the "Abiotic Theory" and it posits that petroleum is constantly being produced deep in the earth's core and forced upward into deposits.
In support of that theory, some previously "played out" oil fields were recently retested and they found that new petroleum was filling up the so-called "empty" deposits.
This guy is dirty. Chi-coms buying up North Dakota assets, porous border, isolated smuggling routes, on and on. A vetting failure. Don't let this corrupt asshole near the president.
It doesn't say WHERE this mother-lode of resources is located. Or is it spread out over wide expanses of the US?
I know someone in southeast Indiana who drilled their own natural gas well. He does not pay for energy.
He is. It is south of Rush County. He said they had to go 700 feet to get to the gas. I'm totally envious.
He is blessed for sure. I know of no one else in this world like him. I think he said they did a survey and determined he's got 50+ years of supply down below.
Spread Out, see map in X link.
Ok thanks.
Still can't find the map, in the X link or anywhere else. Do you have a link to point to?
yes: found the PDF file (after a time) https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2025/3027/fs20253027.pdf
You need to page down slightly to see it https://x.com/USGS
I wouldn't publicy say where 473 million barrels of oil and 27 trillion cubic feet of ng are exactly located until we have secured it
Be Marcellus Shale deposit in West (bygawd) Virginia!!! Shhh.....I may know some peeps who have some property there.....
Greenland??
Most US oil is not suitable to be converted into gasoline, thus is is shipped off to Europe so they can burn it in their furnaces for winter and we import zillions of barrels of sweet crude from the middle east. If we sell this new windfall for a nice markup then we might put a small dent in out national debt, but I think President Trump already has a way to deal with the debt that doesn't include raping our natural resources and selling it off to the highest bidder.
Pennsylvania, California, Alaska, and Texas EACH have more oil and gas than Saudi Arabia. The US has enough coal for 100 years of power at 2x current generation rate. Nuclear power can quadruple base load in 10 years if “enviro-tards” are neutralized. It is our energy and we have the authority and intent to use it. Also, most “natural resources” like oil, gas, and water are self-renewing at different rates. How exactly do you “rape” something that is self-renewing? I think you meant “harvest”. /s
Just the known oil and gas reserves have enough energy for the next 300 - 500 years.
But there's mo' money in pretending the globe is warming and we're all choking on toxic exhaust fumes and about to run out of oxygen if we don't fork over the carbon tax to Them Who Know Better What to Do With Your Money Than You Do.
I was referring to plundering our natural resources like a drunk liberal would plunder a innocent lady on the street and then say "it's her fault for being pretty". Rape, plunder, renewal,.... I'm not for leaving scars on the surface or fracking underground and spoiling the water table, but I'm in favor of mining our assets in a way which leaves as little residue as possible. Maybe is mis-chose that particular word, but I just don't want President Trump to release the hounds to trash the earth simply for the sake of a profit. There is a line which I think we can draw to get the resources without spoiling the land in the process. Reclamation comes to mind, and that should be in the monetary equation before a spade of dirt is overturned.
Fair point. Obviously, globalist corporations in the past have INTENTIONALLY been allowed/encouraged (IMO) to create as much environmental destruction as possible so that it could later be used as justification to restrict national resource development. Engineered problem + Propaganda = Desired result (poor nations, stolen resources, destroyed environment, restricted development). Cloward-Piven 101: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy
Globalist corporations steal and have no interest in nations or development to benefit The People. National (or nationalist) corporations pay fair market price (generally) to acquire assets and develop them for the nation while making a profit. We shall judge by fruits, not words.
cA.pTAin PLaNeT wILL saEV Us!
kek
Plunder? Exactly what should we do it? If you were thirsting in the desert and had one gallon of water the worst thing you could do is conserve the water. If we need to use the resources to become solvent again the thats what we should do.
Won't do any good if we can't get our spending under control and so far even Trump isn't doing that.
Trump wrote a book called other people's money. This debt will be erased. Just watch.
We are already bankrupt and still using currency that has zero value. We've beenninsolvent as a nation for almost 40 years. It's the deep states corporate debt, not ours.
Bingo.
The way money is actually created in our current system means the national debt will never get paid down until the Federal Reserve ceases to exist.
The Fed only releases new money by lending it into the economy, 9/10 times by buying Treasury debt, worsening the problem, so we can't just print to fix it.
Taxing inherently slows the economy down, because you are destroying the M1 money supply by sending it back to the Federal Reserve. So, by the time you've paid the first trillion off the next 36 trillion is that much harder. Rinse and repeat, until you are trying to pull blood from a stone.
It really comes down to "End the Fed", and everything between now and then is kind of moot.
https://youtu.be/iFDe5kUUyT0
Why is there always only 10 more years of Peak Oil Predictions? Because they only tell you about 10-years at a time to keep the price high. If they really told you how much oil there actually is, then the price would necessarily drop do to it's overwhelming abundance.
"Peak Oil" theory is based on a faulty understanding of petroleum. It's called a "fossil fuel" because (they) want you to think that it is a finite resource that came from ancient vegetation and animals (dinosaurs etc.). But recently a new theory has come about called the "Abiotic Theory" and it posits that petroleum is constantly being produced deep in the earth's core and forced upward into deposits.
In support of that theory, some previously "played out" oil fields were recently retested and they found that new petroleum was filling up the so-called "empty" deposits.
True, oil and gas are renewables, scroll down this PDF to the conclusions chapter to see.
https://app.filen.io/#/d/5fcff0df-0d87-48cc-ad73-246672ea4b1c%23BynmduMQkPonUerZfZdRd4kxzgOTF8E7
This guy is dirty. Chi-coms buying up North Dakota assets, porous border, isolated smuggling routes, on and on. A vetting failure. Don't let this corrupt asshole near the president.
Know why?? Because our natural resources only get to go to dem pols in scams like HRC in Uranium 1 and Harry Reid. . . .
Drill, baby, drill!
That oil will last us 7% of a year.
Which makes more sense.....limited resource, or....abiotic oil?
They've k own about that resource for a long time.
its buried in a computer file that was locked away on a windows 2000 server in a government vault ....
It's the government. It was DOS 6.0. It's on floppy.
True story.
The US uses 20 million barrels of oil per day. This ‘find’ is about 24 day’s worth of oil for the US. The natural gas find is more significant.
That's great but let's start by stopping wasting the money and all the fraud and money laundering. Maybe be also see about some claw backs.
Go get the money that the deep state squirreled away. Go find the 2 trillion that the pentagon "lost".
Just thank of all the money the Cabal has stolen from us sense 1913.