I picked up on it years ago too. It was when as a Democrat in California she a) said sensible things, and b) was getting her message out. Her role was to introduce sane ideas into the moderate Democrats crowd, and also to gather intelligence for the white hats.
I shared this thought on my local bulletin board, otherwise known as Mrs. FuzzyBear. MrsFuzzyBear was not convinced. It was not until Tulsi switched parties did the idea gain traction. Fortunately I endured no blasting for being ahead of the curve. Maintaining a strictly invitation-only account membership keeps the shills at bay.
It will be interesting to see how her career path develops. On the VP ticket at some point?
She was the voice of the Kennedy democrat. Aka. JFK today would sound like a far right super MAGA republican. Tulsi during the debates made the other Dems sound lunatic. Plus she’s easy on the eyes. It was a great operation.
Maybe the fact like most other things about this entire operation. It could entirely be flipped. We could be viewing it as one thing but it is actually the other.
That is the point.
I mean I am all aboard, but why act confused? If you have been around long enough we have all discussed Tulsi in length.
She like many others is well connected and has a past.
It doesn't make you a troll for pointing out her former affiliations and upbringings. Quite the opposite.
There is no evidene that IRanians have a nuke, nor is there evidence that they want to have one due to the fatwa. March this year. Whih was prolly correct - until Palantir provided IAEA with AI for their report writing. LOL.
In terms of shaping narratives, it seems chaotic. However, this is to be expected when one is destroying the previous and fake narrative - the hakneyed Net and Yahoo Iran is about to make a bomb in [insert time period], needs replacing with the new narrative that the nuke facilities have been destroyed. <Iran can claim that this is so, and problem solved.
For extra measure - there is the narrative claim that the uranium was inside the 'mine', and is now somehow 'sealed' in.
Of course the counter-narrative is that this is not so.
In terms of defeating the deep state: maybe people are realizing that Mossad intelligence is made up. Even the idea that the Israeli aggression was a bad mistake, and reversed by Trump in a executive decision. Maybe Palantir will realize this, but I doubt it.
Also the IAEA has been discredited for leaking classified information to Mossad. So not sure how that will play out. Iran is talking about biffing them out - they bent backwards far enough - Iran had the most onerous inspections in the world, only to have vital information leaked. The least that can be done is to fire Grossi.
Optics. There's of course no reason for the DNI to report to the public. She reports to the president. If she makes public comments it could be for the sake of a narrative war or something. Normally the public doesn't even know who that person is.
Further to the DS narrative that the nuke facilities were not destroyed etc.
If they say the possibility of nukes, is still there, then they can start making another plan to attack Iran. Hence the NEED for this counter-narrative. - to keep funding that madness.
They cannot affirm that the nuke ambtion wasn't there in the first place, so it couldn't have been destroyed - for example.
However, if this ia a WH operation, then they need to affirm that the nukes are gone, and Iran has been 'knocked back' - so we don't need to attack Iran some more, for the time being.
I think this is why Tulsi hopped on board with the 'lie' - a White lie, if you like.
Psy ops good and bad is always directed every corner of the web at this point.
That is why discernment is paramount. Unfortunately with AI the speed at which psy ops can spread is alarming. But that speed is also a weakness as it is too obvious when everyone adopts the same slogan or narrative on social media.
I got the hunch that it was her when she was making comments to the media back in 2020 and she was talking cryptic. I'll see if I can find the interviews
She is probably a White Hat, who was chosen to be a deep sleeper, in the Democratic Party to gather inside info, over a decade ago! I've followed her pronouncements and genuinely believe she will be President someday! If you have listened to her, with an open ear, notwithstanding, that she was the Democrat Vice Chair, you would have noticed that something was different about her!
I've been saying this for years. And lots of accounts here blasted me for saying she was a white hat asset for years
I picked up on it years ago too. It was when as a Democrat in California she a) said sensible things, and b) was getting her message out. Her role was to introduce sane ideas into the moderate Democrats crowd, and also to gather intelligence for the white hats.
I shared this thought on my local bulletin board, otherwise known as Mrs. FuzzyBear. MrsFuzzyBear was not convinced. It was not until Tulsi switched parties did the idea gain traction. Fortunately I endured no blasting for being ahead of the curve. Maintaining a strictly invitation-only account membership keeps the shills at bay.
It will be interesting to see how her career path develops. On the VP ticket at some point?
She was the voice of the Kennedy democrat. Aka. JFK today would sound like a far right super MAGA republican. Tulsi during the debates made the other Dems sound lunatic. Plus she’s easy on the eyes. It was a great operation.
along with anyone that has a different opinion but isn't being paid.
Mrs. FuzzyBear can be a feisty debate partner. I do not get away with ill-formed thoughts. Trust me on that one.
Shes in a psyops command / airborne and still serving. What part of that confuses people.
Shills, bots, trolls, dumbasses, and doomers.
That's the only anti Tulsi squeaks you'll hear in this pond.
Is her anti gun voting record a cover?
Psyop gonna psyop
kek
Maybe the fact like most other things about this entire operation. It could entirely be flipped. We could be viewing it as one thing but it is actually the other.
That is the point.
I mean I am all aboard, but why act confused? If you have been around long enough we have all discussed Tulsi in length.
She like many others is well connected and has a past.
It doesn't make you a troll for pointing out her former affiliations and upbringings. Quite the opposite.
So, her story went from:
The narrative shifted to: Tulsi Gabbard now says Iran could produce nuclear weapon 'within weeks' https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c056zqn6vvyo 7 days ago
Then: Gabbard: ‘New intelligence’ confirms Iranian nuclear facilities destroyed https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5369572-gabbard-iran-nuclear-capabilities-strikes/
In terms of shaping narratives, it seems chaotic. However, this is to be expected when one is destroying the previous and fake narrative - the hakneyed Net and Yahoo Iran is about to make a bomb in [insert time period], needs replacing with the new narrative that the nuke facilities have been destroyed. <Iran can claim that this is so, and problem solved.
For extra measure - there is the narrative claim that the uranium was inside the 'mine', and is now somehow 'sealed' in.
Of course the counter-narrative is that this is not so.
In terms of defeating the deep state: maybe people are realizing that Mossad intelligence is made up. Even the idea that the Israeli aggression was a bad mistake, and reversed by Trump in a executive decision. Maybe Palantir will realize this, but I doubt it.
Also the IAEA has been discredited for leaking classified information to Mossad. So not sure how that will play out. Iran is talking about biffing them out - they bent backwards far enough - Iran had the most onerous inspections in the world, only to have vital information leaked. The least that can be done is to fire Grossi.
Optics. There's of course no reason for the DNI to report to the public. She reports to the president. If she makes public comments it could be for the sake of a narrative war or something. Normally the public doesn't even know who that person is.
Further to the DS narrative that the nuke facilities were not destroyed etc.
If they say the possibility of nukes, is still there, then they can start making another plan to attack Iran. Hence the NEED for this counter-narrative. - to keep funding that madness.
They cannot affirm that the nuke ambtion wasn't there in the first place, so it couldn't have been destroyed - for example.
However, if this ia a WH operation, then they need to affirm that the nukes are gone, and Iran has been 'knocked back' - so we don't need to attack Iran some more, for the time being.
I think this is why Tulsi hopped on board with the 'lie' - a White lie, if you like.
The entire show was for the normies.
Let's hope it isn't directed at us!
I think about the whole Q operation as a psy-op, a kind of psychological vaccine injected into the zeitgeist.
It certainly has helped alot of people have hope to continue the fight against the manufactured 'mainstream' narrative.
For me Q was essential for understanding what Trump was about, and what was at stake. It expanded my outlook to include the shadowy covert world.
Vis-à-vis the coming Covid attack I shudder to think what would have happened, personally, had I not early on stumbled onto Q.
You ain't wrong.
Psy ops good and bad is always directed every corner of the web at this point.
That is why discernment is paramount. Unfortunately with AI the speed at which psy ops can spread is alarming. But that speed is also a weakness as it is too obvious when everyone adopts the same slogan or narrative on social media.
"That is why discernment is paramount."
Worth repeating.
Agreed! Great post! 👏
It took me awhile to warm to her. But she has proven herself as far as i am concerned.
Who i've considered to be behind the Q posts as part of the team.
<insert Edvard Munch scream face>
I got the hunch that it was her when she was making comments to the media back in 2020 and she was talking cryptic. I'll see if I can find the interviews
She is probably a White Hat, who was chosen to be a deep sleeper, in the Democratic Party to gather inside info, over a decade ago! I've followed her pronouncements and genuinely believe she will be President someday! If you have listened to her, with an open ear, notwithstanding, that she was the Democrat Vice Chair, you would have noticed that something was different about her!
LMAO
Huh.... I did not see that coming.
Check yer grammar, Clandy.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BZbg17iw/important-remindertrumps-hig/c/