News reports surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and his associates mention that Alan Dershowitz received a massage at Epstein's home in Palm Beach. Dershowitz stated that it was a therapeutic massage by a masseuse and not by Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) or anyone underage. He also stated that his wife was present at Epstein's house at the time. Giuffre, however, had accused Dershowitz of sexual abuse in connection with Epstein. In 2022, Giuffre dropped her defamation lawsuit against Dershowitz and stated that she "may have made a mistake" in identifying him. Dershowitz, in turn, dropped his defamation suit against Giuffre.
They/them will take the “victim” status as they were victims of extortion from Maxwell and Epstein. They can not let the actual victims (the trafficked children) take the victim status, because they don’t see any of us as anything that CAN BE victimized. Remember, we are THEIR CASH CROP, property, slaves, ie sub-human to their elite circles and rituals.
He was Epstein's lawyer. At one point he explained that it was the lady Rothschild who suggested that he represent Epstein. Explaining that the Rothschilds give a lot of money to Harvard & etc etc. He's been with Harvard since God knows when.
I never heard anyone else ever call out the Rothschilds directly. He could be a white hat. IDK. My jury is out on him.
exactly. Timing is everything. Who cares about this Epstein stuff, why bother... Oh you want it?/ HERE IT IS, Clink clink clink goes 1/2 of Congress behind bars
Benny Johnson is onto it: the 'evidence' i.e. the 'little Black Book list' is in the possession of the Southern District of New York - where the court will eventually hear Maxwell's case... or appeal, or whatever. Remember: She was the one that kept lists - not himself.
The FBI were telling the truth, then, because they do not have access to the evidence until it is 'introduced' , (which is another way of verifying it, BTW), in court. Only the judge, the jury (to some extent), the prosecution, and the defense have access to these sealed documents. Until they are introduced as evidence in the case, that is. This may explain the side-eyes when they say there is no more evidence. ... There is that 'yet', lurking in their minds.
Maxwell is still alive, remember, and her case is still working its way through the system - even with calls to dismiss the charges, now that 'Epstein did nothing wrong', LOL, or something. Insert Dershowitz.
All the pundits are screaming that the FBi are bottling the evidence. No, that's not how it works. They collect evidence, and when it is suitably verified and sources checked - they are supposed to hand it to the DOJ. Pam Bondi's demand for the Fbi to 'turn it over' got her what was left, after the DOJ had already commandeered most of it, and squirrelled it into the SDNY, as evidence for the big Maxwell case. Remember: Those were her records, not his records.
If the DOJ 'seals' the indictments - that is make a deeper investigation - that evidence will not see the light of day until it is relevant. Otherwise, everything would be chaos - courts would not have a proper, doumented way to track how evidence is treated - putting it out in the public domain before it is 'ripe' would have counter-intuitive consequences. These things take time. [sounds like 'trust the plan', doesn't it?].
But still, wait until herself is grilled, again. THEN make the conclusion that Fbi are bad actors, or whatever. Or to say that Pam Bondi gets rolled out to suppress human trafficking cases. Or to say that Trump has been 'turned' by Israelis, or whatever other accusations one can come up with.
Also: What if there are active elites, e.g. the Saud family, on that list? This would cause utter chaos. We know Trump is on A list. There is a photo (real?) of him dancing with an underage girl, and him in his fifties - but then, is that compromising? There are times when older men take a girl for a spin on the dance-floor, and it's not creepy. Is he on THE list though:? Maybe we will never find out.
He would know from personal experience, I bet.
Via google AI twat:
What kind of person gets a massage from a hired masseuse at their friends house while their wife is in the home with them? So weird
Someone with who's back hurts
Virginia said so!
He knows for a fact because he's one of those fucking people.
No offense to Mr. Dershowitz, but duh
Isn't he the man who Plagiarized parts of a book he wrote, Then refused to admit it.
Has he ever said anything similar before?
Does client confidentiality apply after death?
What does that tell you?
It tells me that one is Schumer. And I suspect Durbin.
Alan Douchebagowitz
They/them will take the “victim” status as they were victims of extortion from Maxwell and Epstein. They can not let the actual victims (the trafficked children) take the victim status, because they don’t see any of us as anything that CAN BE victimized. Remember, we are THEIR CASH CROP, property, slaves, ie sub-human to their elite circles and rituals.
Wasn't he involved with Epstein himself?
He was Epstein's lawyer. At one point he explained that it was the lady Rothschild who suggested that he represent Epstein. Explaining that the Rothschilds give a lot of money to Harvard & etc etc. He's been with Harvard since God knows when.
I never heard anyone else ever call out the Rothschilds directly. He could be a white hat. IDK. My jury is out on him.
By the time Trump is “forced” to reveal EVERYTHING about the satanic pedos, the democrats/media/MAGA will have to believe every bit of it!
exactly. Timing is everything. Who cares about this Epstein stuff, why bother... Oh you want it?/ HERE IT IS, Clink clink clink goes 1/2 of Congress behind bars
Benny Johnson is onto it: the 'evidence' i.e. the 'little Black Book list' is in the possession of the Southern District of New York - where the court will eventually hear Maxwell's case... or appeal, or whatever. Remember: She was the one that kept lists - not himself.
The FBI were telling the truth, then, because they do not have access to the evidence until it is 'introduced' , (which is another way of verifying it, BTW), in court. Only the judge, the jury (to some extent), the prosecution, and the defense have access to these sealed documents. Until they are introduced as evidence in the case, that is. This may explain the side-eyes when they say there is no more evidence. ... There is that 'yet', lurking in their minds.
Maxwell is still alive, remember, and her case is still working its way through the system - even with calls to dismiss the charges, now that 'Epstein did nothing wrong', LOL, or something. Insert Dershowitz.
All the pundits are screaming that the FBi are bottling the evidence. No, that's not how it works. They collect evidence, and when it is suitably verified and sources checked - they are supposed to hand it to the DOJ. Pam Bondi's demand for the Fbi to 'turn it over' got her what was left, after the DOJ had already commandeered most of it, and squirrelled it into the SDNY, as evidence for the big Maxwell case. Remember: Those were her records, not his records.
If the DOJ 'seals' the indictments - that is make a deeper investigation - that evidence will not see the light of day until it is relevant. Otherwise, everything would be chaos - courts would not have a proper, doumented way to track how evidence is treated - putting it out in the public domain before it is 'ripe' would have counter-intuitive consequences. These things take time. [sounds like 'trust the plan', doesn't it?].
But still, wait until herself is grilled, again. THEN make the conclusion that Fbi are bad actors, or whatever. Or to say that Pam Bondi gets rolled out to suppress human trafficking cases. Or to say that Trump has been 'turned' by Israelis, or whatever other accusations one can come up with.
Also: What if there are active elites, e.g. the Saud family, on that list? This would cause utter chaos. We know Trump is on A list. There is a photo (real?) of him dancing with an underage girl, and him in his fifties - but then, is that compromising? There are times when older men take a girl for a spin on the dance-floor, and it's not creepy. Is he on THE list though:? Maybe we will never find out.
No, he’s not on The list. If he were the legacy media would have released it long ago. IMO. Not to mention he threw Epstein out of Mar a Lago.
Q said that the names of those involved would start WW3
I think we could handle WWIII better than we can handle knowing what happens to thousands of trafficked children every hour of ever day.
Serious answer.
That makes sense.
Says the Scumbag
And, he's not feeling suicidal...
👀🍿
No shit Sherlock.
We can just start naming them. Household names like buffet, Cuban, obama...graham,...