I only answer for myself, but he appears to give no shits and will do what is right.
The Bad Guys clearly thought he was important enough to try to wrap him and his dad up in some weird ass scheme, trying to get some prisoner out of Iran or some shit.
I'm not sure, to tell you the truth. But it seems like he gave up too easily the nomination for AG. Maybe they're saving him for "something" and if he's a recess appointment, the Demon-rats can't stop it, as I understand it.
You don’t shut down the country’s business off apparently nonexistent files. This response is sending the message that they exist and that they are devastating. And the request to shut down probably came from Trump himself.
It’s more important than ever to get these files released.
If I try to explain this concisely I'll get it wrong, but I'll do my best.
I saw on OAN the other day either MTG or Anna Paulina Luna explaining that what the Demons are saying about the republicans killing the bill is not what it seems. Apparently there is some house rule that was in play if they voted yes. I don't know if it was because the dems pushed the bill forward or what, but if the bill passed with the majority being formed mostly of dems it would (by rule) allow the dems to control the floor for some time period. They could put forth any bills they wanted - including impeachment(s).
Just found this explanation from George Santos (former repub rep for NY) and he explained it very well.
If we're about to enter THE August:
u/#q3529
u/#q4598
☝️☝️☝️☝️
Here's the archived link from post #3529:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240114164054/https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2096745/john-ratcliffe-ag-william-barr-will-deliver-justice-to-any-obama-officials-who-committed-crimes/
This information is VERY RELEVANT to what's going on right now too.
Can someone explain what coats is referring to?
At the time we all thought it was Dan Coats. Former DNI under Trump from 2017-2019.
Thank you. I wonder what it actually references.
recess appointments
☝️ I think it's this. Gaetz to prosecute Obama? Plus getting the DEMONcrats to jump up and down demanding Epstein files release.
My question is why Gaetz? Why is he the main guy for everyone?
I only answer for myself, but he appears to give no shits and will do what is right.
The Bad Guys clearly thought he was important enough to try to wrap him and his dad up in some weird ass scheme, trying to get some prisoner out of Iran or some shit.
https://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2021/11/22/businessman-pleads-guilty-in-25m-extortion-attempt-of-matt-gaetzs-father-1394858
I'm not sure, to tell you the truth. But it seems like he gave up too easily the nomination for AG. Maybe they're saving him for "something" and if he's a recess appointment, the Demon-rats can't stop it, as I understand it.
Recess appointments only happen when the Senate is in recess, not the House
Correct
But the President can adjourn the Senate under certain circumstances. Does anyone know what they are?
Yup
Bingo!! Special prosicutor? Yup!!
Because he was told to by Trump or Q adjacent key player.
Trust the plan. Whatever we see happening has been gamed out already and even if it (the claim) doesn't actually happen it's going according to plan.
At this point you either believe it (the plan) or you don't.
Mike is definitely controlled. That's why he was put into position.
A rash of safe and effective 'died suddenly' sweeping through DC would be ok by me.
Shut down the house?
Recess?
Right..... Appointments and arrests....
You don’t shut down the country’s business off apparently nonexistent files. This response is sending the message that they exist and that they are devastating. And the request to shut down probably came from Trump himself.
It’s more important than ever to get these files released.
If I try to explain this concisely I'll get it wrong, but I'll do my best.
I saw on OAN the other day either MTG or Anna Paulina Luna explaining that what the Demons are saying about the republicans killing the bill is not what it seems. Apparently there is some house rule that was in play if they voted yes. I don't know if it was because the dems pushed the bill forward or what, but if the bill passed with the majority being formed mostly of dems it would (by rule) allow the dems to control the floor for some time period. They could put forth any bills they wanted - including impeachment(s).
Just found this explanation from George Santos (former repub rep for NY) and he explained it very well.
https://x.com/MrSantosNY/status/1945272285092356336
https://nitter.net/MrSantosNY/status/1945272285092356336
It would be too much to expect the media to report on that correctly. Thanks for explaining!
Ah! Thank you!
Timing.... It's all about the right time.... and apparently, it's not the right time.... yet.
Wait! It’s called “holidays”, isn’t it?
https://www.house.gov/legislative-activity/2025-08-01
Mike on the list....
Uniparty protects itself.
Mike was brought into submission; he isn't MAGA