Federal 5150 incoming Anons. Something I 100% know about since I did this exact job (5150: California Code for psychiatric evaluations for locked psyc detainment) for 20+ years.
We are about to see the return to large scale locked facilities and Assisted Living type places for the disabled, mentally ill, and homeless. Let’s hope instead of abuse, these places can be staffed well, and paid well. In the past these systems failed due to poor pay, and the hiring of shitty and improperly trained staff and management, leading to the severe abuse of patients and their rights.
Hmm, didn’t Q say something about something will send nearly “everyone” to the hospital? 😉
But not necessarily at college sorry but no. Too much brainwashing. The lunatics would literally be running the asylum. Not sure how to overcome that hurdle TBH. Although if you can find a way to sift out the “sure you have a right to ( insert actual mental illness) and just because your violent doesn’t mean you can’t live your best life as a cannibalism advocate. “ underwater basket weaving morons. It could be a good use of grants to pay off college in exchange for working that job. The job would still need to pay a decent wage. Ideally those who genuinely want to heal and also recognize some individuals can never ever heal but need containment AND compassionate separation for life. It would only take a few asshats to create a nightmare system or sabotage it. Your correct in your assessment just not sure it is possible without a committed leader ( pun not intended )
Totally agree. We genuinely need a return to apprenticeship in ALL trades I think including maybe especially the white collar ones that affect people more deeply or in a bigger level.
Yup why do you need to take a geology class to deal with mentally ill people? Why do you need to take a psychology class to be a geologist? Outside of things like being a surgeon there is no reason why you couldn’t learn most white collar jobs in two years.
So the deleted comment below was meant to be after this comment.
But then you wouldn’t be WELL ROUNDED!!
Sarcasm intended, my biggest gripe is that I had to take racquet ball to be a math teacher!!🤬 the universities just want your money!
Because Degrees became a filter for weeding out undesirable people. As Companies and Governments became forbidden from using tests and other factors because of “Disparate Impact”.
Functionally speaking. An inordinate amount of key factors of White Collar work of the last 25-30 years could be performed with a semi-competent understanding of the Microsoft Office Suite. The ability to perform and understand basic Math. And a reasonably pleasant disposition and conversational skills. The last bit is usually skills built over experience rather than taught.
Why so many memoirs of bygone ‘Self Made Men’ usually include some variation of the “Walk in. Proceed directly to the manager. Give him a firm handshake and ask for a job.”
100%!!!!
Since I did hospice and other certified care for 22 years I am painfully aware of the sneaky abuses and disrespect shown. The cameras idea is awesome!
Considered the lowest grunge job of all, very depressing work, if people did get paid a lot better it would take away some of the sting of it.
One of the worst things is the products used around and on these residents... would you want your family member's room air saturated with fkg lysol spray constantly used to cover up poor sanitation? Nasty. Keep the eyeballs on every process, folks
So, what's going to happen in those 4 years it takes to educate staff?
There's already a shortage of workers in that field, and that's talking about shitty workers, much less any that are half way decent.
Then there's the lack of facilities as well. Since Boomers are getting to the age where many of them can't care for themselves, and their families aren't interested in taking care of them, there's already a lack of facilities designed to house and care for people that can't/won't do it for themselves.
It's going to take time to build enough of them to house our homeless/mentally unhealthy population.
So realistically, it's going to be years before this ever actually happens. Just in time for the next president to take the credit for it, if it's a success.
Then there's going to be huge blow back from Boomers who can't get into assisted living, or can't afford it. And then the inevitable problem with people taking advantage of all this and just claiming to be homeless and/or mentally ill in order to have a free ride.
One of my standard practices is to pretend that the other side has said/done something when I'm not sure is a good idea. That way it really cuts through all the bullshit to the heart of the matter and puts an end to a lot of hypocritical bullshit. That's what I've done here.
Be honest, if liberals were proposing any of this, you would not be saying what a good idea it is. At all. And you know it.
If I had the time (I don't), I would go through a shit ton of old posts here about the homeless situation in places like San Francisco and find posts where people were shooting down solutions that liberals were proposing, which had a lot in common with President Trump is proposing here. Do you think any of the Anons were being supportive of liberals proposing virtually the same exact thing?
It's OK to not have 100% the same views as the President (Or anyone else, actually). Every single thing he does doesn't have to be the best idea ever. That's where the label of "cult" starts to kick in.
To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. -Theodore Roosevelt
It's OK to say, "Yeah, I don't think this is a great idea." and still be supportive of our President.
Take all of the money from the bloated salaries and benefit packages of ex-fed employees that are being fired or laid off.
Use a portion of said money to build mental hospitals all across the country, and to hire, train, and staff the facilities with good, well trained career employees.
Screen all of the applicants for these positions to see if any of them should be patients rather than staff.
Screen all of the recently fired or laid off feds to see how many of them need to be residents of the new facilities.
Require random drug and psychiatric screenings for ALL employees in these facilities for as long as they are employed.
Provide ongoing funding for supplies, maintenance, etc for all of these facilities, but with mandatory annual audits for every facility and every dollar of funding to make sure the money is being used legally and appropriately, and not being stolen or laundered into peoples' accounts.
It is extremely important to build enough of these facilities, because 25% of liberals are on prescribed mental health medications, and that means that the other 75% are running around unmedicated!
That's still taxpayers money. It doesn't just magically appear. I'm not in favor of using that money for anything. Give it back to the taxpayers.
Again, not our money to be giving it to anyone, for anything, no matter how small a portion. Give it back to the taxpayer. Where it belongs.
3, 4, 5, 6. Yay! Even more people to pay for!
It's extremely important for
People to take care of themselves. The idea that the majority of the people we're talking about can't do anything for themselves is just laughable. Most of them just like taking drugs and not working. For fucks sake, just read over the comments in this conversation thread alone, that supports the fact that most homeless people live like that because they want to and
For families of those that really can't take care of themselves to step up and do the right thing. Find every single person related to those that actually need to be institutionalized and have them fund it. Hell, set up one of those online crowd sourcing companies for them. Get religious organizations to fund it.
Anyone but me and other hard working taxpayers who don't want to pay for these people that we have zero responsibility for. It's amazing how people suddenly do a 180 on their ideas of when using tax payer money to pay for the lifestyle of complete stranger is ok. 🙄
I am pretty sure that the magnitude of the problem, the sheer number of people who truly need to be institutionalized, at least temporarily to receive some treatment, is going to be so far beyond the means and abilities of any organizations other than government that we will have 2 options:
Have government pay for it (with as many checks and balances and safeguards as can be put in place), or
Let everything remain the way it is, understanding that it will continue to get worse over time.
I don't like using taxpayer money either, but I honestly don't believe there is any other option if we truly want to fix the problem, because the sheer magnitude of what will be needed is going to shock everybody.
There have been many studies done that demonstrate pretty conclusively that most homeless people are homeless (and often addicted to drugs and/or alcohol) because they are mentally ill and not receiving any kind of treatment. You can disagree with that as much as you like, and insist that most of them are simply choosing to be homeless for whatever reasons, but the research has been out there for a long time and it doesn't agree with you on this.
I think if we enforce the laws we have, make people actually scared as fuck to smuggle, sell, or use drugs, actually fucking get rid of the people preying on the, well, fuck it, gotta face it and call a spade a spade, the weak part of our country, and lock up the criminals in places where they don't get cable TV, and get to get degrees (on taxpayer's dime), and get their own comfy room, and all the other bullshit in prisons, and go full out El Salvador on that shit, we can cut down on this idiotic shit a lot.
We have all these issues because we allow all these issues.
Actually get tough on crime and criminals for a change. Scare people straight. Or just get rid of the problems once and for all. ☠️. If you catch my drift.
The shitty pay and poorly trained staff of previous years was due to being run by the government
Today in modern day many Nursing Homes are understaffed, have shitty pay, and poorly trained staff. And most of those are run by for-profit companies and Private Equity firms. Not Government.
Yeah, it's pretty ubiquitous. The point is that those facilities that are run by the government are historically known to have lower quality of care than privately funded facilities.
And when even the privately run facilities are super shitty, that doesn't bode well for the publicly run facilities, now does it?
It's just a fact that the jobs involved with these facilities are horribly shitty jobs. People that can get better jobs typically do get better jobs. Sure, every once in awhile you'll get a reincarnation of Florence Nightingale (don't worry, they'll make themselves known and make sure you know how great they are at these jobs and how they do it because they're such swell people) but for the most part, the people doing those jobs are doing them because they can't get a better job.
And there's just only so much you can do by paying people more. Sure, it will help, but at the end of the day, most people will decide there's not enough money in the world that makes it worthwhile for them to literally wipe people's asses, clean literal feces up off the wall, deal with people groping them, spitting on them, masturbating in front of them, throwing actual shit on them, body slamming them, cussing them out, trying to kill them, and on and on and on.
Go find someone that works with the mentally ill and homeless and chronic drug users that are going through detox and let them tell you just how great it is working with these people.
Or just talk to the families of these people (you know, those people who should be taking care of this stuff) and listen to their sob stories of how it's impossible for them and their entire family to take care of this person. But apparently all of those issues dissappear if you pay someone enough. 🤷♀️
Then you have the sadists that are drawn to these types of jobs because they have free access to vulnerable people and then do absolutely the most horrendous things imaginable to them, because they can. That's true of any facility that cares for vulnerable people, no matter if its privately funded or publicly funded.
But sure, let's all pretend this is an absolutely swell idea, conveniently forgetting about how anything run by the government is bound to royally fuck up and be full of corruption before its even off the ground.
And let's ignore the fact that there is already a critical shortage of facilities and workers in this industry.
And just for shits and giggles, let's ignore that major decisions (like who gets institutionalized without their consent and what they're institutionalized for) will be made by the same "medical professionals" who made vaccines mandatory for kids to go to school and who decided who lost their jobs if they refused the covid vaccine. The same "medical professionals" who think 7 year Olds who like to play dress-up with their mommy's clothes and makeup have a mental illness and need to take hormones and have their penis cut off. Yeah, that's the same set of people who will be responsible for determining who is mentally ill.
But let's all pretend that there's a magic wand that will be waved and all of these issues will magically be fixed, instantaneously, just because we hope there is. Nope, we don't even need to see anything that might address these issues. We have enough hopium to solve all these problems.
And we'll all just play pretend that this doesn't go 100% against every single.principle we have about what we tax people for in this country.
So, yeah, I think this is a fucking fabulous idea. Just the most fucking fabulous idea ever. 🙃
Yes, that's right. There used to be mass scale abuses in these homes. Not because of poor pay and management but evil sociopaths used them for psychological experiments.
The hiring of incompetent and sadistic staff in institutions was done by the Globalists. This is the whole point Q's message to the human race: Human beings aren't innately cruel to each other. They are manipulated and made to be cruel by the sadistic criminals in charge, by the policies they set, by the orders they enact. We certainly don't want to bring back the rapist, drug-pushing psychiatrists to care for homeless people and for mentally ill people. Some of those broken people do need to be locked up to prevent them from harming others. Insanity and psychosis (evil) do go hand in hand. There is no insane person who is not also dramatizing evil purposes, which is why they are so infuriating to deal with and quickly test the patience of ordinary people. Overall, this will be one of the most powerful reforms Trump has instituted to date in terms of how it can transform the everyday streets of American cities. It will drastically cut down on crime. Hopefully soon we will also get to QUICK TRIALS for serious drug dealers. I want to see them arrested in the morning and pushing up daisies by evening. Each drug dealer is responsible for the deaths of 500 people on average. Every serious drug dealer is a MASS MURDERER.
Place these facilities such that the able-bodied can work in the agricultural sector and set the Children free. A good days work has always been therapeutic for me.
In any case do something, the streets are dangerous. I see it every day here in Nashville.
When my mother passed away I was working at a job that gave 3 bereavement days with pay, I used one... Having to focus on work really helped.
I ride the bus and see and interact with homeless every day. Once we have a long period of no wars creating mental problems, and the same with stopping the massive drug problem, things will get better.
The left seems bent on catering to every crazy wrong choice people can make. Now it's to the point of them trying to get the rest of us ok with sex with children. Hurray for the 3 states that have made execution for child rape a possibility.
Indeed, when I was 18 a friend and I hitchhiked from Orlando to Houston Tx. We slept in the woods 1 night on the way and one night when we arrived...
If homeless for a short time, well ok, shit happens, but if days turn into weeks, and weeks into months then years, well... Many homeless aren't unhappy in their situation and don't want any direction which is what you get when you work for someone.
So right about that. Living on the street is an actual culture choice for a lot of people, they get used to it, form loyalties and definitely their own vocabulary. Tried dealing with and helping few. I got so sick of hearing them say how people were "jones'n" for this and that, always the drug culture, trying to get drugs for themselves and to share, and yes, using of good-hearted people. Institutions with good care can help because it is a change in environment! But it takes 2 years off drugs before a person even can make a choice that is not driven by drug addict brain wiring! If you add in various psyche problems, they can't be returned to the street at all, generally speaking. I knew a few entire families destroyed because of one member being on the street and on drugs. I will never forget seeing my neighbor being chased down the street by her own son screaming how he was going to kill her, all from Meth. Yes cops did save her.
Duterte's war on drugs actually worked better than anything the west has done. They killed quite a few drug dealers and some users, albeit not as many as Obama claimed. Users raping family, killing family etc... Out of 30 Meth heads in the area my wife is from, 29 quit and 1 was salvaged (extrajudicial killing) IMHO if 100 addicts need to die to save one child, thats a good trade off.
If they don't spend it on Ramen and electronics from the prison commissary. I'd mandate that a percentage of their wages goes to their commissary account since they actually worked for it, a percentage goes to any restitution they owe, and the rest goes into a savings account they can't touch until they get out.
I'd allow certain exceptions for things like a family emergency - if verifiable and with permission of the court. There would of course be guardrails if for example they got caught buying/selling drugs, but those details could be easily worked out.
Oh I know. I just think some of it needs to be available for them to use in the commissary. Whether it is food, necessities, a radio - they earned it so they should get some now but most later.
Yes, but paying restitution to victims... Non-violent criminals, people needing benefits, and other standbys should have to work for their assistance. 5 days a week with a weekday off to look for a better job. Community service as well, but run better.
If it stays the way written, the Attorney General has a lot of power in this bill. This is okay when someone like Trump is in and a MAGA Attorney General is in place. But if the Cabal gets in and they appoint their Attorney General, all bets are off the table. Especially if they don't get punished for what they did over the last many years!
I like this bill, and think it is needed. I just want to make sure we don't fall into the same trap later down the road.
Q said in post 492 “We will never lose again win this is finished.” If Q is to be believed, I don’t think the cabal ever gets back in after what’s coming. I don’t think the cabal will exist.
I sure do hope so, but I don’t know what is going to break the lefties of Gen Z out of their brainwashed state. It needs to be something visually heavy.
You - and everyone that comments/posts should bookmark the below url. It shows you how to embed Q posts, and the gifs the mods made available for us. Just remember to delete the space.It links to other pages with more gifs as well.
I know a lot (most?) of phones don't show the sidebar - which is where the links are. For some reason the link on the sidebar points to Part VI of the Q Posts/Gifs Thread series. The link I put below starts at part 1.
This is a much needed tool to STOP the DEEP STATE from continued terrorizing of citizens (whites) in Dem-controlled cities by migrants and foreign agents for the purpose of collapsing the local/regional economies. People will not go out and engage in business if they are getting attacked. This is an AGE-OLD method of operation by Bolsheviks, Communists, and Foreign Agents used to collapse economies (blamed on whites, other group, or those in power) in order to justify their consolidation of power which is quickly followed by mass murder.
The 19th century in the United States saw the rise of large-scale state psychiatric hospitals, known as "asylums," which were initially intended to provide a sanctuary for individuals with mental illness. These institutions were built with the concept of "moral treatment," which emphasized humane care, including no restraint of patients and treating them in an open environment.
The original meaning of the word asylum is a "retreat" or "sanctuary," and these institutions were originally built to act as sanctuaries for the protection of mental patients.
The field of psychiatric medicine in western countries in the 19th century began to embrace the concept of "moral treatment" for mental patients, including no restraint of the patients and treating them in a more open environment. With this background, asylums were built according to the efforts of social activist Dorothea Dix with financial assistance from the Quakers. The psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Kirkbride had a large influence on asylum architecture, and believed that the hospital building and environment as well as location have healing effects on the patients, which he called the "therapeutic landscape".
As the architecture was considered part of the treatment, many leading architects and landscape architects at the time became involved in building asylums. In the later half of the 19th century, over 150 asylums were built across the USA. However, moral treatment fell out of favor toward the end of the 19th century, and the concept of therapeutic landscape was also neglected. The hospitals had many uncured patients, and caregivers became pessimistic about the efficacy of the treatments. Abuse and neglect of the patients were also common. The environment at the asylums deteriorated, which created the image of asylums that, we hold today.
Insane asylums began to decline around the turn of the 20th century. As patients with incurable illnesses filled them, asylums became warehouses for people who could not be maintained elsewhere. The St. Louis Insane Asylum exemplifies this trend of decline. Overcrowding and lack of funding led to placement of patients in the St. Louis Poorhouse and to unhealthy conditions at the asylum. Dr. Edward Runge, the superintendent, tried to counteract this trend of decline, but the asylum was able to offer little more than custodial care.
The mid-19th century saw the emergence of a major medical innovation, namely, the rise of the state lunatic asylum. Beginning in the northeast, the phenomenon spread rapidly westwards. By 1875 no fewer than 71 mental hospitals were opened in 32 existing states. Although premised upon belief in the efficacy of ‘moral and humane’ treatment, the asylums soon became custodial rather than therapeutic institutions. Average size continually increased; some accommodated well over 2000 patients.
The United States housed 150,000 patients in mental hospitals by 1904. These asylums were critical to the evolution of psychiatry as they provided places of practice throughout the world.
The moral treatment of the insane was built on the assumption that those suffering from mental illness could find their way to recovery and an eventual cure if treated kindly and in ways that appealed to the parts of their minds that remained rational.
That's a great history lesson of what's going on. I only know about the 20th century and how the patients were used for different therapists or psychologists as genuine pigs.
You haven't seen anything about the mud floods, world fairs, orphan trains and old world architecture? All around the turn out of the 19th century, that was just a synopsis of whatever AI Brave uses, but I find this time frame intriguing as there are some weird goings on, especially when you look at them outside our official timeline narrative.
Trump is talking about a world fair, and now mental facilities. I keep a healthy dose of skepticism around everything, the only thing I know is that I know nothing lol
I'll try to gist it, the mud floods deal with how many buildings have levels, arches, and doorways that are either beneath, or partially beneath "street level".
World Fairs broaches on the enormity of the structures that were built in unbelievably short time frames and supposedly temporary. Also as well, enormous variety of technologies revealed.
Old world architecture is about these buildings you see around, all stone, incredibly intricate details and feats of construction also in a short time span absurd for only having horses and very limited infrastructure.
If you give any credence to previous resets, it would seem there was one somewhere around the mid to late 1800s. These people are stupid, yes, but I'm theorizing, granted if there's any truth to this, that our elites plunder & fornicate until the system implodes, hit the reset button and start again. They don't have to be smart when the have control, technical advantage and driven by greed and lust.
Oh yeah, and lastly the asylums, all the people from this theoretical reset that wouldn't go along or adapt to the "new normal" were stuck away in them.
Like I said, I don't know, there are so many plausible things flying around so who can say but I find all this interesting. There is a great deal being hidden from us, and likely a greater deal misdirecting us from what's truly hidden.
I am not even going to try and guess what it all mean by that. We have been lie to for many years.
You heard about the water turn counter clockwise in the southern equator so anyone going to NZ and Australia would see the water down the drain a different way than here in North America? Well, I I went there and watch and film. It did no such thing. Figure I was brain-dead and couldn't figure out.
Biggest thing is to disincentive criminality. They are treated better than average working man. My husband comes home sweaty, dirty and tired. Just saying…
The only way this gets solved is if there’s an immediate mass sweep of every inch of every city picking up every vagrant. They come in many shapes and sizes… from the 30 year old on a BMX bike wearing a back pack (clearly not a student) or the camouflaged ones sleeping between bushes and brick walls typically found near fast food restaurants.
Problem is, in my local suburb of Los Angeles the area drug dealers use the homeless not only as a drug distribution network but a theft ring. They exchange drugs for stollen goods from area stores. The homeless are basically given cart blanche to walk in and out of a store untouched taking whatever they want in the process.
My fear is, if there was a mass sweep the drug dealers would also pick-up and “house” these homeless in neighborhood houses. They already have them in local motel rooms. There needs to be an anonymous tip line to turn in homeless people. Otherwise, and I’ve said it before, Trump will never be able to truly make America great again. It’ll only be halfway great. I guess beggars (pun totally intended) can’t be choosers.
I guess when the 501c3 churches don't do it, we all have to step up and do it for them. Glory to Jesus Christ for His goodness has permeated secular society to such an extent that these issues would be so cared for at the level of statehood. I like this win. The facilities better not abuse the tenents though.
My church supports the first and only female drop in center for those who are working or in the streets. The women get food, a shower, clean clothes and other basic human needs. Not all churches who get tax breaks are neglecting the poor 😕
Good for your church anon, I'm speaking in generalities; taking care of the poor is the church's job, if they were all doing it we wouldn't even need the state to
praying is important. churning psychology -- when people are easily tossed to and fro without a foundation they will not recover. The woke in large part become mentally ill--retarded. They become addicted to drugs, plus there is some really evil people who will force people to take drugs and become addicted. When we have a culture in rage and against anything good, evil will prosper and remove as many of its foes as possible.
growing up in a place where many were addicted to drugs I somehow stayed out of it. It creates a mess, so the responsible people will take leadership and take care of it as good as possible.
the churning psychology. Keep those you can take care of as close to you as possible. Very sad place in the country we are in. The unresponsible would push all these people onto other countries.. USA is taking those too from other countries.
Out of fire we will be able to see some good. Those like Nancy Pelosi need to be held responsible. People tend to think serial killers are bad, they are, but those at this level are what then?
It seems to me much of this has been tried before and failed, or consist of programs riddled with fraud and abuse, thus not getting to the people who need it.
My idea would be to take a few thousand acres of federal land in a temperate area of the country and built 2 "institutions". Institution A is where the people referenced in the Presidential EO are first placed. This institution has the goal to rehabilitate people with counseling, methadone or other treatments that wean them off hard drugs or successfully treat and manage their mental condition. Every effort would be applied from 12 step programs to hypnosis, group and individual psychotherapy, job training, nutritional, exercise, religious support to give people a new start. People stay in institution A for up to 3 years or until they can demonstrate through their desire to kick drugs, help others do the same, have clean blood and urine tests, have passed a series of skill tests showing they have mastered the knowledge needed to get and keep a job. They are given 6 months of half-way house release to show they have the self control to stay off of addictive substances and can be productive members of society.
Institution B would be for recidivists who again become addicted, or those deemed unable or unwilling to get clean and improve their life. To this institution all the drugs that are confiscated in law enforcement operations are taken here rather than be disposed of. The people here are free to use whatever they choose in whatever amount they choose. In due course they will eventually kill themselves due to overdose. The first job of people in Institution A would be to dig the graves, place the bodies of these people in body bags for burial or cremation. It would be a wake up call for them to see what will happen to them if they backslide and are arrested in any drug related incident or fail to properly take their legal medications after successfully graduating from Institution A. There is no release from Institution B other than death.
This concept gives people a real chance to get the help they need and the resources to insure they have the skills needed to take care of themselves. If they find they cannot manage their own care as they age, group homes should be built where they can live a dignified existence. But these places are for those who have limited mental capacity, physical handicaps, psychological issues beyond their control without assisted care. These are the people who have no other means of support.
That's what they have done in WA and OR. They have big tracks of land and they were used to house them but here is the requirement, they work the fields.
In Vancouver it's on Fourth Plain. In Oregon it's in Troutdale.
all the drugs that are confiscated in law enforcement operations are taken here
I still say keep some of the fentanyl so it can be used for death penalty executions. Why not use something that doesn't cost us anything (once it's evidentiary use is complete) to execute condemned prisoners instead of other toxic drug combinations?
Federal 5150 incoming Anons. Something I 100% know about since I did this exact job (5150: California Code for psychiatric evaluations for locked psyc detainment) for 20+ years.
We are about to see the return to large scale locked facilities and Assisted Living type places for the disabled, mentally ill, and homeless. Let’s hope instead of abuse, these places can be staffed well, and paid well. In the past these systems failed due to poor pay, and the hiring of shitty and improperly trained staff and management, leading to the severe abuse of patients and their rights.
Hmm, didn’t Q say something about something will send nearly “everyone” to the hospital? 😉
So...who is going to be paying for this?
The shitty pay and poorly trained staff of previous years was due to being run by the government.
Not sure how that's going to be any different this time around.
I suspect PDJT has a plan for funding, doesn't he always have a plan? He knows the past abuses, he won't have that as a part of his legacy.
Staff need to be educated for 4 years and paid better.
If it’s a career and not just a “job” there will be less abuse.
Also, cameras. Allow family to be able to log on at anytime to check on their family members.
The idea of 4 year degrees being a requirement for most jobs needs to go. College is mostly nothing but a debt scam.
Training, not just education. College degrees, most of them, are useless. It's a scam.
Agreed
But not necessarily at college sorry but no. Too much brainwashing. The lunatics would literally be running the asylum. Not sure how to overcome that hurdle TBH. Although if you can find a way to sift out the “sure you have a right to ( insert actual mental illness) and just because your violent doesn’t mean you can’t live your best life as a cannibalism advocate. “ underwater basket weaving morons. It could be a good use of grants to pay off college in exchange for working that job. The job would still need to pay a decent wage. Ideally those who genuinely want to heal and also recognize some individuals can never ever heal but need containment AND compassionate separation for life. It would only take a few asshats to create a nightmare system or sabotage it. Your correct in your assessment just not sure it is possible without a committed leader ( pun not intended )
Agreed, well said.
TY.
Actually have people train for once.
Totally agree. We genuinely need a return to apprenticeship in ALL trades I think including maybe especially the white collar ones that affect people more deeply or in a bigger level.
Yup why do you need to take a geology class to deal with mentally ill people? Why do you need to take a psychology class to be a geologist? Outside of things like being a surgeon there is no reason why you couldn’t learn most white collar jobs in two years.
So the deleted comment below was meant to be after this comment.
But then you wouldn’t be WELL ROUNDED!! Sarcasm intended, my biggest gripe is that I had to take racquet ball to be a math teacher!!🤬 the universities just want your money!
Exactly
Because Degrees became a filter for weeding out undesirable people. As Companies and Governments became forbidden from using tests and other factors because of “Disparate Impact”.
Functionally speaking. An inordinate amount of key factors of White Collar work of the last 25-30 years could be performed with a semi-competent understanding of the Microsoft Office Suite. The ability to perform and understand basic Math. And a reasonably pleasant disposition and conversational skills. The last bit is usually skills built over experience rather than taught.
Why so many memoirs of bygone ‘Self Made Men’ usually include some variation of the “Walk in. Proceed directly to the manager. Give him a firm handshake and ask for a job.”
100%!!!! Since I did hospice and other certified care for 22 years I am painfully aware of the sneaky abuses and disrespect shown. The cameras idea is awesome! Considered the lowest grunge job of all, very depressing work, if people did get paid a lot better it would take away some of the sting of it. One of the worst things is the products used around and on these residents... would you want your family member's room air saturated with fkg lysol spray constantly used to cover up poor sanitation? Nasty. Keep the eyeballs on every process, folks
So, what's going to happen in those 4 years it takes to educate staff?
There's already a shortage of workers in that field, and that's talking about shitty workers, much less any that are half way decent.
Then there's the lack of facilities as well. Since Boomers are getting to the age where many of them can't care for themselves, and their families aren't interested in taking care of them, there's already a lack of facilities designed to house and care for people that can't/won't do it for themselves.
It's going to take time to build enough of them to house our homeless/mentally unhealthy population.
So realistically, it's going to be years before this ever actually happens. Just in time for the next president to take the credit for it, if it's a success.
Then there's going to be huge blow back from Boomers who can't get into assisted living, or can't afford it. And then the inevitable problem with people taking advantage of all this and just claiming to be homeless and/or mentally ill in order to have a free ride.
One of my standard practices is to pretend that the other side has said/done something when I'm not sure is a good idea. That way it really cuts through all the bullshit to the heart of the matter and puts an end to a lot of hypocritical bullshit. That's what I've done here.
Be honest, if liberals were proposing any of this, you would not be saying what a good idea it is. At all. And you know it.
If I had the time (I don't), I would go through a shit ton of old posts here about the homeless situation in places like San Francisco and find posts where people were shooting down solutions that liberals were proposing, which had a lot in common with President Trump is proposing here. Do you think any of the Anons were being supportive of liberals proposing virtually the same exact thing?
It's OK to not have 100% the same views as the President (Or anyone else, actually). Every single thing he does doesn't have to be the best idea ever. That's where the label of "cult" starts to kick in.
It's OK to say, "Yeah, I don't think this is a great idea." and still be supportive of our President.
Some very good ideas here!
Agreed.
It is extremely important to build enough of these facilities, because 25% of liberals are on prescribed mental health medications, and that means that the other 75% are running around unmedicated!
That's still taxpayers money. It doesn't just magically appear. I'm not in favor of using that money for anything. Give it back to the taxpayers.
Again, not our money to be giving it to anyone, for anything, no matter how small a portion. Give it back to the taxpayer. Where it belongs.
3, 4, 5, 6. Yay! Even more people to pay for!
It's extremely important for
People to take care of themselves. The idea that the majority of the people we're talking about can't do anything for themselves is just laughable. Most of them just like taking drugs and not working. For fucks sake, just read over the comments in this conversation thread alone, that supports the fact that most homeless people live like that because they want to and
For families of those that really can't take care of themselves to step up and do the right thing. Find every single person related to those that actually need to be institutionalized and have them fund it. Hell, set up one of those online crowd sourcing companies for them. Get religious organizations to fund it.
Anyone but me and other hard working taxpayers who don't want to pay for these people that we have zero responsibility for. It's amazing how people suddenly do a 180 on their ideas of when using tax payer money to pay for the lifestyle of complete stranger is ok. 🙄
I am pretty sure that the magnitude of the problem, the sheer number of people who truly need to be institutionalized, at least temporarily to receive some treatment, is going to be so far beyond the means and abilities of any organizations other than government that we will have 2 options:
I don't like using taxpayer money either, but I honestly don't believe there is any other option if we truly want to fix the problem, because the sheer magnitude of what will be needed is going to shock everybody.
There have been many studies done that demonstrate pretty conclusively that most homeless people are homeless (and often addicted to drugs and/or alcohol) because they are mentally ill and not receiving any kind of treatment. You can disagree with that as much as you like, and insist that most of them are simply choosing to be homeless for whatever reasons, but the research has been out there for a long time and it doesn't agree with you on this.
I think if we enforce the laws we have, make people actually scared as fuck to smuggle, sell, or use drugs, actually fucking get rid of the people preying on the, well, fuck it, gotta face it and call a spade a spade, the weak part of our country, and lock up the criminals in places where they don't get cable TV, and get to get degrees (on taxpayer's dime), and get their own comfy room, and all the other bullshit in prisons, and go full out El Salvador on that shit, we can cut down on this idiotic shit a lot.
We have all these issues because we allow all these issues.
Actually get tough on crime and criminals for a change. Scare people straight. Or just get rid of the problems once and for all. ☠️. If you catch my drift.
Today in modern day many Nursing Homes are understaffed, have shitty pay, and poorly trained staff. And most of those are run by for-profit companies and Private Equity firms. Not Government.
Yeah, it's pretty ubiquitous. The point is that those facilities that are run by the government are historically known to have lower quality of care than privately funded facilities.
And when even the privately run facilities are super shitty, that doesn't bode well for the publicly run facilities, now does it?
It's just a fact that the jobs involved with these facilities are horribly shitty jobs. People that can get better jobs typically do get better jobs. Sure, every once in awhile you'll get a reincarnation of Florence Nightingale (don't worry, they'll make themselves known and make sure you know how great they are at these jobs and how they do it because they're such swell people) but for the most part, the people doing those jobs are doing them because they can't get a better job.
And there's just only so much you can do by paying people more. Sure, it will help, but at the end of the day, most people will decide there's not enough money in the world that makes it worthwhile for them to literally wipe people's asses, clean literal feces up off the wall, deal with people groping them, spitting on them, masturbating in front of them, throwing actual shit on them, body slamming them, cussing them out, trying to kill them, and on and on and on.
Go find someone that works with the mentally ill and homeless and chronic drug users that are going through detox and let them tell you just how great it is working with these people.
Or just talk to the families of these people (you know, those people who should be taking care of this stuff) and listen to their sob stories of how it's impossible for them and their entire family to take care of this person. But apparently all of those issues dissappear if you pay someone enough. 🤷♀️
Then you have the sadists that are drawn to these types of jobs because they have free access to vulnerable people and then do absolutely the most horrendous things imaginable to them, because they can. That's true of any facility that cares for vulnerable people, no matter if its privately funded or publicly funded.
But sure, let's all pretend this is an absolutely swell idea, conveniently forgetting about how anything run by the government is bound to royally fuck up and be full of corruption before its even off the ground.
And let's ignore the fact that there is already a critical shortage of facilities and workers in this industry.
And just for shits and giggles, let's ignore that major decisions (like who gets institutionalized without their consent and what they're institutionalized for) will be made by the same "medical professionals" who made vaccines mandatory for kids to go to school and who decided who lost their jobs if they refused the covid vaccine. The same "medical professionals" who think 7 year Olds who like to play dress-up with their mommy's clothes and makeup have a mental illness and need to take hormones and have their penis cut off. Yeah, that's the same set of people who will be responsible for determining who is mentally ill.
But let's all pretend that there's a magic wand that will be waved and all of these issues will magically be fixed, instantaneously, just because we hope there is. Nope, we don't even need to see anything that might address these issues. We have enough hopium to solve all these problems.
And we'll all just play pretend that this doesn't go 100% against every single.principle we have about what we tax people for in this country.
So, yeah, I think this is a fucking fabulous idea. Just the most fucking fabulous idea ever. 🙃
Yes, that's right. There used to be mass scale abuses in these homes. Not because of poor pay and management but evil sociopaths used them for psychological experiments.
Both, poor hiring practices, crappy pay, and negligible personnel and patient management/care. Yes exactly too, the awful experiments.
Hopefully there will be checks and balance.
There would be if I was the boss/DJT’s Fed mental health Director
Sign me up. That's why I know about this. Mean and evil psychologists.
Don't forget Therapists. It is literally in their name "The Rapists".
Yikes. You are right.
I certainly agree about cams in those areas.
Anywhere hospital USA. Medical has declined in EVERY aspect over the last 30 years.
The hiring of incompetent and sadistic staff in institutions was done by the Globalists. This is the whole point Q's message to the human race: Human beings aren't innately cruel to each other. They are manipulated and made to be cruel by the sadistic criminals in charge, by the policies they set, by the orders they enact. We certainly don't want to bring back the rapist, drug-pushing psychiatrists to care for homeless people and for mentally ill people. Some of those broken people do need to be locked up to prevent them from harming others. Insanity and psychosis (evil) do go hand in hand. There is no insane person who is not also dramatizing evil purposes, which is why they are so infuriating to deal with and quickly test the patience of ordinary people. Overall, this will be one of the most powerful reforms Trump has instituted to date in terms of how it can transform the everyday streets of American cities. It will drastically cut down on crime. Hopefully soon we will also get to QUICK TRIALS for serious drug dealers. I want to see them arrested in the morning and pushing up daisies by evening. Each drug dealer is responsible for the deaths of 500 people on average. Every serious drug dealer is a MASS MURDERER.
Not to mention, if all they have to offer is drugging people, will they be any better off?
Place these facilities such that the able-bodied can work in the agricultural sector and set the Children free. A good days work has always been therapeutic for me.
In any case do something, the streets are dangerous. I see it every day here in Nashville.
That's why I have been working in strawberry fields since Middle School. Working is therapeutic.
When my mother passed away I was working at a job that gave 3 bereavement days with pay, I used one... Having to focus on work really helped.
I ride the bus and see and interact with homeless every day. Once we have a long period of no wars creating mental problems, and the same with stopping the massive drug problem, things will get better.
The left seems bent on catering to every crazy wrong choice people can make. Now it's to the point of them trying to get the rest of us ok with sex with children. Hurray for the 3 states that have made execution for child rape a possibility.
I'm in full support of tough on violence crime.
Work ethics are a choice. I know it's a choice to be on the street OR NOT. I chose not.
Thanks for telling me about this. Keeping busy helps.
Indeed, when I was 18 a friend and I hitchhiked from Orlando to Houston Tx. We slept in the woods 1 night on the way and one night when we arrived...
If homeless for a short time, well ok, shit happens, but if days turn into weeks, and weeks into months then years, well... Many homeless aren't unhappy in their situation and don't want any direction which is what you get when you work for someone.
I understand now.
So right about that. Living on the street is an actual culture choice for a lot of people, they get used to it, form loyalties and definitely their own vocabulary. Tried dealing with and helping few. I got so sick of hearing them say how people were "jones'n" for this and that, always the drug culture, trying to get drugs for themselves and to share, and yes, using of good-hearted people. Institutions with good care can help because it is a change in environment! But it takes 2 years off drugs before a person even can make a choice that is not driven by drug addict brain wiring! If you add in various psyche problems, they can't be returned to the street at all, generally speaking. I knew a few entire families destroyed because of one member being on the street and on drugs. I will never forget seeing my neighbor being chased down the street by her own son screaming how he was going to kill her, all from Meth. Yes cops did save her.
Duterte's war on drugs actually worked better than anything the west has done. They killed quite a few drug dealers and some users, albeit not as many as Obama claimed. Users raping family, killing family etc... Out of 30 Meth heads in the area my wife is from, 29 quit and 1 was salvaged (extrajudicial killing) IMHO if 100 addicts need to die to save one child, thats a good trade off.
Such accurate perceptions.
If they don't spend it on Ramen and electronics from the prison commissary. I'd mandate that a percentage of their wages goes to their commissary account since they actually worked for it, a percentage goes to any restitution they owe, and the rest goes into a savings account they can't touch until they get out.
I'd allow certain exceptions for things like a family emergency - if verifiable and with permission of the court. There would of course be guardrails if for example they got caught buying/selling drugs, but those details could be easily worked out.
Oh I know. I just think some of it needs to be available for them to use in the commissary. Whether it is food, necessities, a radio - they earned it so they should get some now but most later.
Yes, but paying restitution to victims... Non-violent criminals, people needing benefits, and other standbys should have to work for their assistance. 5 days a week with a weekday off to look for a better job. Community service as well, but run better.
If it stays the way written, the Attorney General has a lot of power in this bill. This is okay when someone like Trump is in and a MAGA Attorney General is in place. But if the Cabal gets in and they appoint their Attorney General, all bets are off the table. Especially if they don't get punished for what they did over the last many years! I like this bill, and think it is needed. I just want to make sure we don't fall into the same trap later down the road.
Q said in post 492 “We will never lose again win this is finished.” If Q is to be believed, I don’t think the cabal ever gets back in after what’s coming. I don’t think the cabal will exist.
I sure do hope so, but I don’t know what is going to break the lefties of Gen Z out of their brainwashed state. It needs to be something visually heavy.
u/#q492
Thank you, fren! I can never remember exactly how to embed the drops into my post.
You - and everyone that comments/posts should bookmark the below url. It shows you how to embed Q posts, and the gifs the mods made available for us. Just remember to delete the space.It links to other pages with more gifs as well.
I know a lot (most?) of phones don't show the sidebar - which is where the links are. For some reason the link on the sidebar points to Part VI of the Q Posts/Gifs Thread series. The link I put below starts at part 1.
https://greatawakening.win/p/142BF5stO8/
I would hope not but they keep on trying. And if they succeed we will know about it.
I hope we have watchers.
This is a much needed tool to STOP the DEEP STATE from continued terrorizing of citizens (whites) in Dem-controlled cities by migrants and foreign agents for the purpose of collapsing the local/regional economies. People will not go out and engage in business if they are getting attacked. This is an AGE-OLD method of operation by Bolsheviks, Communists, and Foreign Agents used to collapse economies (blamed on whites, other group, or those in power) in order to justify their consolidation of power which is quickly followed by mass murder.
Sounds like it would work. These people aren't stupid, kind of like Muslims, they keep trying.
This will be used against us eventually just as the Patriot Act is. Who defines mentally ill and why is being mentally ill automatically a crime?
Perhaps they will have to go before a court to be proven mentally ill and homeless before sent to the mental institution?
Yes silly. They’ll be evaluated.
Like the Red Flag Laws? Liberals will find a way to twist it. It's pretty easy when they own almost all of the judges.
I like this, but they will most assuredly try to ruin or twist it.
Everything could be twisted.
Maybe it's just a temporary solution, if Trump truly is bringing us into the golden age then seemingly staff and patients would also be golden.
Otherwise this brings to mind all the large insane asylums around in the 1900s time frame.
I wouldn't think that at all. Ever read the book of Revelation?
It’s not the end of “the world” my friend. Just the end of the 2nd Testament, and the beginning of the 3rd Testament.
Sure hope we are entering a golden age.
We will my friend, but we stupidly must get through all the roug stuff first.
Amen
Not so last century.
The 19th century in the United States saw the rise of large-scale state psychiatric hospitals, known as "asylums," which were initially intended to provide a sanctuary for individuals with mental illness. These institutions were built with the concept of "moral treatment," which emphasized humane care, including no restraint of patients and treating them in an open environment. The original meaning of the word asylum is a "retreat" or "sanctuary," and these institutions were originally built to act as sanctuaries for the protection of mental patients.
The field of psychiatric medicine in western countries in the 19th century began to embrace the concept of "moral treatment" for mental patients, including no restraint of the patients and treating them in a more open environment. With this background, asylums were built according to the efforts of social activist Dorothea Dix with financial assistance from the Quakers. The psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Kirkbride had a large influence on asylum architecture, and believed that the hospital building and environment as well as location have healing effects on the patients, which he called the "therapeutic landscape".
As the architecture was considered part of the treatment, many leading architects and landscape architects at the time became involved in building asylums. In the later half of the 19th century, over 150 asylums were built across the USA. However, moral treatment fell out of favor toward the end of the 19th century, and the concept of therapeutic landscape was also neglected. The hospitals had many uncured patients, and caregivers became pessimistic about the efficacy of the treatments. Abuse and neglect of the patients were also common. The environment at the asylums deteriorated, which created the image of asylums that, we hold today.
Insane asylums began to decline around the turn of the 20th century. As patients with incurable illnesses filled them, asylums became warehouses for people who could not be maintained elsewhere. The St. Louis Insane Asylum exemplifies this trend of decline. Overcrowding and lack of funding led to placement of patients in the St. Louis Poorhouse and to unhealthy conditions at the asylum. Dr. Edward Runge, the superintendent, tried to counteract this trend of decline, but the asylum was able to offer little more than custodial care.
The mid-19th century saw the emergence of a major medical innovation, namely, the rise of the state lunatic asylum. Beginning in the northeast, the phenomenon spread rapidly westwards. By 1875 no fewer than 71 mental hospitals were opened in 32 existing states. Although premised upon belief in the efficacy of ‘moral and humane’ treatment, the asylums soon became custodial rather than therapeutic institutions. Average size continually increased; some accommodated well over 2000 patients.
The United States housed 150,000 patients in mental hospitals by 1904. These asylums were critical to the evolution of psychiatry as they provided places of practice throughout the world. The moral treatment of the insane was built on the assumption that those suffering from mental illness could find their way to recovery and an eventual cure if treated kindly and in ways that appealed to the parts of their minds that remained rational.
That's a great history lesson of what's going on. I only know about the 20th century and how the patients were used for different therapists or psychologists as genuine pigs.
You haven't seen anything about the mud floods, world fairs, orphan trains and old world architecture? All around the turn out of the 19th century, that was just a synopsis of whatever AI Brave uses, but I find this time frame intriguing as there are some weird goings on, especially when you look at them outside our official timeline narrative.
Trump is talking about a world fair, and now mental facilities. I keep a healthy dose of skepticism around everything, the only thing I know is that I know nothing lol
I do not know what you mean but ok. Will find out.
I'll try to gist it, the mud floods deal with how many buildings have levels, arches, and doorways that are either beneath, or partially beneath "street level". World Fairs broaches on the enormity of the structures that were built in unbelievably short time frames and supposedly temporary. Also as well, enormous variety of technologies revealed. Old world architecture is about these buildings you see around, all stone, incredibly intricate details and feats of construction also in a short time span absurd for only having horses and very limited infrastructure.
If you give any credence to previous resets, it would seem there was one somewhere around the mid to late 1800s. These people are stupid, yes, but I'm theorizing, granted if there's any truth to this, that our elites plunder & fornicate until the system implodes, hit the reset button and start again. They don't have to be smart when the have control, technical advantage and driven by greed and lust.
Oh yeah, and lastly the asylums, all the people from this theoretical reset that wouldn't go along or adapt to the "new normal" were stuck away in them.
Like I said, I don't know, there are so many plausible things flying around so who can say but I find all this interesting. There is a great deal being hidden from us, and likely a greater deal misdirecting us from what's truly hidden.
God bless fren
I am not even going to try and guess what it all mean by that. We have been lie to for many years.
You heard about the water turn counter clockwise in the southern equator so anyone going to NZ and Australia would see the water down the drain a different way than here in North America? Well, I I went there and watch and film. It did no such thing. Figure I was brain-dead and couldn't figure out.
Biggest thing is to disincentive criminality. They are treated better than average working man. My husband comes home sweaty, dirty and tired. Just saying…
I don't know. Never been that way.
The only way this gets solved is if there’s an immediate mass sweep of every inch of every city picking up every vagrant. They come in many shapes and sizes… from the 30 year old on a BMX bike wearing a back pack (clearly not a student) or the camouflaged ones sleeping between bushes and brick walls typically found near fast food restaurants.
Problem is, in my local suburb of Los Angeles the area drug dealers use the homeless not only as a drug distribution network but a theft ring. They exchange drugs for stollen goods from area stores. The homeless are basically given cart blanche to walk in and out of a store untouched taking whatever they want in the process.
My fear is, if there was a mass sweep the drug dealers would also pick-up and “house” these homeless in neighborhood houses. They already have them in local motel rooms. There needs to be an anonymous tip line to turn in homeless people. Otherwise, and I’ve said it before, Trump will never be able to truly make America great again. It’ll only be halfway great. I guess beggars (pun totally intended) can’t be choosers.
I guess when the 501c3 churches don't do it, we all have to step up and do it for them. Glory to Jesus Christ for His goodness has permeated secular society to such an extent that these issues would be so cared for at the level of statehood. I like this win. The facilities better not abuse the tenents though.
I am asking for checks and balance.
My church supports the first and only female drop in center for those who are working or in the streets. The women get food, a shower, clean clothes and other basic human needs. Not all churches who get tax breaks are neglecting the poor 😕
Good for your church anon, I'm speaking in generalities; taking care of the poor is the church's job, if they were all doing it we wouldn't even need the state to
praying is important. churning psychology -- when people are easily tossed to and fro without a foundation they will not recover. The woke in large part become mentally ill--retarded. They become addicted to drugs, plus there is some really evil people who will force people to take drugs and become addicted. When we have a culture in rage and against anything good, evil will prosper and remove as many of its foes as possible.
growing up in a place where many were addicted to drugs I somehow stayed out of it. It creates a mess, so the responsible people will take leadership and take care of it as good as possible.
the churning psychology. Keep those you can take care of as close to you as possible. Very sad place in the country we are in. The unresponsible would push all these people onto other countries.. USA is taking those too from other countries.
Out of fire we will be able to see some good. Those like Nancy Pelosi need to be held responsible. People tend to think serial killers are bad, they are, but those at this level are what then?
I pray every day for us to be saved by God. I sure hope so.
It seems to me much of this has been tried before and failed, or consist of programs riddled with fraud and abuse, thus not getting to the people who need it.
My idea would be to take a few thousand acres of federal land in a temperate area of the country and built 2 "institutions". Institution A is where the people referenced in the Presidential EO are first placed. This institution has the goal to rehabilitate people with counseling, methadone or other treatments that wean them off hard drugs or successfully treat and manage their mental condition. Every effort would be applied from 12 step programs to hypnosis, group and individual psychotherapy, job training, nutritional, exercise, religious support to give people a new start. People stay in institution A for up to 3 years or until they can demonstrate through their desire to kick drugs, help others do the same, have clean blood and urine tests, have passed a series of skill tests showing they have mastered the knowledge needed to get and keep a job. They are given 6 months of half-way house release to show they have the self control to stay off of addictive substances and can be productive members of society.
Institution B would be for recidivists who again become addicted, or those deemed unable or unwilling to get clean and improve their life. To this institution all the drugs that are confiscated in law enforcement operations are taken here rather than be disposed of. The people here are free to use whatever they choose in whatever amount they choose. In due course they will eventually kill themselves due to overdose. The first job of people in Institution A would be to dig the graves, place the bodies of these people in body bags for burial or cremation. It would be a wake up call for them to see what will happen to them if they backslide and are arrested in any drug related incident or fail to properly take their legal medications after successfully graduating from Institution A. There is no release from Institution B other than death.
This concept gives people a real chance to get the help they need and the resources to insure they have the skills needed to take care of themselves. If they find they cannot manage their own care as they age, group homes should be built where they can live a dignified existence. But these places are for those who have limited mental capacity, physical handicaps, psychological issues beyond their control without assisted care. These are the people who have no other means of support.
That's what they have done in WA and OR. They have big tracks of land and they were used to house them but here is the requirement, they work the fields.
In Vancouver it's on Fourth Plain. In Oregon it's in Troutdale.
I still say keep some of the fentanyl so it can be used for death penalty executions. Why not use something that doesn't cost us anything (once it's evidentiary use is complete) to execute condemned prisoners instead of other toxic drug combinations?
Letters of marque and let We, The People partake in the Day of the Rope.
Amen.