Ah, how delightfully ironic. There he is, the people's President Donald John Trump @realDonaldTrump
, my President, not in Washington, not behind a gold-plated desk at Mar-a-Lago, but on British soil. And yet, he’s the one receiving Sir Keir Starmer @Keir_Starmer
like a sovereign greeting a provincial delegate. Like a lord welcoming a courtier. The optics are startling, no red carpet required. Just raw, unspoken power. One might say the roles are reversed, but that would be a superficial reading. No, this is a masterclass in dominance, in ancestral reclamation.
And then, the moment that sealed the theatre: "Thank you for your hospitality," PM Starmer says.
I paused. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed a nation’s leader thanking a visiting President for hosting them in their own country. That, my friend, is not diplomacy. That is dominance cloaked in manners.
But this is no accident. You see, most people, even the ones in power, forget that Trump isn’t just a billionaire with a penchant for spectacle. No, he’s the direct descendant of Scottish nobility. His blood runs deep with the legacy of Clan MacLeod, forged on the blustery Isle of Lewis. On his Scottish estate lie the ruins of a castle, the birthplace of King Robert the Bruce, the liberator of Scotland, the man who defeated the English at Bannockburn and restored the soul of a nation.
So when Trump walks across the highlands or through the halls of Balmoral's shadow, he doesn’t just visit, he returns.
Trump is, in many ways, the most powerful Scottish ruler since King James VI, who united crowns and rewrote the fate of empires. Except this time, the power isn't confined to the British Isles. It spans oceans, commands headlines, and bends protocols.
Starmer might hold the title of Prime Minister and the keys to Number 10. But Trump? Trump holds the script; he holds the ancestral memory of a throne. And today, it’s not just a visit. It’s a declaration: Power remembers where it came from.
Donald John Trump is going to be King of earth.
King. Of. Earth.
Revelation 12:5 "And she gave birth to a male child who would come to rule the nations with a rod of iron."
The above verse is not talking about "Jesus." It's just simply talking about the birth of the future "Ruler" (ie 'king') of earth, and makes more sense now than it did 18 months ago when I first started saying it, and yet some do not want to see it because it does not fit with their current belief systems.
OR they simply do not wish it to be true/happen.
Ever heard of the phrase "wish in one hand and spit in the other" ?
But anyone with eyes to see can see exactly where this is going and this OP illustrates it perfectly.
BEFORE Trump and Elon said during the last presidential election: 'just vote ONE MORE TIME, you're not gonna need to do it again'I was on GAW telling you all that's where it's going.
What? Revelation 12:5 is not taking about "Jesus"? I beg to differ. The Son in Rev 12:5 is obviously Jesus Christ, the Seed of the Woman, the Child of the Virgin, born of Israel to rule the nations. In this verse John telescopes the entire history of Christ's earthly ministry, stating (as if it had happened all at once) that her Child was caught up to God and to His Throne.
I voted for Donald Trump (twice) but he's not going to be "King of the Earth", at least not in any spiritual or biblical sense. He's a mere man and just like us he is fallible with a fallen nature. Maybe I've misunderstood what you wrote....
Can you please point to the Bible verse that says SOMEONE ELSE comes and does all the hard work/heavy lifting to clean up corruption and defeat evil AND THEN Jesus just descends from the clouds?
and here we are at the crossroads of dogmatic literal translation religiousity and the realization that bible verses are metaphors and that 1/2 of ancient scripture was abandoned by the politically motivated Roman church
for behold, the kingdom of God is within you - its not some dude with sandals riding a cloud to save us - it is the awakening of the Christ consciousness within ourselves to save our communities and ourselves with it
Can you please point to the Bible verse that says Donald Trump is the someone who comes and does all the hard work/heavy lifting to clean up corruption and defeat evil? Listen fren if you think Rev 12:5 refers to anyone other than Jesus Christ you are sadly mistaken.
What's Revelation all about? What's it's main theme? The purpose of the Revelation was to reveal Christ as Lord to a suffering Church. Because they (1st century saints) were being persecuted, the early Christians could be tempted to fear that the word was getting out of hand - that Jesus, who had claimed "all authority....in heaven and earth" (Matt 28:18), was not really in control at all. The apostles often warned against this man-centered error, reminding the people that God's sovereignty is over all history.
Revelation 1:1 tells us all we need to know about the Revelation: "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show His servants that things that must shortly take place...." (Rev 1:1).
Did you catch that? It's the Revelation of Jesus Christ! Not Donald J. Trump or any other human being. The interpretation that you have put forth is not supported either in Scripture or bible scholars. So the burden is on you to show that Rev. 12:5 is a reference to President Donald J. Trump.
Person who wrote that article doesn't know what they're talking about… And probably gets most of their information from the Schofield reference deception Bible.
I've been saying the same thing for 1.5 yrs here... And now events are aligning more and more in that direction. Is this a coincidence? If I was wrong, then events should be diverging away from my hypothesis, not directly toward it.
The problem with arguing with people today is that they don't GAF about any new information, or where things are clearly headed right in front of their own faces, if it contradicts how they've already decided the way things have 'got to be.'
My comment had nothing to do with what I or anyone else wants.
Who among you thinks God, who "wrote the end from the beginning" gives a fuck what any of us want?
I'll say this much:
Of the roughly 50% of people that survive & make it to the culmination of The Great Awakening, all but 4-6% are going to demand it.
But JT... Roughly 50% die?!?
Stop dooming!
Ya... Read Revelation again.
The next 'plague' will NOT be fake. Q: "BIBLICAL."
well, thats Revelation 12:5. But, reading through verses 1 through 5, I recall in 2016 a prediction on the youtube about the woman, as Virgo, and stars aligned with the head and the moon with the feet. Now, 2016 was when Trump was elected. "Born" as a metaphor for "elected" would fulfill that prediction.
Thanks for pointing out the typo.
Interestingly… If you use astronomy software, you can see that this exact celestial configuration was also ongoing the morning of Trumps birth, which was 7 minutes in to a full lunar eclipse.
Im all for indibidual nations because of earth is backtracking a lot thru one wo4ld goverment corruotio n. Do you have any idea the corruption this will invite? We need individual nations with no back room deals and no huge alliances to hold eachother to account. Othetwise we this will all happen again. Also we need a finanvial reset of some kind because institutionilizing the homeless isnt an answer either. As it stands right now, someone with 0 dollars and no skills can not work their way up with the baseline to buy into society. Not everyone is a drug addict, tho most are, however iys possible to recover from that too
I don't think people took Q seriously enough when he said "Biblical" over and over.
Q was NOT using it as the superlative "biblical proportions"…
But just plain Biblical.
I don't see what is so hard to understand about that; and no one 'wishing it wasn't that way' is going to change anything.
I've always thought that the "Biblical" reference was to the fact that this really comes down to the spiritual fight between "good and evil". In that sense it's "Biblical".
Subtle dominance that most miss. Is Trump somehow "King of Great Britain" right now? Feels like he ran on a military coup on the Windsors and put them into submission. Mechanism unknown. Note that Melania likely has "royal blood" as well (royal cousin?).
Gives new meaning to "No Kings" protests...me thinks thou protesteth too much...
We're suffering a deficit of language here, I feel.
Kings, and the rule of monarchy are based (as we all know, and I recently found out) on their authority and place in the "Great Chain of Being".
Even if we subscribed to the Great Chain model, it would be, in order from the top: God, Angels, Heaven, Humans, (subsets=) Kings, Royals, Aristocrats, Nobility, and so on, downward.
Jesus can't be anything other than God, and describing him as "King" doesn't really suggest otherwise, we just don't have a good way to describe him.
People do tend to forget if you are for Kings, that also includes serfs, no upward mobility, etc. We put an end to that in 1776 and aren't looking back.
It was toward the end of the Book of Judges as the final end of that era, before the Book of Kings. The Israelites had asked the prophet of the time if God would appoint them a King. He counseled with God who instructed him to tell the Israelites all the woes that would result from having a King, and he did, but the Israelites still wanted a King. So began the history starting with King Saul, leading to King David, and then to King Solomon in the Book of Kings. Not hard to look up.
Tweet txt:
Ah, how delightfully ironic. There he is, the people's President Donald John Trump @realDonaldTrump , my President, not in Washington, not behind a gold-plated desk at Mar-a-Lago, but on British soil. And yet, he’s the one receiving Sir Keir Starmer @Keir_Starmer like a sovereign greeting a provincial delegate. Like a lord welcoming a courtier. The optics are startling, no red carpet required. Just raw, unspoken power. One might say the roles are reversed, but that would be a superficial reading. No, this is a masterclass in dominance, in ancestral reclamation.
And then, the moment that sealed the theatre: "Thank you for your hospitality," PM Starmer says.
I paused. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed a nation’s leader thanking a visiting President for hosting them in their own country. That, my friend, is not diplomacy. That is dominance cloaked in manners.
But this is no accident. You see, most people, even the ones in power, forget that Trump isn’t just a billionaire with a penchant for spectacle. No, he’s the direct descendant of Scottish nobility. His blood runs deep with the legacy of Clan MacLeod, forged on the blustery Isle of Lewis. On his Scottish estate lie the ruins of a castle, the birthplace of King Robert the Bruce, the liberator of Scotland, the man who defeated the English at Bannockburn and restored the soul of a nation.
So when Trump walks across the highlands or through the halls of Balmoral's shadow, he doesn’t just visit, he returns.
Trump is, in many ways, the most powerful Scottish ruler since King James VI, who united crowns and rewrote the fate of empires. Except this time, the power isn't confined to the British Isles. It spans oceans, commands headlines, and bends protocols.
Starmer might hold the title of Prime Minister and the keys to Number 10. But Trump? Trump holds the script; he holds the ancestral memory of a throne. And today, it’s not just a visit. It’s a declaration: Power remembers where it came from.
I've been saying it here for a year and a half...
Donald John Trump is going to be King of earth.
King. Of. Earth.
Revelation 12:5 "And she gave birth to a male child who would come to rule the nations with a rod of iron."
The above verse is not talking about "Jesus." It's just simply talking about the birth of the future "Ruler" (ie 'king') of earth, and makes more sense now than it did 18 months ago when I first started saying it, and yet some do not want to see it because it does not fit with their current belief systems.
OR they simply do not wish it to be true/happen.
Ever heard of the phrase "wish in one hand and spit in the other" ?
But anyone with eyes to see can see exactly where this is going and this OP illustrates it perfectly.
BEFORE Trump and Elon said during the last presidential election: 'just vote ONE MORE TIME, you're not gonna need to do it again' I was on GAW telling you all that's where it's going.
Hellooo 👋 👋 McFly... anybody home?
Is it 5:5 yet?
What? Revelation 12:5 is not taking about "Jesus"? I beg to differ. The Son in Rev 12:5 is obviously Jesus Christ, the Seed of the Woman, the Child of the Virgin, born of Israel to rule the nations. In this verse John telescopes the entire history of Christ's earthly ministry, stating (as if it had happened all at once) that her Child was caught up to God and to His Throne.
I voted for Donald Trump (twice) but he's not going to be "King of the Earth", at least not in any spiritual or biblical sense. He's a mere man and just like us he is fallible with a fallen nature. Maybe I've misunderstood what you wrote....
Can you please point to the Bible verse that says SOMEONE ELSE comes and does all the hard work/heavy lifting to clean up corruption and defeat evil AND THEN Jesus just descends from the clouds?
and here we are at the crossroads of dogmatic literal translation religiousity and the realization that bible verses are metaphors and that 1/2 of ancient scripture was abandoned by the politically motivated Roman church
for behold, the kingdom of God is within you - its not some dude with sandals riding a cloud to save us - it is the awakening of the Christ consciousness within ourselves to save our communities and ourselves with it
+1 u/Hillbilly77
"For the Kingdom of Heaven is in your midst but men do not see it."
Completely agree with that
It's in our DNA. Ascension.
It was a self reference to the presence of Jesus. But most men do not see it...
Can you please point to the Bible verse that says Donald Trump is the someone who comes and does all the hard work/heavy lifting to clean up corruption and defeat evil? Listen fren if you think Rev 12:5 refers to anyone other than Jesus Christ you are sadly mistaken.
What's Revelation all about? What's it's main theme? The purpose of the Revelation was to reveal Christ as Lord to a suffering Church. Because they (1st century saints) were being persecuted, the early Christians could be tempted to fear that the word was getting out of hand - that Jesus, who had claimed "all authority....in heaven and earth" (Matt 28:18), was not really in control at all. The apostles often warned against this man-centered error, reminding the people that God's sovereignty is over all history.
Revelation 1:1 tells us all we need to know about the Revelation: "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show His servants that things that must shortly take place...." (Rev 1:1).
Did you catch that? It's the Revelation of Jesus Christ! Not Donald J. Trump or any other human being. The interpretation that you have put forth is not supported either in Scripture or bible scholars. So the burden is on you to show that Rev. 12:5 is a reference to President Donald J. Trump.
Titor … for one who travels through time, I’m afraid you’re misinformed. DJT king of earth? No. Rev 12. https://www.gotquestions.org/Revelation-chapter-12.html
Person who wrote that article doesn't know what they're talking about… And probably gets most of their information from the Schofield
referencedeception Bible.I've been saying the same thing for 1.5 yrs here... And now events are aligning more and more in that direction. Is this a coincidence?
If I was wrong, then events should be diverging away from my hypothesis, not directly toward it.
The problem with arguing with people today is that they don't GAF about any new information, or where things are clearly headed right in front of their own faces, if it contradicts how they've already decided the way things have 'got to be.'
I'm suggesting no other Bible version did more to deceive, misinform, and misdirect Christians.
The Anti-Christ?
My comment had nothing to do with what I or anyone else wants.
Who among you thinks God, who "wrote the end from the beginning" gives a fuck what any of us want?
I'll say this much:
Of the roughly 50% of people that survive & make it to the culmination of The Great Awakening, all but 4-6% are going to demand it.
Ya... Read Revelation again.
The next 'plague' will NOT be fake.
Q: "BIBLICAL."
well, thats Revelation 12:5. But, reading through verses 1 through 5, I recall in 2016 a prediction on the youtube about the woman, as Virgo, and stars aligned with the head and the moon with the feet. Now, 2016 was when Trump was elected. "Born" as a metaphor for "elected" would fulfill that prediction.
Thanks for pointing out the typo.
Interestingly… If you use astronomy software, you can see that this exact celestial configuration was also ongoing the morning of Trumps birth, which was 7 minutes in to a full lunar eclipse.
The more you know…
the Dragon could represent all the evil in the world
Yes agreed
Im all for indibidual nations because of earth is backtracking a lot thru one wo4ld goverment corruotio n. Do you have any idea the corruption this will invite? We need individual nations with no back room deals and no huge alliances to hold eachother to account. Othetwise we this will all happen again. Also we need a finanvial reset of some kind because institutionilizing the homeless isnt an answer either. As it stands right now, someone with 0 dollars and no skills can not work their way up with the baseline to buy into society. Not everyone is a drug addict, tho most are, however iys possible to recover from that too
But IT IS Biblical...
I don't think people took Q seriously enough when he said "Biblical" over and over.
Q was NOT using it as the superlative "biblical proportions"…
But just plain Biblical.
I don't see what is so hard to understand about that; and no one 'wishing it wasn't that way' is going to change anything.
I've always thought that the "Biblical" reference was to the fact that this really comes down to the spiritual fight between "good and evil". In that sense it's "Biblical".
Yep but the witch mocking our dearest President
President Trump also met with the "leader" of the European Politburo, Ursula von der Leyen. The body language on display was noticeable.
Starmer and Von der Leyen both looked totally defeated and cuckolded. It was a joy to see.
Something big was settled yesterday on President Trump's terms.
Subtle dominance that most miss. Is Trump somehow "King of Great Britain" right now? Feels like he ran on a military coup on the Windsors and put them into submission. Mechanism unknown. Note that Melania likely has "royal blood" as well (royal cousin?).
Gives new meaning to "No Kings" protests...me thinks thou protesteth too much...
Windsor is a made up name that was adopted by the German aristocrats previously known as Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. So they are illegitimate anyway.
Yes. Saw a clip of that meeting. At the end Trump had her hand in his, and patted the top of it like soothing a small child. Kek.
And it was awesome! I can't stand that woman.
Brilliant!
Yeah - dude had an epiphany!
Thanks mods!
"...this is a masterclass in dominance, in ancestral reclamation."
Sorry - X link and Nitter link for NoXers:
https://twitter.com/kmbiamnozie/status/1949986298921664533
https://nitter.net/kmbiamnozie/status/1949986298921664533
Nothing like the witch of Netherworld mocking our President. She is going to get it. https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/entertainment-celebrity/shes-a-gangster-for-that-queen-of-the-netherlands-boldly-imitates-donald-trump-to-his-face-and-fans-cant-stop-laughing/ar-AA1JqSs5 Sorry about this link but how hateful the evildoers are. I wonder when they are really be gone for good, she is so fat and ugly behind make up and Adrenochrome (children eaters)
Kings are bad. Only Jesus is King, so let's not go full Cult please.
We're suffering a deficit of language here, I feel.
Kings, and the rule of monarchy are based (as we all know, and I recently found out) on their authority and place in the "Great Chain of Being". Even if we subscribed to the Great Chain model, it would be, in order from the top: God, Angels, Heaven, Humans, (subsets=) Kings, Royals, Aristocrats, Nobility, and so on, downward.
Jesus can't be anything other than God, and describing him as "King" doesn't really suggest otherwise, we just don't have a good way to describe him.
People do tend to forget if you are for Kings, that also includes serfs, no upward mobility, etc. We put an end to that in 1776 and aren't looking back.
Be mindful of the fact that God advised Israel against having kings. Those passages read like pure libertarianism.
To what passages are you referring? Can you copy or highlight them?
It was toward the end of the Book of Judges as the final end of that era, before the Book of Kings. The Israelites had asked the prophet of the time if God would appoint them a King. He counseled with God who instructed him to tell the Israelites all the woes that would result from having a King, and he did, but the Israelites still wanted a King. So began the history starting with King Saul, leading to King David, and then to King Solomon in the Book of Kings. Not hard to look up.
Er, this was far before the voyage of the Mayflower.