Just two nights ago, when I was reading the gospel here, there was a post about Toyota having developed a water-based engine that would endanger the EV market.
A few hours later, it was scrubbed from the internet. Not even the Internet Archive site had a copy.
I thought all this tech was going to come out soon under Trump. This couldn't have been deemed too disruptive to society.
18:11 Toyota CEO Drops a Bombshell about the Water Engine—EVs Are FINISHED!
29:02 Toyota Water Powered Engine Outperforms Hydrogen and Electric https://old.bitchute.com/video/JfLJuGwbiC7R/
10:02 Toyota CEO: This New (WATER POWERED) Engine Will Destroy The Entire EV Industry!
9:15 TOYOTA CEO: "OUR NEW HYDROGEN ENGINE WILL DESTROY THE EV INDUSTRY"
"Hydrolysis on the fly"
Basically this.
I have a browns gas machine, it could never produce more gas than the energy inputs. Maybe Toyota have figured something out, which works like a hybrid car.
There is Ohmasa gas, a turbo version of browns gas, but its more dangerous than browns gas. It is said to involve cold fusion tech.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVwmr7WNtNA
Cheers I’ll check it out later.
It’s not a water engine. Water comes out the tailpipe. It is a Hydrogen engine. The idea is to have compressed hydrogen tanks in the vehicle. The infrastructure idea that makes it possible is for gas stations to have hydrogen pumps. No storage of hydrogen (dangerous); the pump uses electricity to break the hydrogen away from the oxygen in the water supply.
Using the only emission is water to sell it to consumers/investors. But the smart thing to do is to take the technology and design they created and use natural gas instead. Safer and more cost efficient. Both Japan and the US have a significant natural gas infrastructure. It gets a bit spottier in rural Japan, but they have LP and propane tanks.
And we will be shipping a lot of natural gas out of Alaska.
It is a WATER ENGINE. There are NO hydrogen tanks. This vehicle seperates the H2O as it runs.
A hydrogen tank engine has been around for a long time. This is new.
It takes just as much energy to split water molecules as they release when recombined (or burned). So unless this engine uses some kind of exploit of physics to break the molecules with zero point energy or something it isn't going anywhere fast
Careful now Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons will take you somewhere else they don't want you to look.
They will. https://remoteview.substack.com/
Stan Meyers claimed he was using a resonant cavity/chamber to break the bonds at far lower energies. But you're right, it would violate the 2nd law.
"The tendency for entropy to increase in isolated systems is expressed in the second law of thermodynamics-- perhaps the most pessimistic and amoral formulation in all human thought." - PRINCIPIA DISCORDIA
Questions of energy balance involve the First Law, not the Second Law.
The Toyota people are presenting it as a hydrogen engine, pure and simple. Operation on water is chemically impossible. The electricity you would need to split it by electrolysis would be better used to power a motor.
I should have clicked on the links. This is a new, new approach. They say electrolysis to get the hydrogen, but that is a net negative energy. I am guessing they are using Nano silicon to get the hydrogen.
They rate of electrolysis is what must be new. And it is a Hydrogen engine.
the real issue is that it requires more energy to split the h2o molecule than the energy it produces
fact
Agree on Hydrogen storage being dangerous; remember the Hindenburg. Believe this technology actually fuels with water, separates the molecules and burns the hydrogen. The engine is an internal combustion engine. Watch the water indeed.
Who wants to bet the Hindenburg, danger of hydrogen aside, was a false flag?
That was my first thought when they brought it up on this thread!. I'm with you.
Well, there is that. . .
Separates the hydrogen from the oxygen by using more energy than the combustion can produce? That would be a perpetual power generation machine. Just condense the combustion products and pour them back into the water tank. It's magic!
Hydrogen power source? I first heard about powering a vehicle with this back around 2000.
I remember seeing Stanley Meyers on the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson in the late 1980s or early 1990s describing a water powered engine he had designed. Then it all went silent, never heard any more about it. A while back Joe Rogan was talking with Aaron Rodgers about him. He died right after eating out at a restaurant. He was yelling they poisoned me before he died.
(9 min)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUI3QMOtz4E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzhJpZ72BSQ
Absolutely hilarious telling of the Stan Meyers story. Great normie redpill. "I've discovered a way to fuck over the illuminati!"
Are you insinuating that they’d murder innocent people just to protect profit margins and/or a business model?
...and /or a World Wide OIL petrodollar business model
Omg ! I didn’t catch that , the poison. I do remember Stanley on Carson though ,,, wow a memory jolt !
The thunderbolt generator uses water too.
That uses petrol and isn't an overunity engine, it converts the exhaust gases from CO2 into 40% Oxygen. You can breathe the exhaust fumes.
It only uses petrol to begin the process, not in conjunction with
I am not too sure that is true, it isn't overunity and doesn't have ghost/shadow energy.
Please look at these videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtO_qIa9UtI&list=PLBgQorZu_mLnXLxYlvTv8ojoa2BRsx_o2&index=9
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTy4_g0aNxI
Nowhere in these is there any mention of self sustaining energy production.
Search Malcolm bendall instead. Once the process begins it is self sustainable with only water needed
You haven't even looked at the videos have you? I have followed him since Bob Greenyer discovered him and bought him to everyone's attention. Please show me where and when he says or demonstrates its over unity.
I knew it was being tested in the uk on an industrial generator. So , no I didnt
I scrubbed it, because i looked at it and it was false.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BtPtmZZS/x/c/
It's hydrogen.
Make cars that run on cow poop!
Already done; watch Thunderdome!
Haha! Bring it back, it’ll help the climate freaks!
"Your car smells like sh*t!" .... "yep!"
If only we could use Democrat lies to fill our gas tanks, we'd never run out.
u/#kek
Not "water powered." Hydrogen powered. You still have to get the hydrogen from some process, either electrolysis (needing electric power from powerplants) or natural gas reforming (produces carbon dioxide). This is being advertised as a "green" alternative to EVs. But since "climate change" is a hoax, there is no point to it.
As long as there is many companies / organizations profiting on the scarcity of "fossil" fuels they will keep the alternatives hidden. Like a carburetor on a 350 Chevy engine that will get near 50 miles per gallon. Built and tested in the 60's.
I also played with HHO or Browns Gas about 20 years ago. I built an electrolysis cell that generated 5 liters/min. Then used it as a fuel additive in a ICE with the intention of weaning it off the gas completely. And then planned to move up to a simple 4 cylinder. My problems had more to do with tweaking timing and burning valves since HHO burns much hotter and faster than gas. I absolutely knew it could be done, but it would take a company like Toyota or Honda to make it happen.
Also, if you can power a car with water, then you could power a generator for a house. Or a city, or country, or the world, with No emissions. Hence the problem...
Water-based engine years ago that did not come to fruition either.
The water still needs to be converted. They did peanut and vegetable oil in the 1800s. Diesel became cheaper than that for fuel.