No. Don’t burn down our history and our best architecture because some people are demonic.
Be better than Nepal.
Ford knew his businesses weren’t made up of the buildings, but of people. Burning a nice building just destroys a nice building. The people managing the tyranny are likely elsewhere. The organizations and implementers are elsewhere.
This only gives them an excuse to start shouting “AHHH REICHSTAG!!” “AHHH TONKIN!!!” and try to seize more power.
England has been rebuilt repeatedly. It can be rebuilt again. If it takes losing a landmark to get rid of demons, IMO it might be worth it, especially given the crime, and real future which will happen if not stopped.
What does burning a building do to stop people housed in buildings scattered all across the country?
The French Revolution did not have a good outcome. America was blessed to have one, and we tried to keep ours peaceful. They forced it, not us. A Parliament House doesn’t get burned out of desperation but out of impudence and chest-thumping.
The meek shall inherit the earth. The vandals sacked Rome. How’s their name recorded? Sack the buildings and leave the people, and they will rebuild. Go at the people unlawfully, and they will infiltrate and go into hiding and remain in control.
Use righteous law and righteous judgments against them and they lose.
Does mighty England have no lawful respite from these criminals but a match?
Take Control. Arson is the tool of the weakling coward. Be strong.
Go raise up more Martin Geddeses and Christine Grabs. They can’t beat all of us.
If this was true you would be without issue. So would Napal.
You are attempting to muddle (corrupt?) Good advice with missapropriated platitudes.
.
Is good architecture worth preserving? Of course, always if possible. However, a building is still just a building. Buildings can be rebuilt (Notre-Dame, for example) and they are all the time. Repairs can be done. The US white house and Capitol building have both been rebuilt.
My point is, for the love of a building, the acceptance of evil or corruption should be unacceptable, and a singed building is a small price too pay for freedom.
Those who revolt against tyranny could be seen as impudent to the bystander, but are the heroes of history who stood up to the dictator, the tyrant, and who helped reshape their country.
.
From what I've heard on the news, England and her laws have been ravaged by globalists and the lackeys of evil. Foreigners roam your halls of parliment, and have a stranglehold on your citizens.
The citizens themselves are being arrested just for speaking up, or calling for government action against injustice.
It was the same for Nepal. I would not begrudge either of you to take up and defend your freedoms and very lives. Even if it meant losing a building or two. People are much more important!
If you think England can be saved yet by her own laws, I BEG you to get out from in front of your computer and DO IT.
I would hazard to say better people than both of us have already tried, and failed to do so.
If a match is the only recourse to save the island I'd rather see that than it to be finally and utterly conquered with nary a fight. Are the people so complacent and brow beaten they won't stand for God, king and country?
I had a response, then I fat fingered, and I’m not writing it again.
In short, burning down your own history is not the way to save a nation, and it won’t stop the criminals from continuing to do criminal stuff. Ask Guy Fawkes about it and for both yourself and everyone else, please stop being intensely stupid.
Here’s a silly idea for you - how about lawfully putting the criminals in prison, lawfully taking possession of the parliament, creating a warning to future generations against what they’ve done, and then proceeding to rule rightly?
Wouldn’t that be a better outcome?
If you can’t put them in prisonwithoutburning buildings, you aren’t going to do itwithburning buildings, either.
For crying out loud man, go drink some ginseng and think for a second.
Rooks 38 minutes ago +1 / -0
If this was true you would be without issue. So would Napal.
You are attempting to muddle (corrupt?) Good advice with missapropriated platitudes.
.
Is good architecture worth preserving? Of course, always if possible. However, a building is still just a building. Buildings can be rebuilt (Notre-Dame, for example) and they are all the time. Repairs can be done. The US white house and Capitol building have both been rebuilt.
My point is, for the love of a building, the acceptance of evil or corruption should be unacceptable, and a singed building is a small price too pay for freedom.
Those who revolt against tyranny could be seen as impudent to the bystander, but are the heroes of history who stood up to the dictator, the tyrant, and who helped reshape their country.
.
From what I've heard on the news, England and her laws have been ravaged by globalists and the lackeys of evil. Foreigners roam your halls of parliment, and have a stranglehold on your citizens.
The citizens themselves are being arrested just for speaking up, or calling for government action against injustice.
It was the same for Nepal. I would not begrudge either of you to take up and defend your freedoms and very lives. Even if it meant losing a building or two. People are much more important!
If you think England can be saved yet by her own laws, I BEG you to get out from in front of your computer and DO IT.
I would hazard to say better people than both of us have already tried, and failed to do so.
If a match is the only recourse to save the island I'd rather see that than it to be finally and utterly conquered with nary a fight. > Are the people so complacent and brow beaten they won't stand for God, king and country?
If you read the article, there's more going on (if the article or 'news' is in any way accurate, which cannot be guaranteed) than just the burning of a building or two. Politicians are being beaten up, their houses burned, some people apparently burned alive in their home (wife of former PM), etc. And a lot more.
I tend to agree with Sunnywindows "Watch, England and learn"
Not the people, tho. Amateur has a point: be better than mob violence. But the British government and ruling class? Absolutely. Watch and learn, because tyrants who push a people too far will suffer pushback that often leads to violence.
When a people feel they have no other recourse, they will push to violence.
I think the argument rooks and amateur are having is essentially quibbling. Two perspectives with the same end goal in mind.
Whether England can avoid what <seems to be> happening in Nepal seems doubtful. But, it doesn't mean that this is the best or only alternative.
Obviously best to avoid violence. If England can be saved through civilized means, that is the best outcome by far and I support it 100%.
I only worry that, if it is beyond a civilized solution, Brits may no longer possess the wearwithall to save themselves without help. Even with open revolt it may be too late to be effective. Just depends on how the situation really is compared to what the news is saying.
One important clarification - I was not asserting that you are that, but intended emphasis on “being”, as in, “in the immediate present”, and for a specific reason that I don’t want to detail. It was not intended as an insult, but as “be aware of the things you’re writing”, and I want to be clear on that. Apologies if I was not clear then, or here. I do not want to be too explicit here, but it was absolutely not meant as an insult.
I think the issue here is the impression that, given the reality of what is happening in England, you are under the impression that if you wave the flag, go and protest, and call on the law to the face of your corrupt parlement they will all of a sudden realize their malfeasance and either self correct, or turn themselves in to the nearest police officer. Im not saying violence is always the answer by any means, but if this is what you truly believe, then I would have to say it is more than a little unrealistic.
The reality is, when bad people are in charge, they will almost never give it up without force of some type. When the evil is the government, how do you force them out?. What all these countries are dealing with is not one or two or three bad apples. You are dealing with dozens, if not hundreds of evil doers collaborating with each other, protecting each other. The citizenry won't be able to march in there and demand anything without the riot police being turned on them. The scope of this is too big.
In the US, for example, there are hundreds of democrats and Republicans who are in on this, and that is just the federal congress. They are drunk on power and wealth and have body guards, and are very good at twisting words and actions.
Even an armed rebellion here would get bloody, very quickly turning deadly and and into a massacre. They do not give up without a fight.
Do you really believe you could root out the evil in government without collateral damage? That is the real issue. Forget the buildings. These evil leaders are murdering citizens with their actions.
Im sorry to say that the fact you seem more worried about the buildings than the people, raped and murdered by these villains is a bit alarming, and really not realistic.
If I had to fight to keep my daughters from being raped by the thugs they allow to roam the street without punishment, things would get escalated real fast. The least of things I would be worried about is collateral damage, like buildings.
I do pray for the UK. I can only think of one or two other times when it was in such dire peril as now. As is the entire world. I pray others gain the will to fight the tyrants. And overthrow the oppressors and demonic forces which seek to end all that is right and moral.
you are under the impression that if you wave the flag, go and protest, and call on the law to the face of your corrupt parlement they will all of a sudden realize their malfeasance and either self correct, or turn themselves in to the nearest police officer.
Not at all. Protests are useless, except to [them]. Polic(y) Office(r)s work for the Corpor-ate Statute-ists. Legislators have legalized unlawful actions. You seem to be unaware of some concepts in play. No blame, they’re difficult. As noted elsewhere, I don’t fully understand them myself yet.
You are dealing with dozens, if not hundreds of evil doers collaborating with each other, protecting each other.
Exactly. Re-read the drops, Law of War, and other guides.
They are unjustifiably violent. We are not. They are wild unthinking mobs. We are not. The real fight is at a higher level than brute physicality.
The citizenry won't be able to march in there and demand anything without the riot police being turned on them.
You are correct, and that would be a very bad idea. Think more like Tina Peters. She went to court charged by the criminals she was incriminating with the crime of doing her job by which she was oath bound. Her singlehandedly fighting the charges is exposing the total overturning of a Republican form of government in the state of Colorado, with the corruption having rooted at the highest levels.
One sickly, elderly woman is going to take down the whole machine of that state by lawfully stepping into their gears and jamming them. She forced them to overexpose themselves. Justice is coming.
If I had to fight to keep my daughters from being raped by the thugs they allow to roam the street without punishment, things would get escalated real fast.
100% different situation. Any sorts of wrongs like this can, and eventually will be righted.
Be aware that the government can break the Law, too. You seem to think that there’s no remediation of that, yet the Magna Carta exists, where the king himself was brought to heel after declaring himself above the law. Now why was the king himself hiding and running in the middle of nowhere? Go take a look at Runnymeade. There’s nothing there.
Im sorry to say that the fact you seem more worried about the buildings than the people,
That’s not the argument, but I’m not sure how much more I want to write on this.
Optics matter. Acting righteously matters. Being the Party of Law and Order matters.
People misunderstand the American Revolution. It was a war of defense. Burning down parliament is neither war nor defensive.. just gives the cabal reasons for police states
I’m getting ratio downdooted for saying “let’s not be like the mostly peaceful protestors in Kenosha.” Hey remember when they also tried to burn down that courthouse in Portland or whatever? Two years ago everyone would have agreed. I remember we thought those “protestors” at the courthouse were… didn’t we call them “terrorists”?
There’s no good argument for it. It’s not being manly, it’s being an unlawful mob.
What’s different? Oh we’re in power now, “but ‘It’s ok when we do it’ is ok when we do it”, right? “ Equal justice under the law means the law is applied to everyone equally, doesn’t it?
“Nah, it’s all just about what feels good!”
sigh.
TO BE THE PARTY OF LAW AND ORDER, WE HAVE TO BE LAWFUL.
I’m not gonna say that’s the right answer either, I don’t think it is, but it’s at least a much more rational suggestion.
This article may in fact be the only sort of tactical option left for Nepal. I don’t know a single thing about their situation. Britain definitely still has options, as do we.
I’m 100% positive that I’ve made some really stupid guesses here myself for which I probably deserved a few ratios, but after watching the Dummer of Love (nice accidental typo, not gonna fix it.), I’m not gonna back down that arson does not solve this problem. Nor does mob violence, which the founding fathers wrote about.
Everybody needs to throw their emotions out the door and be the autists they were born to be.
AE, I've given you some updoots because you are doing good work by trying to convince folks to go after the criminals and not the buildings. Unfortunately when a mob begins doing violence it is very difficult to stop their actions. Common sense goes out the window and a lit match wins the day. You have taken an immense amount of your time to write out why the efforts in Nepal needs to be focused against the deep state. I applaud you for trying to educate folks on GAW. Thanks!
Tactics: “Burn it down!” (nope) “Storm the Bastille and ready the guillotines! No trials!” (nope)
Less emotion, more thinking. I’ve mentioned a couple approaches that I suspect are good solutions, but fully admit that I don’t know how they’d work in Nepal. I’d like to think I can spot poor solutions though, and emotional gratification aside, it’s this.
I’ll happily wear this ratio as a badge of honor, but I do expect better out of us. It’s not like I haven’t surely posited plenty of poorly thought things here (and will continue to do so), of course.
IDK about your "Tactics" though. If Barry, Big Mike, Bill and HRC are walking down the street it would be very tempting to do the Nepal cleanse on them, don't you think? ;)
I didn’t really present specific tactics. My take on high level strategies (in England and the US at least. TBD in France, Germany, Finland, etc, and nevermind Nepal) is to wage lawfare back on them.
Is it less glamorous? Absofrigginlutely. Is it an infinitely better option than direct action and also what Trump himself is doing? Absofrigginlutely. When done successfully does it win? You bet it does!
Still too dumb in the area to suggest even a single tactic other than reading the two names I threw out (and some others) and figuring out what we can do along those lines. A few smart frogs here know some tricks but I am not one (yet).
Do I still dream of perp walks? Sure. We can all dream, but what’s important is accomplishing the mission.
Really, even prayer and true repentance alone might be good enough. Father did promise if we turned from our wicked ways he would hear and heal our land…
There are also cultural factors at play here. Nepal <appears to have> a very polarized society, with median income something like $1400 a year, while the elite politicians live in luxury. A less developed society, only now trying to emerge from poverty.
Britain is the home of the magna carta. The 1689 Bill of Rights, etc.
Descending into mob violence doesn't seem to be the only way. Take a note from Tommy Robinson. Has he ever advocated mob violence? Not that I know of.
The whole Q operation was to spearhead a mass movement of minds. To rack open the group think. Expose the reality. Create a spearhead force that could eventually shift the entire mainstream narrative.
Which it has. So many of our themes from 2018 are now mainstream thought in the USA.
People should learn the lessons of the two revolutions. American and French. One was lead by well-educated men leading people to stand up for their rights. "Don't treat on us." The other was lead by mobs, mobilized and exploited by instigators, to destroy the rulers. "J'Accuse! You are anti-revolutionary! Guillotine!"
I think we can make the case that frogs saying England should emulate what the Nepalese people are doing are actually advocating more in the vein of the French Revolution rather than the American one.
They did the same in Indonesia, burnt down the corrupt government's houses.. they're all dirt poor and the govt officials have ferraris and millons of dollars and gold bars.
Why is this happening all over the world at the same time? Weird..
Were the people starving and suffering so much they don't have anything else to lose? Why do they want to hurt the rich millionaires and corrupt government.. i don't get it
These corrupt commie parasitic politicians have been stealing, lying, killing/murdering, raping We the People for so long they think they are safe & untouchable. There are many Nepalesque around the world that are ready to pop off. Instant justice via hanging, dragging, chippering, left sandal flogging,... 🔥🔥🔥🦖 lets see what country all these parasites run to... then we 🤜🤡
Read what is actually behind it, rampant corruption and instead of dealing with it, they have sought to oppress comment on it and sounds like the MSM played its part.,
End result people have had enough. History tells you this is how it ends when the elite refuse to deal with the problems. Welcome to reality.
If anyone could condense the issues at stake in Nepal, that would be a big help. Especially why the people now would resort to violent reprisal and overthrow. Today is news. Tomorrow begins the answer for today.
Incidentally, there was one building in a video that seemed to be surrounded by a circular perimeter of what might have been flagpoles, but they seemed too close together to be that and they were not flying flags. The only other structure like that I have seen would be the supports for a very low frequency radio antenna. but that is also questionable. Could they have been the support posts for a chain link fence 20 feet high? I am at a loss to understand it. If that was indeed a high fence, then there must have been immense problems in Nepal.
Kind of a "final straw" scenario? Spontaneous insurrection. It does not look like there is any organized opposition, so it may not be a coup. At least not a successful coup. With the officials of the government having been functionally "decapitated", Nepal may be without any government except the military. i guess we might expect a military regime to restore order. Or India. Or China. This might portend a larger conflict in the offing.
These mob tyrants are the ones who are paid by the evildoers on the top of the pyramid, they are the ones who are destroying the world and human beings.
What I find funny about this is that I have indeed long thought that what it would take to wake up and rouse normies into action these days is the removal of internet, chiefly social meeja, streaming and gaming. Remember what Harari said, that they could keep the 'useless eaters' happy with drugs and computer games? Well right now as we speak, a shitstorm is brewing in the UK over the Online Safety Act leading gaming platforms to increasingly shut users out and demanding ID verification by credit card, which the majority of gamers for one reason or another simply don't have, for fear of repercussions from the totally Fabian-run OFCOM. AND it turns out that Visa, as a mere supposed payment processor recently advertised for a 'Director of Global Gaming Strategy' with all the usual WEF and UN guff about changing world, partnerships etc etc, with the heavy implication of shaping and controlling the availability of gaming content. Now THAT has made normies sit up and take notice of the global agenda. So as Harari's 'stakeholders' are, by implementing his goals now blocking his promise of placating the masses with even computer games, it would be amazingly ironic if this was the thing that sees him and his ilk hoist by their own petards in an uprising. In Minecraft of course.
England…. Watch and learn.
No. Don’t burn down our history and our best architecture because some people are demonic.
Be better than Nepal.
Ford knew his businesses weren’t made up of the buildings, but of people. Burning a nice building just destroys a nice building. The people managing the tyranny are likely elsewhere. The organizations and implementers are elsewhere.
This only gives them an excuse to start shouting “AHHH REICHSTAG!!” “AHHH TONKIN!!!” and try to seize more power.
Be smart.
England has been rebuilt repeatedly. It can be rebuilt again. If it takes losing a landmark to get rid of demons, IMO it might be worth it, especially given the crime, and real future which will happen if not stopped.
What does burning a building do to stop people housed in buildings scattered all across the country?
The French Revolution did not have a good outcome. America was blessed to have one, and we tried to keep ours peaceful. They forced it, not us. A Parliament House doesn’t get burned out of desperation but out of impudence and chest-thumping.
The meek shall inherit the earth. The vandals sacked Rome. How’s their name recorded? Sack the buildings and leave the people, and they will rebuild. Go at the people unlawfully, and they will infiltrate and go into hiding and remain in control.
Use righteous law and righteous judgments against them and they lose.
Does mighty England have no lawful respite from these criminals but a match?
Take Control. Arson is the tool of the weakling coward. Be strong.
Go raise up more Martin Geddeses and Christine Grabs. They can’t beat all of us.
If this was true you would be without issue. So would Napal.
You are attempting to muddle (corrupt?) Good advice with missapropriated platitudes.
.
Is good architecture worth preserving? Of course, always if possible. However, a building is still just a building. Buildings can be rebuilt (Notre-Dame, for example) and they are all the time. Repairs can be done. The US white house and Capitol building have both been rebuilt.
My point is, for the love of a building, the acceptance of evil or corruption should be unacceptable, and a singed building is a small price too pay for freedom.
Those who revolt against tyranny could be seen as impudent to the bystander, but are the heroes of history who stood up to the dictator, the tyrant, and who helped reshape their country.
.
From what I've heard on the news, England and her laws have been ravaged by globalists and the lackeys of evil. Foreigners roam your halls of parliment, and have a stranglehold on your citizens.
The citizens themselves are being arrested just for speaking up, or calling for government action against injustice.
It was the same for Nepal. I would not begrudge either of you to take up and defend your freedoms and very lives. Even if it meant losing a building or two. People are much more important!
If you think England can be saved yet by her own laws, I BEG you to get out from in front of your computer and DO IT.
I would hazard to say better people than both of us have already tried, and failed to do so.
If a match is the only recourse to save the island I'd rather see that than it to be finally and utterly conquered with nary a fight. Are the people so complacent and brow beaten they won't stand for God, king and country?
Well.
I had a response, then I fat fingered, and I’m not writing it again.
In short, burning down your own history is not the way to save a nation, and it won’t stop the criminals from continuing to do criminal stuff. Ask Guy Fawkes about it and for both yourself and everyone else, please stop being intensely stupid.
Here’s a silly idea for you - how about lawfully putting the criminals in prison, lawfully taking possession of the parliament, creating a warning to future generations against what they’ve done, and then proceeding to rule rightly?
Wouldn’t that be a better outcome?
If you can’t put them in prison without burning buildings, you aren’t going to do it with burning buildings, either.
For crying out loud man, go drink some ginseng and think for a second.
If you read the article, there's more going on (if the article or 'news' is in any way accurate, which cannot be guaranteed) than just the burning of a building or two. Politicians are being beaten up, their houses burned, some people apparently burned alive in their home (wife of former PM), etc. And a lot more.
I tend to agree with Sunnywindows "Watch, England and learn"
Not the people, tho. Amateur has a point: be better than mob violence. But the British government and ruling class? Absolutely. Watch and learn, because tyrants who push a people too far will suffer pushback that often leads to violence.
When a people feel they have no other recourse, they will push to violence.
I think the argument rooks and amateur are having is essentially quibbling. Two perspectives with the same end goal in mind.
Whether England can avoid what <seems to be> happening in Nepal seems doubtful. But, it doesn't mean that this is the best or only alternative.
Well put, and I agree.
Obviously best to avoid violence. If England can be saved through civilized means, that is the best outcome by far and I support it 100%.
I only worry that, if it is beyond a civilized solution, Brits may no longer possess the wearwithall to save themselves without help. Even with open revolt it may be too late to be effective. Just depends on how the situation really is compared to what the news is saying.
One important clarification - I was not asserting that you are that, but intended emphasis on “being”, as in, “in the immediate present”, and for a specific reason that I don’t want to detail. It was not intended as an insult, but as “be aware of the things you’re writing”, and I want to be clear on that. Apologies if I was not clear then, or here. I do not want to be too explicit here, but it was absolutely not meant as an insult.
Thank you for the clarification, I appreciate it.
I think the issue here is the impression that, given the reality of what is happening in England, you are under the impression that if you wave the flag, go and protest, and call on the law to the face of your corrupt parlement they will all of a sudden realize their malfeasance and either self correct, or turn themselves in to the nearest police officer. Im not saying violence is always the answer by any means, but if this is what you truly believe, then I would have to say it is more than a little unrealistic.
The reality is, when bad people are in charge, they will almost never give it up without force of some type. When the evil is the government, how do you force them out?. What all these countries are dealing with is not one or two or three bad apples. You are dealing with dozens, if not hundreds of evil doers collaborating with each other, protecting each other. The citizenry won't be able to march in there and demand anything without the riot police being turned on them. The scope of this is too big.
In the US, for example, there are hundreds of democrats and Republicans who are in on this, and that is just the federal congress. They are drunk on power and wealth and have body guards, and are very good at twisting words and actions. Even an armed rebellion here would get bloody, very quickly turning deadly and and into a massacre. They do not give up without a fight.
Do you really believe you could root out the evil in government without collateral damage? That is the real issue. Forget the buildings. These evil leaders are murdering citizens with their actions.
Im sorry to say that the fact you seem more worried about the buildings than the people, raped and murdered by these villains is a bit alarming, and really not realistic.
If I had to fight to keep my daughters from being raped by the thugs they allow to roam the street without punishment, things would get escalated real fast. The least of things I would be worried about is collateral damage, like buildings.
I do pray for the UK. I can only think of one or two other times when it was in such dire peril as now. As is the entire world. I pray others gain the will to fight the tyrants. And overthrow the oppressors and demonic forces which seek to end all that is right and moral.
Not at all. Protests are useless, except to [them]. Polic(y) Office(r)s work for the Corpor-ate Statute-ists. Legislators have legalized unlawful actions. You seem to be unaware of some concepts in play. No blame, they’re difficult. As noted elsewhere, I don’t fully understand them myself yet.
Exactly. Re-read the drops, Law of War, and other guides.
They are unjustifiably violent. We are not. They are wild unthinking mobs. We are not. The real fight is at a higher level than brute physicality.
You are correct, and that would be a very bad idea. Think more like Tina Peters. She went to court charged by the criminals she was incriminating with the crime of doing her job by which she was oath bound. Her singlehandedly fighting the charges is exposing the total overturning of a Republican form of government in the state of Colorado, with the corruption having rooted at the highest levels.
One sickly, elderly woman is going to take down the whole machine of that state by lawfully stepping into their gears and jamming them. She forced them to overexpose themselves. Justice is coming.
100% different situation. Any sorts of wrongs like this can, and eventually will be righted.
Be aware that the government can break the Law, too. You seem to think that there’s no remediation of that, yet the Magna Carta exists, where the king himself was brought to heel after declaring himself above the law. Now why was the king himself hiding and running in the middle of nowhere? Go take a look at Runnymeade. There’s nothing there.
That’s not the argument, but I’m not sure how much more I want to write on this.
Optics matter. Acting righteously matters. Being the Party of Law and Order matters.
God wins. Have faith.
People misunderstand the American Revolution. It was a war of defense. Burning down parliament is neither war nor defensive.. just gives the cabal reasons for police states
I’m getting ratio downdooted for saying “let’s not be like the mostly peaceful protestors in Kenosha.” Hey remember when they also tried to burn down that courthouse in Portland or whatever? Two years ago everyone would have agreed. I remember we thought those “protestors” at the courthouse were… didn’t we call them “terrorists”?
There’s no good argument for it. It’s not being manly, it’s being an unlawful mob.
What’s different? Oh we’re in power now, “but ‘It’s ok when we do it’ is ok when we do it”, right? “ Equal justice under the law means the law is applied to everyone equally, doesn’t it?
“Nah, it’s all just about what feels good!”
sigh.
TO BE THE PARTY OF LAW AND ORDER, WE HAVE TO BE LAWFUL.
Need to find the ones pulling their leaders strings and mob THEIR houses, castles, lairs,etc.
I’m not gonna say that’s the right answer either, I don’t think it is, but it’s at least a much more rational suggestion.
This article may in fact be the only sort of tactical option left for Nepal. I don’t know a single thing about their situation. Britain definitely still has options, as do we.
I’m 100% positive that I’ve made some really stupid guesses here myself for which I probably deserved a few ratios, but after watching the Dummer of Love (nice accidental typo, not gonna fix it.), I’m not gonna back down that arson does not solve this problem. Nor does mob violence, which the founding fathers wrote about.
Everybody needs to throw their emotions out the door and be the autists they were born to be.
We are the Party of Law and Order.
— Donald J. Trump
AE, I've given you some updoots because you are doing good work by trying to convince folks to go after the criminals and not the buildings. Unfortunately when a mob begins doing violence it is very difficult to stop their actions. Common sense goes out the window and a lit match wins the day. You have taken an immense amount of your time to write out why the efforts in Nepal needs to be focused against the deep state. I applaud you for trying to educate folks on GAW. Thanks!
Thanks!
By the time things get to us, we better have better tactics thought up.
Less emotion, more thinking. I’ve mentioned a couple approaches that I suspect are good solutions, but fully admit that I don’t know how they’d work in Nepal. I’d like to think I can spot poor solutions though, and emotional gratification aside, it’s this.
I’ll happily wear this ratio as a badge of honor, but I do expect better out of us. It’s not like I haven’t surely posited plenty of poorly thought things here (and will continue to do so), of course.
IDK about your "Tactics" though. If Barry, Big Mike, Bill and HRC are walking down the street it would be very tempting to do the Nepal cleanse on them, don't you think? ;)
I didn’t really present specific tactics. My take on high level strategies (in England and the US at least. TBD in France, Germany, Finland, etc, and nevermind Nepal) is to wage lawfare back on them.
Is it less glamorous? Absofrigginlutely. Is it an infinitely better option than direct action and also what Trump himself is doing? Absofrigginlutely. When done successfully does it win? You bet it does!
Still too dumb in the area to suggest even a single tactic other than reading the two names I threw out (and some others) and figuring out what we can do along those lines. A few smart frogs here know some tricks but I am not one (yet).
Do I still dream of perp walks? Sure. We can all dream, but what’s important is accomplishing the mission.
Really, even prayer and true repentance alone might be good enough. Father did promise if we turned from our wicked ways he would hear and heal our land…
All lynch mobs are a triumph of temptation over righteousness.
This is the same as tearing down Conference statues in the US. This isn't protest it's vandalism.
I’m pretty surprised more people didn’t pick up on that.
There are also cultural factors at play here. Nepal <appears to have> a very polarized society, with median income something like $1400 a year, while the elite politicians live in luxury. A less developed society, only now trying to emerge from poverty.
Britain is the home of the magna carta. The 1689 Bill of Rights, etc.
Descending into mob violence doesn't seem to be the only way. Take a note from Tommy Robinson. Has he ever advocated mob violence? Not that I know of.
The whole Q operation was to spearhead a mass movement of minds. To rack open the group think. Expose the reality. Create a spearhead force that could eventually shift the entire mainstream narrative.
Which it has. So many of our themes from 2018 are now mainstream thought in the USA.
People should learn the lessons of the two revolutions. American and French. One was lead by well-educated men leading people to stand up for their rights. "Don't treat on us." The other was lead by mobs, mobilized and exploited by instigators, to destroy the rulers. "J'Accuse! You are anti-revolutionary! Guillotine!"
I think we can make the case that frogs saying England should emulate what the Nepalese people are doing are actually advocating more in the vein of the French Revolution rather than the American one.
u/winn u/rooks
A true faggots answer…. shit can be rebuilt, your future will not.
You can't rebuild your past either. Once it's gone, it's gone with everything good and bad that went into it.
FAFO. 🔥💪⚔️
Yea lol, they're not protesting the social media ban, that's what they want everyone to think.
Remember China, 2019 right before convid? What were they protesting? Right....
I'm doing MY part to protest. I refuse to climb Mount Everest this year.
In fact, I won't even consider climbing Mount Everest until the government in Nepal straightens up. :>)
Just doing my part for humanity.
Ok, now do California...
https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0CA2cng/nepali-citizens-burn--parliament/c/
Nepal today, Britain tomorrow? Come on, Brits, grow a pair and let's see some institutional hangings beginning in the morning.
The upper level pawns in this country should be running to Trump's feet to beg for protection in 3...2...1...
They did the same in Indonesia, burnt down the corrupt government's houses.. they're all dirt poor and the govt officials have ferraris and millons of dollars and gold bars.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-02/indonesian-mps-houses-looted-amid-jakarta-protests-over-perks/105722932
Why is this happening all over the world at the same time? Weird..
Were the people starving and suffering so much they don't have anything else to lose? Why do they want to hurt the rich millionaires and corrupt government.. i don't get it
These corrupt commie parasitic politicians have been stealing, lying, killing/murdering, raping We the People for so long they think they are safe & untouchable. There are many Nepalesque around the world that are ready to pop off. Instant justice via hanging, dragging, chippering, left sandal flogging,... 🔥🔥🔥🦖 lets see what country all these parasites run to... then we 🤜🤡
This is the way.
“Actions speak louder than words”
Louder incoherence improves nothing.
Read what is actually behind it, rampant corruption and instead of dealing with it, they have sought to oppress comment on it and sounds like the MSM played its part.,
End result people have had enough. History tells you this is how it ends when the elite refuse to deal with the problems. Welcome to reality.
Ah, but how does it end?
Compare: The American Revolution vs. The French Revolution.
The end of one thing is always the start of another. Sometimes, you end up just substituting one corrupt regime for another.
If anyone could condense the issues at stake in Nepal, that would be a big help. Especially why the people now would resort to violent reprisal and overthrow. Today is news. Tomorrow begins the answer for today.
Incidentally, there was one building in a video that seemed to be surrounded by a circular perimeter of what might have been flagpoles, but they seemed too close together to be that and they were not flying flags. The only other structure like that I have seen would be the supports for a very low frequency radio antenna. but that is also questionable. Could they have been the support posts for a chain link fence 20 feet high? I am at a loss to understand it. If that was indeed a high fence, then there must have been immense problems in Nepal.
Kind of a "final straw" scenario? Spontaneous insurrection. It does not look like there is any organized opposition, so it may not be a coup. At least not a successful coup. With the officials of the government having been functionally "decapitated", Nepal may be without any government except the military. i guess we might expect a military regime to restore order. Or India. Or China. This might portend a larger conflict in the offing.
Just thinking out loud.
These mob tyrants are the ones who are paid by the evildoers on the top of the pyramid, they are the ones who are destroying the world and human beings.
What I find funny about this is that I have indeed long thought that what it would take to wake up and rouse normies into action these days is the removal of internet, chiefly social meeja, streaming and gaming. Remember what Harari said, that they could keep the 'useless eaters' happy with drugs and computer games? Well right now as we speak, a shitstorm is brewing in the UK over the Online Safety Act leading gaming platforms to increasingly shut users out and demanding ID verification by credit card, which the majority of gamers for one reason or another simply don't have, for fear of repercussions from the totally Fabian-run OFCOM. AND it turns out that Visa, as a mere supposed payment processor recently advertised for a 'Director of Global Gaming Strategy' with all the usual WEF and UN guff about changing world, partnerships etc etc, with the heavy implication of shaping and controlling the availability of gaming content. Now THAT has made normies sit up and take notice of the global agenda. So as Harari's 'stakeholders' are, by implementing his goals now blocking his promise of placating the masses with even computer games, it would be amazingly ironic if this was the thing that sees him and his ilk hoist by their own petards in an uprising. In Minecraft of course.
And the Straw Hat Jolly Roger flies!