👉🏻 https://x.com/warclandestine/status/2013681216294154466
👉🏻 https://nitter.net/warclandestine/status/2013681216294154466
When people get mad about the lack of high-profile arrests, they direct their displeasure at Bondi/Patel.
But given the magnitude and scope of the criminality, I don’t know if the DOJ is even the right avenue to prosecute this mess.
It might have to be handled by the Military.
The Dems are engaged in a decades-long treasonous conspiracy, in which they wittingly did not enforce our immigration laws, as part of a broader scheme to steal elections, all while they stole billions of our tax dollars, and tried to replace us with low-IQ immigrants they could control better. In addition to the whole treasonous Russigate hoax, Covid hoax, January 6th hoax, etc., in which they, along with their cohorts in the media, wittingly brainwashed the planet to accept their lies. Not to mention the release of a man-made biological weapon, giving Iran the capability to build nuclear weapons, enabling cartels to engage in human/drug trafficking, and the mountain of other heinous crimes they committed.
At what point does this global crime syndicate become so vast and so entrenched, that the Military has to step in?
My point is, for everyone complaining about Bondi/Patel, I don’t think your displeasure is even directed at the right people. This situation is so severe, I don’t think the DOJ can feasibly take it on. I think they can gather all the evidence and build a case, but the prosecution might have to be handled via military tribunals, given the magnitude of the crimes at hand.
I know people will say that military tribunals are normally reserved for times of war, but this is a war. This is irregular warfare from a domestic enemy. The US is under attack from within by hostile foreign combatants, seeking to destroy this nation and her People. We are at war whether you believe it or not.
This situation must be handled by the Military. It would be a threat to NATSEC to do it any other way. It must be done.
The way I understand it is we declared war back in 2001 (the war on terror) and it was never ended.
5GW. The democrats have engaged in terrorism from the days of the kkk. The church burnings during blm are SOP.
How many satanist temples have been torched?
We’re not like them.
Yep, and that's why we lose so badly and in so many ways.
How are we losing?
None of our enemy has spent time in prison for anything they've done; election fraud, assassinations & attempts; nothing.
DOOMER BS!!!
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5693466-doj-seeks-life-sentence-routh/
https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/2014408947692716332
https://x.com/agpambondi/status/2014349963132543319
https://x.com/agpambondi/status/2014344323706302566
I do believe you are technically correct....
Perhaps there have been a lack of arrests by design, maybe President Trump is orchestrating an overall plan we do not see. Time will tell but if Trump was so disgusted with Bondi, he would replace her like he did with Sessions.
We don't fucking care who does it, just fucking do it for fuck's sake! Do something!!!
If arrests dont happen during Trumps presidency, are we to expect they come under Barron in 2040?
Asking to set expectations and to ensure this domain and mods stick around for the empire strikes back part of the movie.
soooo, what's the hold-up? Asking for a friend.
This is the issue, in the time of TikTok and social media addiction 8+ years is absurd. Even normies catching on 4 years ago are going mad not "seeing" anything. And this show IS for them. And I get it, they need pieces in place for the storm so there's not widespread chaos. I still think the hammer drops BEFORE August 2026.
Trump said we would be having a huge celebration all summer long if I am not mistaken. So if that is true it should be before the 4th of July
100% with you on this.
Well maybe military can get involved with some very tangible low hanging fruit. Example looking at 2020 military voting irregularities. As I recall there were many irregularities there.
YMCA
Military-->GITMO--->GNN Internet/Televised
*GNN = GITMO News Network - Totally bypass MSM
NOTE: 4 posts up in New is the exact same post by someone else who posted AFTER this one.
RE: https://greatawakening.win/p/1ARwe1kIsx/when-people-get-mad-about-the-la/c/
Also on Truth: https://truthsocial.com/@Clandestine/115928861132872797
It has been a long road and, from time to time, we get impatient. But, we were clearly told in post 619 that these people will not stand trial in a civilian court.
What the DS wants is for MAGA to insist the DOJ charge and try these people. Then, like Sussman and Danchenko, the corrupt court system lets them walk. If the judge doesn’t corrupt the proceedings, a lefty jury will happily nullify the charges. If this happens the chance of trying these traitors in a military tribunal go out the window.
We’re watching the case being built that will help convince normies that handling these cases in a military tribunal is necessary. Anons need to be red pilling normies on why these crimes need to be tried by the military. It’s helpful to go back to the drops about enemy combatants.
u/#q619
The Magnitude = The Military is the only way.
It will not be easy even with the military; there are a host of people to be apprehended, some of which are known, others not so much. They lose all; some will fight, some flee, some panic. This is where the people come in. . .those with understanding must share and educate those without or be prepared to defend themselves, family and friends. Enjoy the popcorn now; won't have time for it soon.
Many have already been taken care of. The Trump Team would not leave any power players in place to mess with the second term. A lot to do and a short time to get there. Almost any power player arrests and trials will be backfilling for what has already happened. To make it easier for the public, the villains will be put into bundles. Crossfire, etc. It makes it much harder for the left to defend individuals. Part of something really bad.
That’s what I’m thinking. The Charlie Kirk incident will also be a matter of National Security that needs to be handled by the military.
This makes absolute sense.
Trump has stated MULTIPLE TIMES, including recently: He is a WARTIME President.
Every major DS player is a flight risk. Keeping them in the dark makes it easier for the military to arrest them.
Well, if that's their plan, then you just ruined everything! Now the DS knows that the WHs are planning a surprise arrest and they'll all be leaving the country tomorrow!
All sarcasm aside, this type of reasoning makes zero sense to me.
All of the cloak and dagger misdirection, comms, optics, etc... that people are saying is being done in order to trick the DS makes zero sense if all of that can be cracked by random people online and then those same random people discuss all of it in detail...online.
It's like people think the DS don't have the internet and are operating completely in the dark.
I'm posting this approaching it from the aspect of how it would be handled legally speaking. I'm not arguing that there aren't people who have committed serious atrocities against our government. I'm not arguing that there isn't an actual plan in place. What I am arguing against is the idea that under the US Constitution, civilians can be tried under military tribunals. Especially when there is not an actual, declared war in the legal sense involved. I feel like people are trying to shoehorn cultural ideas (War on Drugs, War on Terror, etc..) into a legal definition. War is not based on vibes. There are actual, real laws that are involved when declaring war. They're not optional. Q said that things had to be done legally, and for things to be done legally, they have to follow the laws concerning them. It's 100% that simple. It's not something that can be based on emotions or opinions. It has to be based on actual, US law.
Calling something a “war” doesn’t make it a legal war. In U.S. law there’s no category like an “informal domestic war” that triggers military jurisdiction over civilians. Military tribunals require a legally recognized state of war and even then are almost always limited to uniformed personnel or lawful enemy combatants. Civilians (no matter how hostile or criminal) are prosecuted in Article III courts. That’s not a preference, it’s constitutional jurisdiction.
If there are actual statutes on the books that grant the military tribunal authority over U.S. civilians in this scenario, post them. Not opinions, not interpretations, just the specific laws.
I would absolutely love to believe that we could just round up all these horrible people and toss them to the military and say "Have at it!". But under the US Constitution and the laws that we live under, it is just not possible.
But I'll readily admit that I'm not a constitutional lawyer and I don't know everything and there's a real possibility that I'm missing something, so I would sincerely appreciate it if anyone could give me actual, real life laws on the books that would allow for this to happen.
Not vague stuff like "Nuremberg 2.0!" or endless renditions of "But what if x and y, and we add blue, and subtract Oreos?! Then it could happen!" type stuff. Those are usually how these conversations progress and I just am too tired to deal with all of that today.
So, if there are any actual real laws that would allow the US government to legally hold military tribunals for non-military citizens, please please, just give me the specific law.
I, like everyone else here, would love to see Tim Walz and Keith Elliscum perp walked from their mansions in front of TV cameras and fitted with orange jumpsuits.
But people fail to grasp the implications here. Look at how many bad actors we're seeing just in Minnesota. Add in Illinois, California, Oregon, New York, and so on. Even in solid red states. Does the DOJ really have the prison space and capacity to prosecute that many people at once? Probably not. Trials would drag on for years. Keith Elliscum would probably die of old age before he ever saw the inside of a prison cell.
The first high profile arrests, we'd see mass riots in large leftist areas. Many bad actors would jump on a redeye to some third world country with a suitcase full of cash. Or to friendly countries that would offer them asylum. Much harder to bring them to justice. And then there would be the media screeching endlessly trying to stoke more riots. Terrorist sleeper cells could be activated. Radical leftist groups would have to be neutralized first. A lot of moving parts and pieces to deal with. That's why we haven't seen any high profile arrests yet.
Fun fact: Gitmo is in the process of vastly expanding their facilities to house up to 40,000 detainees. That's bigger than CECOT. Didn't someone already say "the military is the only way"? Another fun fact: Gitmo used to be a YMCA. "It's fun to stay at the YMCA!".