It's suspicious enough that a grieving widow would remove a photo of her murdered husband, basically just advertising that she'd already moved on from him
Absolutely unnecessary, unhelpful, and clearly done out of spite because I brought some common sense to the table, and that one person did NOT like me having a counter-argument to their thread (and I didn't even notice it was a mod who made the thread, I was just being reasonable)
The first one was simply because I didn't laugh at their "meme" and took a ban for not laughing...
Being told to "touch grass" and being banned for days for something that wasn't even ban worthy, is REALLY aggravating, inappropriate, and NOT helpful to our cause. It was SO infuriating I contemplated giving up on this place. its only one person who was banning me, and banning me for not laughing at their (bad) joke. The rest are fine. But one person seems to have it out for me :( I won't name them here, so as to not lose my account here, I've been around since VOAT.
What is with her eye mannerism? Certain times, when she’s really selling something, it’s like she looks down, looks up, then hyper-widens them. It reminds me of a camera aperture widening, best I can describe. It really stood out to me watching the time stamped clip below. Specifically 53:32 forward, when she keeps saying “what I do know…”
More BS from Candace Owens. The picture is still on the shelf, in a lower position so that Charlie's children can reach it.
The explanation for the "missing" wedding photo of Erika Kirk and Charlie Kirk comes from a Turning Point USA (TPUSA) spokesperson, as reported by Newsweek (and referenced in other outlets covering the viral controversy).The spokesperson stated:
“Erika moved it to a lower shelf when her daughter asked to see it so she could hold and look at the photo. It's still on the studio shelf, just lower down where her daughter can look at it whenever she's in there with her mom.”
Think critically people. Charlie did his podcast out of his home. That room is down the hall from their bedroom. They move things. They replace things. Even if she had moved the picture into another room, why would it mean anything at all?
Some here have not yet learned how to separate signal from noise. They will have a very hard time in the coming months. Worse still, they will likely drag down this movement and their peers by parroting DS propaganda like this.
Ok? Same point as above. Even if that is true there is no solid conclusion to be drawn. Not all widows keep wearing the ring on their finger. You might not like it but that does not make them bad people.
Trump continues to support TPUSA. He promoted their halftime show. He invites Erika to events. It is illogical to ignore those facts and focus on minutia such as the position of rings or photos.
I pointed out Erica Kirk isn't wearing her ring anymore. From that one sentence assertion you assumed my position and asserted I was ignoring things.... From a simple 100% true assertion that had nothing to do with anything else you or anyone else said.
It was a completely illogical response to the simple addition of a clear fact.
You perceived it as an attack and you got defensive with a disproportional response.
Then you attempt to gaslight me and say that I was being defensive? 😂 You're projecting.
Before you start throwing terms like "logic" around incorrectly, go down to your local community college and take a class on it. Because your reply is displaying fallacious reasoning, intellectual dishonesty through misrepresentation, and logical fallacies.
The only question at this point is if you're the type of reddit style mod that will ban me because I'm disagreeing with you.
There is a bit of advice I fell compelled to pass on. It comes from someone very adept at psychological warfare. IMHO it should be every anon's mantra:
Protect your mind - control your emotions
If we do that, and focus on our support for President Trump rather than argue about side issues, then we will be doing our part.
Yeah that's great advice. Let me give you a piece of advice from world famous theologian and one of the greatest debaters of all time, Dr James White....
"Never misrepresent people or their positions during a debate or discussion."
Being said where have I displayed any emotions? Did I say I was mad? No. Did I say I was sad? No. Did I say I was angry? No. Did I say I was in love? No.
Trying to dismiss my assertions and counterpoints as emotions is an intellectually dishonest misrepresentation. Discuss and debate based on what is said, not what you would like to perceive in order to strengthen your position.
I have enough things to be mad about already - is there is any proof at all that this is a scroll from the talmud?
I saw that the picture got removed but it was just a blank spot on the shelf. I think this is photoshopped
Likely, since scrolls don't usually stand well on the rolled part
It's suspicious enough that a grieving widow would remove a photo of her murdered husband, basically just advertising that she'd already moved on from him
Maybe she just moved it somewhere else where she can see it more often.
Yeah, she should be wearing a black dress with a black hood crying and sobbing for the rest of her life! Geeeezzzzzz!
She's not even wearing her ring anymore
Correct, this is likely an altered photo.
It's in the clip Candace played of Erika.
https://rumble.com/v75ml30-viral-who-removed-charlies-wedding-photo-and-why-candace-ep-306.html?start=1547
It is not. I watched the video it came from yesterday, I'll try to find the link.
Thanks for the verify! Good eye
I was hoping it was fake, Charlie deserved so much better
Upvotes to counter all unnecessary downvotes.
Why are we stickying photoshops? We really need to beef up the quality of actual 'research' around here, anons.
Some mods here seem to be bad actors.
Banning people who don't laugh at their "memes" (really bad jokes)
Banning longtime GAW'ers who dare question some iffy info
We have an issue with some of them. But we should NOT BE pushing this fake bullshit
All mods are acting on good faith, I assure you.
Check my recent bans.
Absolutely unnecessary, unhelpful, and clearly done out of spite because I brought some common sense to the table, and that one person did NOT like me having a counter-argument to their thread (and I didn't even notice it was a mod who made the thread, I was just being reasonable)
The first one was simply because I didn't laugh at their "meme" and took a ban for not laughing...
Being told to "touch grass" and being banned for days for something that wasn't even ban worthy, is REALLY aggravating, inappropriate, and NOT helpful to our cause. It was SO infuriating I contemplated giving up on this place. its only one person who was banning me, and banning me for not laughing at their (bad) joke. The rest are fine. But one person seems to have it out for me :( I won't name them here, so as to not lose my account here, I've been around since VOAT.
Why would anyone watch this woman.
shes a terrible actor, keeps wiping fake tears away from her dry eyes. her kids probably don’t exist.
No I missed it .. I'm so disappointed...
Normie: Well Jesus was a Jew, what's the problem?
Lights fuse and runs ...
Jesus was a Jew, not a Khazarian.
Judean Hebrew
VIRAL: Who Removed Charlie's Wedding Photo, And Why? | Candace Ep 306
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWTdXHGQ8R4&t=2662s
Candace gives another alternative that she thinks is more likely.
At least post the right timestamp https://youtu.be/hWTdXHGQ8R4?t=1373
Entire show is worth watching.
This was obviously done deliberately to draw attention
By whom?
What is with her eye mannerism? Certain times, when she’s really selling something, it’s like she looks down, looks up, then hyper-widens them. It reminds me of a camera aperture widening, best I can describe. It really stood out to me watching the time stamped clip below. Specifically 53:32 forward, when she keeps saying “what I do know…”
https://youtu.be/hWTdXHGQ8R4?t=1373
Why would she do that?
So, TPUSA has been completely compromised by foreign agents?
From the start it was all about "Evangelical" Christian Zionists. Attracting, converting, engaging, $upporting, mobilizing.
Probably what Rothschild and Untermeyer envisioned when they published the "SCOFIELD BIBLE".
Perhaps like MUSLIMS (Ilhan Omar married Brother in CHRISTIAN CEREMONY) is not recognized by Muslims as legit.
Perhaps Jews married by Christian Ceremony are null also to Jews.
Playing a game we were unaware of....perhaps.
Also Duck...football. One appears to not have Ducked
More BS from Candace Owens. The picture is still on the shelf, in a lower position so that Charlie's children can reach it.
Think critically people. Charlie did his podcast out of his home. That room is down the hall from their bedroom. They move things. They replace things. Even if she had moved the picture into another room, why would it mean anything at all?
Some here have not yet learned how to separate signal from noise. They will have a very hard time in the coming months. Worse still, they will likely drag down this movement and their peers by parroting DS propaganda like this.
She's also not wearing her ring anymore
Ok? Same point as above. Even if that is true there is no solid conclusion to be drawn. Not all widows keep wearing the ring on their finger. You might not like it but that does not make them bad people.
Trump continues to support TPUSA. He promoted their halftime show. He invites Erika to events. It is illogical to ignore those facts and focus on minutia such as the position of rings or photos.
Why are you trying so hard to tell me what I'm ignoring or what my position is or why I'm bringing this to people's attention?
It's a data point. It's what anons do.
Why so defensive?
“The lady doth protest too much, methinks” - Shakespeare
You're a mod. Do better.
You are the only one being defensive, I guess because you don't like me pointing out how flawed your logic is.
This board will always insist on truth over illogical emotion-driven thinking.
You're intellectually dishonest.
I pointed out Erica Kirk isn't wearing her ring anymore. From that one sentence assertion you assumed my position and asserted I was ignoring things.... From a simple 100% true assertion that had nothing to do with anything else you or anyone else said.
It was a completely illogical response to the simple addition of a clear fact.
You perceived it as an attack and you got defensive with a disproportional response.
Then you attempt to gaslight me and say that I was being defensive? 😂 You're projecting.
Before you start throwing terms like "logic" around incorrectly, go down to your local community college and take a class on it. Because your reply is displaying fallacious reasoning, intellectual dishonesty through misrepresentation, and logical fallacies.
The only question at this point is if you're the type of reddit style mod that will ban me because I'm disagreeing with you.
I guess we'll see.
There is a bit of advice I fell compelled to pass on. It comes from someone very adept at psychological warfare. IMHO it should be every anon's mantra:
Protect your mind - control your emotions
If we do that, and focus on our support for President Trump rather than argue about side issues, then we will be doing our part.
Yeah that's great advice. Let me give you a piece of advice from world famous theologian and one of the greatest debaters of all time, Dr James White....
"Never misrepresent people or their positions during a debate or discussion."
Being said where have I displayed any emotions? Did I say I was mad? No. Did I say I was sad? No. Did I say I was angry? No. Did I say I was in love? No.
Trying to dismiss my assertions and counterpoints as emotions is an intellectually dishonest misrepresentation. Discuss and debate based on what is said, not what you would like to perceive in order to strengthen your position.
Or to put it another way..... Thou shalt not lie.
CANDACE HAD A DREAM!