No Nation in the World has existed in isolation since the beginning of the 20th Century. Like it or not, we live in an era of mankind when no nation can exist in isolation.
Why is this important? Because the direction of the world inevitably affects what happens in America. If China is gaining a toe-hold in Canada, or Greenland, do you think this doesn't affect the USA?
When Trump stated: "The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens" you either agree with him or you don't.
If you do, then you need to understand, there are three major players in the world, and our world is more rapidly developing than at any time in human history. Artificial intelligence will play an absolutely key role to the future well-being not only of America, but of every person on the planet. Whoever wins the AI race, and whatever principles they uphold, will impact the future of the whole planet. America included.
America, Russia, China.
Not recognizing this point is extremely short-sighted.
What about Iran? Iran is the FINAL linchpin maintaining conflict and violence in the Middle East. Iran has sponsored terrorism and chaos in all their neighboring countries, helping to create the immigration crisis that Europe has undergone. But if there is peace in the Middle East, if the Iranian people are allowed to create a prosperous nation dedicated to the well-being of all its people, who benefits?
Everyone.
Everyone except the Globalist maniacs who want to subvert all nations to their will.
Everyone except those people who benefit from war and suffering.
This is why Trump has been moving to secure not just the American homeland - capturing and removal of illegal criminal immigrants - but securing South America - Venezuela, and their energy reserves, etc.
This is why Trump has been making peace deals around the world, bringing together nations that have been enemies for decades, or longer.
Why? Because a world at peace, a world where the different regions are no longer exploited by global corporations or agents of chaos, a world where every nation can finally look at the real American model and aspire to achieve some similar success, that world ensures the safety of America and the future of America.
And if you are worried about Israel, well, a liberated Iran would not empower Israel to pursue war, but rather make the Israeli war-machine redundant. If the Israel Machine is indeed evil, this action against the terrorist Iranian regime doesn't help them. It makes them weaker.
What matters is not the headline, the image, the action, but the WHY. And Trump's why is very, very clear.
Peace for America and the World means peace through strength.
The first duty of the American Government is to protect American Citizens
And that is exactly why Trump is doing what he's doing.
Anyone who cannot see this is ignoring everything that Trump has done. His track record speaks for itself.
Spot on.
Clear analysis sans the static...
IYKYK
u/#catdance
I'm waiting for them to do Netanyahu next.
What I'm predicting, at the moment, is a normalization of prosperity and peace coming to Gaza and the Middle East. Israel under Netanyahu will be virtually forced to enter into peaceful relations and treaties with the nations around it, or else expose themselves as the warmongers and manipulators they are.
As things stabalize, Netanyahu's position will become much weaker, and we might see the non-Zionist factions in Israel gain traction and take over.
Bibi will have no where to go, and corruption charges will eventually catch up to him.
Trumps hands will be extremely clean.
Well said
Those long range missiles and iran's mullahs are crazy enough to use them . The beast is cornered and more than willing to reign over the ashes. Trump understands and this action is America first.
Good analysis. Thank you.
Yes they can, they just haven’t. The argument you should be making is that previous administrations left messes around the world and now President Trump has to clean it up.
There are various angles at which we could look at the situation, and the post is by no means comprehensive.
This is certainly true, but I wrote the post primarily thinking of how to argue the point with normie Maga-type folks and people who are not yet read in on how corrupt and evil Bush Snr ~ Obama were.
The point is to highlight the nature of the playing field Trump MUST deal with. America First normies could easily argue "oh, well, Sure, earlier administrations left a lot of mess but that's not our problem. How does cleaning them up serve America's interests?"
Well, that's a bit of a theoretical argument like, "socialism can work; it just hasn't until now".
I would emphasize that (imo) there is a big difference between being self-sufficient and being able to exist in isolation.
The Cabal globalist agenda has been to strip the Western nations of their ability to be self-sustaining, making them reliant on other countries (like CCP China) for supply chains and so forth (Eg Europe - energy, Russia). Why? Because this makes those nations vulnerable and weak.
But no country today can realistically exist in isolation, unless its a tiny little country hidden away in the deep Amazon or in shangri-la up in the himalayas.
Even if America were to become quite self-sufficient - which I believe is one of Trump's core objectives - the USA cannot escape the impacts and effects coming from its environment. What if, for example, Canada became a Chinese vassal state? Of if all of South America collapsed and more and more people attempted to immigrate into the USA?
Having a diseased, malfunctioning, failing set of nations around is going to have an impact. Even if the USA was to build a huge wall, could the USA exist as the Kingdom of Heaven when the rest of the world is in hell?
What if nuclear plants in Mexico imploded? The best bet for a truly independent nation that could potentially exist in isolation is Russia, but its simply not practical.
In history, technology, geography, limited ability to travel or communicate restricted how isolated a country or people's could be. Not so any more.
Self-sufficiency is the first step, but then, mutual cooperation and mutual prosperity based on shared principles is the way forward. For everyone.
It's a very small planet now. We either move forward together, or we all go down the sinkhole.
America truly great is the model. But it is like one organ in a body with all sorts of organs and systems. 'Isolation' is an illusion. imo.
The plan is to make Americans great again, who will pursue greatness for generations, and lead the world into greatness. Trust the plan. One nation under God. It's biblical. God wins. NCSWIC. WWG1WGA. Amen.
Q3717 & 3716: "They will fight but you are ready."
The old guard was never going to be vanquished completely without a STORM (war).
This was inevitable and 100% America first.
STORM = 350 = IPETGOATII
"Follow the white rabbit."
https://files.catbox.moe/t18ruz.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/5smw0b.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/8qe2rz.jpeg
"Sometimes you can't tell the people the truth, you must show them."
Well there you have it frens.
After reading this I feel like I just took a nice warm shower.
You forgot one thing.
Among the Americans Iran threatened was President Trump himself. Based on the duty to protect American Citizens, former President Clinton could have had the clear go-ahead to take out Saddam Hussein due to him threatening Former President Bush 41 in 1993.
But instead Bush had to duck a shoe and not a bullet like GEOTUS
It was Bush 43 that got hit by a shoe. It makes you wonder what would have happened if it was a bullet instead of a shoe. It is the exact same thing as that incident where Bill Gates got hit in the face with a pie. What if that attacker blew out Billy's brains with a bullet instead?
What if Dale Earnhardt didn't die at the end of the 2001 Daytona 500?
What if JFK wasn't killed on November 22, 1963?
What if MLK Jr. wasn't killed in April of 1968?
What if Ronald Reagan died on March 30, 1981?
We will never know the exact answer to those questions and more.
At this point, are we sure he didn’t?
We know Reagan was alive because he told Nancy he should have ducked.
We know that someone said that Reagan (“he”) told Nancy he should have ducked.
We also know that Reagan had some dementia signs later on that eerily mimicked Biden’s.
We know he was already 70 at the time of the shooting and was stated to have taken serious injuries from it.
We know Hinckley was brought up on 13 counts.
I wouldn’t say that I know Reagan died, or even that it seems likely, but it does seem possible given some of the weirdness of the last 6+ years.
Short-sighted.
You need to realize how interconnected everything is.
Venezuela was (apparently) a very core source of oil for China. Now? Cut off.
Iran was China's most valuable ally in the Middle east, also supplying (probably) on the black market, oil to China. Now? Cut off.
Recommended: Consider the perspectives delivered here:
https://rumble.com/v76fnh4-us-strikes-iran-whats-really-going-on-redpill-project-and-alphawarrior-show.html
US Strikes Iran - What's Really Going On?
Quite a detailed analysis of how everything Trump has been doing the last few months counteracts and limits CCP China's ability to outstrip and compete with the USA going forward in key areas: energy, AI, Tech.
If you take a look, I'm sure it will provide some interesting avenues for a broadened perspective.
Trump needs your support. Your move.
Sooner rather than later, we will have to enter Mexico in order to get rid of the cartels. Trump knows this and that is why he needs to get Iran first. China, through Iran, is helping the cartels thrive.
Um, last two weeks?
I am aware of that. The truth is that the cartels are Mexico's 5th largest employer and their President will be dead sooner or later for the crime of working with President Trump. It is either that, or we eliminate the cartels soon.
Proper response to a liberal: You are too stupid to understand.
I have been trying to get thrue to my Trump hating brother in law, who is a retired warrent officer who was a aircraft pilot and helicopter pilot. He is very smart but can't get over his cognitive dissonance. A battle I have to have without ruining a family relationship. I told him to watch the inauguration speach on 1/20/2017 and see military intelligence & JAG come stand behind Trump when he says he is giving power back to we the people. Then exiting after just that one line. He still can't get it in his head. Maybe at least I have planted the seed ?
I give you credit for trying to salvage family relationships, but I am WELL past that point...numerous liberal retard family members (both blood and by marriage) have judged, ridiculed and persecuted myself and my family for our choices in supporting Trump over most of the last decade. I am DONE building bridges...they would, and they have, blocked us out of their lives...due to POLITICAL DIFFERENCES. Think about how ridiculous that is. At the end of the day, I/we have been vindicated by numerous decisions and courses of actions by POTUS. And at the end of the day, I have to protect the well-being, mentally and physically and socially, of my wife and children. It may sound cold...but I no longer care about the retarded reactions of my liberal family members. I hope they suffer from severe and impairing cognitive dissonance at this point...because they have wished worse on me and mine.
Yeah, same here. Blocked by my sister but still talking to her husband. Blocked by my little brother too. I gotta try. Just have to convince them we have a common enemy.
Trump has much bigger visions than presidents in the past. One of those is peace and prosperity in the Middle East. To get there, a few skirmishes are required.
For the US, Trump not only wants peace and prosperity for us, he also wants to solve problems (or at least make things a lot better). People will really call it the golden age, especially the middle class.
What you are seeing play out is a huge fight for power. Demographics and bad policies threaten to put the democrats out of power for decades. The democrats Hail Mary was to flood the country with illegals for the next census and later votes. They have maxed out the media advantage and voter fraud techniques, leaving them just enough to hold on till the census and redistricting. If they lose the illegals, they will be lost in the wilderness for decades.
Their other big problem is that they have been scamming a lot of money from the government to keep their party alive, plus enrich their friends and themselves. Trump is cutting that money off piece by piece.
When Trump wins, you win.
Does anyone have the YouTube link that only shows that one line with the military behind Trump? I know he won't watch the whole speach. Thanks in advance.
Here you go, anon. A one minute video ---
https://youtu.be/FhYPJidoqzg
Thank you so much. I will share it with him. You can lead a horse to water. Let's see if he drinks it.
Socratic method.... Has that ever happened before in history? Do you suppose it was just a whim by the military? (As a veteran I bet he'll be pondering over military doing anything like that without a reason as highly unlikely).
Good luck. I've got brainwashed individuals in my circle clinging onto their matrix fervently. At this point I just pray God will guide them out of their 🤡🌎 and back to reality because I surely haven't been able to.
Yeah, I guess we were trained by the best for what 5 years ? I thank GOD for Q ! I would not go back to be a normy for anything. If I ever really was a normy.
hasbara will always seem to make sense
It's not America First though. It was explicitly campaigned against and it's what I voted explicitly for. The videos of Trump being against Middle East regime change wars is on video all over social media, it's undeniable. JD too.
I can accept that its not what Trump campaigned on, but don't you think that the priority here in Trump's mind is for America? America first?
Do you regret voting for Trump now, because he's reached the conclusion that doing this is critical and necessary for America's future? (Or do you think that he decided, nah, in this case, we'll do what's important for America second or third?)
Note also, he said in his address at the start: this is not for now; this is for the future, for our children and our children's children (or words to that effect)
If you do not see that this is 100% America First, then I do not know what to say, except that I'm glad Trump is President.
The issue is that President Trump has consistently framed "America First" as staying out of military operations in other countries. That was one of the things he campaigned on, staying out of wars and military operations in other countries and stopping wars around the world. He was very clear on what "America First" means
You can't have it both ways. "America First" can't mean both "staying out of military operations in other countries" and "getting involved in military operations in other countries" as it suits you.
Do I think President Trump is wrong for wanting to keep America out of pointless wars around the world? No.
Do I think President Trump is wrong for helping orchestrate removing Kehmani? No.
Because I understand that "America First" is a campaign slogan used to describe the ideal situation President Trump wanted to happen and that real life doesn't always match up to our ideals and that we must sometimes make difficult decisions.
But trying to wave away the fact that President Trump and the Republicans have leaned heavily on the "America First" slogan, and repeatedly framed it as avoiding wars/military operations in foreign countries and stopping wars around the world is not going to work.
It just makes us look like we're hypocrites or that we are cult like and will just twist definitions of words and slogans around to fit whatever President Trump is currently doing.
Are liberals and similar trolls going to use President Trump's "America First" slogan against him when he is involved in military operations in other countries? Of course they are. Because it's an easy thing to attack.
But the best response is not trying to gaslight people about what "America First" means, or try to redefine it to suit whatever is going on at the moment. Especially in this day and age when even 7 year Olds can find every quote and recording of President Trump talking about how his "America First" stance would be to end wars and keep us out of new ones. In pretty much every single rally he has held and countless interviews and various quotes.
Thanks Bakas. Updoogle
Overseas Patriot here (neither a US resident or citizen). As such, I don't keep as close a watch on DJT, the US political campaigns, etc. Also, its not flooded into my environment as I expect it would be in the US (i.e. normal conversation).
Anyway, so I'm not as exposed to the information you're giving, re: that Trump's America First campaigning had a strong ""staying out of military operations in other countries" aspect to it.
So, I can neither confirm nor deny what you're saying here. But, a few thoughts.
Firstly, I found your comment makes good sense and it comes across as thoughtful and considered. If you are right, then the argument you make stands.
Secondly, over the course of the past 12 months, I've come across thinking that suggests a strong effort for certain quarters to hijack the Trump base by making MAGA (Make America Great Again) different to America First, and then the America First slogan and narrative being used against Trump, in attempts to delegitimize him and MAGA.
So, I'm wary of the idea of America First being weaponized. Aka how was "America First" by Trump? Has it been hijacked to mean something it isn't?
As far as I know, the "America First" platform was not "staying out of military operations in other countries" but rather a) "No more endless wars" and "No more forever wars", rather than a pure "no overseas wars" idea.
I.e Trump campaigned on America First by rejecting the neoconservative interventionism that has lead to protracted military actions lasting years and decades, aka forever wars.
Which is really the point of my post. Not letting anti-Trumpists (whether overt or covert operatives, aka whether Lefties or fake Maga, fake Conservative influencers) redefine what his America First approach really is, by contrasting the difference between the neocon interventions (and democrat operations) over the last few decades and what Trump is doing now.
I'd agree that its a tough sell. And if so, its precisely because narrative war has been waged on Trump specifically from 'our side' to redefine what America First really means.
The goal of the narrative warfare is to de-legitimize Trump, precisely by redefining what Trump really stands for.
But also, if his message was generally frameable as "no more wars" even if not in those specific words, then it's a tough sell.
You may well be right.
I'm not sure that what I've done here is attempt to gas-light, and I still think the case has to be made.
There MUST be situations where this sort of military action is necessary, and we know that Trump does tend to go big on rhetoric. Let's hope the benefits (and necessity) of this current action become self-evident enough to the US population and that it's quickly brought to a state where the distinction is clear between all those 'forever wars', 'endless wars' and what Trump is now doing.
What exactly do you think the word "Patriot" means, that it would include someone who is neither a resident nor a citizen?
Why do you feel like you can speak as an authority on what "America First" means, if you're that in the dark about what is actually going on here?
If you really are in doubt of what I say, just spend some time watching all of Trump's rallys and campaign speeches and such. Watch
I'm wondering where exactly it is you're getting your info about what is going on in the US if you're not listening/reading what President Trump and the Republicans are saying first hand.
To be clear, I'm not saying that military operations are never needed. I'm saying that trying to convince people (especially ones who are actually in the US and/or actually pays attention to what Trump himself says and doesn't get their info from various random ass people on X) that "America First" has meant anything other than "Keep the US out of foreign military conflicts" is asinine and just makes normies distrust everything we say.
If someone has spent the last 5+ years going to Trump rallies or watching them on YouTube and actually paying attention to what he and the Republicans have been saying and have heard for themselves the sentiment that the US needs to stay out of foreign conflicts and focus on domestic issues and that Trump was the President that was going to end wars, not start them, for literally hundreds of rallies and speeches over the years and then someone tries to tell them that "America First" actually meant <insert whatever it is you're trying to convince them of>, rather than what they have been told for years....what do you think will happen, exactly? They'll just jump right on board and ignore the years and years and years of constantly being told we need to stay out of foreign business and focus on things here, in the actual US?
Now throw in the fact that they're being told this by someone who 1. Is not an American 2. Not even in the US. 3. Obviously can't be bothered to watch/listen to what the President has actually said in the past and seems to get their info from places like X.
What exactly do you think that accomplishes?
How about you go do some actual research on this before trying to instruct actual Americans who actually live here what "America First" means?
Wow, why so agro?
"Patriot" What exactly do you think the world patriot means?
Is it an exclusive property of Americans? there are millions of 'patriots' around the world who are inspired by the patriotic heart of Donald Trump. A patriot means someone who loves their nation and their people.
You can be a patriot without being an American. I am a [my nation] patriot. I feel sorry for you if your viewpoint is so zenophobic to think that only American patriots are real patriots, and if you haven't realized that the Q movement became a force of inspiration for patriots all around the world. And that patriots can very much be aligned because of common principles aka loving one's own nation and people.
Your reply reads like a rather stuck-up kid throwing a tantrum.
In essence, your assertions include:
No one can share a viewpoint or opinion unless they are an authority. (I have never, ever stated "I'm an authority on what America First means".)
You dared question my perspective! How dare you? You are not even American???
I'm outraged that you would dare express a view!
(shock, horror. Newflash, there are plenty of dumb Americans who do not get either Trump or what he is doing, and there are plenty of non-Americans who get what Trump is doing far better than (I'd say) what most American do.)
In case you missed it, there were plenty of frogs here who happened to resonate with my view expressed in the post. I guess all of them are not American either.
And, I engaged you here in the premise of good-faith discussions, willing to learn more. I candidly expressed my lack of knowledge compared with yourself, even though I still attempted to engage and discuss.
Sadly, instead of discussing, you responded like a priggish kid.
Let me conclude with a question or two.
Do you think that Trump acted with the mindset that his first priority is the United States? Or is his mindset, nah, sometimes, just, American second or third?
Your points about his campaign and rhetoric are well made. But at, its essence, what you do think that Trump means when HE says 'America First'? Surely that counts for something?
Thanks anyway for the insight into your mentality, attitude and character. Best of luck.
Edit: Maybe the reason you have made so few contributions here is because your viewpoint is so perfect? Or because you are not 'an authority' on ... anything?
This is a Q board. It's not a place for authorities.
Note to self: arrogance is very rarely very becoming.
Yes, you're a Patriot of your country. Not an American Patriot. Yes, you being a Patriot of your country means you love your country and the people of your country and are loyal to your country. Goodie for them. As a Patriot of my country, you being on the side of your country means, what, exactly, to me?
As such, why do you feel like an authority on what America First is. Because you certainly seemed very convinced of your own authority and understanding of the issue in your OP. You sure didn't preface it with "Now, I'm not an American citizen, and I don't live in America, and I'm a Patriot of my own random ass country, and I don't really know what President Trump and the Republicans have actually been saying for about a decade now, even though my random ass country has the internet and I can access every single campaign rally and speech and news interview, but I haven't because <insert whatever reason why where>, but let me jump in and tell you how you're wrong about this!"
As an actual, real, in America, born in America American Patriot, I am not a fan of people who aren't Americans, aren't even in the US, muddling about with American issues.
And trying to tell Americans what "America First" does or does not mean, when you readily acknowledge that you don't really have much knowledge about what President Trump and the Republicans have actually been saying is absolutely asinine.
Why am I irritated? 1. Simply because I don't appreciate non-Americans telling actual Americans what to think about American issues. 2. Because you're actively damaging our credibility over things that you admit you don't know much about.
Yeah, it's nice and great and all that you're an Anon and you support Q. But that does not mean that you have any business at all telling Americans what to think about American issues.
Would you appreciate it if I jumped in and started lecturing you on whatever it is your government is saying/doing, while readily acknowledging I really don't know much about what is going on in your country, since I don't live there and I'm not a citizen there? But it's OK, because I'm also a Patriot (even if it's a Patriot of an entirely separate country, and as such, have completely different ideals/goals/loyalties/etc. than you).
You can have all the opinions you want. But your post above was not framed as an opinion piece. You were having a dandy old time telling people that they were wrong about certain stances. You were not framing it in a "In my opinion..." way. Before you jump back on your keyboard, go back and re-read it again, but this time pretend it's some random ass person from some random ass country who readily acknowledges that they don't live in your country and aren't a citizen of your country, and don't even really know what's actually being said day to day in your country, but they feel like they know better than you do, and are lecturing you about what you are wrong about in regards to your country.
You really don't see why someone would get irritated over that? Really? Be honest.
You comment rely actually pissed me off a lot. So I wrote in haste in reply.
So I'm going to try a more measured reply here.
I think you're take on my post is really very narrow. Others seemed to see where I was coming from.
I mean, you are welcome to your opinion, but it doesn't mean its correct, or right.
You read what I wrote as "lecturing" either you or others. Its a post. Taking it as me lecturing you (or others) I think is your very subjective reaction: it's certainly not what a lot of other people thought (well, those that responded).
You seem to be a bit fixated on people 'telling' others X, 'lecturing' others on Y, or on anyone having a viewpoint means they think they are an authority.
What this says to me is that this is probably how you view the world, and yes, your reply to me exhibited that behavior exactly. Instead of engaging in a discussion, you lectured me in your reply, you 'told me how it is' and you present yourself as some sort of authority.
The point of my post, by the way, is not "Donald Trump campaigned on American first and this means no military wars whatsoever". It's asking the question, what does America First, when push comes to shove, really mean.
And sorry, you don't get to determine who can express their views.
I suspect that you spend a lot of your daily life "telling others what to think". I'm not interested in that, frankly.
I would certainly welcome any constructive opinions and outside perspectives, if offered in good faith. No one has a monopoly on a perfect view.
To repeat, you took my post as 'lecturing to Americans what they should think' or do. Totally wrong perspective. You missed the point. Then, you missed an opportunity for both engagement and also potential expansion of your perspective.
I'll leave it there. I think you are too convinced of the perfectness of your viewpoint to participate in any real discussion, so I won't belabor the point.
Good day.
"And if you are worried about Israel, well, a liberated Iran would not empower Israel to pursue war, but rather make the Israeli war-machine redundant. If the Israel Machine is indeed evil, this action against the terrorist Iranian regime doesn't help them. It makes them weaker."
Watch how quickly they identify their next target. I'm already seeing it - even on these boards...
Peace through strength. We’re almost there.
All I have to contribute to the discussion regarding this here, is trolls have a selective memory:
Iran literally targeted President Trump for death. Perhaps there is more to July 13 we don’t know about. Why is the man going to let that slip by?
Now you can really see who is on his side.
Mainstream news and online forums will be a total cluster of nonsense the more things ramp up. I know I will be staying away from the noise, and focusing on what I have control over, on this worldly plane. It’s all we can do for our own health, family and sanity’s sake.
Trolls have no responsibilities like these.
yup, it was iran who tried to assassinate trump, not the satanic pedo cult trying to protect their own.
One in the same, expand your thinking.
People have short memories I guess.
It was widely reported that Iran was behind one (or more) of Trump’s assassination attempts.
Good luck trying to steer the narrative in your direction, though
not really. iran hates us because of our support for isreal. removing iran is a means to end the support to isreal, aka no more boogeyman.
they are not the same and i refuse to change my beliefs because "trust trump". its the same stance ive held when he promoted the vaccine. theres another agenda not visible to those who fall for political theater.
this is normie level stuff, anons should know better.
Anons know that Iran and the deep state are working together anyway (always have been) so what is your point?
Riddle me this: What country did Obama “come from?”
Every time the new cycle changes, you guys come out of the woodwork
How can you claim to be an anon and not trust Trump? He’s a man of God, so where/in what do you place your faith?
Was it? Or was the....
"Oooh, Iran is Evil. We are going to fight with them, because we are not evil, we are good, and rigtheous"
....the perfect cover for perpetual war and conflict in a region that the bankers so desperately want to control (and have).
Actually, it 100% is.