mRNA is amazing technology, incredibly useful, could save a lot of lives ... if it's use right. No fucking different than radiation.
If you've got an inoperable brain tumor thats going to kill you in 6 months, blasting it with radiation that might give you an extra 10, 20, 40 years is great. Does not make it harmless.
mRNA can be used to kill cancer cells, so even when it's metastasized and even if you could go in and take out a dozen tumors you'd have another two dozen in a year. Does not make it harmless.
A gun can be used to kill hostage takers, so even when there's a guy threatening to kill a dozen people you can have a sniper take a shot through a window and save those lives. Does not make the gun harmless!
They all inherently and by design cause harm, and that doesn't inherently make them bad either.
mRNA specifically engineered to target melanoma cells in Alice, isn't at any realistic risk of causing harm to Bob. Small potential if it did cross into Bob, it might cure him of melanoma as they're the only kind of cells it should be capable of infecting.
The covid "vaccine" was nothing of the sort. It didn't target the virus, it mutated healthy cells. It was literally the antithesis of any sane medical treatment.
People on the internet who are against the covid shot pretty much conflate ALL mRNA technology together 'as bad'. There are some issues with it, but their beef is really with the covid vaccine's mRNA, which is an instruction that tells cells to produce an antigen that is very similar to the covid virus spike protein, but slightly modified. The industry changed their story on that. Initially, it was the covid spike protein, and then they said it was almost identical but modified to be less pathogenic. We don't know what this means, even today. It's all clouded.
My point is that mRNA is just an instruction. The mRNA technology is a bunch of biotechnology tricks to transfect it into cells. There are problems with the technology itself though, that are a bigger superset of problems than with the covid mRNA. Here is a not-all-inclusive list of those problems.
the mRNA transfected via liposomes has no cell-type SPECIFICITY right now, meaning that they go into any and all cells, and that will yield unforeseen consequences, especially if they go into immortal or semi-immortal cells
a) like stem cells
b) progenitor cells
c) long lived cells (up to 7 yrs, for example)
There is no off switch (mRNA transfected cells that are modified, continue the instruction until the cell dies or is destroyed)
There is no UNDO switch (same problem as above)
This is not specific to mRNA, but they are using pseudouridine in the process of this technology, and we now know that this molecule causes random mutations in the copy process inside the cell, and this happens due to frameshifting. This causes weird proteins to be made, and those do GOD KNOWS WHAT in the body (usually cancer, or worse, the rise of a prion or prion like infection)
To make the mRNA for the gene therapies, they use either aborted caucasian lung cancer cells or they use monkey cancer cells SV40; and the vaccine will have some of those left behind 'as scaffolding' for the technology, because apparently they can't be filtered out! Do you want monkey or baby lung cancer cells injected in you, even if they are 'attenuated' (made inactive)?
They said the mRNA vaccine would go into your deltoid and stay there. It did not. It went all over the body, and was unselective. Meaning it ALWAYS goes thru your heart and ALWAYS goes to your brain. The technology has to be made so that it doesn't damage these organs in any way.
Despite the enormous problems above, it's a great technology
(I'm not being facetious, we can overcome these issues)
It doesn't help that Pfizer changed the definition of mRNA from messenger to modified RNA. That is a sneaky move and if people don't know this, they're assumptions are flawed.
If the inventor is unqualified, then literally no-one alive has the expertise needed to make vaccine recommendations. Or will ever. So abolish the recommending body. Done and done.
Alternatively, judges that dont know what a woman is but that still get hired as one of the top judges in the land might be too unqualified to judge anything, ever. Maybe the vaccine panelists should assess the capability of the judge and tell him how and how not to run his courtrooms?
Dueling egocentric bureaucrats are a gay diversion to the murdering that has been done in the name of people like Fauci, Gates, Daszak, Walensky, Bourla and this cast of demon spawn still at large.
Being able to invent a vaccine is different to 'being qualified' to inform government policy on coercing hundreds of millions of people to take (or not take) that vaccine. They are 2 different domains.
Inventor of Gizmo X, vs 'so inventor, who should use your shiny new gizmo?' - yeah these are very different conversations. One technical and scientific, one atechnical but with a sales or marketing slant.
Coercive force and threats pertaining to people using their gizmo on the other hand is an area that any sane and decent inventor would shun.
How many people have heard behind closed doors 'well the YYYY industry would be very upset if we promoted your alternative and they have deep pockets and few scruples'?
Malone is not the sole inventor of mRNA technology, it is a collaborative technology that developed over decades. He ran experiments showing that liposomes could transfect mrna into the cells. So he can claim the transfection part.
Right, I remember
him saying that he designed the lipid nanoparticle to allow it to enter the cell membrane. So, don’t “clam up”. You are adding context and specificity. Thanks.
Alternatively, judges that dont know what a woman is but that still get hired as one of the top judges in the land might be too unqualified to judge anything, ever
That DEI autopen appointment needs to go. Sham and a disgrace to the court.
I hate to say this but it all feels like a dog and pony show anyways.
The fact that the Covid jabs are STILL avaliable to take is mind boggling to me.
Only slight improvement on the vaccine reccomendations and schedule, not a peep about Fauci and not a damn thing about accountability for the whole covid debacle is a giant failure IMO.
I never thought Malone would tuck tail and run but I guess when the entire DS goes all in against you bringing in the Judicial branch of the government that knows NOTHING about vaccines and you are NOT getting paid to listen and fight against all the BS, I DON'T BLAME HIM! Only man I have seen to be able to stand against the DS and fight like a hell bent mad dog is POTUS. He is one of a kind!
Why was Dr. Malone one of the creators of mRNA , not given time to give his full testimony due to fact there were many witnesses before him that were giving their testimonies and answering questions Why didn't the RINO, MTG, who was chairman, had the broad discretion in arranging the order of witnesses, not put Dr. Malone as her first witness?
That’s discouraging. There are judges who now think they can decide which doctors are qualified to have opinions? Is if time fur a culling of judges or is it time for a culling of judges?
I believe Dr. Malone has always been truthful about the mRNA about the vaccine despite "Judge" Brian Murphy's declaration. This "Judge" should be impeached, fired, jailed, etc or whatever is done to judges to get them out of their bench (and quickly with this judge).
Isn't it weird that they claim to have all these technologies to fight viruses but they've never isolated a virus or proven that viruses cause illness?
Strange how the media interviews everyone that says mRNA is safe, except one of the creators who’s been saying STOP since 2020z.
mRNA is amazing technology, incredibly useful, could save a lot of lives ... if it's use right. No fucking different than radiation.
If you've got an inoperable brain tumor thats going to kill you in 6 months, blasting it with radiation that might give you an extra 10, 20, 40 years is great. Does not make it harmless.
mRNA can be used to kill cancer cells, so even when it's metastasized and even if you could go in and take out a dozen tumors you'd have another two dozen in a year. Does not make it harmless.
A gun can be used to kill hostage takers, so even when there's a guy threatening to kill a dozen people you can have a sniper take a shot through a window and save those lives. Does not make the gun harmless!
They all inherently and by design cause harm, and that doesn't inherently make them bad either.
mRNA specifically engineered to target melanoma cells in Alice, isn't at any realistic risk of causing harm to Bob. Small potential if it did cross into Bob, it might cure him of melanoma as they're the only kind of cells it should be capable of infecting.
The covid "vaccine" was nothing of the sort. It didn't target the virus, it mutated healthy cells. It was literally the antithesis of any sane medical treatment.
People on the internet who are against the covid shot pretty much conflate ALL mRNA technology together 'as bad'. There are some issues with it, but their beef is really with the covid vaccine's mRNA, which is an instruction that tells cells to produce an antigen that is very similar to the covid virus spike protein, but slightly modified. The industry changed their story on that. Initially, it was the covid spike protein, and then they said it was almost identical but modified to be less pathogenic. We don't know what this means, even today. It's all clouded.
My point is that mRNA is just an instruction. The mRNA technology is a bunch of biotechnology tricks to transfect it into cells. There are problems with the technology itself though, that are a bigger superset of problems than with the covid mRNA. Here is a not-all-inclusive list of those problems.
Despite the enormous problems above, it's a great technology
(I'm not being facetious, we can overcome these issues)
It doesn't help that Pfizer changed the definition of mRNA from messenger to modified RNA. That is a sneaky move and if people don't know this, they're assumptions are flawed.
As intended. Now the crop spraying of mRNA is being tossed around.
Here is the JUDGE of it all....ROFLMAO. Sounds like a Judge who does the dirty work
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/07/08/supreme-court-clarifies-rogue-judge-brian-murphy-cant-ignore-courts-mandate/
Didn't he take the vaccine?
Did he?
Yeah he took moderna according to an interview he did, wanna say it was a Joe Rogan podcast or something I saw it on
If the inventor is unqualified, then literally no-one alive has the expertise needed to make vaccine recommendations. Or will ever. So abolish the recommending body. Done and done.
Alternatively, judges that dont know what a woman is but that still get hired as one of the top judges in the land might be too unqualified to judge anything, ever. Maybe the vaccine panelists should assess the capability of the judge and tell him how and how not to run his courtrooms?
Dueling egocentric bureaucrats are a gay diversion to the murdering that has been done in the name of people like Fauci, Gates, Daszak, Walensky, Bourla and this cast of demon spawn still at large.
This is all I need to know it is not good and the mRNA vaccine platform use should be banned.
https://x.com/iluminatibot/status/2036375294655996308?s=61
Bill Gates Ted Talk, telling the participants that he’s gonna reduce the world’s population by 10-15%.
He may yet achieve his goal.
Being able to invent a vaccine is different to 'being qualified' to inform government policy on coercing hundreds of millions of people to take (or not take) that vaccine. They are 2 different domains.
Inventor of Gizmo X, vs 'so inventor, who should use your shiny new gizmo?' - yeah these are very different conversations. One technical and scientific, one atechnical but with a sales or marketing slant.
Coercive force and threats pertaining to people using their gizmo on the other hand is an area that any sane and decent inventor would shun.
How many people have heard behind closed doors 'well the YYYY industry would be very upset if we promoted your alternative and they have deep pockets and few scruples'?
Malone is not the sole inventor of mRNA technology, it is a collaborative technology that developed over decades. He ran experiments showing that liposomes could transfect mrna into the cells. So he can claim the transfection part.
Right, I remember him saying that he designed the lipid nanoparticle to allow it to enter the cell membrane. So, don’t “clam up”. You are adding context and specificity. Thanks.
He holds the most patents on mRNA tech of anybody. So you can clam up now.
That DEI autopen appointment needs to go. Sham and a disgrace to the court.
Keep him nearby to answer some questions about how this was used for the death jab.
I hate to say this but it all feels like a dog and pony show anyways.
The fact that the Covid jabs are STILL avaliable to take is mind boggling to me.
Only slight improvement on the vaccine reccomendations and schedule, not a peep about Fauci and not a damn thing about accountability for the whole covid debacle is a giant failure IMO.
Are there any honest judges?
Pretty sure the judge isn’t qualified to say who is unqualified?
I never thought Malone would tuck tail and run but I guess when the entire DS goes all in against you bringing in the Judicial branch of the government that knows NOTHING about vaccines and you are NOT getting paid to listen and fight against all the BS, I DON'T BLAME HIM! Only man I have seen to be able to stand against the DS and fight like a hell bent mad dog is POTUS. He is one of a kind!
Why was Dr. Malone one of the creators of mRNA , not given time to give his full testimony due to fact there were many witnesses before him that were giving their testimonies and answering questions Why didn't the RINO, MTG, who was chairman, had the broad discretion in arranging the order of witnesses, not put Dr. Malone as her first witness?
I never understood before how f'd our system is that a Federal Judge and do things like this. Judge Brian Murphy knows more than the panel?
That’s discouraging. There are judges who now think they can decide which doctors are qualified to have opinions? Is if time fur a culling of judges or is it time for a culling of judges?
I believe Dr. Malone has always been truthful about the mRNA about the vaccine despite "Judge" Brian Murphy's declaration. This "Judge" should be impeached, fired, jailed, etc or whatever is done to judges to get them out of their bench (and quickly with this judge).
It looks like Murphy is unqualified to judge.
Isn't it weird that they claim to have all these technologies to fight viruses but they've never isolated a virus or proven that viruses cause illness?