I think the term losing should be in quotes. I don’t think we’re going to continue with the military bases throughout Europe and the Middle East, including Israel and we certainly don’t want to leave any military infrastructure intact when it comes to the strait of Hormuz. Trump and future presidents will be following the Monroe/Donroe doctrine and making sure US has western hemisphere dominance.
I think he’s using the term “losing” to make his point, but I expect that this war will be won in a very unconventional sense. I expect that once the dust clears, we’ll find that both Iran and Israel have been significantly weakened (perhaps set back decades with both leaders eliminated). A new alliance will have been formalized amongst the gulf states to oversee the region with a path for long term stability set out.
I also expect to find out that the U.S. bases have also been destroyed beyond salvage. But if the plan is to leave the region (and Europe) then this isn’t a big deal in the long-run.
There’s also the macro effects of realigning the world energy distribution in Americas favor. The biggest win here being that they starve China and put the breaks on any expansionist plans of theirs.
If all this works out as it’s trending then it will be an incredibly beneficial to America on a number of fronts.
Nah, not losing to anyone, taking control...HIS WAY, The "America First" way...with a little "kiss my ass" thrown in there.....Globohomos created the US to eventually fail in everyway....Trump has Refit everything, and destroyed their plan to Crush America, but now we're Stronger than ever....They have LOST forever....now it's about Waking up the People.
Yeah, I agree with the concluding remark "Trump is the greatest president in history," but can't abide the drooling, blinkered idiocy of "Yes, America is losing the war to Iran."
The sheer genius of Trump though....smashing Iran's ability to conduct its terror regime and in the same move forcing the world to buy American oil—even while giving the genuine appearance of trying to keep the Strait open
Interesting tidbits in there but based on two premises:
American Empire ...-> the 3000 pound Gorilla: City of London.
(See Davos: Howard Lutnick discussion with the british chick: you need our (UK) financing, this way we can be great allies
Iran = unwinnable.
The conclusion may pointing into the right direction, but it does not name it.
I agree, I’m in the Promethean Action camp, but thought it was interesting how the person came to the same conclusion about Trump creating a better US by taking control of the Western hemisphere.
When the term: global economy is mentioned, it fails to mention where the real pain starts to become visible. Simply, by looking at who is left behind ( spoiler: EU)
Yet, in contrast with the Prometean Action this video does not mention the reason for it. It looks at matters through the old lens: Kissinger/Brezinski, and does not touch on maximization of wealth extraction [commodification / financialization] which lead to enslavement and dystopian nihilism. [JD Vance; Hungary]
So, this begs the question: who is the source .... ?
And perhaps, exactly what it does not mention may prove to be pertinent to the answer tot hat question.
And not quite. It is an accounting metric. How and where that money is used is a different matter.
For instance: We could LABEL the outlays for a contingent of troops stationed in Germany as costs to NATO, OCCUPATION, or something else.
And there are ways to relabel outlays onto NATO to argue meeting the 2% or 5% threshold. For instance, it would not surprise me if EU/NATO countries involved in the Ukraine war try to sell their "solidarity" as a NATO outlay.
Good points. My thought was the creator of the video doesn’t see the whole board and doesn’t know the historical background, but they’re still sensing the endgame.
I liked the visual aspect of the geopolitical results, helps me visualize what’s actually going to be the end result of the Donroe Doctrine.
yeah, not sure, if you’re being sarcastic or not. It’s an interesting take and backs up the end game premise that Promethean Action has been talking about —- not the whole of what they say — but the endpoint - Donroe Doctrine and the EU being defanged.
Ah, I really liked the visual aspect of it, I’m a visual learner when it comes to politics and this was very helpful to me. I like Promethean Action’s stuff but the geography aspect was well done.
Personally I don't believe he is losing the war in Iran but definitely know this is what he is doing: PROTECTING AMERICA as a sovereign nation that is sefl sufficient and able to protect itself from the rest of the world and using trade and oil as his leverage.
When he says "losing the war in Iran" keep in mind who his likely audience is. It's not us. It's not conservatives. He's making a video for liberals saying "Ok. You say Trump is losing the war. Even if he is, look what's coming from it."
Losing the war with Iran? Bullshit!
I think the term losing should be in quotes. I don’t think we’re going to continue with the military bases throughout Europe and the Middle East, including Israel and we certainly don’t want to leave any military infrastructure intact when it comes to the strait of Hormuz. Trump and future presidents will be following the Monroe/Donroe doctrine and making sure US has western hemisphere dominance.
I think he’s using the term “losing” to make his point, but I expect that this war will be won in a very unconventional sense. I expect that once the dust clears, we’ll find that both Iran and Israel have been significantly weakened (perhaps set back decades with both leaders eliminated). A new alliance will have been formalized amongst the gulf states to oversee the region with a path for long term stability set out.
I also expect to find out that the U.S. bases have also been destroyed beyond salvage. But if the plan is to leave the region (and Europe) then this isn’t a big deal in the long-run.
There’s also the macro effects of realigning the world energy distribution in Americas favor. The biggest win here being that they starve China and put the breaks on any expansionist plans of theirs.
If all this works out as it’s trending then it will be an incredibly beneficial to America on a number of fronts.
Agree 100%
Nah, not losing to anyone, taking control...HIS WAY, The "America First" way...with a little "kiss my ass" thrown in there.....Globohomos created the US to eventually fail in everyway....Trump has Refit everything, and destroyed their plan to Crush America, but now we're Stronger than ever....They have LOST forever....now it's about Waking up the People.
Yeah, I agree with the concluding remark "Trump is the greatest president in history," but can't abide the drooling, blinkered idiocy of "Yes, America is losing the war to Iran."
The sheer genius of Trump though....smashing Iran's ability to conduct its terror regime and in the same move forcing the world to buy American oil—even while giving the genuine appearance of trying to keep the Strait open
Worthy of Consideration:
https://x.com/BredsguardDalen/status/2042004646815002891
Interesting tidbits in there but based on two premises:
American Empire ...-> the 3000 pound Gorilla: City of London. (See Davos: Howard Lutnick discussion with the british chick: you need our (UK) financing, this way we can be great allies
Iran = unwinnable.
The conclusion may pointing into the right direction, but it does not name it.
I agree, I’m in the Promethean Action camp, but thought it was interesting how the person came to the same conclusion about Trump creating a better US by taking control of the Western hemisphere.
Indeed!
When the term: global economy is mentioned, it fails to mention where the real pain starts to become visible. Simply, by looking at who is left behind ( spoiler: EU)
Yet, in contrast with the Prometean Action this video does not mention the reason for it. It looks at matters through the old lens: Kissinger/Brezinski, and does not touch on maximization of wealth extraction [commodification / financialization] which lead to enslavement and dystopian nihilism. [JD Vance; Hungary]
So, this begs the question: who is the source .... ?
And perhaps, exactly what it does not mention may prove to be pertinent to the answer tot hat question.
22 trillion to NATO. This version of the world economy fails to mention this tidbit.
True.
And not quite. It is an accounting metric. How and where that money is used is a different matter.
For instance: We could LABEL the outlays for a contingent of troops stationed in Germany as costs to NATO, OCCUPATION, or something else.
And there are ways to relabel outlays onto NATO to argue meeting the 2% or 5% threshold. For instance, it would not surprise me if EU/NATO countries involved in the Ukraine war try to sell their "solidarity" as a NATO outlay.
Bookkeeping is a rather talmudic exercise.
Yes. Good reason non bookkeepers need to examine fungible funds (grin).
Very good observations and points, fren...
Good points. My thought was the creator of the video doesn’t see the whole board and doesn’t know the historical background, but they’re still sensing the endgame.
I liked the visual aspect of the geopolitical results, helps me visualize what’s actually going to be the end result of the Donroe Doctrine.
Are you suggesting that Trump’s administration is setting that up, or that the globalists were, or that you can’t tell?
If you grind this video up, add some deionized water, slap it in an IV bag, and hook yourself up, it feels real good, man.
https://files.catbox.moe/viyvep.jpeg
yeah, not sure, if you’re being sarcastic or not. It’s an interesting take and backs up the end game premise that Promethean Action has been talking about —- not the whole of what they say — but the endpoint - Donroe Doctrine and the EU being defanged.
Not being sarcastic, it’s got a bigly like. I’m gonna make a second batch.
Ah, I really liked the visual aspect of it, I’m a visual learner when it comes to politics and this was very helpful to me. I like Promethean Action’s stuff but the geography aspect was well done.
Picture’s worth a thousand words.
It’s a good day to Meme Hard.
:)
Mainlining hopium. Right there with you, Bro. Feels so right.
That would be some serious 5D Chess to turn the national debt into an asset.
Personally I don't believe he is losing the war in Iran but definitely know this is what he is doing: PROTECTING AMERICA as a sovereign nation that is sefl sufficient and able to protect itself from the rest of the world and using trade and oil as his leverage.
When he says "losing the war in Iran" keep in mind who his likely audience is. It's not us. It's not conservatives. He's making a video for liberals saying "Ok. You say Trump is losing the war. Even if he is, look what's coming from it."
The Iran conflict is meant to trigger the precipice, being the 3-way nuclear standoff between China, Russia, and USA.
The countries above are going to be the only ones with nuclear arsenals.