Everyone thought these shots were free - the government gave big pharma our money to kill us. why we're not stacking bodies right now, i'll never know.
These are results for excess mortality usa 2025 2026
Search instead for excess morality usa 2025 2026
AI Overview
Excess mortality in the USA is projected to persist through 2025 and 2026, though at lower levels than the 2021-2023 pandemic peak. While 2024 showed a significant reduction in excess deaths to around 0.4%, structural issues like drug overdoses, gun violence, and cardiovascular diseases maintain elevated mortality rates.
Boston University
+4
Excess Mortality Trends (2025–2026)
Projections: Excess mortality is expected to remain above pre-pandemic levels until at least 2028, with a potential return to baseline by 2033, according to Swiss Re Institute analysis.
Swiss Re
2025 Status: The CDC Mortality Dashboard shows that for the 12-month period ending 2025 Q2, the crude death rate (911.6) was slightly lower than 2024 Q2 (914.0), indicating a slight decline but still high levels.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | CDC (.gov)
Persistent Factors: Even with COVID-19 as a reduced factor, US excess deaths in 2023 were roughly 700,000, continuing a trend of rising mortality among working-age adults.
Advisory Board
+1
Drivers: The ongoing mortality gap compared to other high-income countries is heavily driven by preventable causes rather than pandemics, note experts in a Boston University study.
Boston University
+2
Factors Influencing 2025–2026 Mortality
Population Health: While mortality among the elderly is expected to improve, long-term trends show a stagnation in life expectancy improvements for working-age adults.
Penn Wharton Budget Model
Flu Seasons: The 2024-2025 flu season had a peak in early 2025, which, while severe, did not increase overall annual excess mortality, according to reports from RGA.
Age Disparities: Excess mortality remains higher in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations compared to White populations, with significant contributions from non-COVID causes in younger groups, according to NBER.
This was one of my first nightmare scenarios. When "How Bad is My Batch" came out with the ability to online track the codes, it seemed closer. Now here it is. I would add, this in addition to the various storage circumstances. Some had specific cooling or temperature constants. So we are lab rats, and we told the man no.
There is also the possibility of a two stage delivery. IE, you take the corresponding lot number that responds to say 6G and your terminated. Or what about the IEM numbers showing up locating the dead in cemetaries or walking around live. I'm sure they can track, trace and eliminate. . . I'L BE BACK ! (BOVK)
edit: Lastly, imagine Congress going into 'the room' to get their jab being told, 'don't worry, its saline'. They know that they can be terminated at any moment, fall over dead or maybe 'influenced'. What a movie.
This is finally coming up again and was reported years ago. Post what you saved that connected to this Anons. Or dig in to new data to add more ammo to the post.
You need to supply the link to the 147-page "public" report. Who issued this report? At one time i worked as a Review Chemist at FDA. Who is the FDA person that contributed to this report and in what division did they serve? Did they collect their data while still working at FDA?
I remember posting an interview with Karen Kingston on my TS where she was one of the first to call it a bioweapon. I think Dr Jane Ruby was also saying the same thing, though she's got a bad case of TDS.
Tenpenny called it a bioweapon too if I recall but her estimate was a very gloomy worst case scenario. But it goes to show you that if you mix in enough placebo that it would delay people's inquiries enough into the bioweapon jabs and questioning it all.
I believe that to be a secondary goal to be obtained later. They needed the large clinical trial for the delivery system first. Ever since I learned that cancer cells do not deteriorate like normal cells, I knew deep down the only reason they research cancer so much is because they want to be able to duplicate that trait in human cells and thus have "the tree of life".
I would be led to believe that they are close or already have that technology and thus they need to refine the delivery system. If I were as greedy as them, I would have it as an ongoing therapy so if you can't pay, you age, but if you can pay, your body doesn't decline.
I then see how the sheeple would scream loudly if they found out only the rich had access and demand access. This is where I see the mark of the beast come into play. I could be wrong, but that's how I see it
Over and over and over again, random people say they have it, statisticians have made a report. Where is it? Why hasn't it been spread to the winds? Why is each declaration not reviewavle?
Yes, but thats not the result of the stated litany of professionals that have made a report. If I have to "go find it myself" I will come out with different figures.
So I have a claim with statistical results and no reviewability into that claim - we can't check the methods, the data that they used, nothing.
You must not have spent any time on the governments own VAERS database.
User Datasinc provided a number of custom database links years ago that showed the data across all 3 vaccines clearly directly from the VAERS database..... That anyone could review and further customize or start from scratch.
Most of information is related to Pfizer. I have family that took Pfizer as well as Moderna and J&J. Is there anywhere that shows all the adverse effects? Thank you.
"All the ferrets died." That's what I think whenever I hear about the mrna testing. During trials for that tech they tested it on ferrets, and guess what? They all died.
I could be wrong, but I believe it was Karen Kingston who properly reported this. I.e., she pointed out the side effects and ineffectiveness of the vaccine and then said that the ferrets were all "sacrificed" at the end of the trial. What she seems to have meant by this is that they were killed and autopsied at the end of the study to see systemic effects of the vaccines. "They all died" seems to be a misleading and possibly malicious half truth. Adamant pure-blood here, by the way.
This was discussed years ago that they had to mix i placebo (roughly 1/3rd) to keep people from finding out quick enough to mount a resistance hence the fast roll out and fast timing of additional boosters. Subsequent boosters were loaded with higher concentrations of toxins even if people received placebos the first time around.
The Covid VAXXX was the process of natural selection based on intelligent skepticism. Those without it died.
Caveat emptor. If something is “free,” YOU are the product.
No such thing as a free lunch
This^^
Everyone thought these shots were free - the government gave big pharma our money to kill us. why we're not stacking bodies right now, i'll never know.
There are a lot of people dead or dying. "They" are saying as little as they can get away with.
I think TOM meant stacking bodies in the fashion the founders would be stacking.
These are results for excess mortality usa 2025 2026 Search instead for excess morality usa 2025 2026
AI Overview
Excess mortality in the USA is projected to persist through 2025 and 2026, though at lower levels than the 2021-2023 pandemic peak. While 2024 showed a significant reduction in excess deaths to around 0.4%, structural issues like drug overdoses, gun violence, and cardiovascular diseases maintain elevated mortality rates.
Boston University +4 Excess Mortality Trends (2025–2026) Projections: Excess mortality is expected to remain above pre-pandemic levels until at least 2028, with a potential return to baseline by 2033, according to Swiss Re Institute analysis.
Swiss Re 2025 Status: The CDC Mortality Dashboard shows that for the 12-month period ending 2025 Q2, the crude death rate (911.6) was slightly lower than 2024 Q2 (914.0), indicating a slight decline but still high levels.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | CDC (.gov) Persistent Factors: Even with COVID-19 as a reduced factor, US excess deaths in 2023 were roughly 700,000, continuing a trend of rising mortality among working-age adults.
Advisory Board +1 Drivers: The ongoing mortality gap compared to other high-income countries is heavily driven by preventable causes rather than pandemics, note experts in a Boston University study.
Boston University +2 Factors Influencing 2025–2026 Mortality Population Health: While mortality among the elderly is expected to improve, long-term trends show a stagnation in life expectancy improvements for working-age adults.
Penn Wharton Budget Model Flu Seasons: The 2024-2025 flu season had a peak in early 2025, which, while severe, did not increase overall annual excess mortality, according to reports from RGA. Age Disparities: Excess mortality remains higher in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations compared to White populations, with significant contributions from non-COVID causes in younger groups, according to NBER.
u/#kek
Just bend over and say: "AHHHHH"!!!!!!
I'll let myself out!!!!
A lot of liberals still alive. Dont you think it is a coincidence?
Well, if you read the post, that's not exactly true.. For sure true, for certain populations, but not for others.
This was one of my first nightmare scenarios. When "How Bad is My Batch" came out with the ability to online track the codes, it seemed closer. Now here it is. I would add, this in addition to the various storage circumstances. Some had specific cooling or temperature constants. So we are lab rats, and we told the man no.
There is also the possibility of a two stage delivery. IE, you take the corresponding lot number that responds to say 6G and your terminated. Or what about the IEM numbers showing up locating the dead in cemetaries or walking around live. I'm sure they can track, trace and eliminate. . . I'L BE BACK ! (BOVK)
edit: Lastly, imagine Congress going into 'the room' to get their jab being told, 'don't worry, its saline'. They know that they can be terminated at any moment, fall over dead or maybe 'influenced'. What a movie.
That web site kept my brother from getting a poster. It's very good.
This is finally coming up again and was reported years ago. Post what you saved that connected to this Anons. Or dig in to new data to add more ammo to the post.
User Datasinc posted his own research on this and custom links to the VAERS database that showed this clearly across all 3 vaccines YEARS ago here.
Basically 5% or 1 out of 20 lot numbers/ batches were almost 100% deadly.
You need to supply the link to the 147-page "public" report. Who issued this report? At one time i worked as a Review Chemist at FDA. Who is the FDA person that contributed to this report and in what division did they serve? Did they collect their data while still working at FDA?
Read to the end of the post:
Mr Pool
Ok so who is Mr Pool? Inquiring minds wanna know
Some think his posts aren't true.
Exactly!
Mr pool is a liar
Interesting, where would I go to find this study the tweet is referring to?
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf This is the one that I know of that lists the adverse events; Table 7 is by category and tells you how many of each.
That document is from 2021. Where is the new information?
don’t know, haven’t seen it, that’s the only one I know about.
Finally had a chance to do some research. Here’s what I found. https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D8
Here is another link but doesn’t include EU/UK past November 2022, https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
Best way to keep your death shot from being questioned. Run the experiment(s) on hundreds of millions worldwide.
Former Pfizer Dr. Mike Yeadon has been saying the vaxx were calibrating bioweapons for years. Here’s just one older thread:
https://greatawakening.win/p/141En1grFX/vaccines-are-they-calibrating-a-/c/
I remember posting an interview with Karen Kingston on my TS where she was one of the first to call it a bioweapon. I think Dr Jane Ruby was also saying the same thing, though she's got a bad case of TDS.
Tenpenny called it a bioweapon too if I recall but her estimate was a very gloomy worst case scenario. But it goes to show you that if you mix in enough placebo that it would delay people's inquiries enough into the bioweapon jabs and questioning it all.
Every batch had a different formula BECAUSE they were looking for the deadliest formula and the public was the lab rats.
Or.... Looking for the safest delivery system. Collateral damage was to be expected with a clinical trial that large
I think depopulation was the agenda.
I believe that to be a secondary goal to be obtained later. They needed the large clinical trial for the delivery system first. Ever since I learned that cancer cells do not deteriorate like normal cells, I knew deep down the only reason they research cancer so much is because they want to be able to duplicate that trait in human cells and thus have "the tree of life".
I would be led to believe that they are close or already have that technology and thus they need to refine the delivery system. If I were as greedy as them, I would have it as an ongoing therapy so if you can't pay, you age, but if you can pay, your body doesn't decline.
I then see how the sheeple would scream loudly if they found out only the rich had access and demand access. This is where I see the mark of the beast come into play. I could be wrong, but that's how I see it
Old news, useful. But buried. How creepy... I remember looking ip batches depending upon regions sold in, when possible.
There were about 20 of those sites and most of them were total BS.
grok could not verify this
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5LWNvcHk_b8c238b1-f846-4d34-836a-8b8cf8d3788d
It's all been mapped. So WHERE IS THE DATA.
Over and over and over again, random people say they have it, statisticians have made a report. Where is it? Why hasn't it been spread to the winds? Why is each declaration not reviewavle?
It's on the VAERS database and always has been.
Custom searches were posted here years ago that showed it clear as day.
Yes, but thats not the result of the stated litany of professionals that have made a report. If I have to "go find it myself" I will come out with different figures.
So I have a claim with statistical results and no reviewability into that claim - we can't check the methods, the data that they used, nothing.
Again.
You just made a lot of assumptions.
You must not have spent any time on the governments own VAERS database.
User Datasinc provided a number of custom database links years ago that showed the data across all 3 vaccines clearly directly from the VAERS database..... That anyone could review and further customize or start from scratch.
I made no assumptions, i stated it as it is. A claim was made that reviews have been done. Where are those reviews?
Faith is for Jesus, not random people who scream "proof" into the wind.
I already said where. The government VAERS database which is publicly viewable.
Did you spend any time looking at it? (You dodged that question)
No one but you said "faith" so don't try that strawman fallacy shit with me son.
Most of information is related to Pfizer. I have family that took Pfizer as well as Moderna and J&J. Is there anywhere that shows all the adverse effects? Thank you.
Totally evil. We tried to tell them.
I said when the jab first rolled out, they're recording lots because the formulas are different.
I've long believed it was a giant clinical trial that was testing a delivery system.
We know. Blue shitholes got the stable version while American states did not,
The sooner you realize that the covid vaccine was a worldwide trial for the mRNA technology and not a vaccine, the more it makes sense.
They didn’t care if it worked, they just wanted the data.
Except MRNA tech was started back in the 60s and used for a TON of cancer trials in the 90s and 2000s.
Agree but I believe it was about the delivery system. What exactly they have planned, I don't know, but I have a feeling
"All the ferrets died." That's what I think whenever I hear about the mrna testing. During trials for that tech they tested it on ferrets, and guess what? They all died.
I could be wrong, but I believe it was Karen Kingston who properly reported this. I.e., she pointed out the side effects and ineffectiveness of the vaccine and then said that the ferrets were all "sacrificed" at the end of the trial. What she seems to have meant by this is that they were killed and autopsied at the end of the study to see systemic effects of the vaccines. "They all died" seems to be a misleading and possibly malicious half truth. Adamant pure-blood here, by the way.
They were practicing eugenics with this. And probably with any other vaccine program for kids too.
147 pages sounds familiar....
They killed a lot of veterans, but the Satan disciples didn’t kill the liberals. They knew who to murder
This was discussed years ago that they had to mix i placebo (roughly 1/3rd) to keep people from finding out quick enough to mount a resistance hence the fast roll out and fast timing of additional boosters. Subsequent boosters were loaded with higher concentrations of toxins even if people received placebos the first time around.