The implication (as well as the made-up word) is quite pretentious!
They can judge a baptized Christian or self-identified Christian as merely a "pretend" Christian.
So what about "trans-pretensism"?
For that matter, why not Judaic-pretensism? As in those who pretend to be part of the Chosen People and their history: "Judaic Studies to understanding the historical experience of the Jewish people, from Abraham to Modern Judaism."
everyone does judge whether something seems like the real article, though. A trans person wouldn't like it if I told them I was trans, I bet. And if I dressed up as a muslim they'd probably have something to say about that. The real deal is what peoole prefer, I think. This doesn't insult me as a christian.
I like this. The more words they use to marginalize themselves from normies, the better it is for us.
Words like this are like little red flags - either they're an idiot for regurgitating the latest faux-cademic buzzword, or a serious progtard for internalizing the concept. Either way, they out themselves by using them.
True, but they get away with it too often. Like using communist revolutionary terms. Like calling people fascist on nothing other than their own say-so.
I'm actually glad they are trying to create new terms as left wing ambiguity and double meanings piss me off so much in debates. If you're speaking the same language but every other word means a different thing to those involved in the debate, it's no longer a debate. It's a flaming row.
This is just another example of how "the left can't meme", but on a whole new level. no one is going to use christopretensism outside of acedemia, and the only people who use it inside acedemia are the ones who actively deserve having their shit kicked in.
Where I lurk on the left, so it is appearing on social-media. I don't expect it to be used, but then I did not expect all their other made-up words to catch on either . . .
AL, I'm scratching my head at this stupid idea from the left. Heck, I can't even pronounce their stupid word, much less understand the meaning behind it. If it's too complex an idea for my smooth brain, just think what the purplehaired idiots on the left will do when they see it. Their minds will melt because they won't know who to process the information.
Christians don't like these types either, in my experience. Christians are called to be sincere and don't want to be pandered to by false pretenses. Most groups don't I don't actually see a problem here. I mean, read the description. I'm not a fan of these types and nobody I know is.
Sounds like a lot of Christophobia® is going around.
INDEED!!
The implication (as well as the made-up word) is quite pretentious!
They can judge a baptized Christian or self-identified Christian as merely a "pretend" Christian.
So what about "trans-pretensism"?
For that matter, why not Judaic-pretensism? As in those who pretend to be part of the Chosen People and their history: "Judaic Studies to understanding the historical experience of the Jewish people, from Abraham to Modern Judaism."
How about “intelligent-pretensiism”? I think that would cover EVERY Democrap!
good one!~
everyone does judge whether something seems like the real article, though. A trans person wouldn't like it if I told them I was trans, I bet. And if I dressed up as a muslim they'd probably have something to say about that. The real deal is what peoole prefer, I think. This doesn't insult me as a christian.
Not to mention Loxism
I like this. The more words they use to marginalize themselves from normies, the better it is for us.
Words like this are like little red flags - either they're an idiot for regurgitating the latest faux-cademic buzzword, or a serious progtard for internalizing the concept. Either way, they out themselves by using them.
"they out themselves by using them"
True, but they get away with it too often. Like using communist revolutionary terms. Like calling people fascist on nothing other than their own say-so.
and they get paid for this crap!
Agreed. Their 1984 New Speak is the same level of cringe as valley girl speak or boomer/zoomer/coomer level retardation.
OH YES~! Pelosi, Biden, all claimed to be Catholic while being pro-abortion!
So the term does fit some people, see? And they aren't likeable because of it.
Not working with me.
Too many syllables to be common sense.
Looks contrived from the word itself.
totally contrived
When Dems want to call people names to make them “look or seem” bad they just make them up? What a novel and idiotic idea. What are they 5 yr olds?
yes, kids on the playground calling other kids names
Where did you hear this term? I've never encountered it, and it doesn't seem very marketable.
Where I lurk on the left, so it is appearing on social-media. I don't expect it to be used, but then I did not expect all their other made-up words to catch on either . . .
Fair enough. Thankfully their era is ending soon ...
Because true Christians can identify and interpret the globalist agenda. Those who read and study the Bible have the knowledge to recognize the evil.
How about this one - liberoviromania.
Why dont they just say "lying christians"?
How can self-identified Christians be lying if that is what they believe they are?
AL, I'm scratching my head at this stupid idea from the left. Heck, I can't even pronounce their stupid word, much less understand the meaning behind it. If it's too complex an idea for my smooth brain, just think what the purplehaired idiots on the left will do when they see it. Their minds will melt because they won't know who to process the information.
But I would not be surprised to see it on some pre-printed signs they bring to their protests / riots. HA!
I’m purple haired and I am Red Republican through and through. Could we call the left idiots “green” or “rainbow haired”? Just asking?🇺🇸❤️
Whaa? You mean if you "identify" as something it automatically means that is what you are? Seems like I've heard that argument refuted pretty roundly.
Don't worry. There's not a liberal on the planet that can pronounce this word. 🙄
Like this?
James Talarico's church library features LGBTQ propaganda for children, including pornographic material
https://notthebee.com/article/james-talaricos-church-library-features-lgbtq-propaganda-for-children-including-pornographic-material
HT to: https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASsdr8VGf/the-dum-candidate-for-the-senate/c/
u/#Catdance
Christians don't like these types either, in my experience. Christians are called to be sincere and don't want to be pandered to by false pretenses. Most groups don't I don't actually see a problem here. I mean, read the description. I'm not a fan of these types and nobody I know is.
Came to say, I like the term. I'll be using it myself (:
Whole lotta christo-pretendo's in our government.
Roman Catholicism is pretendo-christo.
I like it!
Me too!