Introduction

I posted comments across several posts on GAW today regarding this, but my blood is boiling with impotent rage right now. I'm trying to keep a calm, cool head over being here, as if I react emotionally on this I'll start screaming obscenities outside the train station at every Ali and Mohammed that I could encounter.

I've always been a "live and let live" type who hopes to find the best in people, and try to curb my own biases, but at the moment I have nothing but contempt for Islam and Muslims as a result of the findings of the Rape Gang Inquiry Report. I would be happy to pull the gallows levers or be on the firing squads, or flip the switch on the chair, or push the button to deliver the injections if capital punishment were still a thing. And for the crimes committed, I am fairly certain most want it to be brought back now.

However, this post isn't a rant in isolation. It is a rant with data analysis and statistical calculations done by yours truly. I want to showcase just what the implications of this report are in terms you all can go on to explain to those you know around you and on twitter / X for those you don't. Spread this info far and wide, so that people can grasp the reality of the UK's greatest shame.

Data Provision

First, here are the critical information sources:

• Rape Gang Inquiry Report (full text) - page 155 is the start of the conclusion which summarised the findings, but the whole report is absolutely damning. You can read the whole document on Scribd or download it if you have an account with them.
• GAW post 1 - this tweet was an inference as to why Kier blocked 10-15 Yr Olds from having twitter.
• A Summary of the Worst of the Worst - h/t to u/purkiss80 for sharing this in the previous post mentioned, along with the worst crimes amongst this bevvy of evil,permalink here.
• Rupert Lowe's reshare - again this is the raw file from a sourcing perspective, but the comments here are what kicked this off for me after reading the document and analysing the conclusions.
• 2021 Census data - peruse this search tool at your leisure. It is what a lot of my analysis will be using moving forward.

Now, onto the analysis portions of this post.

Top Line Numbers in Brief & How to Visualise Them

Some brief info on how to properly calculate stats. A lot of people will look at the proportions of the data. They'll quote real numbers, then factor them down into proportions and indicies. However I want to highlight a key fact from the conclusion of the report that cannot be understated in any way:

At Least 250,000 girls under 16 were victims in this case.

This number is very hard to grasp for a lot of people. It's the kind of numbers you see in retirement accounts for people who saved for decades, but instead of money it is people we are being shown. A quarter of a million girls raped and abused across the country. That isn't the number of offenses made, that is just the number of victims. It's insane as a stat in its own right.

To help everyone conceptualise this I want to use something y'all are more familiar with seeing on screen: stadiums. The largest stadium in the world, the Great Strahov Stadium in Prague, could just fit this quantity of people. In the USA you would need to fully pack 3 to 4 NFL stadiums to fit all of the people victimised here.

That's for Americans to see it mentally, but for the Brits? Imagine Wembley stadium packed to the rafters. It holds 90,000 people at capacity. Ergo you would need 3 Wembleys to contain all of the victims, and it would almost fill them all completely, with less than a third of the space left for the third stadium.

Worst of all? Those are the conservative figures. it is highly likely that even more victims exist than this number represents. I loathe to consider just how many could have been brutalised by these gangs in reality, and sticking with the lowest possible number is the best statistical way to look at this as it steelmans the argument instead of exaggerating it, and to say that is chilling in its own right.

That visualisation exercise hopefully will help people to grasp the severity of the problems here.

Lies, Damned Lies, & Statistics: How best to analyse the numbers of victims.

Some people will look at that 250k and compare it to total population in the uk, which was around 69 million in the last census. Done that way you have about 0.3% of the total population being a victim of this crime. That number sounds relatively innocent, a statistical abberation potentially, and it drives people to dismiss it. It's why I used the Mark Twain quote.

Sure it's 0.3% of total population but by using that figure:

• you've ignore age demographics: 12.7 million under 16s, who are the group in question.
• you've ignored gender demographics: we don't have accurate counts for this in the age group itself available publicly from what i could find quickly, but 50.73% are females in the uk, so extrapolating from there, you can presume there are approximately 6. 3 million girls under 16 in Britain.
• you've ignored racial demographics: again no real number for the age group, or for the gender itself, but about 76.8% are white British in the uk, so we can estimate there are 5 million white British girls under 16.

Now we have what can be called a relevant comparison. When you compare that 5 mil relevant figure to the victims, you get 5% of the relevant group being tortured/taped by these gangs. That's a 1 in 20 chance someone's daughter was a victim of this madness. A 1 in 20 chance some paki is gonna rape a young girl because "her skirt was too short" or "that ma'am haram and kaffir, so she's free game."

So yeah... The numbers in real terms and relative stats are the important way of looking at the problem. That also doesn't factor in a few other risk elements, like the proportion of Muslims in a local area to white British girls, or the policing records and behaviours, but on its own its beyond "bad".

Fun with Indicies: How Muslims are vastly overrepresented as perpetrators

Okay, so we've had a look at the raw stats, rates, and ratios of victims. Now let's look at the other side of the coin: the criminals. The conclusion identifies that the vast number of people involved as perpetrators were of Pakistani origin. However it flags this is but a side issue, as the real factor isn't race or nationality. It is religion.

Of those charged and / or sentenced in the cases of gang rape in the UK, approximately 90% of the criminals were Muslim. That's a huge component factor. It's like the worst ever toothpaste ad: 9 out of 10 gang rapists in Britain agree, Allah is grrrreat! Perhaps we shouldn't be too surprised they lean this way, given the stories of Aisha and Mohammed but key, details, right? Okay yes, I'm getting flippant now, but if I don't I'll start looking at joining the Irish on this bullshit.

To bring this back to some level of analytical thought, we need to compare that to the proportion of Muslims in the UK. I know people like to say that Islam has taken over England, but the reality is that the real figures of who is a practicing Muslim is closer to 6% of the UK (according to 2021 Census data).

So 90% of the crimes in question are committed by 6% of the populace. How do we present this properly? Well to do that we need to use a tool called an index calculation. An index is calculated loosely the following way:

100 * Proportion A/Proportion B

In this calculation:

• 100 is a standard distribution, or a "perfectly proportional representation"
• Anything greater than 100 is over represented
• anything under 100 is under represented.

You can then interpret this further by taking the representation index, subtract 100 and then divide that result to get the rate of likelihood. Eg if you have a 150 index the likelihood of the event is 50% greater than random.

Now, normally we need to establish things like statistical significance and the like for proper scientific results, but these are data points we have from events involving groups of people that are probably under 1000 at the moment so that's a challenge to establish against the wider group, but for the exercise of analysing the actual subset of people involved, it still has relevance.

Now the specific type of indexwe will use is a representation index, where you divide the crime proportion by the proportion of the group in the country who are committing the crime. As such we get 100*0.9/0.06, or 1500 as the index.

Based on this we can extrapolate the rate of likelihood that a Muslim would commit this type of crime compared to the average citizen. That result returns 1400% or in other words a 14x chance.

Yes. You read that right. A random Muslim in Britain is 14 times as likely to rape a British girl under 16 than any random person sampled in Britain. That's an insane statistic, no matter how you review it.

Qualitative Analysis: Review of Realities instead of Raw Numbers.

As sickening as all the above was to go through, we now must move onto the more qualitative analysis of the report. A quantitative analysis like I've just done explains the what. We also must review the qualitative data, which explains the why and how.

I am going to quote the last paragraph of the conclusion regarding this and then go over some findings:

the evidence is now overwhelming and irrefutable. The Rape gangs did not operate in the shadows, but with the active or passive consent of the British state. The betrayal was total.

That was the final conclusion made by the inquiry report. And as damning a statement as that is, it is only a summary of the gross negligence, complicit actions, and heinous crimes committed. One must be forced to admit from the results of the report that the police, social services, the NHS, courts, and media are all in part complicit in these events.

But first, let's look at the criminal mentality, and how these networks held their victims effectively hostage:

• rape victims were trapped by threats and blackmail and then used to breed future victims in some of these gangs;
• victims were seen as "easy meat" and "white trash" by the rapists;
• many were forced into unregistered Islamic marriages;

Now let's look at the authorities, the media, and agents of the state, and how they helped facilitate the problem, either directly or indirectly. Fyi this is fucking horrendous:

• Police officers ignored reported crimes, destroyed evidence, blamed or criminalised victims, allowed rapists to go free on bail, and in some cases even actively participated in or shielded these trafficking networks;
• Parental authority was stripped from families of victims by social care workers, who sent victims back to their abusers;
• social care workers closed active abuse cases without any just cause, destroyed evidence, and persecuted whistleblowers;
• courts were seen to be complicit passively by handing down warnings or very lenient sentences;
• the NHS was reviewed and found to have let the offenders collect their victims from the hospital;
• schools watched as rapists collected their victims from school, ignored reports from victims, and excluded victims instead of protecting them;
• taxi licensing authorities were even held complicit, having allowed the backbone of these gangs to exist via authorising their taxi businesses, who were trafficking these girls from city to city;
• whistleblowerss were actively persecuted by the police, the media, and the court system;
• Finally media pretending this problem isn't a problem at all, but just a "far right conspiracy". They self-censored to prevent accusations of racism.

Finally, let's review what the victims went through at a top line level:

• those traumatised by the rapes who went on to raise a family had their trauma used against them;
• some victims were driven to suicide by the authorities themselves;
• most lost all hope in the system as a whole, struggling to just stay alive through their trauma.

That is what qualitative analysis looks like, and the inquiry report did a smashing job of presenting it. All of this was gleaned just from the conclusion of the document, which was well written.

That said, as this was all just the conclusions, the above is also just the tip of the iceberg. The problem in brief is bad enough, but the specifics are so horrific that I felt physically ill from reading even some of them. Murders, abuse and death of babies caused by the rapes themselves, and stuff that would make the Maquis de Sade say "whoa! steady on, habibi!" but obviously in a French accent.

My Conclusions from the Report

I've spent hours writing this now, and tbh I'm hitting character limits. But that's how much needed to be said here. It's fucking horrible what has been going on, and it's been happening for decades. Multiple iterations of the government and multiple parties have failed Britain. It has done nothing but firm up my faith in ancapistan tbh, as at least there the average British dad could go full Rambo on the gangs directly and end each one locally. The only reason this has persisted the way it has is due to an abject failure by all elements of the state to do anything about it, save help it flourish.

There are zero fucks left for me to give for any government body. The well of my fucks has gone dry, and my field of fucks is barren. The people who did this I can no longer consider as human beings in my eyes anymore, nor the people who let it happen under their watch.

It is why I refuse to stay here in the UK longer than I must, and categorically will never raise a child in this hell hole of a country. I'd say a pox on this nation, but it's already here.