The Climate Data Changed My Mind
A 15-minute talk by Chris Martz, a young, 23-year old meteorologist.
He talks about growing up, arguing with his dad about climate change, discovering historical weather records that rarely make the news, and facing pressure from activists and even university administrators as his online audience grows.
How is this post Q-adjacent/Great Awakening adjacent?
One of the biggest revelations that Q brought to the masses is the concept of the psyop. Yet, in the midst of a full-blown 5G war being waged in all information spheres, many of us still get sidelined by this psyop or that psyop, and critical thinking is necessary more than ever to simply engage with the info war and keep a level head.
The Climate Change hoax is one of the greatest psyops perpetrated on the human population in the modern era. Entire populations, governments and institutions have been caught up in this operation.
But what should be clear to most of us now is how psyops work. Through a combination of emotional manipulation and information (or thought) injection, psyops can hijack a person's thinking and action and direct those towards the desired objective.
Think MKultra, ala Jason Bourne. The concept is to create extreme, emotionally traumatic experiences in order to fracture a person's psyche and then reprogram or craft a new personality that can be weaponized for [x] purpose.
The Role of Emotional Reality
Where does it start? On the emotional level. The emotions are always the gateway for the pysops.
This is why the global warming / climate disaster psyop has been so powerful. It targeted reactive and powerful emotions to bring people to a state where they would accept what they were being told without thinking about it as critically as they might otherwise. Emotions like outrage, righteous anger, pity, fear, and so forth.
One of the key objectives of the Q operation was, I believe, to help bring the masses out of the trance that decades of pysops have put them/us in, not by simply reacting, however, but by learning discernment, critical thinking, and questioning.
Why did Q mention scripture, the Bible, God, etc, so often? Because the best foundation for tackling any form of psyop is a well-grounded emotional stability, and the best emotional stability comes through a powerful, personal connection with the Creator, a relationship based in faith and love.
Not Just Data Alone
In this short talk, Chris Martz explains how, in his view, getting younger people to engage in breaking the climate psyop works best when there is an emotional element attached. Facts, data, just by themselves don't move most people, especially young people.
After an article in the NYP labeled Martz as the 'anti-Greta Thunberg', he adopted the moniker and embraced it. This is a young man who deserves support and attention, as he brings important balance to the whole situation. As the video proclaims, 'Climate Realism' is rising.
We should note here that emotions in and of themselves are neutral. They were designed by God for creative and useful purposes, but like all things, they can be used productively (by listening to them, recognizing them, learning what they teach us about ourselves and others), or they can be used manipulatively, for wrong and selfish purposes.
Any time someone is eliciting strong emotional reactions as a basis for presenting their arguments, we should be wary. On the other hand, based, grounded, non-reactive emotions are an important element of life. Things should be personal, and to convince anyone of our ideas, we should be able to engage with them emotionally at the start. Not in a manipulative way, but in an honest, open way.
(Think Charlie Kirk's style...)
In any case, emotional intelligence is one of the best defenses against mass-psyoppery and a powerful tool for liberating ourselves and others from a world of media deception.
I thought that Asian looking guy was an AI created generic video entity.
Here is the video shared by u/ChiefWoody earlier.
This was shared in the post:
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASsL7aoPi/no-oil-to-sell-and-no-water-to-d/c/
Now I am not suggesting that out beloved wood chief is actively trying to spread fake news/views. I assume everyone here is doing their best to help others find truth & follow Q in the Logical Thinking and critical thought process which Q was adamant we all use (unless it is clearly a troll/glowie/or some TDS account which become obvious pretty quickly to many experienced Anons here).
Now these may be valid claims, though this post is specifically to teach Anons that this specific avatar is used by video creation AI to make fast videos for monetization on YouTube & probably other streaming services.
Many claims made by that specific avatar on multiple channels IIRC.
I have a hard time believing the claims about Iran in the above link just because of the face & how often it is used in what seems to be AI productions.
@DrKenzoAG https://youtu.be/iTaOv6XjMgU
@Mr.DudeExplained https://youtu.be/bIFhUkoGAM4
@Hidden-Fix-Lab https://youtu.be/WFV6H5ZXHLg
Seems pretty AI to me. I am curious what other Anons believe.
Regardless if I am right, we need to keep our heads on a swivel & be aware of how easy it is to create fake videos that look legit with AI these days.
edit: I should have said I have a hard time initially believing claims.
Here is the whole story, breaking it down below with sauces.
Project Constitution tweets the supposed proof that Erika was recruiting for Epstein claiming
I have been sent a bombshell audio file, and I have verified its authenticity
The voice is undeniably Erika Kirk's. There is no mistaking it.
Ian Carrol quote tweets it and rack up 8.7 Million views.
Reader's add context saying its not Erika Kirk because, get this, the controlled audio from the DOJ has information as to whom it belongs - Kelly Hobson.
Ian Carrol deletes his tweet, then tweets this lame ass excuse.
After the whole thing falls flat on its face, Candace Owens takes credit for the "debunking" claiming they had received this audio many times over the last months and her team "was able" to debunk it (I presume she meant her team was able to read basic english text).
So somehow she decided to sit on it until her buddy Ian Carrol tried to "fly the kite to see how high it can go" and quickly came in for cleanup and took the credit and in the same tweet pushed her other conspiracy theories.
Anyone still following these human garbages at this point should be ashamed of themselves.
this psyop probably began before I was born,
but when i was going thru elementary school, and supposedly learning “English”
i distinctly remember these absolutely jarring sentences that just had really weird pronoun useage,
for example, the sentence opened with
(a person, presumably a man, but later revealed to be a woman) in a (traditionally male dominated field) (does something), (insert female pronoun) (the big implied gender reveal)
the fireman got in her fire truck
the English language, was once highly biased, in the sense that ordinary, non-specific pronouns etc were given male pronouns,
fire-man
congress-man
but even our story-telling, in its most basic form, favors male pronouns
he him his
but then along come the pronoun police,
forcing DEI on everyone
male pronouns aren’t “inclusive” enough
now even a fire-man is a fire-person
today, in 2026 we associate pronoun weirdness with trans and non-binary
and looking back on it now, all of these English classes seemed to be built around pronoun progressivism
each year they move the needle a little more,
we start out with female firemen,
and we “progress” until one day we have pregnant men and “chest feeding”
———————-
in the comments below, please describe if your English lessons felt the same way
Did they use gendered pronouns in very awkward manner?
Should we throw away all these DEI pronoun police propaganda?
Should we go back to using highly biased and highly exclusive male centered, generic pronouns?
Should we go back to just saying that
the fireman got in his firetruck?
sorry but theres been way too many transgender mass shooters in the last few years.
transgender people have a propensity for violence, for sure, but the deep state fake news has overplayed their hand again, by doing too many, too fast…
i suspect the long game is to get everyone on board wirh red flag laws targeting a tiny sub set of problematic people…
and then as soon as the red flag laws are in place, they keep expanding them to encompass more and more people
This video link (Asian AI Guy: Silver PsyOp or False Flag Operation?) takes you to a 9-minute clip that discusses a phenomenon that has recently emerged on Youtube, involving AI, established community leaders, and a short discussion of one type of psyop technique.
The clip is broken up into 5 sections: the Content, the 'High Speed Printing Press', Community Testimony, A Pattern of Warnings, and The Final Question
Silver and PM frogs will know this phenomenon (the 'silver asian guy') well, because its been circulating the Youtube precious metals arena for more than a month now.
I'm posting this here to GAW not because of the precious metals content, but because the breakdown presented in this very short (9 minute) video cross-translates extremely well to the things that we frogs and others in the truth-seeking community encounter all the time: potential information psyops.
Disinformation Psyop?
Well, to be more accurate, I'm talking about propaganda (propaganda psyops) in a number of forms, including dis-information, mis-information and mal-information.
The Methodology/Technique
What's used is a reasonably well known method of concealing an active piece of poison (mis/dis-information) inside a carrier in the form of legitimate and real information. The real and legitimate (accurate) information works as the medium by which the lies or deceptive information is 'snuck in'.
e.g. 90% accurate info + 10% lies/deceptive info
The video in the link is a great overview of how this technique works, but its also a good example of how to combat this this sort of operation, which I would breakdown as
1.) Identify content
2.) Identify mechanisms for delivery
3.) Contrast with an overview of solid community perspectives (or analyze using factual information)
4.) Identify potential harms or dangers
5.) Upgrade discernment
Although the context for this short video is something that's been happening on youtube over the past 40 days or so, the lessons apply to everything we encounter on social media, from influencers, or commentators, and more.
Why Discernment Upgrades Are Necessary
It should be obvious, but it's important for us frogs to consonantly upgrade our discernment because the collapse of the Lamestream Legacy media has resulted in the supremacy of decentralized content shared via social media (podcasters, 'researchers', commentators, inflooencers, etc).
That means that the primary target of dis-information / mis-information / mal-information operations is .... us. And our community. And all the people online who dig, research, read or share information in some form.
It's a lot easier to spot the Legacy Media propaganda now, because their methodology is so widely well known. But the information we get via social media etc, is trickier. And, the forces arrayed against you and I have gotten a lot sneakier; the general awakening of millions and millions to the deception psyops they used to run has forced them to evolve their techniques.
Also, any serious frog has to recognize that the disinfo and misinfo operations targeting us are going to be done using people who have 'established' a level of credibility by giving us good information or information that feeds our biases. They will use agents who look to us to be on the same page, or to be saying what we want to hear and which immediately resonates.
And that's why its tricky.
So, we need to constantly develop our discernment skills and also be on a constant lookout for operations that look good, but which may not actually have our best interests at heart. Wolves, dressed as very nice looking sheep.
As scripture advises: "Do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God"
How do we do this within the information war: independent research, verification of facts, and upgrading discernment.
Note: The video is also a very good 'normie-friendly' introduction to how information manipulation works. Suggestion: share it with a friend, a colleague or a loved one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCgIAuTACtI
Some Definitions
(These are my personal definitions; feel free to correct, modify or comment)
Disinformation
- a lie injected into an information stream in order to deceive and cause the recipient to form a wrong or mistaken conclusion or impression, one that does not correlate to the truth of the matter.
Misinformation
- Mistaken information usually inadvertently shared (not deliberate) that has a similar effect: causing the recipient to form a wrong or mistaken conclusion or impression, one that does not correlate to the truth of the matter.
The difference between disinformation and misinformation is intent. The former is deliberately injected into the information stream in order to deceive, the latter is usually passed on by unsuspecting or undiscerning 'sharers'.
Disinformation will often ultimately evolve to be spread as misinformation.
Mal-information
- mal-information is information that may be true, but the purpose of which is to manipulate the recipient in a negative way. For example, information that omits the context necessary to correctly evaluate its worth. Or 'correct' information that inspires a destructive response. Example: "Donald Trump banned all immigration from Muslim countries during X period!" >>>. "He's racist!"
The mal-information lays the foundation for the disinformation to be received.
Folks who are not aware of information warfare or the existence of psyops are probably particularly susceptible to mal-information.
Mal-information is information that is both manipulative and which also comes with a deliberate, destructive purpose.
