The situation in Syria is very interesting.
Currently the Assad forces are crumbling and the terrorists are advancing at a blitzkrieg pace.
Taking one step back though we can see that this has been orchestrated from Turkey with the help of NATO/Israel.
Syria's main allies are Russia and Iran.
Russia is tied up in Ukraine and wasn't even focusing on Syria.
Iran was fighting in Syria through Hezbollah which got decimated by Israel in their war against Hamas.
So naturally, Turkey used these factors to break the ceasefire and advance on the Syrian positions. To make matters even worse, Assad had to demobilize his army to save the last remnants of his economy. Hence most of the front line troops are poorly trained conscripts with very low morale.
In my book, Assad needs to survive in office till Trump takes charge. Pretty sure, Trump will preferred working with Assad as opposed to the deep state controlled "opposition".
At this point Assad will take any deal that would end the rebel problem once and for all. Pretty sure he would even accept breaking ties with Iran in exchange for territorial integrity guaranteed by the US.
First Greenland and now Canada.
Those "God Emperor Trump" memes are starting to become a reality.
You can replace China with the US in your comment, and the meaning will be the same.
Send them this video. It's real nice break down of the whole tarrif situation for normies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82HsrrTExqY
Romania owns their independence to Russia. The fact that they even exist as a country is down to a series of Russo-Turkish wars, culminating with the one in 1877-1878.
And yet, they forgot all about it and preferred to bend over backwards and suck globalist and NATO dick.
Many such cases
One thing I never understood about the US is why are non-citizens and non-residents even allowed to own land?
Most countries on this planet, have laws that prohibit non-citizens owning land. How come we are the exception?
Kind of like Lombardo in Vegas.
These people are nothing more than political hostages who are given the option of playing ball or being fertilizer. And the sad thing is that if they don't play ball, someone else always will.
To add stupidity to this:
Russia is already mobilized and deployed in military formations on the border.
Any pre-emptive strike, is not going to be pre-emptive, but walking into a prepared fir pocket while having tactical nukes being dropped on you.
These Wermacht wannabes need a humbling real bad.
I agree. After all, being part of the Q movement is questioning everything.
I just think that for the first time in their lives, most people are just happy that they have someone who they believe trully represents them, hence why they're overlooking or avoiding uncomfortable topics: it's the fear of disappointment really.
Well, let's not go down the "feel" rabbit hole, because that's what liberals use in their arguments.
By definition, any platform that you can upload your media to: video, photo, text falls under the category. Even if you have a social profile of yourself, hence the term, social media.
What do you mean?
So youtube is a social media platform, and yet pornhub isn't?
Nah, they are in the rears.
The front lines are usually manned by territorial defense units. They are there to soak up the Russian artilery shells and they attacks. Once the Russians breach a position, these Azov units do a quick hit and run to slow them down.
Rinse and repeat.
Every time I have an argument with one of them on youtube, they go quiet real fast as soon as I mention that they should be drafted and sent to Ukraine because their biggest shortage right now is manpower. Kek
Hate to break it to you, but the US was already under occupation way before Khruschev set foot in the US.
All you need to know is that the Federal Reserve was established 4 years prior to the bolshevik revolution. And despite the USSR collapsing 30+ years ago, the effort to destroy our nation has only increased since then.
I always find it interesting how people on this board think of Putin as some kind of staunch anti-communist. Putin is a conservative and a USSR patriot, plain and simple. He famously said that "the dissolution of the USSR is the biggest geopolitical tragedy of the 20th century".
What I meant to say was that he did confirm that he used a ballistic missile, however it was a medium ranged one as opposed to a inter-continental one.
Reply 1 of 2:
I will reply directly to this post to address a lot of your inaccuracies as well as lack of knowledge. The problem is that you are making a lot of assumptions and yet you think you are telling the truth.
Let's begin:
You did not live there during the Stalin and Hitler years.
I didn't, but my parents and grandparents lived there. All of them are in agreement that times were tough, but fair. When asked who do they think is the best USSR ruller, Stalin sits at the front of the queue by a country mile.
I can also go on about how Nazis treated my grandparents during the occupation of their village. I can tell you how they executed my anti-communist great grandpa right in front of my grandma and her sister. I can tell you how the German allies(the Romanians) beat my grandma senseless for refusing to hand over her horse because they needed it for the war effort. I can also tell you how both the Germans and Romanians confiscated all her livestock and chickens almost causing them to die of starvation. I can also tell about how the Romanians forcefully drafted my grandma's 17 year old brother(even though he wasn't an adult) and sent him to die not from Stalingrad.
But I won't bore you with the details, since this is an emotional argument after all.
I care about what EVIDENCE can be presented to support a claim. You have presented NONE
What? There is a reason I called your argument a smooth brain take, because clearly if you can't see any evidence despite me presenting tons of it, is a problem.
a housing program where everyone could own their own home. For each child born, 1/4 of the mortgage was forgiven. Have 4 children, and you own your own home free and clear.
Umm, not sure how to tell you this, but in the USSR any married couple was entered in line to receive a free apartment/house(depending if they lived in the city/village)free of charge from day 1. The more kids you had, the bigger the arrangement. For example: my dad received a 3 bedroom apartment once he turned 24. My ex's dad got a free 5 bedroom 3 bathroom apartment because he had a large family.
So believe it or not, programs like the one you mentioned existed not in the Reich alone. As a matter of fact, the free apartment program was scrapped with the dissolution of the Soviet Union. And now the "free" Russians are debt slaves to their mortgage.
They wanted to take out Germany because it had become an economic threat by having such great success under Hitler's economic policy
Again, they became an economic power house because of the billions poured by the cabal banking system and their oil companies. Once the investment dried up, Germans were almost starving, hence they had to invade the USSR to get Ukraine and the Caucaus range for food and oil. But don't worry, they did that because the Soviets were conveniently plotting to attack them first.
The Russians had no problem with the czar.
You need to study Russian history more. Pre bolshevik Russia was a backwater feudal agrarian society with a caste system. The peasants were treated like real slaves even though they were "free". The boiling point was WWI which was preceded by a couple of major famines(pretty common under the Russian empire btw). The point is that contrary to the dominating narrative here, Russia was in a far worse shape as an Empire rather than under the commies.
In hindsight, yes. That is because Stalin double-crossed him.
You do know that both USSR and Nazi Germany fought against each other during the Spanish civil war?
You also do know that USSR wanted to assist the Allies during the annexation of Czechoslovakia?
The notion that they were friends or allies is plain wrong. The Molotov Ribentrop pact was response from the USSR to buy themselves some time to arm up because they were falling way behind.
Stalin's plan was to take over all of Europe, though, and Hitler did stop that.
This theory is not supported by a simple litmus test, and that is that the USSR was in the middle of reorganizing it's army.
Why you might ask? Because Germany at the time had an army of 3 million men. USSR had an army of 1.5 million men despite being 3x as big. In 1938 they started reorganizing their army and increased the number to 5 million. When Germany attacked them they were in the middle of the said organization hence why they suffered such catastrophic losses. Suffice to say, when they got their shit together around 1943, they simply curbstomped the Nazi machine.
How do I know USSR wasn't planning to attack Germany?
Winter war. The top Soviet brass understood that if little Finland can give them such a bloody nose, imagine what the best army on the continent can do.
According to the Soviet archives that I read, they were estimating that their army would finish the reorganization process around 1943/1944. So the notion that they were ready to attach is false simply because their army wasn't ready.
What about Stalin invading the Baltics and Poland?
Those were historic Russian lands that were taken during the Soviet civil war. As such they were returning them to their original owners.
If he got rid of the faggots in the 1920's, and if Moscow was the depravity capital of Europe at that time, it is only because the jews were the ones in control until Stalin walked in the door.
I have not looked into Stalin nearly as much as I have Hitler.
You should. You'd be surprised what you're going to find. As a disclaimer, the english internet only has smear campaigns against him which kind of contradict your points below.
The lies about Stalin are to make him look good when in fact he was evil. The lies about Hitler are to make him look evil when in fact he was good.
You are thinking of Lenin. There is not a single article that portrays Stalin in a positive light on the english side of the internet. As a matter of fact try finding one positive article about Stalin. You won't. Not even the lefties will acknowldge him as one of their own. Now look up Lenin and Trotskii to see the difference.
And yet, plenty of articles and even youtube channels(zoomer historian) who speak positively of Hitler. There are entire forums dedicated to talking about what a great man he is.
By comparison, I can only find positive things about Stalin on the Russian side of the internet.
All USSR citizens were FUCKING SLAVES. NO PROPERTY.
That's false. Soviet citizens owned apartments, cars, jewlery, vacation homes. The real estate was given to you by the state, free of charge from day 1. Everything else could be bought using money interest free. There were no loans as I mentioned.
That would be counter to communism, as communism demands conformity.
I can tell you've never lived in a traditional society. Traditionalism is about conformity. The man is the head of the household while the wife raises the kids. The husband is the provider, while the wife takes care of the household.
If as a man or woman, you don't like any of this, sucks to be you, because everyone is like this and you should too, or your community will think that you are crazy. And no, I'm not making this up.
Look at the Amish for example and see how much conformity is expected of them. I guess they must be commies as well, right?
You want me to believe that the USSR was a special brand of communism? I don't.
Don't know what to tell you, but there was only one country that rivaled the US in the last century technologically or military, and that country was USSR.
So did I. And my parents could own a house.
Your parents or you don't own your house. Don't believe me? Stop paying your property tax and see how long you are going to own your house. This was a thing even when your parents were in their 20's. As long as you have to pay tax on anything, you are just leasing it from the government.
In the USSR people owned their homes till they died without paying a dime. But somehow they were slaves. Meanwhile someone who has to work all their life to pay off their home and lose when they miss 1 tax payment is considered free.
As for the US not having fluoride, porn, drugs is just downright lie.
Fluoride has been in the water since the 1920's.
My wife who was born and raised in the US told me about the porn industry and how big it was back in 1970's and 1980's.
And are you seriously going to tell me the US had no drugs, when even the fucking hippies were popularizing that shit as far back as the 1960's?
As a mentioned, none of these factors were a thing in the USSR. So by default a country that has no porn, no LGBTQ, no drugs, no fluoride and no usury by default can't be jewish controlled.
But again, this has nothing to do with Nazi Germany.
Which years are you talking about? Pre- or Post-1991?
Pre 1991.
Germany was the #1 economy in the world under Hitler, so OF COURSE there would be A LOT of economic trade -- especially the usual deep state suspects.
Germany wasn't the No.1 economy in the world since the early 1900. There was not a point in the war were they held that position.
The only time they became a powerhouse is when they annexed the industry rich lands of Czechslovakia and Austrria. Only then were they able to trully challenge the rest of Europe.
Mind you this still happened with the full cooperation of the Allied powers who according to you were looking to take them down.
The country that was the #1 economic powerhouse in the world was the US. During the WW2, the US outproduced the entire world combined. You can check all the industry metrics and compare them to Nazi Germany and the USSR.
I would think as someone who claims to be a patriot, you would know and be proud of your ancestors, but for whatever reason you spend more time glorifying a regime that has nothing to do with your country. A regime that is at odds with the US Constitution and that has a Socialism element(in before: it wasn't real socialism even though the government literally decided how citizens live their daily lives).
As a sidenote: notice how the US economy stayed strong all the way till the USSR collapsed. And only then did the cabal start the controlled demolition of this country.
Some food for thought.
P.S. I'm off to work, I will include part 2 once I get back.
It's a show of force.
A lot of leftists in west have accused Russia of being a paper bear and for barking without bite. Last night they showed that they're not afraid to escalate this conflict if the situation requires it.
As for the how: most likely they produced a couple of these platforms and simply didn't use a payload.
Or they also have non-nuclear variants of these missile and have decided to start using it.
At the end of the day these are Russians. Just like Trump, they are very unpredictable.
Putin himself said they used a ICBM.
Here is the video proof: https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-icbm-attackddnipro-38b0faf6eed2cef98bdbc9be18f58244
Edit: Not directly and ICBM, but from the same family.
It's because of their ethnicity.
Dr. Oz is turkish while Abramovic is Serbian. Most likely they both share turkish DNA.
Back in the day, Serbia was occupied by the Ottoman Turks for about 500 years until Russia liberated them.
Oh look, feds working overtime to cause chaos and panic. Nobody saw this coming /s
Funny how all of these countries miraculasly stop genociding the Germans as soon as WW2 ends.(in before "but but but they were genocided post ww2" and yet somehow their population doubled since 1945)
But you know what never stopped post WW2? The cabals war on slavs. Their ethnic cleansing is ongoing to this day. Also funny how out of all the deaths during WW2, 40 million are slavs.
Funny how all of that works.
Oh boy, where do I even start with this one? First of you sound like a redditor who got trigerred, bulshit disinfo reee.
Second of all, Q called out Nazis on multiple occasions even going as far as calling the NWO a Nazi World Order. Any notion that Hitler was a white hat is smooth brain take.
Third of all, I actually lived in the USSR. I have first hand experience of everything I'm saying. And I can tell you for a fact: people would spit in your face if you attempted to tell them that Hitler tried saving them considering the shit they had to go through.
With that being said, let me address the reeeing and bulshit disinfo claims.
Hitler printed his own money and arrested one of the Rothschilds because he was stealing from the Austrian bank.
So did Stalin. As a matter of fact, during Stalin's reign he attached the ruble to the golden standard and banned usury all together.
He also executed a lot of zionist jews. You remember the 96% of jews that were part of the Soviet apparatus when Lenin took over? You know how many were left after Stalin died? I'll help you out here: 2%.(more on that below)
The purges were aimed at the zionist jews who wanted to stage a coup and overthrow Stalin and have Trotskii come back.
Remember the cold war? Here is a fun fact you can verify yourself. The reason the cold war started is because Stalin refused to sign the Breton Woods treaty. In case you didn't know, Breton Woods made the US dollar reserve currency of the world.
Stalin refused to sign it because he would be handing the control of the national currency to an external power.
By 1939, the jewish communists already had control of USSR for more than a decade, and they were trying to do it to Germany, too, and then the rest of Europe, and then the rest of the world.
You argument doesn't make sense considering that the USSR came out stronger post WW2. If anything Hitler basically handed Stalin all of eastern Europe on a platter. Not sure how he saved the white race while handing most of it over to the bolsheviks.
As for the jews controling Russia,I can tell you right now that they didn't because they were killed. Trotskii, Tukhashevskii, Yagoda, Zinoviev all zionists all purged from the aparatus.
But let me tell you what else Stalin did:
-
Purged the LGBTQ movement- before Weimar and your precious uncle Adolf, the LGBTQ capital of the world was Moscow. Lenin era USSR was an infested with tranies and all sorts of degenerates. Stalin banned all of that and sent them to gulags for reeducation while reestablishing the nuclear family and traditional values. Something you like to say Hitler did and always give him props for it. Funny how when a different dictatorship does it, it's all crickets.
-
Decriminalized christianity- Stalin was an ex-priest himself who became disilussioned with the church hierarchy. Up until WW2 being a Christian would land you in jail. Post WW2, everyone was allowed to be a Christian. Not as freely as the west mind you, it was a dictatorship after all.
-
Banned usury and predatory loans - all USSR citizens were debt free. All services were free as well. They had no income tax as well. The only tax they paid was the property tax which constituted around 1 weeks worth of wages over the course of an year.
I can go on and on. However I can tell you this: there is a reason why all of the based European countries are ex-Soviet bloc ones: Russia, Belarus, Poland, Hungary. There is a reason why non of them have any national guilt. It's because the commies reinforced national pride as being part of the collective.
I grew up with no porn, no drugs, no fluoride in my water, no lgbtq propaganda, no violence or sex on tv. As you can imagine, it was a very nice period to live in, and 80% of Russian will agree with me on that.
Hitler built up the German military over the objections of the West According to the nazis were the good goys theory: Hitler somehow managed to outmaneuver the west and become all powerfull over night.
In reality billions were being poured in by the British and American corporations. The Bush family was even investigated by Congress for funding his regime during WW2.
Even so, per Versaille treaty, the Allies(Britain and France) were supposed to make sure Germany never rearms itself. If it does, they were supposed to step in and stop it, BY FORCE.
But what do we have?
Germany starts rebuilding it's military - crickets
Germany takes back Studetland - crickets
Germany takes Austria - crickets
Germany annexes Czechoslovakia
Let me stop here.
Did you know that the Soviets and Czecoslovakia had a mutual defense pact? As a matter of fact, the Soviets asked both Poland and the Allies to attack Nazi Germany or at the very least, let them pass through Poland to aid Czecoslovakia.
So there it is, the perfect oportunity to attack Germany 4 vs 1: USSR, England, France and Poland.
And yet nothing happened. As a matter of fact, the Allies told the Soviets not go through Poland.
The result?
Germany and Poland both annex Czechoslovakia, enabled by the Brits and France while the Soviets got shafted.
Now riddle me this? If Germany was facing a monolithic conspiracy from these powers, why did this happen? Why did these powers allow Germany to get even stronger? The math ain't mathin here buddy.
Funny how you use a bit of critical thinking, and your argument falls apart.
It is an emotional argument, that's all it is.
But but but, the Germans said dei good boyz, they be aryans en shieet. That's all there is to it.
Your emotional argument belongs on plebbit and not here. Only liberals use emotions to argument their position.
Q told us as much. Use questions and think critically. Just because the western media hates Hitler, doesn't mean he was a good guy. As I mentioned, he was patsy who played his part.
You can also thank him for having anti-semitic laws. Funny how that works: he builds camps that target jews, and yet everyone is ok in them. And yet the ones that target slavs have a death rate of 60% compared to 10% for the rest of the allies. According to your logic, those 60% were shot by commies as well while being in captivity. All of them were comissars too probably.
The Slavs were murdered by the Soviets (jews), and the Germans were liberators.
Your are right about this. Initially a lot of the Slavs viewed the Germans as liberators. Soon that would change dramatically once the local populaces got a taste of what this liberation was like.
Here is a quick video of how the noble Germans treated the Soviet POWs. Fair warning, it gets very intense: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeRR100incE
As a sidenote, did you know that out of all the prisoners that entered the German capitivity in 1941, 80% died. The overall Soviet pow death rate is 57% in 4 years. By comparison, the evil subhuman bolshevik scum only killed 33% of German pows from 1941 to 1955.
Imagine that, the Germans had a higher survivability rate in the gulags over the course of 10-14 years as opposed to Soviets(mostly Russians, Bielorussians and Ukranians) who were humanely treated by the liberating Germans.
If you want numbers, here there are:
Out of 5.7 Soviet Pows that entered german captivity, 3.1 million died over the course of 4 years or about 775k per year.
By comparison out of 3 million German Pows that entered soviet captivity, 1 miilion died over the course of 10 years or 100k per year.
By this metric alone, the death rate for soviet pows was 7x of their german counterparts.
I can go on and on. The problem is that I don't think you'll read most of this comment anyway.
The point is that you've been duped into believing the whole persecuted German lie.
This girl is just proof as to how far western society has fallen.
Imagine appearing on video and showing everyone what a degenerate you are, and as your reward you end up going mainstream.
Let's forget the economy and illegal immigration. Our biggest challenge is the normalization of degeneracy and being a fucking retard.