Thank you much for you research. Interesting points. I did look into the fest but It's been awhile. Most American names have a foreign counterpart origin. I'm guessing that if Richard claimed he was related to Reuben, he probably is. "Connections to India" might serve the privateer notion as history. Thanks again, and carry on fren.
One could only hope that a TRUE investigation can be opened in the shooting death of an anti-illegal-immigration judge that got passed over by claiming wife Gabby was shot. Would the investigation discover that a surgery had already been scheduled? Is that just a guess? What was up with her 'miraculous' recovery? Her doctor said it was unprecedented. It sure was. Why did her speech then begin resembling a child's speaking patterns rather than the type of speech seen from serious brain injury? Check on that and see if you can 'hear' it.
Jared Loughner. The kid said to be the shooter. He had previously attracted attention by making statements about lucid dreaming and began successfully predicting stock market values. I know this because I ran across his site while researching articles on lucid dreaming. He seemed like a very intelligent young man with interesting cutting edge ideas. Always dangerous, no? Add to this the fact that he was challenging his teachers in college and defeating their argued responses. Another 'no-no'. He got 5150'd fast and the resulting product was a totally different looking character (in later pics after the shooting). He had that whole 'look' if you know what you're looking for. So it's three birds with one stone, using timing and setting up the Situational event. Judge gone, surgery done, hero hubby can replace. Fun with puzzles.
MK is a helluva drug.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansari_X_Prize
When this prize was offered, it told me that space was going to be opened to (select) private companies and individuals. It was about that time that Branson appeared on the scene as a candidate. I followed his 'progress' as a made man from there. His formation of a company named 'Virgin' and owning an island was possibly a double-sided brag/tell of sorts. One, the obvious pirate's historic penchance for island virgins. Put an eyepatch on some of 'these guys' and they might as well have a parrot on their shoulder standing next to their chest of booty. And yes MANY of them are indeed direct descendants of the old school pirates. They just become the New Gen 'privateer' as they learned to call it.
He was connected to Virgin Records who had an island base. Is he behind the music fest at Branson, Missouri? Was the town named for one of his ancestors? Might be an interesting dig.
Some things really can be seen coming from a long way down the road once the 40k ft map is seen. Agendas become apparent and the devil is revealed in the future details. I've done this 'thing' my whole life. If one keeps the ugly inconvenient truth as your only dog in the fight, it will serve you well.
Judge, AJ and his team and prosecution's by their intentionally suspect actions DISALLOWED a legitimate discovery phase.
As stated from day one.
No points what so ever. Here, let me edit it so a fifth grader can understand.
WE the people were disallowed justice with a discovery phase. Justice was disallowed by their disallowance of discovery EVIDENCE which is what discovery is about, not the process.....the EVIDENCE disallowed by not having a legitimate discovery of evidence. SAME AS DAY ONE.......YOU simply DIDN'T GET THAT and chose to use a lame semantic 'argument' to attempt to cover. If it actually works for you as getting one over on me, you have an issue with reason and logic.
Where the hell are your answers to my questions smart guy? NOT ONE SINGLE ANSWER and you think you've won some prize by getting smarmy and using semantic dodges? ......I'm done with your stupid game.
It took me two days because I was busy discussing the limitations of artificial intelligence with intelligent people and didn't want to be distracted by a person who's intellect is artificial. I was also simultaneously going through a third round of chemo and a little tired. Just like I told you I'm tired of your incessant projection and ignorance. You lied when you said you'd leave it when I asked. Didn't you? Place answer here _____.
Now please come back with proof of your lie so I can block you as ignorant willful harassment instead.
Macron is said to have FILED a suit. Whether that's true or not, doesn't mean it will come to court. Ha......ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. "You're so ignorant" that you assumed too much and didn't listen to or answer the question, did you?
And now you pretend that taking the subject back to the original one is 'changing the subject'. If it did go to actual trial, would she be allowed a true discovery, without farce, as opposed to the Jones trial? Same question, same points.
You're afraid. Afraid to answer the questions with actual prediction because your conscience knows you don't know. You defraud. You misrepresent. You obfuscate. Look that word up.You don't answer a single thing. You OBFUSCATE and your whining tone makes it humorous. You WISH you could upset me, that's hilarious, but it's you who is 1) Whining and upset 2) Defeated without acceptance 3) Refusing to answer questions or put his money where his projection hole is by predicting.
Not ONE question (the answers already known to me) was answered. And I knew that would happen also. Sophomoric hall monitors do not run the school, they only attempt to be a gatekeeper. It's usually indication of sub-conscious inferiority complex, and/or power trip. In this case, it's a fishing trip.
Isn't it? Place answer here ______________.
You feel threatened because you have no authority over things you don't understand.
Good luck trying to fake your way through life with this attitude.
Here you go: "I don't want to continue this discussion any further"
You claimed that would stop your pointless harassment and insults.
Let's see how honest you are now.
Why slander? You actually had to ask that question? What was AJ's charge?
Tell me what charge you expect to be filed if not slander. Defamation? Same rules apply. Go ahead. Venture a charge:
Place your answer right here ___________.
Did you know that truth is a defense, but needs 'discovery' to find that truth.........and to deny it is to deny a legal defense?
Place answer here. _________
Will Candace be sued and she'll respond with discovery which will be allowed? Predict. Make a commitment or just shut the fuck up. Place answer here _____________.
I've had more productive conversations with dogs than I'm having here. So I'll continue providing facts and information you've never heard or considered, and you can continue simple denials and insults so we can show our proper place and relative standing.
Why would AJ sabotage his own discovery? Why would his team sabotage his case by allowing that to happen withOUT evidence discovered, and then hand over the defense in a phone? Answer here ________.
Why didn't AJ's team petition the judge for a mistrial? Why didn't AJ fire his team and ask for a mistrial/retrial?
Why would a judge allow that to happen in a high profile case that skews the outcome?
Answers here ______ here ____and here ______.
How does all this not add up to 'KANGAROO COURT' by arrangement? What is 2 plus 2? Answer here ______.
Thanks for playing......with your food.
One more personal insult gets you reported.
Leading by example.
Your turn, insult comedy dog. Answer the questions or stfu.
Another insult as point? You mistake my ability with words to be sign of physical weakness do you? You trained in MMA? Did you bounce in rough clubs as a youth? Huh. I can out 'man' you every day of the week, mentally and physically. I've proven the second part to many would be big-mouthed pretenders and it would be a pleasure to add you to the list. Now back to the 'debate' you're failing BIGLY.
You get to ignore my questions by asking me 'why'?
Let's revisit your very first response. You: "What is disallowed discovery phase?"
You FAIL to put your money where your projection hole is. Didn't you? What's the matter, skeered to stake your ego on a commitment. I gave you mine. I gave you a rundown on the reasons WHY the Macron case will never get to discovery IF it is even levied as a charge. I don't OWE you explanations, I gave them to you already and you pretend not.
Why is the charge slander? Holy cow. How else would they be able to keep Candace and others from spreading inconvenient accusations? Same reason for AJ. But AJ cooperated, being a shill.
Okay now on to the part where YOU, not I make your bold predictions on all cases pending or cried about.
What will happen smart guy? I'm still waiting with BAITED breath and you're the master baiter.
I certainly hope Erika Kirk tries to sue her. Just the resulting attention to details should be enough for them to discourage them. You'd know that and WHY only if you knew the details referenced. They're 'sensitive' to those can't sense the coffee.
What will happen? Will there be a trial? Will the burden of proof be on the prosecution to prove (to prove what) or on the defense to 'disprove' (kangaroo court)? Will she get legit discovery? Will it allow peripheral but related, and/or circumstantial, 'sensitive and classified' information? Be sure to detail your answers.
Here's 'my' position. NO Reasons to be explained unfortunately, in the near future. Kind of difficult to explain why something didn't happen, but it takes intellectual fortitude.
Come get some. Your turn
"Sure, I'll be a leader and do that......so.....go ahead.....lead the way".
Well since you're so brave and need fuel for your fire.....
Interesting you start with the Macron case. The charge would be slander. The burden of proof would be on the prosecution. What would be considered 'proof' from a foreign agent, when such proof would actually be classified? You KNOW it would. What if that gave license to misrepresent with a single doctored document? Would that determine the case? Would discovery for Candace be so limited as to determine nothing? Would classified info from a foreign player of the cabal be automatically allowed upon Candace's request? Would peripheral data and information be allowed as circumstantial evidence? Please detail each answer and be clear as to why. Let's 'debate' til your head spins.
You've not presented one actual fact, while ignoring the ones I present. You wouldn't know a debate from a reprobate. You argue by ignorant denial and projection using false assumptions and misreadings of other people's work. At least that's the buzz.
Candace will be sued and will get a legit discovery phase. YES or NO? Why? Or....you could move on to save the future embarrassment. Choose wisely.
Y'all are going to find some pretty stinky fish in this pond. Racine is like a little capital to the Ancient Ritual Religion crowd. Similar to the Newtown situation.