Investigate, indicted, impeached (where required), prosecuted, and, if found guilty, should be a Capital Offense, in my opinion. Not incarceration.
I understood that, but drew a parallel closer to home. Regardless, I am sure their constitution is just as much the contract for their government, as our is for our own.
Canadian people need to stand up and hold those that represent them accountable. All men have the same right to reform their own governments, as do we. This is a right given all people by our Creator to hold the governments of man they live under accountable for their conduct.
Look how Mike Simpson limits the ability of his constituents to contact him:> https://simpson.house.gov/contact/
I am opposed to #13 and #14.
For #13, I am 100% opposed to continuing use of the FRN as the U.S. Dollar. I fully support abolishing the FRN, the Federal Reserve, and returning to the real U.S. Dollar in the form of Silver and Gold Eagles, as established and intended by our Founding Fathers.
For #14, Both programs (along with many others) are purely socialistic and not authorized by the Constitution. I would much rather see a program to eliminate these programs and giving the people back their money to use as they choose.
I love our Country, but as a fully functioning Constitutional Republic operating 100% on the principles upon which it was originally established.
No Branch of our Federal Government has any legitimate power to grant any person or entity full immunity for any act that violates the individual natural rights of Americans. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute.
In a Constitutional Republic, when the Federal Government ignores the Constitution, you have an illegitimate Government. The Constitution is quite literally they contract, or license, for Government to exist and operate.
"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." - Quote by: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Source: Federalist Papers #78, See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762, Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)
Once President Trump is back in office he should work toward withdrawing all federal funds from any City, County, and State that is ignoring immigration law and enforcement.
And yet, over 99% of Americans pay property taxes on homes and other property. It isn't about me knowing the difference, it is about being able to argue it successfully in court when the deck is stacked against you by the corrupt system.
We all have a right to own and carry weapons yet in many places you will be arrested for doing so. That is despite the 2A telling government not to infringe.
It is the County, not the State, and yes, they will force you to go to court because they will deny your petition, and your filings. There maybe a rare few that get the easy approval, but most end up having to go to court to secure they patents. Harris County, TX was the last time I saw someone filing and ended up having to go to court.
I know, for a fact, that it will most likely go to court to enforce.
First of all, the Court didn't grant anything. The Constitution defines each Branch of government, and each role. Presidential Immunity has always been around. There are already remedies to Presidential criminal activity. It is called Impeachment. If impeached, then the President can be tried for illegal activities.
Not without a court fight. You MUST know how to fight to win, or you will lose the case. Most lawyers are going to be useless for a case like this. You need to be ready to argue your own case.
Learn about land patents and how to apply them. Here is a good place to start your research: https://teamlaw.net/land.htm
The Constitution doesn't grant them any "Emergency Powers". Only the limited powers they always have. Nothing more.
Wrong. The constitution merely protects our pre-existing rights from government infringement and overreach. We were born with the right to abolish government no longer operating under the limits of the constitution. Our Creator endowed us with all of our rights at birth.
Land patents are worth the time and effort to research, apply, and defend in court. https://teamlaw.net/land.htm is a great place to start learning and researching.
Obama was not eligible, either, but see how that turned out?
The President can't give anyone the death penalty. He can sign a bill into law, but he is not king.
They don't have to turn Idaho blue to win control. Just see what they did in Denver to win control over the entire State of Colorado.
No, he merely declared war on the states that, as was there right, had decided to secede from the Union. Thereby effectively destroying States Rights and Sovereignty.
We have the right to remove SCOTUS Justices that do not uphold their oath and the Constitution. The real litmus test, as set forth by our founders, was that in all cases the Justices had to use the Constitution, as it was originally intended, as the guide to rule on the case. No politics, no political biases, nothing.
If they do any different, they betray the oath they took, and their rulings are null and void, just like any laws repugnant to the constitution.
Actually, when all Federal branches of government are compromised, it isn't up to government to decide who committed treason. It is 100% the Peoples call. otherwise, the Declaration of Independence means nothing.
All government power comes from a single source, and is enacted through a contract, called the Constitution. If government violates it, that act is null and void. We do not need SCOTUS to tell us what is legal or not. We have the capacity to do that for ourselves, and, as masters over government, have every right to do so.
George Washington most likely never said this, but it is the way our founding fathers all believed. I give you the 2nd amendment as proof that they were very much for an armed society.
I am a firm believer in the fact that we all have a spiritual, moral, and personal responsibility to protect ourselves, our families, our property, and our communities. Everyone should be armed, and fully trained in the use of the weapons they choose to own and use. Everyone should have emergency plans in place for their households, and should be rehearsing these plans with their families to the point that if something were to happen, everyone knows their role, and what they are supposed to do.
Taken to the next level, if you have good neighbors, is a neighborhood plan for if something were to happen. The recent events in Israel should make it very plain why this would be a wise course of action.
I do believe scenarios like written in that book can actually happen in real life. Our suburbs and neighborhoods are all but defenseless against these type of attacks, unless you and your neighbors do something to change that.
We need to relearn what it is to be neighbors, and build communities of people who care about each other. Who have each others backs.
Now let's see this happen across the rest of the States.