Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

354
Unless proven with court documents, at the time of Kamala’s birth, her parents were not U.S. citizens. They were foreign students. At the time of her birth, she was the daughter of non-citizens. This makes her an anchor baby. She is not eligible to hold the office of President. (media.greatawakening.win) 💊 RED PILL 💊
posted 1 year ago by Bloggerchick 1 year ago by Bloggerchick +354 / -0
75 comments download share
75 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (75)
sorted by:
▲ 46 ▼
– Richone 46 points 1 year ago +46 / -0

I don’t believe Obummer was either, especially after his birth certificate was analyzed.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– Speak2Truth 23 points 1 year ago +23 / -0

The birth certificate says Obama's Father was a Kenyan citizen when Obama was born. That disqualifies him even if he was born in Hawaii.

"The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens." - Law of Nations

Kamala is not even legal to be Vice President, per the 20th Amendment. If Republicans had ANY ballz, they would invoke the 25th Amendment on Biden and simultaneously remove Kamala for ineligibility, making Speaker Johnson the President.

Here's more about Kamala's situation. It also applies to Vivek Ramaswamy, Ted Cruz, Barack Obama and Marco Rubio.

Kamala Harris is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States Not eligible to be President or Vice President https://www.dagnyintel.com/home/kamala-harris-is-not-eligible-to-be-president-the-natural-born-citizen-requirement

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– harleytrvlr 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/169/649/ This court decision defined “natural born citizen .” Kamala Harris is unfortunately a “natural born citizen.”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Speak2Truth 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

What did the Wong Kim Ark case say about "natural born citizen"? The exact words:

'The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children;' US v. Wong Kim Arkenactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens..." United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 702-703 (1898)

The case did not DEFINE "natural born citizen", it RECOGNIZED the actual definition and determined that Mr. Ark is NOT a "natural born citizen".

So, the Judge had to resort to the 14th Amendment to try to make Mr. Ark a citizen by birth. Even that was incorrect, since the 14th Amendment was worded to exclude anyone born with foreign allegiance, its purpose being to give citizenship to the freed slaves who had no foreign allegiance but were not US Citizens either.

Wong Kim Ark, Dred Scott and the Venus cases all acknowledged the definition of "natural born citizen".

Kamala harris is NOT eligible to be President or VP.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– farpointpatriot 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

CORRECT

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TheTroof 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Do that and the damn Democrats would win the election in November. You know full well it would get spun as Republicans playing dirty political tricks. Which is why I know none of the powers that be in DC are actually in power, because that's exactly what RINOs would try and do right now with Trump running away with it. Throw the damn Democrats a lifeline. Hell no. Here's a lot of rope... Have fun.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ThinkItThrough 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

🤔🤔

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) Argued: March 5, 1897 Decided: March 28, 1898

Long opinion, here is the bottom line:

[Holding:] The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/169/649/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Malachi3vs16 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

I gave +1 for the research. I think the Great Awakening principle is that we are going back to Founding principles. U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark was a 14th Amendment citizenship case, and I think the direction of judicial philosophy we need to go back to includes natural law — The Law of Nations as written by Emer de Vattel, published in 1758. ”The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” ____The 14th Amendment did not alter this constitutional requirement which had a clear purpose as understood by the Founders when the Constitution for the United States of America. Vattel, “The Law of Nations” Book 1, chapter 19, section 212 ____ Link to online book: https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/whatmore-the-law-of-nations-lf-ed

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Malachi3vs16 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

James Kent, author of “Commentaries on American Law” vol. 2 (pp. 18ff in pdf link) did not intend to exclude “of parents who are citizens” from his definition of natural-born citizenship, and neither did Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story in his “Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States” volume 3, sections 211-213. Each author merely focussed on the aspect of the territory of birth, but their discussions do not imply that we should neglect Vattel and his complete definition. ____ Kent: https://lonang.com/wp-content/download/Kent-CommentariesVol-2.pdf. Key statement p. 22 The staute of 7 Ann., c. 5. was to the same general effect; but the staute of 4 Geo. II. c. 31. required only that the father should be a natural born subject at the birth of the child, and it applied to all children then born, or thereafter to be born. Under these statutes it has been held, [28] that to entitle a child born abroad to the rights of an English natural born subject, the father must be an English natural born subject, the father must be an English subject….” ____ Kamala is not a natural-born citizen, it appears based on Vattel and Kent.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Malachi3vs16 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Additional, Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries: on the Laws of England” p. 239 “ To encourage also foreign commerce, it was enacted by statute 25 Edw. III. st. 2, that all children born abroad, provided both their parents were at the time of the birth in allegiance to the king, and the mother had passed the seas by her husband’s consent, might inherit as if born in England; and accordingly it hath been so adjudged in behalf of merchants.(a) But by several more modern statutes(b) these restrictions are still further taken off: so that all children, born out of the king’s ligeance, whose fathers (or grandfathers by the father’s side) were natural-born subjects, are now deemed to be natural-born subjects themselves to all intents and purposes….” ____Difficulty: does the USA follow the Continent— Vattel (Swiss)— or English on this subject? Blackstone p. 239 The children of aliens, born here in England, are, generally speaking, natural-born subjects,15 and entitled to all the privileges of such. In which the constitution of France differs from ours; for there, by their jus albinatus, if a child be born of foreign parents, it is an alien.(c)16 ____ link http://files.libertyfund.org/files/2140/Blackstone_1387-01_EBk_v6.0.pdf. ____The Dissent in Wong Kim Ark knew that some Congressional promoters of the 14th Amendment intended to make it so birth on US soil would confer citizenship, but Chief Justice Melville Fuller and Justice John Marshall Harlan” did not agree with the majority opinion and some of the 14th Amendment promoters in Congress.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TheHumanPrimer 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

He definitely was not a U.S. Citizen. Atomic-level Ammo. This truth will cause a complete implosion. Has to be used at the right time. "How do you get evidence on the record?" Run for public office. Oops.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Factfiler 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

Lorena Fuddy knew the truth.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– RachelkillsBam 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

She was in the same cult as Obama and his mother (Subud Worldwide), so of course she knew the truth.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Throwawaysgareblue 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Biggest scam in American history was that non American commie pos pretending to be “President”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– camtreezy 27 points 1 year ago +27 / -0

If true wouldn't that make her an illegitimate vice president as well. I suppose in one more additional way on top of the other reasons.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TakeItBack 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

She had no business running as VP; been saying that for 4 years....same with the kenyan.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Standingoak 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

The Kenyan may have an Indonesian Baby Daddy or Frank Marshall (at least this communist was a citizen)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– farpointpatriot 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Already been litigated. Ive had this same convo 4 times this weekend with normies. As much as I hate it, she is “official”. Supreme Court made that distinction around the turn of the century (1898). It has been argued however that the case never really disagreggated the difference between a “Citizen” and a “Naturalized Citizen”. Both citizens, almost identical, only one has a tiny number of limitations.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– camtreezy 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Yes I was able to dig that up. Do you know if that would be different should her parents have owed allegiance to a different country or been agents of?

Either way, we know she didn't actually win

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– farpointpatriot 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Agreed. They 100% did not win shit. I think you are on to something with the allegiance thing. If I recall correctly, if a parent is aligned with a foreign “adversary”, that would preclude the citizenship birth right by proximity. I gotta say, I despise that rule. It may have made sense 200 years ago, but that “rule” has been insanely abused. It needs to go.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– summerstormAK 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

Why aren't we hearing more about this? Maybe because of the fraud surrounding Obama's eligibility?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Spongebob1808 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

Because no one cares….Congress would simply change the rules and make a special exception.

She is ineligible, like Obama…but we know how that went.

Is Vivek eligible? We know Ted Cruz was not eligible.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– rherrell 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

It's not a "rule", it's in the constitution so if they want it changed they'll need a constitutional amendment...not likely.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Spongebob1808 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I was using “rules” generically….but 100% nothing will happen from this. We know Obama got away with it, and so will Kamala…heck, Ted Cruz would too.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Standingoak 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

We know Obama got away with it,....in Our Democracy

But what about as # 17 in the American Republic ?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Bullseyed 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

And yet right above people are citing a Supreme Court case from the 1890s defining what is or is not a natural born citizen. No amendment needed there.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Irishman4Trump6 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Is it because Cruz Daddy something? /sarc

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Mr_A 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

Your mistake is assuming this matters. If it mattered, it would've mattered when she was approved as VP.

The 12th Amendment states clearly: "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to the office of Vice-President of the United States."

It's clear that the current Congress and the public at large believe she is eligible and already determined as much.

I'm not saying you're wrong, only that a lot has to be done before it matters. For example, in the past Trump has discussed birthright citizenship, saying that the 14th Amendment has been misinterpreted- "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States ..." by ignoring the "and subject to the jurisdiction" section. This means that being born here and then growing up in another country, not subject to US jurisdiction, would not qualify as a right to citizenship. But the courts disagree with that interpretation as of today. But Trump is right. There may be a court case waiting for this, but I haven't seen it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AmateurExpert 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Probably sitting in a back pocket somewhere waiting for timing and optics to be set.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– proforma1 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

But she identifies as a woman of color, black I think, and she is a female. The only thing she doesn't have going for her is being gay😎😎

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Yanky-Doodle 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Until she’s outed a man named kamal ;). Or is called dead naming? I won’t remember they/their silly rules…

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mr_A 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

And nowadays being gay gives you instant asylum status. She has enough time to go for the bonus category. (Maybe her husband can take one for the team and switch sides.)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– PlatinumDave2020 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Maricopa County Sheriff proved that Obama birth cert fake--media ignored

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TakeItBack 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

That was THEN....things are changing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– inspoken 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

I hate to break it to you but I think being born in USA establishes citizenship independent of parental status or at least those that issue foreign visa's think so about those people born her 60 odd years ago. I know someone who happened to be born here to Greek students 65 or so years ago and was, of course raised by his parents back in Greece, after, which is usually the case with things like that.

When he became an adult & all, he also went on to study & at some point in his studies he needed to come here for some reason so he applied for a Visa. The Visa took a lot longer than usual, he was worried it wouldn't come through for some reason & then, to his surprise he was granted an American Passport instead of a visa!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TakeItBack 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

Nope, not for eligibility to run for VP or president. Anchor babies should be absolutely refused anything. It's because of ignorance about constitutional qualifications that these abominations occur.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– GDZeus 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

What’s with the “AMENDED 1 OF 2”? Was the birth certificate amended twice and if so why… what was amended on it?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LacyLiberty 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I wondered that too. For one thing, I thought her middle name was Devi, not Iyer.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– lastbestplace 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Does the document state either of the parents were not US citizens? I'm not arguing that they are/were but I would like to see actual documentation of this before I pass on the info. Thanks

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TakeItBack 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

The mother was born in India and the father was born in Jamaica. Case closed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– lastbestplace 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I once worked with an unmarried guy who was born in India and later he became a US citizen thru proper channels so I was just asking.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TakeItBack 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

You're correct that foreign-born people can become naturalized citizens but they may NOT run for president or VP. So many are entirely unaware of this. 👍

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Captainzoomer 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

When Kamala was born, her mother asked her what she wanted. Kamala looked up at her mother and said, "Fweedom". If that's not presidential material right there, I don't know what is!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Zadok 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Yeah... That will matter as much as it did for 8 years of Obama.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AtlasLied 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Oop. Looks like they want Kabbalah Harris out of the way. There were reports last night that Biden had a “health incident” last night. The Rothschilds are telling me that it was fake news, which means A. He’s dead or B. They replaced him with a more compliant clone, either way he’s not making it to the election.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-misinformation-biden-medical-emergency-5176f10443a286f581221fe994b5ad78

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– photobuf 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

She is not a legitimate VP according to the Constitution. One reason I think if Joe steps down or dies, Kamala will be passed on and Mike Johnson will be President!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– kaizen777 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Nope, she's already VP. Nobody is going to successfully challenge this, even if they did, her term would be long over by the time it hit any court.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– photobuf 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

If Joe steps down I'm betting she gets challenged!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– jhartz39 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Biden's inauguration was fake, it happened in the capital that was surrounded by barbwire / 25,000 national guard, the city was shut down. The public did not attend the inauguration, he was sworn in 15 minutes before noon, he didn't receive the 21 gun salute. Traditions were broken, Air Force 1 was not sent to bring Biden to DC and Trump flew away with the nuclear football on Air Force 1.

Does any of this make you believe Biden is our real president? We were told patriots are in control. That means Joe was intentionally paired with Kamala for the reasons we are talking about today. When Joe is forced out, order of presidential succession puts Kamala next in line, she is ineligible because she is not a natural born citizen. This will be hashed out and the SC will rule on it. Clarence Thomas will give another detailed explanation about natural born citizens just like he did with the immunity ruling. This will immediately put Obama's time in office under question. Fraud vitiates everything. Remember, Trump was one of the original birhters questioning Obama's birth certificate.

Speaker Johnson will be next in line. I have suggested this is why Johnson is bending over for the democrats. The democrats will be more likely to agree with the move of Johnson into the President's seat if they think they can control him, as we have witnessed with the spending bills and money to Ukraine.

Johnson will take office and do some clean up before Trump takes over in 2025, the Scaramucci model will be used again.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– rayw_wwg1wga 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

scaramucci model

What's that?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– jhartz39 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Anthony Scaramucci was Trump's White House Communications Director for 11 days. While in office he got Reince Priebus to resign.

Theory is, move someone in as an acting replacement, cause all sorts of hell and then they move on. Trump's hands would be clean, Johnson did all the dirty work. (there are many department heads that need to be fired, investigations started, evidence released, 9/11, JFK, ect, ect)

u/#q2957

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Bloggerchick [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Okay, let's go with that story.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TheHumanPrimer 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

How convenient, this was obviously baked into their plan all along. Let's see here...

1st, we have a President looking for an exit. We had a 1st Lady with a package. Now we got a No. 2 that can never be No. 1.

Add this all together and you get a "packaged" deal!! Problem solved.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Owl_Eyes_Alpha 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Anchor baby is the stupid shit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TwoPhish 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I love how this was easily explained. Your parents have to have been born in the United States because the 'honor' of being an American citizen has to be passed down and inherited by two American-born/American-loving parents.

You can't have two foreign-born parents who might otherwise hate America, raise a child to hate America and then have that child become President. (like Obama)

That's why both parents have to be born here and presumed that their allegiance and love of America is ingrained.

Obama's admin will be abolished and ruled traitorous. That IS coming!!! The way this operation is being handled is mindblowing!!! They are drip-drip-dripping intel and people's brained-washed ideals are changing. Now they're openly talking about Obama being gay etc.........

It's a phucking phantasitc time to be alive!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– HeartofStone2 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Should be fairly easy to get copies of her parents citizenship paperwork.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Patriot454 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/natural_born_citizen

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 427windsorman 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Obama was not eligible, either, but see how that turned out?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– OffGridGuy 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

We went this route with Obama and it's not going to work this time either. Our opponents do not follow the law.

In totally unrelated news the Wisconsin Supreme Court now says unattended ballot drop boxes are legal. They probably don't even have fire suppression systems, which means if they catch fire all those harvested ballots will be lost.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SOGWAP 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

That's the least of her disqualifying attributes

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– QDay 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Like any of that matters?

Same rule applies to VP, yet here we are.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– pugsan 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately, anchor babies are given citizenship when born. Not sure if that disqualifies you for President.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– bluewhiteandred 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

similar problem alleged in the vatican, the papal claimants from the last half century are argued to not have been Catholic, you need to be Catholic in order to be elected and become a pope

if it was proven for example Obama wasn't legally able to become president, then his official acts as president would become null and a current president would need to issue new acts to cover the gap that isn't accounted for; or if a current president claimant (like Biden) was proven to have been elected illegally, seemingly a new election would be required or the election would go to the next in line (I don't know what is specified legally if this is proven).

In a similar way, we think the "popes" since 1958 will have to have their positions considered vacated and a new pope would need to be elected to bring things up to speed to the current day.

in politics they may try to get away with this and succeed (kamala or obama) somewhat. in religion such attempts still can't produce a real pope so the illegal acts would have to be accounted for.

edit: in the last paragraph, I mean to compare this to the founding of America, which was technically illegal. in politics I think some technically illegal acts can acquire validity, but I don't think this applies in religion in the same way.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– swimkin 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Well she shouldn’t have been selected as VP either. But there she is

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Archon69 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Natural born citizenship is special and only relevant to people who want to hold the public trust of president or VP. If the natural born citizenship clause was completely disregarded, Russian, Ukrainian, Chinese, Iranian, N Korean, Israelis, Cubans couples could come stay in a birthing apartment in California (as Chinese do) on tourist visas, and have a kid raised under the influence of his parents who goes on to be president or VP. The Founders wrote the natural born citizen clause to prevent this.

The president of Georgia (former USSR) was born in Paris 1952 and by agreement between France and Georgia, received Georgian nationality in 2004. She barely speaks the language. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salome_Zourabichvili America was supposed to be held to a higher standard than this.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/08/why_it_should_matter_that_kamala_harris_is_not_a_natural_born_citizen.html

If the media were to ask President Trump, "Are you a natural born citizen?," he would probably respond with, "My father, an American citizen, Fred Trump, was born in New York City, and my mother, Mary Anne, was born in Scotland and became a naturalized American citizen in March 1942. I was born in Queens in 1946. Yes, I am a natural born citizen."

https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/07/23/u-s-senator-kamala-harris-is-not-a-natural-born-citizen-of-usa-not-eligible-to-be-president-and-cinc-or-vp/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– harleytrvlr 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately, she is a citizen of the United States “by birth “ which makes her a “natural born citizen.” Were she not eligible to be president, she would not be constitutionally eligible to be vice president.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Based_in_Space 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Doesn’t seem to stop them anyways. Anchor babies should not be eligible.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– damnImgood 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

We all seem to know this...why doesn't anyone else seem to know this fact? Sheesh!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TinkAnon 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

This is what a Natural Born Citizen & why this requirement was made. https://youtu.be/h9PxdDvgQks?si=4U2kQ6DgSidwEYdv

A 12 minute video and an excellent explanation.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– special1ntere5t 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Never stopped Obama 🤷🏽‍♀️

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– we_let_this_happen 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Neither was Obummer but you see how that worked out.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy