Imagine that a former President of the US so blatantly engaging in open sedition.
Why would they mention it.
This is an information war. They stand on the deep state side. They propagandize their audience. This is what every faction or side in a war will do. So they have lost a consequential battle that will erode their power structure. To broadcast that would be demoralizing and potentially lead to defections in their captured audience. So it doesn't get mentioned. Similar to how losing ground or battles in a kinetic war will go unmentioned or denied if it is not immediately obvious to the population ( sometimes even when it is obvious) -- remember Baghdad Bob.
Two party system here. Multi party system in France.
Seems like any human government system we setup is very susceptible to being infiltrated by Satanism when the population behind the government are not engaged and involved in said government, and/or when said population overall has fallen away from or rejected Christianity in their own personal lives.
Now for a few million more normies to see the precipice as clearly.
I don't expect it will be much longer.
Cloward Pivan. They were unsuccessful pulling it off with welfare classes in New York in the 60's, so they simply redirected to illegal aliens in the 10's and 20's.
People wonder at how we will manage to find and deport all the illegals. The government already knows where all of them are. They are collecting checks and having all their needs and wants paid for on the daily.
If the government wants to deport them all, stage the military in the cities, and cutoff funding. Within a week or less the illegals will start marching and causing trouble. They will reveal themselves and will be easily captured and deported (or killed if they resist with violence). Since the money spigot is in the government's control, this can be a gradual operation with forced media blackouts for op-sec in the regions where they are implemented.
If the nation's of origin won't take these people back, then a penal colony will be necessary somewhere. Perhaps some privately owned islands seized by E.O. 13818 will be suitable for such a colony.
Why settle for one coup when you can just run a train of coups anytime you get tired of the leadership.
Kennedy.... Nixon.... Reagan (only partially successful).... Trump.... Now Biden.
Yes, covid vax will make you more susceptible to illnesses like cellulitis and will exacerbate the severity of it.
I know someone whom after the vax had issues with cellulitis. Eventually ended up nosediving with sepsis. Barely kept alive from that event and was more or less vegetative and on dialysis in the aftermath (although the drugs given masked that it was brain damage for sometime). Eventually had a heart attack (possibly due to brain damage progressing to things shutting down), he was really already gone and once life support was removed, it was over in minutes.
If he covers the real patents, people might learn about it and understand it.
If he covers a crackpot business entity of unknown funding source, whom puts out a poorly faked video claiming to have done it.....people will hear the news, see the video, spot the fake part, have a laugh, and reinforce their belief it's not possible. If the real thing happens to come out, they won't believe it to be a human capable technology.
That and a battalion of greyhound buses and or school busses to get those Philly voters to the Delaware polls.
Not like we haven't seen democrats bussing voters all over the place to impact elections illegally in the past 20 years. Considering the technology and opportunity for this method of voter fraud has been around for 60 years now, I'm sure it's been widely used.
Funny how so many of these idiots are fantasizing about Biden sending military to kill some of the supreme court.
None of them remember or recognize that Obama and the Democrat party already have assassinated Scalia back in 2016. Podesta's email traffic from that day basically confirms they had Scalia murdered.
It occurs to me, if the plan was intended to lead to an outcome which would effectively be an abolition of the constitutional republic of our nation's founding, then why would the Q drops and President Trump himself ( on more than one occasion at political rallies) state they were doing everything by the book.
If the end goal is to have a different form of government ( rather than restoring the original government of our nation's founding), then it really is an unnecessary exercise in futility to try to bring about this new planned government by following to a letter the legal rules and requirements of the old government.
The task, for such a "change government plan", instead becomes gain sufficient popular support to dissolve the original government and replace it outright either with said government's approval or without. The critical factor would be that the people enmasse across the nation clearly and decisively voicing their desire and intention to dissolve the current form of government and to implement something different. As it stands currently, I don't see Trump campaigning for anything like this, but I do see a lot of discussion about restoring the constitutional republic as founded.
From this perspective, I don't agree with much of any of these predictions beyond the parts that would be compatible with and normal in our nation within the original constitutional Republic.
I'm cautiously hopeful this materializes into a useful treatment for the survivors who are suffering from the mrna vaccines.
Perhaps some aspects of the damage will be undone and those harmed could return somewhat to what things were for then before.
Sad. Not surprised anymore.
There are a couple others I sadly wouldn't be surprised to see news similar to this coming out in the near future too.
Anyone else think that looks like a green screen with Biden superimposed on top of it?
You are conflating big families with requiring multiple wives. Many children can be the blessing of God with only one wife.
Some general commentary on your examples: Jacob married Leah then Rachel. In that period of his life, I would argue his thoughts and desires did not particularly involve seeking God. He did eventually seek God and he wrestled with God for a blessing just before he was to meet his brother Esau whom he feared would kill him on sight due to stealing Esau's blessing and swindling Esau's birthright. It was after this encounter with God that Jacob changed. This is also made clear by God renaming Jacob to Israel. Jacob already had 2 wives and 2 concubines so this continued, but what happened is not necessarily aligned with what God's intended purpose and plan for a marriage is.
David did take multiple wives and was also said to be a man after God's own heart. David's best desires though did not prevent his flesh from leading him astray. His multiple wives bore multiple children and the whole situation caused serious calamities to befall Israel and the House of David including a rebellion and civil war by Absalom and the eventual divided kingdom period. Had David been content in the blessing of God for marriage between 1 man and 1 woman, David would have avoided many future troubles for himself, his children, and his kingdom.
Solomon took many wives and concubines. In fact he was extremely worldly and disobedient in many ways to God's law during his life. With his many wives came idolatry. His many wives setup the events that directly led to the divided kingdom even though it was David whose sins brought that prophesied punishment from God. These men David and Solomon were flawed sinful dysfunctional men whom at times wanted to follow God's law but were unable to and multiple wives was an aspect of this sin playing out in their lives. God used them even in their sinfulness to bring about his perfect plan and timing in this world.
Shifting to the New Testament
I Timothy 3:2 clearly indicates multiple wives in marriage is not the intended plan. This is why husband of 1 wife is specified as a requirement of pastoral leadership.
Therefore an overseer must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3 not a drunkard, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. 4 He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, 5 for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?
But that is for leaders you may argue. But the reality is we are to follow Jesus and our actions and thoughts should be toward that goal. If leadership requires the Christian be notably qualified by doing well in this way, it is also true that the congregation being led should also be striving to meet the same standard for it is out of the congregation that leaders will be determined and appointed by the Holy Spirit.
It is unfortunate the Bible doesn't fit man's desire for multiple wives or other arrangements for marriage. Before Christ, multiple wives to a husband was tolerated in some cases but that does not mean it was the intended perfect plan God created marriage to be. Specific to Hebrew law, the requirement for a wife (where the husband has brothers) in the family where the wife's husband dies without producing a child was to be married to the brother ( bringing the possibility of two wives to one man) was allowed to insure the bloodline and inheritance of the dead brother was not ended. For Israel this could cause problems if family lines died out given that each family line was promised prophetically specific blessings. Outside of that specific scenario, multiple wives is not condoned. In fact, I would argue that for the Christian, we are expected to follow Jesus. Jesus said to the teachers of the law that divorce was allowed to the Hebrew people by Moses because of their hard hearts (ie not seeking God), and clarified it was not the plan God intended (for marriage to be dissolved). Similarly marriage is designed and intended by God to be a uniting of one man and one woman into one flesh.
Matthew 19:4-6
He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, 5 and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.”
Simply stated, God did not set His creation up to match man's sinful nature which came after the man's fall. Since God is Holy and we are not Holy in this life, this makes for a good deal of internal friction for our fleshly nature when we are trying to follow Jesus -- at least there is friction for those whom are following Jesus having believed in Him and trusted that His death and resurrection is the perfect sacrifice through which we are saved by grace through faith (which that faith is also given to the believer by the Holy Spirit awakening the person to the reality that they are dead in their sins and that they are made alive in Christ), and that this salvation through Jesus provides the Christian with the Holy Spirit which replaces our heart of stone (dead in sin and at war with God) with a heart of flesh (alive in Christ Jesus and able to resist the fleshly desires by relying on God and seeking Him). To follow Christ is to follow the Father and the institution of marriage given by God in this context of following God is one man and one woman married before God for life.
Frankly, the corruption of God's intended design and purpose for marriage and of the family produced in that paradigm is definitely part of Satan's plan for humanity. Satan's plan to corrupt is also greatly aided by sinful man's hard heart which ignores God's plan and purpose and supplants God's rule with mans sinful desires. Both destroying marriage and the family through divorce, adultery, and fornication and extending marriage to be multiple husbands and/or multiple wives are corruptions to what God has revealed in the Bible is intended. By following either path falling outside what God intended and specified ( 1 man and 1 woman), we are displaying and revealing evidence of our sinful hard hearts that do not seek and follow Jesus.
Methinks their funding is drying up.
Since we know they were never grass roots supported, what does that tell us about the larger picture with the deep state / deep pockets.
Yawn.
Try more.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17tKwywJiK/the-kids-you-used-to-bully-in-hi/c/
Nope, I didn't miss it. Of course that video is a clown behaving as a shill for the camera pretending to have it together (here's what we all need to do) while desperately looking for validation on social media. Truth be told, the "nerds" she names are not in charge or wealthy from some chip on their shoulder. She completely fails to understand the way this world works with the elite families and their sired children (both official and bastard). And doesn't even touch on the sick disturbing religion they all follow at the top.
Overall, I find it sad that the boat is missed and effort and energy is redirected ineffectively in a way which would not result in actually defeating and removing the evil that enables and facilitates those politicians and actors and communists to gain power while being fully compromised and controlled.
Thankfully, that lady and people similar to her are not in charge of anything and have nothing to do with the operations that are unfolding to address the real problems.
You keep on being happy with yourself.
I see being precise in saying what you mean is not your strong suit.
Here let's create more ways to divide each other up on meaningless boundaries so we can be more divided as we strive for a common goal... Yes, that will help us succeed.
Also I claim no offense. Just that you have made a poorly formed argument which is generally unhelpful to uniting a group against our enemy.
What does theatre and band camp have to do with commies?
I can agree with the sentiment for removing communists.
But your post seems to be incorrectly indicating that All of A (communists) is B (theatre and band camp) and All of B is A.
This part of your premise is invalid.
It's like saying I hate fleas. Let's eliminate all the rabbits that will fix it.
I still think Twitter's change of ownership was simply a move to get the public whom would leave for Truth Social to instead stay or rejoin Twitter and keep everyone on the plantation.
First you loosen up the control mechanisms (remove censorship). Everyone comes back and rejoins. You let them have some time to get used to and enjoy the social media experience. Next you counter move to eliminate or stifle the free flow of ideas. You have other contingencies (out of band ways to pressure or neutralize) in place to make sure nobody dares talk about the true controllers, and on the fringes you eliminate problem voices that are too good at criticizing the lieutenants to the true leadership.
Feels like a Trojan horse to me.
Time will eventually reveal what is true.
Nothing to see here. Paul Bunyan accidentally threw his barbell southwards from the Yukon when he and Babe (his blue ox) got to horsing around too much.
Also, this could very easily be controlled opposition in the market domain which would make a lot of sense and keep to the general playbook for infiltrating and destroying America.
Indeed, that would indicate Biden also was a CIA asset as Hunter was groomed by his father. It would suggest the Biden family was a product of some version of MK Ultra, rather than just being an abusive family.
If we take a longer look, it would explain and make sense of our nation's presidents since 1989.
George H W Bush. ---CIA director
Bill Clinton ---ties to cocaine drug smuggling, human trafficking, and multiple murders of opponents or threats to his power in Arkansas, compromised with young girls, serial rapist, had abusive step dad and never knew his bio-dad, seemed protected somehow with every wrong doing swept under the rug by mockingbird media, declared by George W Bush to be "a brother from another mother" which reeks of CIA farm ideology.
George W Bush - son of H W Bush, raised in CIA home, alcoholism, protected from consequences, puppet to minders like Dick Cheney. Again looks like CIA.
Barak Obama - mother appears to have worked for CIA in some respect. Also protected from consequences of actions or behaviors. Politically was installed into every position with lots of help from mockingbird media, enjoyed abusing children, was given two kids to make him palatable for presidency. Had opponents just get out of the way for him (remember Mr No name himself in 2008).--- sure sound like CIA
Contrast all the above with Donald Trump and all the roadblocks and trials he has faced. The big picture starts looking very clear.
Yes, you are correct in that working with CCP / commies is not the correct response. But what I'm seeing is that this man broke his programming because of his fear of certain annihilation for him and his children if we continue to follow the deep state plan for our national direction.
So he's reacting mostly out of fear (possibly even terror) at what he sees down the road. His solutions are knee jerk and not the correct path either, but the big thing here is he broke the programming. Now he has a chance to accept a new path when a logical and well considered alternative is presented.
The fact he stayed in the room, resisted removal, and kept focusing in on the abject criminal suicidal stupidity of the (deep state) "experts" plans is a good sign of things to come.