6
BadMamaJama 6 points ago +6 / -0

Do you think Ratcliffe will have trouble getting confirmed by being this prejudiced (not a negative here) against the MSM? I know that we have the senate by 54 to 46 at this point but there are still a number of RINOs in place who might find their 'high horse' on which to ride interference if they have strong MSM ties. (edit: I forgot the obvious.. which is if the RINOs have ties to CIA via DS)

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

You never mentioned how either Catherine or the 'other man' are financially supporting themselves. If neither of them are independently wealthy, this whole thing may peter out in short order. Then, the decision is Bernard's to make on whether the marriage continues.

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's also some history you might want to know before jumping in both feet about him. He had a long term relationship with a Russian woman who was determined to be a Russian spy against the US. She (somehow) got close to several influential contacts in big business and the govt, 'all innocent', she claims. US didn't buy it and she served/is serving time. Back on earlier iterations of this board, Patrick Byrne was crying about her being so intelligent and 'misunderstood'. I'll try to locate her name and edit this post in a little bit but please be aware of this.

4
BadMamaJama 4 points ago +4 / -0

Too strong language use here. Not attack. He's simply trying to (rapidly) right the ship using tools legitimately in his area of control. Attack, imo, would be for him to try to go into California and empty that cesspool when they have the right to ruin (oops, 'run') their own state as they see fit.

'Attack' is the language the left is hoping to see to validate their claims.

1
BadMamaJama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just start listening. After the pleasantries in the beginning it gets on track and doesn't slow down.

1
BadMamaJama 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn't be surprised if she is the one who told Trump - 'no family in this next administration or I won't take the job.' I remember hearig stories how Ivanka would just walk into OO whenever she wanted to meet wth "dad".

1
BadMamaJama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes - something like 'there was no election fraud'.

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

But if the rank and file would 'disobey' and visit the trump homes and then get caught, I suspect they would be fired for insubordination. This supervisor should be fired, not simply moved to inflict her bias on victims in another county.

8
BadMamaJama 8 points ago +9 / -1

I am feeling they are also looking at Sarah Huckabee for something like this path too. Several up and coming figures - I think we have a good looking bench right now in the rep party.

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

Milley probably still thinks he is in the right.

8
BadMamaJama 8 points ago +8 / -0

Wait a second... the FBI is supposed to be among the top premier investigative services in the world... and they couldn't see the massive groundswell of support for Trump and they couldn't predict a Trump victory? If so, then they need to go for that reason alone, regardless of any corruption that is present.

1
BadMamaJama 1 point ago +1 / -0

BO, Sideshow Bob, Chucky, Pete, Rachael the Health Doctor, Nancy P, Schumer (both), Hakeem, Mayorkas (in stripes via zoom call on a TV monitor), Kamala. AOC and the other 3. Fauci.

1
BadMamaJama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Psychedelics? What 'healing' properties do those have?

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

What - are these donations for printing costs?

3
BadMamaJama 3 points ago +3 / -0

I will bet Emhoff's kids and family are all employed in some fashion at exorbitant salaries. Similar to how Pelosi employed her daughter.

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

If dems want to remove Joe under the 25th... wouldn't Joe have opportunity to challenge this legally and that could drag out until Jan 20? That's only about 9 weeks and you know how suits can drag on.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›