6
Brent75 6 points ago +9 / -3

With Fall of the Cabal Episodes 1-10 at possibly 95-100% accurate, Fusca being so oddly connected out of nowhere, always having great seats at every Trump rally he is seen at, and the young lady who’s his assistant (kinda looks like JFK Jr.’s wife’s sister) always being near; I’m not thinking McAfee. That’s not a big enough End of the Movie WOW. But JFK Jr., that’s a whole other level of Future Proves Past! 😉

16
Brent75 16 points ago +16 / -0

I’m not sure in what order things/events happen, but yes everything will come off the rails.

We Anons have been told for years, the precipice in the US is everything we think can go wrong politically, economically, socially, and globally. It all happens or appears to happen at near the same time. And then continues for a period at the same time affecting EVERYONE. This is to make us feel America’s Near Death, but it really is the Death of The Great Reset and Cabal here in the US, and it’s rebirth emerging from or into the next phase of The Great Awakening.

7
Brent75 7 points ago +7 / -0

Their time is up anyway. God will deal with them soon enough.

1
Brent75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. I wish I knew how to shut them down without wishing for God to physically obliterate each building Old Testament Style! 😂😂

10
Brent75 10 points ago +10 / -0

In this day and age we should not neeeed to hear someone talk like this! We nearly expunged racism from the mid 80s through the early 2000s, but the F-ing DemoLibs brought us right back to the pre-60’s!

God bless this guy for pouring out some truth-salt.

1
Brent75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not on drugs. Everything you’re attempting to lay out is debatable. Why? Because the info varies from scholar to scholar. And don’t start verbally attacking me like a Liberatard. We are better than that Anon. Let’s keep this civil please. I have not verbally assaulted you, I am just debating and disagreeing with you. That’s what debate is.

I see you finally laid out a source. Good. That means you did some research on your own instead of blindly asking again. That’s what I was hoping. Now your sources still don’t disprove what I said. It actually says nothing about the other apocryphal or non-canon texts at all. It just lays out who they were and where they were referenced by the church/s. So there is that.

Nor did you disprove the Bible or prior scriptures were not linguistically edited over time or had BOOKS REMOVED! I linked a full 4-hour video on the Aramaic, Hebrew, Greek, and Latin linguistics and editing of the KJV leading to the NIV of Church’s Council’s and Pope’s in control of what would become The Vatican. And you have yet to disprove me, since the whole scholarly world knows It Was Clearly Done!

And how is it that Enoch is in all of the oldest Bibles, and Christ himself references Enoch? How does Enoch appear in the Sumerian Kings List/Text as a scribe? Why is Enoch listed as Noah’s great grandfather?

Please attempt to disprove how Enoch is not a true book of the Bible when it originally was per thee oldest Non-Church/Council controlled or edited scriptures of the Ge’ez Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls?!

https://www.bibleblender.com/2011/bible-stories/old-testament/genesis/from-adam-to-noah-genealogy-genesis-5-1-5-32

https://lovinglantern.com/jesus-quotes-book-enoch.html#Lessons_and_insights_from_the_Book_of_Enoch

https://cautivoestrella.org/en/jesus-quotes-book-of-enoch/

I commend you for trying Anon. But the Church certainly did more damage than you think to the Bible’s Originally Intended Format. Or else you and I, nor millions of other scholars would be having identical debates in their Awakening over ancient religious texts and beliefs. WWG1WGA

1
Brent75 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like how you want to disprove but linked nothing. So your words are just here-say right now, just as you accused me, hypocrite. 😂😂

Disprove the Ge’ez Bible being the oldest Complete Bible on Earth. 800 years older than any other Bible. Only the Dead Sea Scrolls themselves come close. Constantine formulated the Bible to be put together and the 2 Council’s of Nicaea removed the apocryphal texts and edited the Bible. The Council of Hippo also edited as they saw fit for canon. That means editing and removing son!

You originally asked me who edited the Bible? You helped me prove your first question. That sure as sh1t it was edited away from thee original scriptures as INTENDED by God himself by man. Thank you for helping me prove I was correct in that.

Now you clearly failed to recognize how old the Book of Enoch is. Why is it found in both the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Ge’ez Bible if it is not original canon. And the people that decided it wasn’t original canon did so after AD 700?! When before it was F-ing included in the oldest Bibles known, besides what the Vatican currently hides?

Yeah you go figure that out genius. I’ll wait here for your next dance around the Awakening Truth of what is original and what isn’t. 😉 I suppose the Sumerian texts are also not true because you and some other 7th century man controlled council said so.

But the real point in any of this which you helped me prove I was correct again, was both biblical books and scriptures were factually edited and altered from their original context and scripture as they were originally written. And all due to linguistic changes and for power, religious narrative control! And God nor Christ EVER Intended for man to fall so low as to edit His Words.

So again thank you for assisting me in proving my original point back to you Anon. Let’s play again sometime. 😁

1
Brent75 1 point ago +1 / -0

The 1st & 2nd Council of Nicaea was very responsible for the books removed from the Bible becoming the Apocryphal books. They also heavily edited the Bible from scriptures possibly and most likely due to linguistic translations from Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, Ge’ez, and even the mirrored stories out of the Sumerian Tablets. Billy Carson if 4Bidden Knowledge has an entire research book series and YouTube video series on these. The Dead Sea Scrolls also confirm the 2 most popular versions of the Bible (KJV and NIV), do not have all of the original books and in their original 100% written meanings And again this is due to linguistics and the agenda of man. Not because God or Christ intended these people to change the meanings of words or even remove entire books all for narrative control. Below is also a great video on linguistic changes and how the current/modern Bibles in certain places, especially around creation do not mean exactly what was originally written. Especially the idea of God being of 1. Turns out the original word Elohim is plural, not mono. Which in turn creates an entire different original narrative on God vs Gods. Is it what we choose, yes. But the context in current Bibles is per research, no longer modernly correct since we now have translated access to more complete and older, non-Vatican-controlled scriptural information.

It just may appear due to the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ge’ez Bible, that the Sumerians have been partially right/correct all along about some of the story of Human Creation. And this was all purposely hidden by the Roman Church/Vatican the last 1800+ years, so they alone could control the Christian religious narrative.

https://youtu.be/Qo7e2Rh6WpM?si=HjYZ_fbCQ26NisjA

2
Brent75 2 points ago +2 / -0

😂😂😂😂😂 That’s because that slut loves to “Hauk-Tuah and jus spit on that thang!”

3
Brent75 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed! I hope he has great security and they can keep him safe too! We need more leaders like him, Putin, the lady from Italy, and Trump that don’t take sh1t from these Cabal bastards.

2
Brent75 2 points ago +2 / -0

Correct. Not letting humanity read all the books all this time was for nothing more than man’s control and power over other people. God nor Christ ever intended for their words to be misconstrued or hidden for a greedy human agenda.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›