CHAOS_ACTUAL - The Great Awakening - Where We Go Qne, We Go All!

On Wednesday, 09/14/22, when Mike Lindell was once again regaling Brannon Howse about being buttonholed on Tuesday, 09/13/22, by the FBI, he dropped a comment, in the form of an aside,

Transcript starts at 21:15

Mike Lindell: "Because, this is something for some reason, the FBI was worried about Dr. Frank's work. He does great work. And they go, "You know, he goes state to state and tells people" this is the FBI telling me this, "and tells people about stuff."

"I said... and he said, "Did you ever help him out?" And I said, "Yeah," I said, "I've given him twice, I think, I've given him help for this." I said, "The guy quit his job and he's just out there doing it on his own. Day by day, and taking voter roles that he got from the Secretary of States' office and showing people these algorithms that were set so you can predict any county. Like you pick a county, Brannon. Where do you live? What county?"

Brannon Howse: "Shelby County."

Mike Lindell: "Shelby County. Pick an age. Pick any age."

Brannon Howse: "30."

Mike Lindell: "30. The same percentage of 30 year olds that voted in Shelby County voted in every single county in Tennessee. And you're going, "No way!" Well, its never happened before in history but it did in the 2020 election. That's called 'machine algorithms.... machine manipulation.' They already know who was going to win when the election started. That's called selection, not an election."

"Now remember everybody we still have the cast voter records, cast vote records. So now its like having another camera angle."

"Then we even have a third camera angle, which we have the Dennis Montgomery data, by the way everybody, we hope to have that website up tomorrow, so you guys can see all about Dennis, all about the hard work he's done, all about... and everything he's done for the government and all of our terrabytes that are sitting before a judge in Nevada to get released. We got to pray that that judge gets them released soon. Everybody, you can all check on that, that's case number (searches for then reads from a piece of paper) 3:06 - cat victor - 00056, for all you journalists. I guarantee you, Brannon, 100 to 300, maybe even more, journalists' outlets watching this show right now."

09/14/22 The Lindell Report / transcription starts at 21:15
https://frankspeech.com/video/mike-lindell-brings-another-update-being-raided-fbi

Here is the docket for case file number that Mike Lindell reads out to the journalists: Montgomery v. eTreppid Technologies (3:06-cv-00056)

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4316345/montgomery-v-etreppid-technologies/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

Here is the issue before the court in Nevada, Lindells motion to lift the states secret privilege gag order on Dennis Montgomery / Document 1216 (3 items, all from the docket link above)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1216.0.pdf

Mike Lindell Declaration

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1216.1.pdf

Dennis Montgomery Declaration

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1216.2_2.pdf

Are we witnessing

Nancy Pelosi / The Wrap Up Smear
https://youtu.be/kg9JuyJ1nZo (41 sec)

https://www.newyorker.com/news/american-chronicles/the-election-official-who-tried-to-prove-stop-the-steal

09/13/22 Lindell phone seized.
09/14/22 Frank phone seized

Something significant in the New Yorker article is not what they write about, but what they do not write about. In those portions of the article which describe the events describing Tina Peters and the forensic images at the August 2021 Cyber Symposium, there is no mention of the provenance of the data that was the top billing draw for the symposium - the Dennis Montgomery 32 terrabytes of PCAPS. While Lindell claims never having mentioned Montgomery's name at up to and after the symposium, others at the symposium did (Kirk Wiebe specifically indicates Montgomery is the source and so states during an interview at the symposium.)

Have that "curious incident of the dog in the night-time" vibe.

Lindell, in the middle of his story about his phone being seized by the FBI, is asked by Brannon Howse about the FBI asking Lindell about Dr. Frank. This changed the narrative Lindell was telling, about his phone being seized, to the narrative about Dr. Frank, in the middle of the the telling of, Lindell drops the off hand comment about setting up a website all about Dennis Montgomery.

This was the first mention about this new tailored information cache dedicated to Dennis Montgomery. Nothing more has been said about this Dennis Montgomery website since Wednesday and nothing has shown up on the frankspeech.com platform either.

I am predisposed to believe Lindell was messaging (to whom is anybody's guess)

Here are some dots to watch, and see if they connect.

The case in Nevada is about getting the states secret privilege order lifted on Dennis Montgomery so that he and his terrabytes of 2020 PCAP data can be presented during discovery and possibly trial in the Dominion v Lindell & My Pillow, Inc. case.

The case of Trump v Unites states about the appointment of and scope of access of a Special Master is going up for appeal to the 11th circuit (where it will be denied) giving the DOJ one last shot in an appeal to the US Supreme Court. Since the argument put forth in the Kohler Declaration that went right up to the line of invoking the states secret privilege, when appealing to the US Supreme Court, invoking states secret privilege is the only bullet left in the DOJ's gun.

Both of these high profile cases - one concerning election integrity issues and the other concerning the assault on the civil liberties of Donald Trump (an by proxy every one of us, because if they can do it to Donald Trump, they can do it to any one of us), is going to be about the states secret privilege.

United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953), is a landmark legal case in 1953 that saw the formal recognition[1] of the state secrets privilege, a judicially recognized extension of presidential power.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Reynolds

permalink context all comments (6) save report block

New Bombshell Information from Dr. Frank about leaked secret passwords on Dominion voting equipment allowing modem activation and wireless connectivity. 09/15/22 interview with Brannon Howse - Dr. Frank discusses FBI seizure of his phone, and then starts dropping infobombs. Transcript and video. by CHAOS_ACTUAL

▲ 4 ▼

CHAOS_ACTUAL 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Concur, however

See post history and sample texts in posts.

Better yet, see comment history to others posts.

Only thing that makes logical sense is that high information posts (and good threads with excellent dialog among commentors) like these are mainly kept off the front page,not stickied and relegated to obscurity on NEW where blueanons will not spend time searching or reading by design. And if they do lock on to high information commentors and posters, they are getting addicted (by following select usernames) to red pills.

Its a win - win zero sum game and # (chess annotation) all in one.

A deliberate site profile is being curated to bait the blue pilled (blueanons) so that when the attacks come they will be biased and tainted ...

It is literally and figuratively the narrative strategy used to develop the Mike Lindell 'trusted build' information deception operation ( see comment this post). Its a dig, take your time, flesh it out and follow the links in comment) around the Dennis Montgomery story and the PCAP hack (see second link to post)

https://greatawakening.win/p/15JU7vu64p/q-is-a-psyop/

https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUHNmiNb/interesting-dialog-between-patel/

You see the difference in the quality of the posts stickied and those that should be (not just mine) and it is stark. But this is not a complaint, it is a recognition that there is a plan.

In other words...

Nothing is random.
Everything has meaning.
Misinformation is necessary.

And as Gregg Phillips constantly communicates...

Everything is an information operation.

Welcome, to a Q misinformation front operation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA4e0NqyYMw

"The best place to hide a rock is among stones."

Who set up and really runs this board (and patriots.win) is a question that some MODS (not cleared or read into the op) go ballistic over and others just wink at.

So, no worries.

Enjoy the movie.

P.S. If you want to really deep dive high information comments of a user that was banned for pushing "the Mods" over GAW and patriot.win information warfare role, check out u/Norman_F_Dixon comments, select old and start from the beginning of his comments... https://duckduckgo.com/?q=matrix+follow+the+white+rabbit+image&t=opera&iax=images&ia=images

permalink context all comments (9) save report block

Who is P? P = Payseur. IntheMatrixxx and Shady's explanation of how they came to Payseur being the P, Q was talking about with the {P}. It's a quick 15 min video on TG. by AngelCole

▲ 2 ▼

CHAOS_ACTUAL 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

TO3011
Q / @q 03/29/2022 21:45:34

p=23
os íqna sirpán un ʁará jáq'an kes mut'úˤh χírtːut
parčáħ wárχˤbos

permalink context all comments (7) save report block

BREAKING: Oops! Judge Aileen Cannon has DENIED the DOJ's motion for a partial stay to continue investigating Trump with seized materials from Mar-a-Lago and has appointed Raymond Dearie as special master. This was one of Trump's picks! DOJ criminals are PIIIISSSSSEEED! by catsfive

▲ 15 ▼

CHAOS_ACTUAL 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

09/15/22

DoJ in its motion to stay Judge Cannon's original order to appoint a Special Master, and Judge Cannon in denying DoJ's motion, both noted that the DoJ intends to immediately appeal Judge Cannon's denial to stay the appointment and or to win a limit on the scope of the access by the Special Master to certain seized documents as designated by the D0J and the Intelligence Community.

Below excerpt, DoJ telegraphing its intention to appeal Cannon's appointment, from page 2 of Judge Cannon' denial to stay DoJ's motion:

"The Government advises in the Motion that it will seek relief from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit “[i]f the Court does not grant a stay by Thursday, September 15” [ECF No. 69 p. 1]. Appreciative of the urgency of this matter, the Court hereby issues this Order on an expedited basis.*

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.89.0_2.pdf

09/08/22 Document 69

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.69.0_3.pdf

Attachment 1 to DoJ Document 69 contains the declaration of Alan E. Kohler, Assistant Director, Counterintelligence Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation that goes right up to the line of invoking states secret privilege, something Judge Cannon was sure to pick up on. By denying DoJ's motion to stay, Judge Cannon has called DoJ's bluff (we [FBI] have an ace up our sleeve, you [Judge Cannon] know we have an ace up our sleeve, so go ahead and fold your hand now and avoid having your ruling overturned on appeal). Below excerpt also on page 2 of Judge Cannon's denial, noting the gist of Attachment 1, Doc 69 the Kohler Declaration:

"The Motion is accompanied by the Declaration of Alan E. Kohler, Jr., Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (the “Kohler Declaration”) [ECF No. 69-1]. The Kohler Declaration states that the Government’s Security Assessments are “inextricably linked” to the Government’s criminal investigation, and that it would be “exceedingly difficult” to bifurcate the personnel involved [ECF No. 69-1 pp. 3–4]."

09/08/22 Attachment 1 / Document 69 / Declaration of Alan E. Kohler, Assistant Director, Counterintelligence Division / Federal Bureau of Investigation / Full document:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.69.1_2.pdf

In any event, anticipate DoJ losing this in the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and appealing to the Supreme Court. Again, the DoJ has telegraphed their ultimate legal strategy in Document 88 of this case...

19/13/22 Document 88:

page 9:

"For that and other reasons, the delay of the government’s criminal investigation constitutes its own irreparable harm. The government and the public unquestionably have an interest in the timely enforcement of criminal laws, particularly those involving the protection of highly sensitive information, and especially where, as here, there may have been efforts to obstruct its investigation. The government’s ability to perform other investigative tasks that do not require its review or use of the records marked as classified does not “refute[]” this irreparable harm. D.E. 84 at 18. These records are at the core of the government’s investigation, and the government’s inability to review and use them significantly constrains its investigation. The compelled disclosure of records marked as classified to a special master further harms the Executive Branch’s interest in limiting access to such materials absent any valid purpose served by their review. See United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1, 10-11 (1952)(courts should be cautious before requiring judicial review, even ex parte and in camera, of documents whose disclosure would jeopardize national security)."

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.88.0_5.pdf

Q # 14 / What is 'State Secrets' and how upheld in the SC?

Q # 1944 / Define 'State Secrets'.

Q # 1945 / Define 'State Secrets'.

https://qaggregator.news/?q=%23%2314%2C1944%2C1945

https://qaggregator.news/?q=state+secret

The state secrets privilege is an evidentiary rule created by United States legal precedent. Application of the privilege results in exclusion of evidence from a legal case based solely on affidavits submitted by the government stating that court proceedings might disclose sensitive information which might endanger national security.[1][2][3][4][5][6] United States v. Reynolds,[7] which involved alleged military secrets, was the first case that saw formal recognition of the privilege.

Following a claim of "state secrets privilege", the court rarely conducts an in camera examination of the evidence to evaluate whether there is sufficient cause to support the use of this doctrine. This results in court rulings in which even the judge has not verified the veracity of the assertion.[1] The privileged material is completely removed from the litigation, and the court must determine how the unavailability of the privileged information affects the case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_secrets_privilege

The privilege was first officially recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953). A military airplane, a B-29 Super Fortress bomber, crashed. The widows of three civilian crew members sought accident reports on the crash but were told that to release such details would threaten national security by revealing the bomber's top-secret mission.[1][2][3][4][5][6][10][11] The court held that only the government can claim or waive the privilege, but that it “is not to be lightly invoked” and that there “must be a formal claim of privilege, lodged by the head of the department which has control over the matter, after actual personal consideration by that officer.”[1] The court stressed that the decision to withhold evidence is to be made by the presiding judge and not the executive.[1]

In 2000, the accident reports were declassified and released, and it was found that the assertion that they contained secret information was fraudulent. The reports did, however, contain information about the poor condition of the aircraft itself, which would have been very compromising to the Air Force's case. Many commentators have alleged government misuse of secrecy in this landmark case.[12]

Despite this ruling, a case might still be subject to judicial review since the privilege was intended to prevent certain, but not all, information to be precluded.[

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_secrets_privilege#Supreme_Court_recognition_in_United_States_v._Reynolds

United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953), is a landmark legal case in 1953 that saw the formal recognition[1] of the state secrets privilege, a judicially recognized extension of presidential power.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Reynolds

What we may be witnessing is the gutting of the state secrets privilege [United States v. Reynolds] by exposing it as nothing more than another corrupt lawfare practice and corruption of the judicial system by the deep state, like latches and standing, and other kick-the-can rulings by judges, that allow the system to protect itself in the courts under the color of law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laches_(equity)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_(law)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_(law)

Link to full Docket : Trump v United States

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64911367/trump-v-united-states/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

permalink context all comments (56) save report block

WAKE UP! and smell the COVFEFE. The covfefe is bubbling over on Truth Social as @realDonald Trump nears TT1776 truth marker. by CHAOS_ACTUAL

▲ 2 ▼

CHAOS_ACTUAL 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Possible communications synchronization scenario developing on Truth Social (TS) between TT series (Truth Trump) and TO series (Truth Other) message numbers.

Keep in mind that President Trump has been less and less shy in sending Q coded or Q associated messages / images recently or making Q references at his rallies ...

Rally

I Am Q / 09/24/20 (thunder intro)

https://youtu.be/Mb4-Ic5_ytM

Wwg1wga / 09/24/20 (thunder intro + theme) / banned off youtube 09/21/22

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZKkUBlc4Vg

Wwg1wga theme - (rumble - added to comment 09/21/22)
https://rumble.com/v1inq0u-wwg1wga-by-richard-feelgood.html

"We are a nation in decline..." (thunder intro + theme + message)

https://qagg.news/truthimages/tLRif.caa.mp4

Wilkes-Barre PA / 09/03/22 / I AM Q + Wwg1wga + "We are a nation in decline"

https://youtu.be/hLx_Eiuqd2c?t=11914 (time stamp)

And keep in mind the @snazzyburrito TS messages that @realDonaldTrump retruthed that had authentic /pol/4chan/8chan/8kun sourced Q drops embedded in TT messages.

@snazzyburrito

Here is the qaggregator admin explanation back in June of how Q drops had shown up in Trump Truths on 21 May and 30 May 2022.

https://qagg.news/specstate.php

The two Trump Truth drops from back in May with Q drops in them (oddly enough when he linked to the same Truth Social user @snazzyburrito as today drop with a Q post):

22 May and 30 May 2022 Trump Truths with Q drops:

https://qagg.news/?q=%23%23TT201%2CTT278

30 August 2022 Trump Truth with Q drop:

https://qaggregator.news/?q=%23%23TT1435

A pattern of anomalies...

Trump began high volume posting after TT1699 (picture of twin beams of light 9/11 memorial) on 9/11/22 and that kicked of the high volume string of drops beginning with TT1700 through TT1774 posting to date (1775 and then 1776 will be the next two drops).

https://qaggregator.news/?q=%23%23TT1699-1774

And included the following...

https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUHI715m/since-0911-this-070622-speech-li/

Currently, the TO series of truth drops (all other subscribers on TS available on the qagg.news aggregation site is TO41684 ... this is a series of drops by Devin Nunes made between 02:16 and 02:18 AM ET... which is pretty late (or early) for Nunes.

If there is a communications synchronization the thing to watch for is Trump posting TT1776 (1776 days from first Q drop and announced death of Queen Elizabeth) and for the last four numbers of the TO series to "sync up" TO41776 either just before of just after TT1776.

Something similar occurred the night of October 21 / 22 2020, the night President Trump spoke at a rally in Gastonia, NC, when a synchronization occurred between Trumps twitter drops and Q's 8/kun drops.

See link to post below, scroll down for details...

https://greatawakening.win/p/11PVWNI2Ca/q-drops--october-21th/

u/meteorknife... linking back to your post of Q drop analysis on 21 October 2020.

permalink context all comments (2) save report block

Who is (P)? by Shapirogoldbergstein

▲ 3 ▼

CHAOS_ACTUAL 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

TO3011
Q / @q 03/29/2022 21:45:34

p=23
os íqna sirpán un ʁará jáq'an kes mut'úˤh χírtːut
parčáħ wárχˤbos

https://qaggregator.news/?q=%23%23TO3011

permalink context all comments (149) save report block

Q WARNED US. The DOJ goes "there": United States v. Reynolds / page 9 - Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 88 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Donald J. Trump, Plaintiff -v- United States of America, Defendant. THE UNITED STATES’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL. Links in text. by CHAOS_ACTUAL

▲ 3 ▼

CHAOS_ACTUAL 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Trump: "I took the documents home with me because Joe's dogs would eat them."

permalink context all comments (4) save report block

Sundance: The Machiavellian Intent of John Durham by Narg

▲ 5 ▼

CHAOS_ACTUAL 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

sundance banned any user making comments in support of Q or Q topics in 2018.

He was losing control of his spin on his narrative analysis. So discussion of Q alternative interpretation and narrative analysis got your comments shadow banned at first, banned if you "persisted."

On theconservativetreehouse it is sundance's way or the highway and its been an anechoic chamber ever since.

To sundance, stalwart defender of the 1st amendment, I dedicate this song...

https://youtu.be/yuY44PHC0wI (1 min, 49 sec)

permalink context all comments (6) save report block

by ghost_of_aswartz

▲ 2 ▼

CHAOS_ACTUAL 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Modulation, not moderation.

permalink context all comments (2) save report block