BREAKING: Oops! Judge Aileen Cannon has DENIED the DOJ's motion for a partial stay to continue investigating Trump with seized materials from Mar-a-Lago and has appointed Raymond Dearie as special master. This was one of Trump's picks! DOJ criminals are PIIIISSSSSEEED!
(media.greatawakening.win)
Cannon Fire!!
Holy hell, the winning is TOO MUCH!!!
https://www.stripes.com/theaters/us/2022-09-14/trump-special-master-dearie-7334846.html
EDIT: (From Cates)
u/#catdance
u/#catdance
There's no such thing as too much winning. 😁
Nope. Bring on some more.
if I ever have 10 seconds to talk to him, I'm gonna tell him the only thing he's lied about is that I would get tired of winning.
DA YUM!! Yeah baby!! YUGE winning! 💥
Make sure you get that looked at if it lasts more than four hours. 👀😉
Love the rush reference
Trump's first choice for Special Master, a Reagan appointee, and worked in the EDNY back in the 80s, when Trump and Giuliani were running stings against the mob. Seems like a solid dude.
He was also one of the FISA judges who the FBI & DOJ lied to. (Hand me my popcorn!)
DS: Thinking They are cool..
u/#vincewalk
DS: Shmelling some fish...
u/#vincewhat
DJT coming out of Nowhere and Whooping Ass!!
u/#trumpbeatdown
u/#trumpdance
09/15/22
DoJ in its motion to stay Judge Cannon's original order to appoint a Special Master, and Judge Cannon in denying DoJ's motion, both noted that the DoJ intends to immediately appeal Judge Cannon's denial to stay the appointment and or to win a limit on the scope of the access by the Special Master to certain seized documents as designated by the D0J and the Intelligence Community.
Below excerpt, DoJ telegraphing its intention to appeal Cannon's appointment, from page 2 of Judge Cannon' denial to stay DoJ's motion:
"The Government advises in the Motion that it will seek relief from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit “[i]f the Court does not grant a stay by Thursday, September 15” [ECF No. 69 p. 1]. Appreciative of the urgency of this matter, the Court hereby issues this Order on an expedited basis.*
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.89.0_2.pdf
09/08/22 Document 69
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.69.0_3.pdf
Attachment 1 to DoJ Document 69 contains the declaration of Alan E. Kohler, Assistant Director, Counterintelligence Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation that goes right up to the line of invoking states secret privilege, something Judge Cannon was sure to pick up on. By denying DoJ's motion to stay, Judge Cannon has called DoJ's bluff (we [FBI] have an ace up our sleeve, you [Judge Cannon] know we have an ace up our sleeve, so go ahead and fold your hand now and avoid having your ruling overturned on appeal). Below excerpt also on page 2 of Judge Cannon's denial, noting the gist of Attachment 1, Doc 69 the Kohler Declaration:
"The Motion is accompanied by the Declaration of Alan E. Kohler, Jr., Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (the “Kohler Declaration”) [ECF No. 69-1]. The Kohler Declaration states that the Government’s Security Assessments are “inextricably linked” to the Government’s criminal investigation, and that it would be “exceedingly difficult” to bifurcate the personnel involved [ECF No. 69-1 pp. 3–4]."
09/08/22 Attachment 1 / Document 69 / Declaration of Alan E. Kohler, Assistant Director, Counterintelligence Division / Federal Bureau of Investigation / Full document:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.69.1_2.pdf
In any event, anticipate DoJ losing this in the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and appealing to the Supreme Court. Again, the DoJ has telegraphed their ultimate legal strategy in Document 88 of this case...
19/13/22 Document 88:
page 9:
"For that and other reasons, the delay of the government’s criminal investigation constitutes its own irreparable harm. The government and the public unquestionably have an interest in the timely enforcement of criminal laws, particularly those involving the protection of highly sensitive information, and especially where, as here, there may have been efforts to obstruct its investigation. The government’s ability to perform other investigative tasks that do not require its review or use of the records marked as classified does not “refute[]” this irreparable harm. D.E. 84 at 18. These records are at the core of the government’s investigation, and the government’s inability to review and use them significantly constrains its investigation. The compelled disclosure of records marked as classified to a special master further harms the Executive Branch’s interest in limiting access to such materials absent any valid purpose served by their review. See United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1, 10-11 (1952)(courts should be cautious before requiring judicial review, even ex parte and in camera, of documents whose disclosure would jeopardize national security)."
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.88.0_5.pdf
Q # 14 / What is 'State Secrets' and how upheld in the SC?
Q # 1944 / Define 'State Secrets'.
Q # 1945 / Define 'State Secrets'.
https://qaggregator.news/?q=%23%2314%2C1944%2C1945
https://qaggregator.news/?q=state+secret
The state secrets privilege is an evidentiary rule created by United States legal precedent. Application of the privilege results in exclusion of evidence from a legal case based solely on affidavits submitted by the government stating that court proceedings might disclose sensitive information which might endanger national security.[1][2][3][4][5][6] United States v. Reynolds,[7] which involved alleged military secrets, was the first case that saw formal recognition of the privilege.
Following a claim of "state secrets privilege", the court rarely conducts an in camera examination of the evidence to evaluate whether there is sufficient cause to support the use of this doctrine. This results in court rulings in which even the judge has not verified the veracity of the assertion.[1] The privileged material is completely removed from the litigation, and the court must determine how the unavailability of the privileged information affects the case.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_secrets_privilege
The privilege was first officially recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953). A military airplane, a B-29 Super Fortress bomber, crashed. The widows of three civilian crew members sought accident reports on the crash but were told that to release such details would threaten national security by revealing the bomber's top-secret mission.[1][2][3][4][5][6][10][11] The court held that only the government can claim or waive the privilege, but that it “is not to be lightly invoked” and that there “must be a formal claim of privilege, lodged by the head of the department which has control over the matter, after actual personal consideration by that officer.”[1] The court stressed that the decision to withhold evidence is to be made by the presiding judge and not the executive.[1]
In 2000, the accident reports were declassified and released, and it was found that the assertion that they contained secret information was fraudulent. The reports did, however, contain information about the poor condition of the aircraft itself, which would have been very compromising to the Air Force's case. Many commentators have alleged government misuse of secrecy in this landmark case.[12]
Despite this ruling, a case might still be subject to judicial review since the privilege was intended to prevent certain, but not all, information to be precluded.[
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_secrets_privilege#Supreme_Court_recognition_in_United_States_v._Reynolds
United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953), is a landmark legal case in 1953 that saw the formal recognition[1] of the state secrets privilege, a judicially recognized extension of presidential power.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Reynolds
What we may be witnessing is the gutting of the state secrets privilege [United States v. Reynolds] by exposing it as nothing more than another corrupt lawfare practice and corruption of the judicial system by the deep state, like latches and standing, and other kick-the-can rulings by judges, that allow the system to protect itself in the courts under the color of law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laches_(equity)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_(law)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_(law)
Link to full Docket : Trump v United States
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64911367/trump-v-united-states/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
I think you’re definitely onto something! I’ve had a few days to process the response to the motion. It’s a circular argument they couldn't win. They want to review “and use” the information to continue their investigation for reasons of “national security”. But one must ask, how is national security a risk, almost two years later, that is now back in the hands of the government?
Let’s remember, we (and maybe the investigative team looking to file charges for mishandling) don’t know it’s classification. Or do they?
Let’s say a president classified certain docs as “personal” yet NARA feels like they should be archived. What if the docs expose something sensational… collusion, treason, players of Russiagate, election fraud etc.
NARA may not agree with the “personal” classification. The president believes it is. Executive privilege gives a very wide reach in discernment to the president. It’s be a simple disagreement between a president and NARA. You know, sending letters, asking for documents, giving documents, asking to see the storage, asking for a lock to be placed, typical back and forth negotiation.
But it’s Trump. Nothing has been normal. Enter the 3 letter agencies. So they raid MAL and claim state secrets. National security. As you said, under the guise of the color of law. Transparency doesn’t work for those above the law. Having a judge who honestly believes in the rule of law is a threat. Just as Trump is. Just as we the people are.
Checkmate.
👏👏👏
Q pointed out Obamas EO 13526 Sec 1.7 governing classifications that's still in effect.
Swamp Wile Es hoist on their own petards by Road Runner Trump and Q?
Meep. MAGA Meep.
Love Winning🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️❤️❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️❤️❤️
RUh ROH......MAGA4EVA
u/#trump4eva
Let the Winnings begin
So this is how they are going to get all of the treasonous documents into the open court system and on the record. He trapped the FBI into raiding him for one set of documents, and only left another even more damning for them.
Can you imagine the rage in those offices when they found 50 empty folders and then nothing but documents proving treason for everyone? No wonder they fired the lead guy in the middle of the day.
He dug up a ticking hand grenade instead of gold booty, then handed the hand grenade to his bosses and walked away.
B O O M
Fucking glorious, hey?
I know I'm the lead Qtard mod and all, but, we will be dissecting and researching this heavily on our WIN. Check in and see what we're up to. Any interesting details, I guarantee we'll be the FIRST to have it.
"DOJ Criminals are PIIISSSSEEEED" So is Bill Bar.
Barr was edited out of the equation by the EO. People thinking Barr could have/should have/would have "done something" are low info.
People that don't lift think Barr is trash. If he was swamp, NO WAY would he have appointed Durham as SC in the first place.
Did you know? The judge that the DOJ appointed as Special Master today was running stings against the east coast mafia WITH TRUMP back in the 80s? Guess who was also on that team.... BARR.
And did you know? During the Noriega trial, a Special Master was appointed to handle all the documents seized. Who ran those arguments (and knows the issue best)? BARR.
Those that lift and are paying detailed attention know the answer to your question as to whether Barr is DC swamp.
I have always wanted to believe in Barr and Sessions. A good movie needs good actors. I hope any enmity they appear to display against President Trump is a front to lull the DS into a false sense of security.
Don't listen to their words. That's just theatre for the tards and the MSM. Watch their actions.
Dearie, Trump, Barr and Guilliani, who was the AG in charge and who created the prosecutorial use of RICO to bring down corrupt criminal organizations like the mob and now......
Who's undercover and convincingly playing a role? Stay tuned to find out. Or dont.
BINGO!!!
Hell, yeah!!
Bring on the pain!!!
Thank God!
Brilliant work by trump. He has appointed the most unimpeachable person and will get a fair ruling on the facts. He can declassify anything he deems. And thus these documents can be kept by him and, hopefully, revealed to the public. And we shall all know the truth
Now let's get the Special Master unlimited access to the FBI's documents to see how politically motivated this was and to look through each Agent's home
It was also a pick Andrew Weissman favored, so we shall see!
We'll see who has the leverage, here. This is the judge that approved the Carter Page warrant, so Weissman might think that's a tick in their favour.
I share your hopium on that for sure. If Dearie truly believes in justice, which he should, then Weissman and the DOJ are toast.
I read and seem to remember, but no links were provided, that at the time news broke that the FBI had knowingly lied to FISC judges so the coup plotters could get their FISA warrant to spy on Trump and everyone in his orbit, using Carter Page as their Trojan Horse, only Judge Dearie publicly expressed his outrage.
At the time, that was all he could do. Now he can do more. Hopefully he will. He's definitely now in my prayers.
"A pick Andrew Weiss man favored".
" We shall see". In order to "see" please provide source links to look at, vet and ponder.
Thanks.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUCerm8f/-trumps-choice-for-maralago-raid/c/
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2022/09/12/trumps-choice-for-mar-a-lago-raid-special-master-may-be-brilliantor-disastrous-n1628878
https://rumble.com/v1bggx5-you-levelled-up.html
I'm thinking she doesn't understand how its supposed to work. Is she slow?
This isn't the same guy the doj agreed too is it?
Do you mean woman, Barbara something? It wasn't Trump's first choice, but it was his 2nd. Sometimes lawyers do this. They put in a name as their 1st choice when actually they want the 2nd name anyway, and IMO this filing is a good example. Did you know? The judge that the DOJ appointed as Special Master today was running stings against the east coast mafia WITH TRUMP back in the 80s? Guess who was also on that team.... BARR.
We are winning SO HARD right now, it's not even funny. Panic in DC.
There was a different guy who was one of Trumps picks who the doj agreed too being the specialmaster. It was the fisa court judge who allowed the DOJ to spy on Carter Page.
"Allowed the DOJ to spy on Carter Page"
Allowed because the FBI swore everything they said to the judge was vetted and true when, in fact, the FBI not only lied to the judge but falsified evidence from the CIA which doxxed/burned one of the CIAs assets, Carter Page.
This falsification has been proven, thanks to Durham. He got the FBI lawyer who did it to plead guilty and confess, on the record.
And I don't even like popcorn! 🍿🎉
Found actual video of DOJ after learning this news:
https://youtu.be/YersIyzsOpc?t=19
For a change the world is upside right. For rhe moment
What do you mean? It does ;)