Well, damn. Now I feel silly because that is something that I should have realized before I posted. You're 100% right.

That's what you call a typical political ad in the US.

I'm not trying to be rude, but why are you saying "our military"? You're not American. This isn't the first time that you've done this type of thing.

How would you feel if someone from a different country started calling South Africa THEIR country?

Again, I'm not trying to be rude, but I don't think non-Americans should be calling the American military "OUR" military. It's not YOUR military in any sense. Unless you're somehow paying American taxes and voting in American elections, none of it is yours.

This is very odd unless he was forced to wear an ankle monitor, he was using a boot to cover it,

I see this being said here alot. That people with those boots on are hiding ankle monitors.

I just don't think this is true. I've been on house arrest and had to wear an ankle monitor. They're pretty small now. If you're wearing straight legged pants, you can't see it under them. You don't need a big bulky boot to hide it.

I'm pretty sure that plenty of Christians would be upset as well over this. All Christians don't have the same religious beliefs, and Baptism is a pretty contentious subject among some denominations. And even the method of baptism is a hotly debated subject.

Sounds like an interesting story on getting fired for red pilling. Could you share it with us?

I constantly meet people who have read about Q in the MSM. They ALL assume I am a Nazi and disassociate from me (with prejudice).

Do you tell people you meet that you're a Q follower right away? Not judging, just curious how they would know you followed Q.

I haven't met any. But I don't really get involved with going to rallies or protests or things like that, where you can find Q followers.

so we have to rehash it here again for those that rather post fast than read what already has been posted the same freaking day.

I think this is a problem that ALL forums have and I see it happen here all the time, not just with this topic.

I agree that it's annoying. But I don't know how it can be changed. I just try to not let it bother me too much but it's really hard sometimes.

They allowed Trump to put it out because they thought we would all follow and majority would then accept the shot. Well that plan flopped…

Do you know where we can get some true info on how many people took the vax? Because it seems like the most people maybe DID take it.

I know that most reports from the gov can't be trusted, though.

But just by going by what people I know did, it looks like most people got at least one shot. And almost all my friends and family voted for Trump so their not libs.

And I read so many posts here where people talk about how all their family got the shot except them.

So I just think that maybe the majority of people really did get vaxxed but I know you can't go just by what goes on in your life, so I thought maybe you had something that showed how many people really got vaxxed. So I'm not trying to say your wrong but I just want to know for sure. You get me?

How are things going to change during his second term, then? The DS swamp is still there.

Pomona College is like this with the number 47. If you're actively looking for a specific number, you're going to see it everywhere. Especially if you count manipulation of other numbers to get to your number.

https://magazine.pomona.edu/pomoniana/2015/02/13/the-mystery-of-47/

Well, that was embarrassing.

This is why we have foster parents and adoption.

What about martial law?

Why? Like the cloned Biden issue, it's just needlessly complicated.

The amount of money involved in cloning people would be astronomical. It would be far, far cheaper just to pay people for their children. Or just steal them. It's not like there's any shortage of desperate and/or evil people in the world that would sell their kids for a couple grand. It's the main reason why we have so much child trafficking already.

I just don't see why anyone needs to come up with these overly complicated scenarios when there's ample evidence that there are far, far easier and cheaper ways to accomplish their goals.

It’s safe to assume that was disclosure that human cloning also possible/probable.

I don't think it's all that unreasonable to believe that human cloning could/has happened. But then there's the issue of age difference. A cloned human isn't going to happen like in the movie Multiplicity. It still starts off as a baby and has to grow up.

And why would you even need to clone someone when it's clearly easier to just get a look alike or use masks or use plastic surgery to make a double? It's just making things needlessly complicated.

He doesn't read the news? None of his staff read the news? He has to be told this stuff by some random public citizen? Weird.

sat phone will be trackable everywhere.

But aren't their regular phones trackable too?

I'm by no means a fan of Bezos, but he's worth around 40 billion. This wouldn't ruin him in the least.

Ok. That actually does make a bit of sense. Context is important. Thanks for taking the time to give a serious answer.

Not trying to be a dick, but there is something I just don't understand.

Why are you subtracting 1 from 56? I get that it was spelled correctly once, but why would you subtract the one time it was spelled correctly from the 56 times it wasn't? Or why not add it?