5
ChessNotCheckers 5 points ago +6 / -1

Q references Godfather 2 (politicians compromised and controlled by blackmail, Government, Mafia & big business working together in corrupt ways). Godfather 3 (Secret corruption and massive wealth of Vatican and connections to organized crime, "respectable institutions" being fronts for criminals). Sum of all fears (False flag nuclear attack carried out by hidden deep state actors to draw USA & Russia into conflict). But I never quite understood how Iron Eagle (1986) deserved to be on Q's movie list. I think I've figured it out.

In Iron Eagle, there is a civilian kid who's military father has been captured on a mission. Since the government has declined to save his dad he decides to do it himself. The military father and civilian son seem to mirror the relationship of JFK Sr. and JFK Jr. What's really weird about the movie is that in your typical dumb action movie, the protagonist would simply fly his stolen F-16 10k miles to the Middle East, unrefueled and rescue the dad, but that's not what happens. The first half of the movie, the kid uses his extensive knowledge of HOW the military works and his connections in the military to arrange all the pieces to enable the mission. He sets-up air-to-air refueling, satellite data, all kinds of stuff through relationships and deception, and the fact that it's all completely compartmentalized prevents people in the military from understanding that they're enabling an illegal mission that would be impossible to accomplish without their assistance (military is the only way). Q has mentioned that the plan is compartmentalized and only a very small number of people are aware of the entire plan. Sounds very similar, right? Also in the movie, the father is unable to complete his mission without the son (returning him home) and in the case of JFK Sr, he was unable to complete his mission of smashing the deep state and dismantling the CIA, but if Jr is Q (I think he is), he would be completing his father's mission in the same way the kid in Iron Eagle does.

4
ChessNotCheckers 4 points ago +4 / -0

This song is played during the FINAL SCENE of the movie.

1
ChessNotCheckers 1 point ago +1 / -0

And maybe the Irish. JK, Blazing Saddles reference.

5
ChessNotCheckers 5 points ago +6 / -1

So you guys think she's in on it, and the shots were real, and she would intentionally position herself downrange where she could be accidentally killed by a sniper incapable of making a 150yd shot at a stationary target from a prone position. Got it

Did you notice her last name reads like "Disguise"?

0
ChessNotCheckers 0 points ago +1 / -1

I've done high-speed photography on bullets, and your assumption is correct. The camera would NOT have been able to capture an image of the bullet. However, it now appears that Trump was not struck with a bullet, but rather, glass from a shattered teleprompter. If true, those objects could be traveling significantly slower than the bullet and possibly slowly enough to be captured. Of course, the whole thing could simply be part of a scripted movie like the one that Q says that we're watching.

13
ChessNotCheckers 13 points ago +13 / -0

The last time Trump issued a call to arms, me and two other patriots I had never met before dropped everything, climbed in a car and made the ~5,000 mile round-trip to Washington D.C. to be there for the Jan 6th protest. All because our president said to be there and to be non-violent. It would be an enormous mistake for enemies of freedom to confuse restraint for cowardice.

3
ChessNotCheckers 3 points ago +3 / -0

Literally the only thing in favor of the JFK JR = Vincent Fusca theory is that Vincent has been seated next to a woman that looks EXACTLY like a more mature Carolyn Bissette a couple of times. She looks so much like Carolyn that I think the plane crash was likely a faked death. I don't think Fusca looks like anyone.

3
ChessNotCheckers 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interestingly, the famous Iwo Jima photo was staged. It really happened, but then they did it a second time to take the photo. Reminds me of how they tried to take Trump out with the missile launched from the submarine which the public is still unaware of.

1
ChessNotCheckers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, if that's your explanation for why Vincent Fusca didn't jump, then what's your explanation for EVERYONE else around him that did simultaneously (20+ people).

6
ChessNotCheckers 6 points ago +6 / -0

He's that strange looking guy with hat and curly hair behind and to the left of Trump (Trump`s right). He has been to many of Trumps rallies, always right behind d Trump and occasionally seated next to a woman who looks very much like an older Carolyn Bessette. Some think Fusca is JFK Jr in a mask (looks too short to me). No one knows who he is or why he always has consistently excellent seats at trumps rallies (always in the frame with trump). Not seen him in a while,then he makes a scene arriving late at this particular rally and is the only person in the crowd to not react to shooting. Seems notable.

8
ChessNotCheckers 8 points ago +11 / -3

The fact that "Vincent Fusca" very noticeably arrived just prior to the shots, was right behind Trump (AGAIN) and then didn't react to shots fired (a normal person would visibly startle) I'm taking as a wink from white hats that this is part of the movie and not to worry too much about it.

15
ChessNotCheckers 15 points ago +15 / -0

If they committed fraud, it invalidates any immunity they were granted (Hint: they did).

6
ChessNotCheckers 6 points ago +6 / -0

They have claimed all-along that DEI makes organizations stronger, wouldn't they need those "better" DEI employees now more than ever?

32
ChessNotCheckers 32 points ago +32 / -0

It's going to be so depressing if they never announce these executions. All of us here have really earned our "I told you so" moment.

2
ChessNotCheckers 2 points ago +2 / -0

DOCTOR Vulture.

4
ChessNotCheckers 4 points ago +4 / -0

While, I agree that JFK Jr may have faked his death and I'm hoping that he turns out to be both Trump's running mate and also Q, the "lack of public viewing of the bodies" is NOT evidence of anything. If you'll recall, it supposedly took a couple of weeks to find and recover them. They would not have been in a suitable state for "public viewing".

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›