1
DigitSoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m just glad that lying sack of shit Josh Merrit was denied access to the packet logs. I thank God that Mike cut access off to the data when he did.

You go ahead and try to discredit the truth all you want. Maybe politifact will hire you because their current “fact checks” against election fraud are a good laugh.

You are welcome and good luck!

1
DigitSoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lindell's symposium was to award "to disprove" the data, not "to prove".

According to Mike Lindell, what was to be disproven is that the data came from the 2020 election. I find that to mean confirmation but either term works for me.

Packet logs

Why did you insert that? Once again, according to Mike, his original request to the red team was to disprove the data he had was from the 2020 election. He showed them data (not the packet captures) and the red team agreed the data they saw was from the 2020 election thus no 5 million reward.

The only reasonable easy proof I would be able to slam my fist down on a table would be if foreign actors backdoored the machines and used some commonly available remote desktop ...

I couldn’t agree more, however that was not the challenge. Mike’s challenge was for the red team to disprove the data he showed the red team was from the 2020 election which they didn’t do.

1
DigitSoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn’t rely on a known liar to tell you anything.

He was part of the red team that confirmed the data Mike had was from the 2020 election which is what the 5 million reward was for, which the red team did in fact confirm. He then ran to the M$M with lies about how he didn’t confirm that China remotely connected to election machines, falsely claiming that’s why he didn’t get the 5 million.

He lied about Mike Lindell and stated that the physical attack on Mike during the symposium was not true. He wasn’t even in the room when it happened.

It’s a good thing Mike’s CI team sniffed him out before Mike dropped the PCAPs to the red team. Who knows what that lying fool had planned for them.

66
DigitSoldier 66 points ago +66 / -0

The short, short version:

Dr. Frank discovered that the voter rolls numbers for the 2020 election and the number of votes cast are very highly correlated to the 2010 census data. They are so highly correlated, that it is not possible for it to occur naturally and an algorithm is involved.

3
DigitSoldier 3 points ago +3 / -0

"they say the same shit your saying so you're the same as them".

Tell him the truth is the truth no matter who says it.

6
DigitSoldier 6 points ago +6 / -0

Some QAnon Believers

Translation: Some covert FBI shills

2
DigitSoldier 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just ordered a new MyPillow pillow today

Mike continues to fight to fix 2020 and he gets my full support!

3
DigitSoldier 3 points ago +3 / -0

Translation: “The C_A is preparing to conduct a false flag operation in Ukraine to create the pretext for a fictitious invasion.”

by gamepwn
1
DigitSoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alex Jones is controlled opposition according to Q.

Take anything he reports with skepticism.

26
DigitSoldier 26 points ago +26 / -0

Sounds like a good idea.

What’s the problem?

1
DigitSoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

Frankspeech

Now run along handshake.

1
DigitSoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s posted up on frankspeech.

2
DigitSoldier 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought the same thing as well. Hard to tell from a transcribe. I’d rather listen to the clip.

1
DigitSoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

Total hit piece.

They are regurgitating the boxed stores dropping him years ago, but making it sound like it just happened.

Fake news is gonna fake news...

5
DigitSoldier 5 points ago +5 / -0

Meanwhile, I think many people would agree that USA Today needs its hard drives checking.

I agree.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›