None of the above will happen
Emotional thinking and refusal to read and understand things that may prove them wrong.
Sure. Maybe it will turn out differently this go 'round.
I was only pointing out the fact check-FALSE.
The rest is immaterial.
From the FAQ-
GodBlessTheUSABible.com uses Donald J. Trump’s name, likeness and image under paid license from CIC Ventures LLC, which license may be terminated or revoked according to its terms
I would stay away regardless.
The above reply seems to have been posted multiple times.
Please delete.
-Ministry of Information
How about Vance?
FaceBlock
{I know nobody will get that reference}
Just cold drop the entire enchilada
I'm going to go ahead and use Mr Massie, who just today agreed with me.
https://greatawakening.win/p/199hlQt2j1/thomas-massie-calls-it-as-it-is-/c/
Agreed.
How about drawn and quartered?
It's an attack. Because Russia launched an all out war and invasion into Ukraine.
I suggest you read up on this if you aren't being purposely obtuse.
I just happen to have read a great write up on this entire fiasco minutes ago.. if you go to Substack, search "The 100 days". His most recent article on this is at the very top, entitled "The 1001 Days".
Ukraine just launched the missiles into Russia.
That's an attack.
And now you're playing politics toeing the company line of Russia attacking Ukraine and poor little Ukraine is just defending itself.
So either you're clearly partisan and just think Russia BAD, or you have a clear misunderstanding of what has lead up to this in the first place.
Or you're trolling, but I don't think you're being that underhanded.
Hate to break it to you, It's the favorite music of the white dipshits in the suburbs too.
That's what it's all about-no music becomes huge without the white consumer making it mainstream.
Supplying weapons to a country for defensive purposes does not require congressional approval.
Supplying weapons that are used to attack another country must gain congressional approval.
"We have not declared war on Russia. We have not made military attacks on Russia."
False. A declaration in modern terms does not have to be formal. Actions taken can be determined to be the declaration.
In addition, we have attacked Russia by proxy. If Mexico were supplied missiles by China, and Mexico launched them into Texas, what would we say?
Seems downright fair to me
I get so angry about the J6 hostages that I think I have buried the entire thought of it deep down.
The combination of sadness and rage is a difficult one for me to control and I have had to quell every bit of it.
He's under control
Declare War Clause
"And, as Professor Saikrishna Prakash has demonstrated, eighteenth-century diplomatic and personal correspondence commonly referred to wars “declared” by hostile action. Thus the clause most likely referred to wars “declared” by attacks as well as by formal announcements.
This reading of the clause resolves the difficulties suggested above. Giving Congress the power to declare wars by word or action makes sense in the context of founding-era fears that the President would involve the nation in needless conflicts. It further explains why leading framers described the clause as an important limit on presidential war-initiation and why in post-ratification conflicts the President was understood to be so limited.
This reading also confirms a number of situations in which independent presidential actions are thought to be constitutionally permitted. The President (without Congress’s approval) cannot take actions that put the United States in a state of war – most obviously, military attacks on a foreign nation.. But the clause does not bar presidential actions that do not put the United States in a state of war. Thus, for example, peacekeeping deployments and defensive deployments do not create a state of war. Similarly, rescue missions and other acts to protect U.S. citizens abroad may not create a state of war if they do not involve direct confrontation with foreign governments. It is important to note, however, that the eighteenth-century definition of “war” included low-level hostilities as well as total or full-scale conflict. Samuel Johnson’s 1755 dictionary defined war as “the exercise of violence under sovereign command.” Thus, limited hostilities with foreign nations, even if the United States is not fully engaged, would seem to require Congress’s approval."
I'm not even sure there was a blow up.
That's what was "reported", so grain of salt required
Are you having fun, Rachel?
Yes yes. Then let me ask you if you think sending tax payer dollars overseas to another country, and then arming said country to attack yet another country that poses no threat to the USA mainland is constitutional?
So you're pointing me to the official document on providing security for Ukraine?
Is that what you're doing?
It's Gowdy Doody time!