Shits like this will only make the dollar worthless.
Dat back-stabbing face...
Vaccines create autism, but the autists strike back.
Today we celebrate
Would it be better to say "Today we commemorate" or "Today we remember"?
You quote one section from the Nazirene link, and moved on with your twisted logic to conclude that the KJV was "indeed" perfect.
What the quote says is that the ancient manuscripts that were discovered in such a time that it might be a revelation by God. And that if God revealed these manuscripts, it effectively proves that the KJV was NOT a divine inspiration/revelation, because the KJV was never translated from those manuscripts!
Do know that before the KJV was even a thing, there was the Geneva version. The State Church has been pushing its own version but to no avail, so King James ordered to based their new version on the GNV, altering it to the point that nobody can notice, and in a way that supports the agenda of the State Church. More on that here. This article also explores the King's character, but that is irrelevant.
Even so, it was rejected by the King's own bishops and people, and it took decades to make the GNV out of print. And that the KJV itself was revised many times, the most popular one is the 1769 version!
I watched your video several times, and my observation is the same: What he did was: 1) quoting from the KJV, easy peasy, 2) comparing it with other translations, 3) talks about how it relates with the number 666. He only showed in his video one manuscript - the Sinacitus. I thought "What? these were all the arguments he could make?" He did not even try to attack the older manuscripts. With such unfound analogy, it only convinces those who have already been convinced, but fails to convince everyone else.
The Apostles told us to "Prove all things". Q tells us to "Question everything". Trump and Q show us the material facts. They don't play with numbers.
slander the KJV
It is not people slandering the KJV. Ever since the emergence of KJVO in the early 20th century it has always been KJVOs who are slandering everyone else.
Showing a list of what was "removed" from the KJV is a deliberate omission of what the KJV has made up. This is by far one of the most common KJVO argument. That won't work, especially in here.
you will have to take that up with Jesus
Imagine if Jesus walked among us today, and you spew such nonsense in front of him, all those fabricated doctrines rooted in Pagan Rome, all those false scriptures dated back in the 2nd century (see Celsus, Origen), he would have blasted people like you as hard as (if not harder than) the Pharisees.
Don't forget you are writing this in GAW, not PDW. I'm ready to slap in the face of everyone who is still propagating this century-old lie.
Was the guy in the video "proving" anything, or was he just paying with numbers like most other KJVOs and fundies do?
Meanwhile there are countless facts and discoveries to prove the exact opposite - that the KJV is one of the most corrupt translation in existence:
In the Preface to the Revised Standard Version of the bible this notable statement is made regarding the need for a revision of the English translation: "Yet the King James Version has grave defects... was based upon a Greek text that was marred by mistakes, containing the accumulated errors of fourteen centuries of manuscript copying. It was essentially the Greek text of the New Testament as edited by Beza, 1589, who closely followed that published by Erasmus, 1516-1535, which was based upon a few medieval manuscripts. The earliest and best of the eight manuscripts which Erasmus consulted was from the tenth century, and he made the least use of it because it differed most from the commonly received text; Beza had access to two manuscripts of great value dating from the fifth and sixth centuries, but he made very little use of them because they differed from the text published by Erasmus". [...]
With regard to the textual problems of the King James Version, Dr. Tischendorf writes: "…this text (the Received Text) differs in many places from the oldest authorities of the 4th, 5th and 6th centuries, and, therefore, must be replaced by a text which is really drawn from the oldest sources discoverable. The difficulty of finding such a text lies in this that there is a great diversity among these texts." (Codex Sinaiticus; by Dr. C. Tischendorf, p. 85).
Dean John W. Burgon, one of the most respected of scholars, is cited by Dr. David O. Fuller in his book WHICH BIBLE?, when he wrote in reference to Codexes B, Aleph, D, and L: "I insist and am prepared to prove that the text of these two Codexes (B and Aleph) is very nearly the foulest in existence" (Pp. 126-127); and "That they exhibit fabricated texts is demonstratable… B and Aleph are covered all over with blots -- Aleph even more than B.... We suspect that these two manuscripts are indebted for their preservation, solely to their ascertained evil character" (Pg. 93, 128). Burgon then goes on further and states: "No amount of honest copying -- persevered in for any number of centuries -- could possibility have resulted in two such documents" (Pg. 93). Burgon also said: "By far the most depraved text is that exhibited by Codex D" (Pg. 93). [...]
The problem is that believing Christians today have no means to deal with the issue of the corrupted biblical texts, so they have adopted the doctrine that God wrote the Authorized, or King James Version of the Bible. It does not matter that the Authorized Version is founded upon the most corrupted manuscripts in existence. It does not matter to this group of believers that the Authorized Version is at many important points in opposition to the original teachings of Jesus. What matters is that the Authorized Version which was composed in the year 1611, says what they want to hear, and therefore they reason that God must have written it. Thus, what this ultimately means, is that the faithful flock expects God to be in subjection to man, and conform to the doctrines contained in the believer’s version of the Bible. What they in fact proclaim, is that since the church wrote it, then God must accept it!
Whole article here. Note that despite the length of this article, there are much more evidence that were not covered in it. To know about the history of how the KJV came to be, read this article.
28 You heard me say to you, ‘I am going away, and I will come to you.’ If you loved me, you would have rejoiced, because I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I.
The 14x occurrences of this line comes from Ephesians 6:10-18.
In original Hebrew, the word translated to Lord/God in these verses is Elohim, instead of Jehovah.
Makes you think.
Also, don't fight the devils with just your bare hands. Deceive them. Fool them into thinking they were still winning. This is what Q does.
Was the drafting of the RICO Act any way influenced by the earlier Communist Control Act in the 1950s?
I don't think you should keep playing their game.
Just like Guns don't kill people.
We seize what they use to do evil and use it to do good.
Anyone know if the drafting of the RICO act was influenced by the earlier Communist Control Act in the 1950s?
Right before the primary election in August 2019, the exchange rate was 45 pesos to the dollar. Right after that, it shot up to 60.
And 4 years later, this month, it is 700+ to the dollar.
29 For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers and sisters.
30 And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.
4 He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.”
Some dark history about the Jesuits: https://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/isis/iu2-08a.htm
The Jesuits have done more moral harm in this world than all the fiendish armies of the mythical Satan.
The elder son of the Church might be made aware of the perversity of this doctrine. . . . A doctrine authorizing Theft, Lying, Perjury, Impurity, every Passion and Crime, teaching Homicide, Parricide, and Regicide, overthrowing religion in order to substitute for it superstition, by favoring Sorcery, Blasphemy, Irreligion, and Idolatry . . . etc. – Arrest du Parlement du 5 Mars, 1762
The popular feeling in Venice (1606), when the Jesuits were driven out from that city, expressed itself most forcibly. Great crowds had accompanied the exiles to the sea-shore, and the farewell cry which resounded after them over the waves, was, "Ande in malora!" (Get away! and woe be to you.) "That cry was echoed throughout the two following centuries"; says Michelet, who gives this statement, "in Bohemia in 1618 . . . in India in 1623 . . . and throughout all Christendom in 1773."
The Silent War.
12 No one has ever seen God; but if we love one another, God lives in us and his love is made complete in us.
If this is a troll (which it very well could be)
Any evidence suggesting so? From what I have remembered, they are not the only ones who talk about this.
To put a fine point on the question: What is it about little children that is in any way sexually attractive to some people? Innocent prepubescent children are the opposite of sexually appealing, as they represent pure, unspoiled, uncorrupted spiritual sweetness and innocence.
It is more than having sex with children. It is about destroying their spirits.
Jehovah is the God of this World.
Hurricane Hilldawg... a work of God... right...