2
Frayed-2 2 points ago +2 / -0

A good way to tell would be to see how much news coverage this gets. If this is the big one to confirm future direction, I imagine it’ll get all of the spotlight.

4
Frayed-2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Unless this is one of the sealed indictments I don’t think this is the “first arrest” Q is referring to. Looks like the unseal comes first, if I’m reading that right?

4
Frayed-2 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have an X account but it got suspended probably because I only used it to look at posts. No tweets, no interactions, no profile

2
Frayed-2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Executive orders aren’t laws. Can someone explain whether the executive branch has the power to actually do anything on the matter?

6
Frayed-2 6 points ago +6 / -0

I was doubting for a bit but every single time I check this site there’s something new and amazing. Mr. President, slow down! I’m getting tired of winning!

3
Frayed-2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Recurring themes! wait that’s not right

1
Frayed-2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m a little bit concerned about Trump’s comment about not wanting to prosecute his political opponents. I imagine this means we’ll have to wait for rock-solid evidence of significant crime to come out and be widely publicized before they take (outwardly visible) action. How long will that take?

1
Frayed-2 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what I’ve been looking forward to. Redpill material from a “trusted source”.

6
Frayed-2 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don’t trust anything The People’s Voice says. Every time I see an article of theirs going around, it’s something that falls apart under the most basic scrutiny. Not trustworthy.

5
Frayed-2 5 points ago +8 / -3

I also see a lot of people posting knee-jerk emotional reactions to provocative events. To them:

YOU ARE WATCHING A MOVIE

We’re supposed to be the ones who keep our cool through to the ending. Some of us have forgotten that. Do you really think that after all this planning, after making it this far, that the plan would be allowed to fall through at the very end due to something as stupid as petty infighting?!

1
Frayed-2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Innocent until proven guilty. They need proof he is the killer, and if there isn’t sufficient proof, he should go free.

4
Frayed-2 4 points ago +4 / -0

oh but it makes the legislators and their party look like really good people so that’s an accomplishment

3
Frayed-2 3 points ago +3 / -0

There’s also an issue of them potentially saying “hold on a ““minute”” let’s check if that’s right” “Oh hey good news, looks like you’re covered! Oh, you’re already dead? Well isn’t that just too bad”

2
Frayed-2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean yeah, that’s a very apt comparison. The problem is who is writing the message that’s being read. It’s all about who is arranging the letters, who is making the choices that result in a message popping out. In this case that person is OP.

Imagine being tossed a bunch of those letter blocks for children, arranging them to spell out “NUCLEAR WAR”, and then thinking that whoever gave you the blocks wants you to be nuked because of it. Insane.

2
Frayed-2 2 points ago +3 / -1

All of those options with the same number and you pick only the one that says what you want. This is the problem with gematria. You can get it to say anything

2
Frayed-2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I’d like to know if they’re saying it makes more of itself in the victim’s body or if it’s contagious, pretty big difference in my opinion

3
Frayed-2 3 points ago +3 / -0

They had to find something to do after AI took their jobs

1
Frayed-2 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one wants to do the fighting themselves.

view more: Next ›