5
FuckYouAsWell 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think the phone drop is coincidence.

But I think you're pretty spot on otherwise. We see a systemic effort to consolidate power at the federal level. Another shining example is the current situation with police.

7
FuckYouAsWell 7 points ago +7 / -0

Where I'm at in us life's pretty back to normal. Almost done with all this covid bullshit. Just the mega events and corps doing the testing and masks and other faggotry, but even that's pretty lax. The people don't give a fuck.

I used to be the absolute sole minority when I wouldn't wear a mask in the grocery store. Now most times you don't see a mask on anyone and employees don't have them either.

It's tough being in the other side of the world. Try and wether the storm best you can. Covid is just the means to introduce some other bs. The lockdowns will go away. You'll likely be left with unchecked medical tyranny so the outcome still isn't great short term.

One battle at a time. Focus on priorities. Simplify your life and your "priorities" may fall more in line with a life you can live going forward. Easy to say tough to do. Good luck.

1
FuckYouAsWell 1 point ago +1 / -0

They didn't say any of that.

They said the risk of heart inflammation in males under 30 exceeds the risk of covid.

What they didn't explicitly say but could possibly be inferred is; they think for all females and males over 30, the risk of covid is greater than the risk of inflammation.

2
FuckYouAsWell 2 points ago +2 / -0

I bet it's down in purpose to stop spread of Pandora papers or whatever else may be released in retaliation.

4
FuckYouAsWell 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well fren we have no where to go. Not like I'd want to anyways.

1
FuckYouAsWell 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do. From a very basic level like they funded terrorists in 19 billion different ways and they flew into the buildings. I'm not on board with missiles and some other things yet, but there was fuckery no doubt. I just couldn't definitively say how and I think anyone that says otherwise is full of shit to be honest. Although I love entertaining all of the various theories.

1
FuckYouAsWell 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean you have the link to the book. These excerpts clearly are not in there. What more is there to discuss?

MAYBE if you find the source material for what you posted it would be worth discussing. Until then use your own fucking advice, wake up, and do some digging.

3
FuckYouAsWell 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's a fucking roll of the dice if I've ever seen it. The 10% pissing off the 90% and assuming we will give a fuck what they think after.

What are their safe guards for retaining power through the chaos?

3
FuckYouAsWell 3 points ago +3 / -0

Black and white? Dark to light? Sleep tight!

1
FuckYouAsWell 1 point ago +2 / -1

This makes no sense for one simple reason.

Trump pushed and continues to push the vax. Therefore he will be tried as well.

by Restore
2
FuckYouAsWell 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh wow changed definitions. We will see how well that holds up in court.

0
FuckYouAsWell 0 points ago +2 / -2

To be fair was it not the older generations that setup the system that has shaped these millennials?

2
FuckYouAsWell 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm offended. I'm telling our dear leader joe. Have fun in the gulags

0
FuckYouAsWell 0 points ago +1 / -1

Doing things in the name of "the children" is some liberal Marxist bullshit.

Present the facts. The vax is safe or it isn't. Adults can decide to risk what they want, and thereby force their kids to act accordingly. Let the chips fall where they may. A tragedy? Sure. But we're well past that point anyways.

1
FuckYouAsWell 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not as autistic as some here so I couldn't tell you which one, but EAM loyalists comes from a Q post.

EAM is speculated to mean emergency action message

If you search for "EAM loyalists" it'll pull up no problem.

2
FuckYouAsWell 2 points ago +2 / -0

I love to call a spade a spade, but that ain't a Q.

He's talking about working together when he does the first circle. Then he says we, points to a small group, then points to a row.

Pointing in circles like that perfectly matches what he's saying.

Furthermore. A Q has one of two strokes after the O. Either a \ or a l but not a flat horizontal __

To each his own. This is likely the only comment I'll make on the subject. I'm glad somehow this got some spirits up, but that sure as shit ain't a Q.

Edit: after watching again a couple times. Ill throw a bone and say the very last one could plausibly be a Q as he does a very tight O and (), personally I don't think it's alluding to anything though. But I'll concede that one. It also throws me off when there's 20 posts on the front page right now (this is one) talking about how he made a bunch of different Q finger drawings when in fact it's possible one. A single one.

2
FuckYouAsWell 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't blame you there. I don't have strong feelings either way for it other then I'll pay attention and see how the dust settles.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›