I’m referring to public laws, for example: https://www.congress.gov/97/statute/STATUTE-96/STATUTE-96-Pg1211.pdf
And no, Cornell is not an authoritative source but it’s better than nothing.
If you’re looking for a single source (which I think you are) you won’t find it. Instead you have to “connect the dots” so to speak. An example: Public Law 86-624 says that statutes are limited by their definitions. So now you would need to understand the definitions and how they apply to you. Define “employee”, “employer”, “trade or business”, etc… they all relate to businesses.
I did a full text search
Don’t take this personally but being lazy won’t get you far: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C1-1-1/ALDE_00013387/
Amendments (or bill of rights) is part of the constitution but not the constitution.
Forgive me for not giving you a straight answer but when it comes to this topic I want people to actually do the work.
E: you may need to rely on Supreme Court rulings and public laws for rulings that point to the exact interpretation, that may give a hint to where it’s located within the articles.
It’s in the constitution as business profits.
Are you a “trade or business” (per irc)
Their methods require you to wait until you get a NOD. Not that great of a plan. Imo your better off reading and understanding the rules (usc 26) and file as a NRA. You’d have to do the work yourself but the reward is worth it.
Who sowed said seeds of doubt? Identify the source, identify the problem.
To water the tree of liberty?
I didn’t get any good photos from my phone but I got a nice Timelapse of catch me if you can
But does the chemicals fall off with it or is that already absorbed into the body.
I usually use a alcohol pad and wrap it with scotch tape (because Ireland tape handles alcohol too well)
Sounds like you lost a lot of money to bbby.
Now do income tax.
Loose a life, gain a kingdom.
Methinks that will happen under trumps revenge tour
It’s crazy how many people don’t understand how law works.
Not defined in The constitution -> state law
Not defined in state law -> left to the people.
Delegation of authority left it up to the people so the state took control.
Our laws are written by good people for good people. It only works if good people are in control.
Want to see my autwork?
Who did bank corp buy out not too long ago? No bailout this time, watch the dominoes fall.
Every Jew alive is a fake jew (converted). The real “Jews” died with Jesus.
Unpopular opinion but that’s not a win. That a “I’ll sit down and shut up”.
Can this be retroactively applied (1917)
If you’re not already on a list, you’re doing it wrong.
You’re using their rules for you. If you want to sue, use your rules for them.
E: meant to make a top level comment, not a response. I’ll leave it as is.
I’m not denying that propaganda exists. It’s your interpretation of what happened that bothers me. If they could pass a law that expressly allows propaganda to be used, they would have done so and your terminology would be accurate. It’s not.
There is nothing passed as law that allows the government to use propaganda on the people. like you stated.
I doubt you understand the distinction I’m trying to make so let’s just leave it at that.
Then you understand that the law doesn’t grant the government powers, it restricts them, and protective restrictions were removed.
Modernization doesn’t allow anything as you originally stated.
Usc and statues are codifications of public law.
Correct, like I said: If you’re looking for a single source (which I think you are) you won’t find it. Instead you have to “connect the dots” so to speak.
Simply doing a word search is the epitome of laziness, as it requires the least amount of effort. Reading is where the reward is. “Income” is a form of taxation, so again, start with the articles I linked and go down the rabbit hole.
The only way to win is litigation and that requires understanding.
If you just want some copy paste nonsense, try https://www.freedomlawschool.org/ or https://capitalvsincome.com/