1
GottaCatchAMall 1 point ago +2 / -1

What do you suggest?

0
GottaCatchAMall 0 points ago +1 / -1

I hope you warmed up before that stretch!

by MAGULQ
1
GottaCatchAMall 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes, and did you see in another thread that 1984 adds up to 22? That’s this year!

9
GottaCatchAMall 9 points ago +10 / -1

I’ll never again vote for a Pence!

2
GottaCatchAMall 2 points ago +3 / -1

Holy shit, that’s unbelievable! Did any big surveillance state things happen in 1975, or 1993? I think you may be onto something!!

4
GottaCatchAMall 4 points ago +5 / -1

According to the top commenter, this is actually God stopping an assassination attempt. I choose to believe that!

1
GottaCatchAMall 1 point ago +2 / -1

Haha yes! Down and dirty! Just how I like my politicians!!

2
GottaCatchAMall 2 points ago +3 / -1

But, the texts between Mark Meadows and people other than POTUS wouldn’t have fallen under EP anyway. Mark Meadows himself was the one who turned over those texts to the committee. It was nice to feel a bit of hopium for a moment, though.

2
GottaCatchAMall 2 points ago +3 / -1

Exactly. Just remember, when the president says something you don’t like or agree with, he’s not actually saying what he’s saying. It’s a secret code he’s communicating.

0
GottaCatchAMall 0 points ago +1 / -1

Would people banned from this site also have grounds to sue?

by MAGULQ
0
GottaCatchAMall 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don’t think that’s the reason.

0
GottaCatchAMall 0 points ago +1 / -1

I remember seeing an article on the public interest shifting in early March.

1
GottaCatchAMall 1 point ago +2 / -1

It’s great, because that is not a common phrase!

4
GottaCatchAMall 4 points ago +7 / -3

Everything else Q has predicted has come to pass, so this is bound to as well!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›