On the other hand, Xiden can't even promise not to poop his pants while talking to other world leaders. Actually, come to think of it, he can make the promise, just can't keep it.
The way things are going, our WWIII looks to be much worse than that.
Unfortunately, the money the government will use to compensate them will be from the middle class tax payers which is another group the government is destroying. There something very wrong with a system where the very people the government is oppressing are basically paying themselves compensation. And that's minus the deep state's cut, so it's a net loss. It's very much a heads we win, tails you lose situation.
When things finally go down, we need to make sure the psychos in charge pay for what they have done directly, not the tax payers.
We currently pay for the government to oppress us, not to defend us or our country.
I'm still waiting on the protect us option. However, that option will cost extra. And it's been a long time coming so I'm not holding my breath it will ever happen. We need completely new management.
Everything Xiden says is a lie. He says the reason he ran for president was because of this:
...Nazi banners, and literally singing the same vile rhyme they used in Germany in the early twenties, or thirties I should say, and then the gentleman you mentioned [Trump] was asked what he thought and a young woman was killed, a protester, and he was asked what he thought, he said there were “very good people”‘ on both sides. And that’s when I decided I wasn’t going to be quiet any longer.
Except Trump never said that about the Nazis. What he said in full context:
...Trump: Yes, I think there’s blame on both sides. If you look at both sides -- I think there’s blame on both sides. And I have no doubt about it, and you don’t have any doubt about it either. And if you reported it accurately, you would say."
Reporter: The neo-Nazis started this. They showed up in Charlottesville to protest --
Trump: Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.
Reporter: George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same.
Trump: George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down - ...
And later in the interview, Trump said:
So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
Source: https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/apr/26/context-trumps-very-fine-people-both-sides-remarks/
In that very same interview he says he condemns the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists and the media and Xiden still claim he is for them. The truth has no meaning to Xiden, his handlers, or the legacy media.
I agree. Ideally, corporal punishment shouldn't be necessary at all. However, not all parents are perfect. Sometimes they may see reasonable corporal punishment as the only option. While not ideal, it is better than not addressing the behaviour at all.
However, the prevailing culture these days is parents to not discipline their kids at all in any way. In fact, the philosophy is that everything that comes naturally to a child is inherently good and should be nurtured, not supressed. By that same logic, you should never potty train your child. That sounds insane, but many people think they can make an exception for potty training but otherwise give the children a free pass on everything else. However, the end result is a seriously dysfunctional adult who has no impulse control and can barely function in society. This is the kind of philosophy that results in these same parents arguing with a teacher when their child misbehaves in school, instead of addressing the child's behaviour. It leads nowhere good. I would argue, based on observation, that most children are under-discipled these days, not over-disciplined.
Parent's should have ultimate authority over their kids in every aspect, except when it crosses the line into criminal abuse. I would not consider reasonable corporal punishment as such, even as certain countries today do.
If a parent sends their kid to a school they trust (not a public one) and the school makes it clear this is what we do at the school when kids misbehave (nothing excessive) and the parents agree, then it is their right to delegate the disciple.
Corporal punishment is normally not ideal, and the perfect parents would be able to avoid and still get the desired result. However, we are not perfect people and no one is a perfect parent. If you reach the situation where you no longer think you have any options and the choice is between reasonable corporal punishment or raising a dysfunctional child, you have to do what you have to do. I know people who remember when they did something really bad and their parents lost it on them. Since they are functional adults today, they don't hold it against them and think they deserved it. A perpetual victim would probably disagree, but you do not want to raise someone like that.
In a more middle ground approach, corporal punishment can be used as a deterrent. Something that is only a threat but hopefully never needs to be used. That can work well enough sometimes.
Most Terrifying Words – ‘I’m From The Government And I’m Here To Help.’
While the quote only somewhat applies, what is happening here is very suspicious. Never trust the government.
Climate change strikes again. It's been a busy week for it after it resulted in a MMA fighter getting cardiac arrest during a fight. The only solution is communism and everyone of us (except the satanic rich who are better than us and deserve good standards of living) becoming dirt poor and crawling back under the rocks from which we came. It won't be so bad. We'll still get "free" vaccines.
Totally normal. Nothing to see here. Even before COVID, MMA fighter were dropping dead from cardiac arrest during fights left, right, and center. Move along. It is the young and in-shape who are most at risk of cardiac arrest. It just makes sense.
It will actually end in 2024 now and this time for realzies.
You describe a solution to a problem that most (if not all) of the people reading this thread do not have. It's not even clear if having too much money is actually a good thing, given how so many people that do, seem to be evil. Cause and effect is difficult to prove, but there is a definite correlation.
I would suspect that the truly wealthy don't keep that much money in bank accounts. Real assets are less likely to evaporate in this way.
Another examples of a Capitol incidents memory holed by the media:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_United_States_Senate_bombing
Bill Clinton commuted two of the prisoner's sentences upon leaving office. It's also very odd that upon leaving prison, the two people convicted of this bombing really landed on their feet. The seemed to easily find cushy jobs at various advocacy groups and didn't seem to skip a beat.
A solution looking for a problem. What is the issue with the current system (which is still over-kill but that's another topic)? Not authoritarian enough?
You do have to hand it to them. The NYT's reporters are in no danger of thinking too much or critically. They are leading by example.
Is now, however, soon it might not be because when the fake propped up assets start to fail as we all know they will eventually, people will realise their money is not safe and scramble to buy up gold and silver. You always want to get in before the panic.
This is always how it starts. Are we to believe that this specific bank was doing something different from the other banks. If what we have seen in the past, all the big banks do pretty much the same stuff, take the same risks, steal in the same way. If we do believe they all act in pretty much the same way, then the others will follow. I'm with Cramer on this one, JP Morgan might be next. See reference below:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTQeRkFr/if-we-go-with-cramer-jp-morgan-w/
They were ahead of their time actually. They didn't want the NPCs having to search for these graves which never materialized. It might cause them to wake up and realize that what they were promised did not happen.
Looking at this headline more closely, I have 2 main observations on it:
-
How evil are the people reading this news outlet that they have to be told not to dance on the graves of people who did them no wrong. They simply made a different medical choice from them. The enemy of the left is now anyone who is different from them even if they do them no harm. Sounds a lot like racism and bigotry to me.
-
It's interesting that the end goal for them is NOT to save lives but to "get shots in arms". Vaccines were supposed to be a means to a goal, to save lives. But the vaccines themselves have become a goal in and of themselves for these people. It's almost like they can't hide the fact that they have been paid off to push the vaccines and don't even pretend to care about lives. Wouldn't this headline sound better if it was: "Don’t dance on the graves of anti-vaxxers who die. It won't save any lives.". It would make them sound a little more virtuous, except for that first part of course, which makes them sound petty and crazy. I'm not surprised a lot of people think that a lot of society has been hoodwinked into joining a vaccination cult and I can't disagree with that assessment.
With how bad his advice is and the fact that it's guaranteed to lose money, I suspect he's used by the big banks to dump failing stocks they no longer want to hold. They simply pay him to promote a stock they want to get rid of and are soon able to find buyers for it. It does make me question, who is gullible enough to ever take his advice? How many times does he have to burn your for you to stop? Also, he promoted FTX. I think he actually apologized for that one.
There are trading threads on how to make money by shorting Cramer. This strategy outperforms the regular market which also means if you take his advice, you will lose money. They now even have an ETF where you can automatically invest in shorting the stocks he recommends:
... because they can't move forward with their new world order without you and others like you either disappearing or stepping in line. You must never step in line for these people or things will get so much worse and more difficult to fix.
Let and let live was a nice idea once, but they have figured a way around even that. They will say, ok, we agree. And then send their LGBTQ... people in the schools to quietly (and not so quietly when they post it on tiktok) to brainwash your kids. They can be left alone for the most part, but we need to be aware of what they are doing when in positions of power. For example, if they are a teacher, that position is not a forum for them to brainwash other people's kids. They are to teach what is in an appropriate school curriculum and not dump their personal lives on the kids. If they even try to do that, ban them from teaching at the very least.
It's not about inclusion or tolerance. That was a lie. It's about becoming compliant to their agenda. Also, the LGBTQ rainbow flag is a distortion of the standard 7 color rainbow described in the bible and is in essence a satanic symbol (per the people behind it and the fact that it is a distortion of a Christian symbol which used to mean hope, a virtue, and is now pride, a vice). They are trying to get these kids to unknowingly wear a satanic symbol.
Here is a short article on the difference between the standard rainbow and the LGBTQ one: https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/difference-between-gods-rainbow-lgbt-pride-rainbow/
A lot of people don't realise that the LGBTQ flag is intentionally different from the standard rainbow we think of and especially the one in the bible. Given that it is a satanic movement, that is no surprise. These movements like to take Christian things and distort them as a form of mockery and to confuse people into thinking it's the real thing. Here is a short article that briefly goes into it:
https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/difference-between-gods-rainbow-lgbt-pride-rainbow/
Note that even innocuous information as the above article is already supressed by google and all western search engines. Had to use Yandex to find this thing otherwise I was getting no relevant results. I find the google search engine has been come trash in general. It's no even good at completely non-political searches such as searching for a driver. Even simple things like that have become a pain to do with all the current western search engines although still possible unlike finding the above link on google.
It wasn't the government who issued $5000+ fines and forced people into internment for 2 weeks if they wanted to return to Canada from abroad. It was their employees. And by the way, the $5000 fines were provincial (Ontario), not federal. I know this for a fact. If the internment hotels were also under the quarantine act, they were likely a provincial (Ontario) matter as well. Can't say that for sure as I was never interned there.
Also, it wasn't the government that would let life long tax payers die by refusing them life-saving healthy care (such as surgery) if they didn't take the death shot. It was the hospital administration (also a provincial/Ontario matter). They didn't have to take the shot, they could just chose to die. For context, you cannot get private surgeries in Ontario by law even if you are willing to pay for them. They have created a monopoly on healthcare. You'd have to go abroad for that and depending on the health status of some of these people, that may not even be an option.
I didn't kill my enemy. It was the hitman I hired. No blood on my hands.