Most deaths were in childhood. If you survived past 14, you were probably going to make it. But that also meant if a women wanted to be sure at least a few of her children survived, she would need to give birth to as many as possible.

You guys complain about how it's not fair for biological men to compete against women in sports yet you think it would be fair for an un-vaxxed athlete to compete against those who did the right thing and got their blood clotting and heart destroying health shots. This is a question of fairness. How is a fully vaxxed tennis player being carried off the court in a stretcher (if they don't already drop out before the tournament) supposed to compete with this guy.

I always thought "far right" was short for "so far, right" and they just dropped the "so" and comma to make it quicker and easier to say. This is confirmation.

This might not even be about the vaxx. It might just be another outright lie to scare women away from having children. It is known that pregnancy does carry an increased risk for heart attack and stroke at any age (the extra load on the mother's system from the baby is inevitable). However, the risk is minimal for healthy women and since continuing your blood line is considered a worthy endeavour by sane people, it is worth the risk. Pregnancy has been a risk for women since humanity has existed. Due to some positive medical advances, right now it is actually the least risky time in history for a woman to be pregnant.

I'm also thinking, are they trying to imply that women should wait into their 30s or 40s to get pregnant or are they saying they should aim to get pregnant before their 20s? I would agree that trying to get pregnant at 40 is less risky in terms of pregnancy side-effects than at 20 because with the likely outcome at 40 being no pregnancy, that also means no pregnancy risk. It unfortunately also comes with the side-effect of no children.

What you and I consider depopulation might not be the same thing as what I consider depopulation is always wrong. The more extreme version, which Stalin and Mao used, involves indiscriminately murdering 10s of millions (exact number are hard to determine but when you're in the 10 of millions, you've made your point) is definitely wrong. In ancient times, when one power would conquer another power, they would sometimes depopulate their enemies land by either killing all the men and enslaving the women or just enslaving and deporting everyone. Absolutely not something we ever want to repeat today because it would also be wrong. If we get to what the deep state is doing to depopulate to judge its ethics, a list of the main ways I can think of are as follows:

1. They are taxing people into the ground in the hopes that hey won't be able to afford to raise their own children. In the Bible, God demands only 10%. The deep state has gotten people used to being taxed way over that. Is it not a sin to deny the labourer his fair wage? Well the government is basically stealing way more of the labourer's wage then is even justified by the services they claim to provide.

2. They are poisoning the food supply which is causing many people to have problems having children. Not as much of a problem in Europe, but look what is allowed in food in the US. Why is it that certain items you can make at home with 4-5 natural ingredients but the store version has over 20 and most of which you can't even recognize.

3. The death shots. We may be frustrated with those who will blindly take the death shots, but no one willingly takes a toxic shot. It's just that they have been brainwashed by the deep state for so long, they have trouble coming to the realisation that they are being lied to. We shouldn't be surprised that there are people that believe the lies given the power the deep state has wielded for almost a century or maybe even more. We should be surprised and thankful that we have seen the truth.

4. The deep state control the media and educational institutions. They take children from an early age and try to destroy their minds so they hate human life and children (for example: turning girls into feminists) or destroy the children as human beings so they can't even take responsibility for a child (by pushing them into the LGBTQ...).

5. They push the birth control pill not just on adult women but on high schoolers. They don't even always sell it as birth control. Many times I've heard the following excuse for taking it: It's to help to deal with the issue of irregular and painful monthly cycles or even to ensure they don't get zits on their face during puberty. Giving girls birth control during puberty is known to sterilise some of them but I am not aware if they ever mention that when they give them the pills as that being a side-effect.

Every item on this list is wrong. It is all done through either violence or underhanded means. And what makes it worse (although even if this was not true, it would not be right) is that almost all Western countries are having a population crisis where they won't have enough people going into the future to keep operating. Pushing policies to prevent people from having children in these societies is actively working towards the destruction of these societies. It is not just wrong, it's treason because they are doing it to who are supposed to be their own people.

In most of history, earlier than that. Unnecessary and inappropriate now, but back in those days, women would be pregnant as early as it was reasonably safe (16 in some cultures) out of necessity to ensure your tribe could at least maintain its populating with the higher mortality rate. And women had to have as many children as possible because most of them didn't make it to adulthood (childhood mortality was especially high). If a woman had only 2 children even as early as only 300 years ago, chances are none of them would survive to adulthood.

The snake was the first democrat.

Mutilating children in quack experiments and having them commit suicide as a result has been around for more than 50 years. But at that time, they were still conducting their satanic experiments on the gender binary. The creating of new genders as fast as clearly mentally ill people can think of them, that seems new and designed to further confuse young people into making the wrong choice.

Also, it seems weird that these quack experiments didn't scream failure and "Do NOT do this". To a normal individual, suicide is a bad outcome. But our evil overloads have decided to stop pretending to have any decency and have really made their plans clear lately. In the end, it's difficult to see how their pushing of evil for the sake of evil is anything but satanic. It's no longer about trying to brainwash the masses to be the perfect slave class (and likely it never was about that). It is about destroying the masses at as young an age as possible so they end up committing suicide on a large scale later on. The perfect satanic sacrifice. The science supports that what they are doing will only lead to that type of outcome if successfull.

Because the government is just another form of mafia. They provide little to no services but want almost half your money. For context, in the Bible, God demands 10% of your salary. The government demands many times more than that. Let that sink in, the government thinks they are entitled to far more than God because they think they are that much better than him.

People who turn a blind eye and let evil things happen can hardly be considered good. Nazi Germany actually purged a lot of the good people internally before going forward. They brought the guillotine back as a punishment just for them. The "Good People" this sign is referring to are just the sheep. They went with the flow and kept their heads down in order to survive. They survived at the price of their souls (metaphorically, I'm not implying they all went to hell just for being cowards).

'hate speech' can and is being defined as anything the people in power don't like. It includes the truth such as 'The death shot the government is mandating is going to kill off a sizeable portion of the population'. Nothing hateful about that, but it got supressed during the scamdemic.

Maybe it was a failed suicide. As in, turns out it's pretty clear some one else did it when you do an investigation.

Child trafficker Maxwell was convicted in a federal US court of trafficking children. By definition, that implies some one received those children. You don't get convicted of trafficking children if their is no receiving party. You can't tell me she trafficked all those children to herself. Jimmy Kimmel should call himself "tin foil hatter" for thinking Maxwell, a convicted child trafficker, trafficked all those children to no-one. Then again, he'd probably take that title over what he really is, a child exploiter.

Transgenderism is caused by the evil people running the system taking advantage of vulnerable children to trick them into sterilising and destroying themselves. No vaccines necessary. These people are in our schools.

Despite what TV might be teaching people, autistic children for the most part do not have mental super power that would make them more resistant to grooming. Like with most disabilities, they are less mentally capable and therefore it is actually easier for predatory individuals to manipulate them into their desired outcome. Especially if their parents find it difficult to deal with them and decide to offload most of their care-giving to the system.

As for "non-binary" people, of course some one who has already been brainwashed part way is easier to coheres into going all the way. We would be shocked if non-binary people were only equally likely to get tricked into destroying themselves.

It is easier to fight the insanity at it's root. Once it takes hold, the situation becomes much more difficult. Give the deep state an inch, they will take a mile. You never give them any ground, no matter what it takes. Good on these famers. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

It was a cure for being alive.

A lot of dumb laws exist just to keep the government happy and to oppress the people. I would bet you even if these stills were made legal tomorrow, you would not have a rush of people to set one up. Those who had them would continue to have them. They are too complicated and troublesome to setup for the average person.

Another dumb US law: short barrel rifles. Apparently, those were restricted when they were planning to ban hand guns back in the day, to close a loophole. The handgun ban fell through. So now, for no reason, the less concealable short barreled rifles are more restricted than perfectly concealable guns.

Taxes on alcohol going up in my jurisdiction on April 1st of this year (in the Soviet Republic of Canada). With how alcohol prices had already skyrocketed (but apparently only due to inflation), I thought those had already taken effect. This is going to be me after April 1st.

Let's not forget that in many jurisdictions, doctors also got paid for each death jab they were able to successfully administer. The medical system has been thoroughly corrupted across the World. You can only reliably trust yourself with your health.

They probably didn't want to do it because they knew they wouldn't find anything and would be made to look like the partisan tools, which of course they actually are. They are evil, but not as stupid as the Xiden regime.

It could work. Now that they can't defend themselves, it will be the criminals that take their lives, not themselves.

However, on a more serious note, this clearly isn't about suicide. You don't need a gun to commit suicide. There are so many methods out there and all equally effective since the target is not trying to evade being ended. For example, and not trying to give people ideas but, running a hose from your exhaust pipe into the cabin of your car. Or jumping off a bridge. If someone wants to end themselves, they don't need a gun to do it. Common house hold items will do the trick. On the other hand, if you need to defend yourself from crazed criminals or the government, guns are the ultimate equalizer.

Just because they can pull a statistic and say X number of people committed suicide using guns each year does not mean that if you took the guns away from those people they wouldn't have put in the effort to use some other method. It is very likely that these people only used a gun because it was the easiest method they had on hand at the time. And they can't presume to prove they wouldn't have done it if they had no guns available, because you can't survey dead people to ask them: "If you didn't have a gun available to you, would you have not bothered to commit suicide?".

But she's too entertaining. I initially thought she was a plant because it was difficult to imagine anyone being that dumb. She says and does the most insane and hypocritical things in public which makes it easy to point to her as an example of leftist hypocrisy and insanity. Then again, I also thought it shouldn't be possible for her to get re-elected. And yet she did. So the lesson is, leftist are as insane and dumb as we think they are, because they seem to have voted for her. And that would be funny, if it wasn't so sad.

How can anyone be a Conspiracy Theorist these days when even the craziest most out there ideas anyone can think of are coming true.

This is only going to get worse as the vaccines take full effect and sterilize a large portion of the people that aren't killed by them. But this is what they want. Less people.

For Mars: We must be careful to fully sterilize our landing craft as not to contaminate the planet to safeguard any potential life there.

For Earth: Let's pull that sucker out of there in pieces, stomp on it for good measure, and toss it in the trash. It's just a worthless clump of cells. But lets still illegally sell its body parts for a profit and get heels-up to run defense for us.