Tell me you want to depopulate Earth without saying you want to depopulate Earth
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (66)
sorted by:
The only thing that puts a 20 year old women at risk is the genocide vax.
Wow. Truth is brutal. But must be spread wide.
Now now no need to go all felineist on those of us who keep a cat or two. I’m secure enough in my masculinity to have a cat and have for many years.
Never had a toxoplasmosis issue in 40 years of pussy companionship. But then again I’m healthy.
Never knew the crazy cat lady diagnosis. Learn something new almost every day.
And hands off my pussy. He only likes my and my wife’s hands on him.
Lol
I 100% agree and continually try to educate my family and friends. I’m fortunate to have brought my wife over to the awake side a few years ago, she being a trusting Canadian who has seen the light. And is now more adamant than me on most things ‘Right’. It’s amazing and never ending brilliant what the universe has provided us in nature and smart thinking to live well.
Afternoon again then and thank you. It took me awhile of lurking to come up with an appropriate handle.
Unintended Consequences by John Ross is a book that should be read by every American citizen. And then all should more accordingly. The Founding Fathers would approve.
Great book.
Wow. Nice post. Side note Marvin Hagler was the greatest. Never ducked a fight. Hagler vs Vito Antuofermo 3 times, some of the greatest middleweight flights in history. Same w Tommy Hearns. Sugar Ray was a good fghter but also ducked fighters until after their prime
Addendum: BC pill also fucks up normal hormones, which in turn fucks up every other bodily system.
That and unemployment.
FTFY
Good thing women have been having babies in their early 20s for literally hundreds of thousands of years, so we know it's safe. Therefore this must be another lie to cover up heart attacks and strokes in young people caused by the GMO pseudovaccine.
Early 20s was actually LATE for most of human history.
Wow, what are you some kind of pedo? Don't you know girls need to wait until at least 25 and having fucked 4 dozen men before they have children?
Joking aside, there are some good arguments (no, promiscuity is not one of them) on why women should delay having a kid to mid-late twenties or even early thirties. Chief among them is the immense responsibility of raising a child correctly (not offshoring it to minimum wage diversity hires), which requires that one be a responsible adult to begin with.
With that said, philosophical/moral/spirtual arguments are one thing, but claiming that the female body is going to go into heart attack mode when bearing a child at THE AGE IT IS DESIGNED TO DO SO WITH MAXIMUM SUCCESS/SURVIVAL RATE FOR BOTH THE MOTHER AND CHILD is...not just wrong, it's downright evil.
Better to have kids and fuck up raising them than to wait too long and end up with a smaller number. We need bodies, everything else hardly matters.
Dang, who let muhammad in here? /bad joke
Everything a vaxxed person does will elevate their risk of heart attack and stroke. The idea that it’s more dangerous getting pregnant younger, as opposed to 30’s or 40’s is insane.
In most of history, earlier than that. Unnecessary and inappropriate now, but back in those days, women would be pregnant as early as it was reasonably safe (16 in some cultures) out of necessity to ensure your tribe could at least maintain its populating with the higher mortality rate. And women had to have as many children as possible because most of them didn't make it to adulthood (childhood mortality was especially high). If a woman had only 2 children even as early as only 300 years ago, chances are none of them would survive to adulthood.
Most deaths were in childhood. If you survived past 14, you were probably going to make it. But that also meant if a women wanted to be sure at least a few of her children survived, she would need to give birth to as many as possible.
This was as recently as the early part of last century. Agrarian societies need extra farm hands, they married younger and had babies younger. Sixteen - 18 was not too young when life expectancy was half of what is today. Just think of all the "boys" who fought in the wars. It's crazy that those who survived led full responsible adult lives before they were thirty. Heck, look at the ages of the declaration of independence signatories. It blew my mind. And just look at us now. So advanced /s
Bullshit. A woman in her 20s is at the peak of her health. It's the safest time to have a child.
Wtaf. Early 20s when the fuck is a good time then
Never, according to them.
So now every single thing is said to be a risk for stroke or heart attack, EXCEPT . . .
They should already have kids by that age. Nothing inherently wrong with depopulation, the moral element is based on which groups get to survive, you'll never be able to win if you value all lives and don't want to get rid of the competition to ensure your place at the top.
What you and I consider depopulation might not be the same thing as what I consider depopulation is always wrong. The more extreme version, which Stalin and Mao used, involves indiscriminately murdering 10s of millions (exact number are hard to determine but when you're in the 10 of millions, you've made your point) is definitely wrong. In ancient times, when one power would conquer another power, they would sometimes depopulate their enemies land by either killing all the men and enslaving the women or just enslaving and deporting everyone. Absolutely not something we ever want to repeat today because it would also be wrong. If we get to what the deep state is doing to depopulate to judge its ethics, a list of the main ways I can think of are as follows:
They are taxing people into the ground in the hopes that hey won't be able to afford to raise their own children. In the Bible, God demands only 10%. The deep state has gotten people used to being taxed way over that. Is it not a sin to deny the labourer his fair wage? Well the government is basically stealing way more of the labourer's wage then is even justified by the services they claim to provide.
They are poisoning the food supply which is causing many people to have problems having children. Not as much of a problem in Europe, but look what is allowed in food in the US. Why is it that certain items you can make at home with 4-5 natural ingredients but the store version has over 20 and most of which you can't even recognize.
The death shots. We may be frustrated with those who will blindly take the death shots, but no one willingly takes a toxic shot. It's just that they have been brainwashed by the deep state for so long, they have trouble coming to the realisation that they are being lied to. We shouldn't be surprised that there are people that believe the lies given the power the deep state has wielded for almost a century or maybe even more. We should be surprised and thankful that we have seen the truth.
The deep state control the media and educational institutions. They take children from an early age and try to destroy their minds so they hate human life and children (for example: turning girls into feminists) or destroy the children as human beings so they can't even take responsibility for a child (by pushing them into the LGBTQ...).
They push the birth control pill not just on adult women but on high schoolers. They don't even always sell it as birth control. Many times I've heard the following excuse for taking it: It's to help to deal with the issue of irregular and painful monthly cycles or even to ensure they don't get zits on their face during puberty. Giving girls birth control during puberty is known to sterilise some of them but I am not aware if they ever mention that when they give them the pills as that being a side-effect.
Every item on this list is wrong. It is all done through either violence or underhanded means. And what makes it worse (although even if this was not true, it would not be right) is that almost all Western countries are having a population crisis where they won't have enough people going into the future to keep operating. Pushing policies to prevent people from having children in these societies is actively working towards the destruction of these societies. It is not just wrong, it's treason because they are doing it to who are supposed to be their own people.
Indiscriminate killing is usually dumb, it's never just generic population thats the biggest problem, you want to get rid of certain groups and once you're done with them you move on down the line of problems to your survival and the survival of your regime.
I agree about enslaving their women as that would be tainting our own bloodline if they are able to reproduce but what else do you plan on doing with a hostile population that could turn on you at any time and can possibly out breed the people you want to succeed?
Things are only wrong based on who you are doing them to and given that we are the ones being targeted that's what makes it wrong, however if we were the ones in power than it would be morally right to do this against others to ensure our survival. no bad tactics, only bad targets.
Jews and their golems are not our people, they've been trying to kill us all for millennia.
And no one is questioning WHY!?!? after centuries of women giving birth, heart attacks are suddenly the number 1 risk? Smh
Sidenote: In particular women who have been vaccinated.
Ignore the fact that this has been prime childbearing age for a few hundred thousand years (or however long it's been).
Believe it, because "science."
We just finally figured it out. It can't possibly be a new environmental factor, it's just always been this way and we were finally smart enough to figure it out.
It's just good science, and "science" is always a step forward. All society lives in the world of Progress. We only takes steps forward. That is the belief. That is the dogma. That is how The Matrix is maintained.
'* Tok was an app released in 2030 because TikToks were considered to be too long, containing too much information (TMI**). No Tok is allowed to be longer than 4 seconds, and even that is considered by many to be TMI.
'** TMI is short for "too much information," but it was shorted to TMI because its extended form was determined to be... too much information.
...
Oh what did people do in past centuries without these scientists, researchers and studies? Live a happier life.
Especially if you have the clot shot.
Author name is Pickles? Isn't Pickle a symbol for a certain 3 letter place?
Bunch of bullshit.
I like looking at these studies to figure out how they cooked the books.
They admit younger 1st birth mean more births and more birth means more stress, but they don't separate more birth from younger births and throw them all together, making it a pointless study. You can see how pointless it is really when you look at the final chart that applies known risk factors. There's a very weak correlation to age of first birth and a strong one with the known risk factors.
For the Daily Mail to come up with that head line is very missing leading and dishonest.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.027933
Also, it's BS. Women taking estrogen-based birth control would be at higher risk than fertile women not on BC so they can have kids. The risk is not large for most women. It's incredibly small because we're dealing with young, healthy adults in the prime of their lives, but it is higher with BC than without. The entire premise of this story is junk science - and anyone who has ever been trained to talk to a young woman about her options in that department should recognize this.
The risk of a stroke from birth control pills is outrageous.
This might not even be about the vaxx. It might just be another outright lie to scare women away from having children. It is known that pregnancy does carry an increased risk for heart attack and stroke at any age (the extra load on the mother's system from the baby is inevitable). However, the risk is minimal for healthy women and since continuing your blood line is considered a worthy endeavour by sane people, it is worth the risk. Pregnancy has been a risk for women since humanity has existed. Due to some positive medical advances, right now it is actually the least risky time in history for a woman to be pregnant.
I'm also thinking, are they trying to imply that women should wait into their 30s or 40s to get pregnant or are they saying they should aim to get pregnant before their 20s? I would agree that trying to get pregnant at 40 is less risky in terms of pregnancy side-effects than at 20 because with the likely outcome at 40 being no pregnancy, that also means no pregnancy risk. It unfortunately also comes with the side-effect of no children.
Why is it they always show a white mother and child with population control (and euthanasia) type articles. But always see minorities for everything else? Never for these types of articles though. Weird.
I'm seeing a baby boom in under 30s women. Some are on their 3rd 4th 5th child and they're under 25. I'm like dang, how do they afford it?
Actually single women live significantly shorter lives. Just more rigged studies.
Don't take the vaxx and everything will be ok
So the kid is in their 20's? Do the parasites plan on sending the 20 year olds to Ukraine for a "war"....that would give some Mom's a heart attack.
Author's name is literally Ms Pickles. This is either written by a cat or this is someone's trans name.
beautiful picture.... worth way more than 1000 words!
I want to see what Trump has in mind with the Baby Bonus he talked about at CPAC.