Let me re-word the headline to how it got passed around internally: Armed Citizens Foil 94% of our False Flags - How do we Stop Them?

Don't want to be too harsh on the FBI so will also point out that the CIA and other agencies also generate false flags.

Now for how do we lure them all to Idaho.

Is Trump even in New York? How will the NY DA arrest him if he's outside the state?

They will shed tears for a pregnant cat being put down in an animal shelter but will cheer on an unborn human life being ended. And they will not see the contradiction in it. The brainwashing in our society is at an insane level.

This should be published on "NotTheBee".

That is true. However, Rome was build around the immorality of invading their neighbors and when they ran out of those, anyone they thought was convenient and profitable to invade and plunder. And for most of their history, it brought them great success. It did backfire towards the end for the western empire (and even for the eastern one even as it survived). However, that same immorality that helped to bring them down was the same one that made them an empire in the first place. There had to be some external factors to their eventual collapse to answer the question of why did that thing that had worked for for so long stop working. There are a lot of competing theories in academia regarding this.

However, regardless of what the actually cause of the invade and plunder doctrine failing was, I would argue that it was just the natural cycle of civilizations. They rise for some reason. They reach their peak. And, eventually, when either internal or usually external factors change, the reason that they were powerful disappears or abates, they become weaker as a result, and either collapse or are invaded by a new civilization who rose for some other reason.

Our civilization on the other hand, seems to have immorality just for the sake of immorality right now. And that immorality is the opposite of what build western society. Discipline, strong family values, law and order, and especially the truth is what our society is built on. Every one of these are now being attacked for some odd reason. It's like someone or something is trying to create an internal collapse on purpose and it is definitely not natural. And one of the key characteristics of this manufactured collapse seems to be an insane level of and unthinkable types of immorality. I almost have to wonder if they haven't pushed people to rock bottom already because where else is there to go. What new abhorrent sin will they invent next?

But his true masterpiece is having the child sniffing racist CCP loving vegetable play the role of the president. It makes the left look really idiotic bending over backwards to defend that monstrosity.

If he can still vote, he can definitely still run. They'll just exume his remains and put strings on them like they did with Xiden and Fetterman. Both seem almost life-like.

That's what I was thinking. They've been there, done that.

Then what did she sue him over and why is she famous? So basically she's some nobody from who knows where and there is no reason to keep talking about her or buying any of her memoires. Is her book titled "I didn't have an affair with Trump, but if I did, this is how I would have done it.". Clownworld!

All the points you mention are correct. However, I would argue that no society is perfectly moral. And the main reasons that Rome fell were not moral. They did include the lead poisoning you mention but that was out of ignorance and not a moral issue. The corruption and pride of certain emperors didn't help either, but that is the corruption of the few and nothing compared to the type of corruption we see in our society today which is not only of a self serving nature but of a satanic characteristic (what does it benefit the deep state to promote the transgender who are at best mentally ill, putting them in positions of power only serves to undermine society at no gain to anyone).

With the respect to abortion, be careful what sources you use. There has been a concerted effort by the pro-abortion groups to revise history in order to make it appear as if abortion has always been normal and widespread and it was the Christian fundamentalists who are the only ones who were ever against it. While Christians appose abortion, they are far from the only ones. Even as early as ancient Greece, there was an argument around it (NOT consensuses that it was ok as some would argue). While Plato and Aristotle were for eugenics and the killing of imperfect babies, Hippocrates (460-382 B.C.) opposed it and that opposition was in his original oath. Modern so-called historians are trying to re-write that part of history and the oath to suit their political views. In the end, the kingdoms of Greece and Rome (pre-empire at this point) did enact abortion on demand due to similar arguments that are made today. The argument was that if they don't offer it, women will take risks and do it themselves. However, there is no evidence that by the time of the Roman empire, this policy was any more widespread than it had been originally. In fact, with the Christianisation of Rome, while I cannot find any evidence of abortion being legally banned in Rome so it probably was not, any of the early Church fathers who spoke on the topic condemned it. As a result, with respect to abortion, the trend in Roman society at the time would have been against abortion, not for it and it's expansion. Here is a source about abortion in the ancient world and cites some of what I have stated here: https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/brief-history-of-abortion-9589.

Furthermore, Rome wasn't promoting or marrying gay people. Rome wasn't changing the gender of children. They did have eunuch but that was a horrific form of slavery and was not intended to be an attack on nature or God even if it actually was. The eastern Roman empire, which survived, also had eunuchs and kept them into the middle ages so this can't be seen as the cause of the eastern one's collapse otherwise both empires would have fallen. Furthermore, they weren't castrating their population which would have caused a population collapse, just their male slaves.

With respect to pedophilia, even if Rome had a problem with it, were they trying to actively promote it as our society is doing now, granted still in the early stages. Because it is one thing to have a problem with something and a whole other thing to have the key intellectuals in your society promote some evil. The early Church fathers who I would argue were the key intellectuals for that period in Roman history were against any such thing just as they were against fornication, adultery, and any form of lust (something modern society promotes).

And regardless of internal morality, in the end, Rome fell due to external forces. They were broke due to constantly having to go to war with the barbarian tribes from the north and most historians consider the end of the western Roman empire to have occurred due to the last emperor being overthrown by the barbarians in 476 and not falling on their own due to internal force. Rome was really weak at that point, but mainly due to constant invasions and sacking by the barbarians and not due to any specific internal immorality.

Note that I'm referring only the the western Roman empire here. The eastern one is a different story. However, the very fact that the eastern one survived and the western one didn't also suggests my point as the two empires had very similar moral structures. If morality was the reason for collapse, then both should have collapsed. I would argue it was geography and perhaps with the eastern Empire seemingly having better leadership.

I would close this post by arguing that the current immorality we are seeing in our society has no historical equivalent. We have blown past Sodom and Gomorrah in terms or our depravity as a society. At least they weren't marrying men with men or women with women. And they certainly weren't messing with the gender of children even if they probably were molesting them if I had to guess. The worst part of it all is however that our society refuses to acknowledge sin as sin. In fact, it points to evil and says it's good and points to good and says it's evil. They only thing worse than sin is pretending sin is not sin because how do you come back from that. You can't fix a problem when you pretend it's not a problem. And ancient Rome was definitely not doing that. The early Church fathers in ancient Rome called sin out for what it was.

Chess is a comparatively simple problem and well suited to computers. It has very well defined and rigid rules. All that is needed is a lot of processing power to think as many moves ahead as possible.

The kinds of problems that people are good, computers are still really bad at. Things such as determining whether a joke is funny. Or better yet, writing a good joke. Most people can't write good jokes either, but no computer can.

In addition, solving any kind of unstructured problem where the solution can come from many angles. For example: A large family have started to have trouble getting ready in the morning and getting to school/work on time due to limited kitchen and bathroom resources. What should they do? This problem can be approached from many different ways from having them buy a new larger house to coordinating with each other on who gets to use the limited resources and for how long. However, in the end, the solution involves finding out what they want to do and their relevant circumstances. Maybe they're really attached to their current house so the scheduling solution or even renovating their house might work best to them. It's unlikely that the ChatGP AI would consider that, unless it already had a similar problem in its database. It might also miss such factors like their current house being close to the school and/or work of many in the family so getting a new house might actually cause additional problems. In fact, it might really optimize for the stated problem and ignore other factors which would make the solution untenable like suggesting they sell the house and rent 3 apartments which might optimize everyone's situation with respect to crowding and getting to work/school on time but the parents would no longer own their own house and have no equity saved up in their house come retirement.

However, the advantage of a system like ChatGP is if a very similar solution already exists, they can look it up, modify it a bit, and provide the user with a starting point that might even work or be close to working, saving them time. The catch is, a person (user) would still always need to double check and fix any proposed solution as needed. These systems can at times provide ridiculous solutions. They are not reliable. You'd be surprised how often AIs can seem to work on a set of test problems to completely bungle one seemingly out of nowhere. For example: A few decades ago, the US army was trying to train a neural net to spot tanks hidden in a forest. They fed it a bunch of photos with forest which had tanks and with those that didn't appropriately identified for training. They then started testing the neural net. At first, it seemed to work. Then it started to fail occasionally. They were puzzled until someone noticed that they had in fact trained it to identify shadows, not tanks. And that was a simple system. ChatGP and anything similar is so complex, the potential for blunder is far greater due to the complexity and number of inputs. An the reason for any blunders will not be easily identifiable like in the previous example.

Finally, when encountering a new problem for which no previous solution exists, they will not come up with anything useful. They are unable to invent. They are, after all, only as good as the information that is fed into them and the system does not appear to create or infer new knowledge from existing data, even if it sometimes appears clever.

They might be doing this on purpose to justify having an EU army. That idea was being pushed quiet aggressively just a few years ago. Has died down a bit lately.

Some speculate that based on her appearance, she seems to have fetal alcohol syndrome. Wouldn't be a surprise given how narcissistic her mother is.

Notice how they have security. They're better off than most people who can't afford it. You reap what you sow.

baffled

As I think about this, even if they drop trying to arrest him, it's already given him a big boost. They have lost credibility and face just from even attempting this kind of stunt. Don't interrupt your enemy when they are making a huge mistake.

That it's 60% in leftist New York city among government lawyers who are even more left than the general New York city population is a promising sign. I'd guess maybe 1% of those 60% ever voted for him but all of them can see the writing on the wall. Like or hate Trump, if you try to arrest him, the country will rise up and the government loses any of the credibility you might still have left. If the Deep State is smart, they will not let this happen. But if they do, hold on guys, we are in for a wild ride. Things may start to move really fast.

At least during the collapse of Rome they weren't sterilizing children, killing the unborn in horrendous numbers, or promoting pedophilia. What we're seeing is way worse than the collapse of Rome. It's not clear what will survive this collapse given the insanity the deep state has created.

Those are also interesting points. If New York wants to arrest him but he's in Florida and Florida refuses to extradite him, what then? Do they give up? Do we see other states start to take sides and a civil war start? A lot has to happen for this arrest to even be a possibility.

It was pretty clear the republic was dead when they stopped needing anyone's vote and themselves picked a vegetable as the leader of the country. However, it may have been dead long before that, with how the media was controlled and how both candidates were essentially the same for the last few elections before Trump. It may have officially died with the Patriot act after 9/11. However, even to get that bill to pass, they had to have a lot of power and control to steer things that way beforehand. What is happening now has been many decades in the planning. However, I am confident it will get reversed faster than it took to setup making all their evil scheming for nothing. However, that could still be a few years.

If I had to guess, off the top of my head, the Trump arrest will not happen. They intentionally leaked it to rile up what few supporters they have left. However, the leak itself is fake. They never had any such plans because if it did happen, they would not be able to hold back the backlash. Their excuse for why no arrest will materialise will be the fact that it was leaked and is no longer a surprise, otherwise they will claim that they were totally for sure 100% going to do it.

The only plan they have that would take care of Trump would be to assassinate him and frame someone or some disposable group for it. Hopefully he has good people protecting him. However, if they did that, there would be major backlash against them and regardless of who would appear to have done it, they (the deep state) would get the blame. That would probably spark a civil war or revolution for sure.

And the satanic vegetable they put up to run against him will officially win anyways with 300% voter turnout and a record number of dead rising to vote. Unless we fix the voting system, there will be no more democracy in the US. There is still a lot of work to be done there if the mid-terms are any indicators.

What we're actually going to get is an AI that is going to be 1000 times better at being awkward and ridiculous. The promises above will not materialize. 1000 times more parameters will not inherently result in something 1000 times better. It will be interesting in some ways, but it will not be as revolutionary as stated.

This is what I was thinking. If they stop taking the hormones, they will be back to 90% normal in no time assuming they only started taking them to meet the competition guidelines for hormone levels in blood and after they were mostly developed (after turning 18 lets say).