Who's ready for the SINGULARITY?...🤔
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (79)
sorted by:
Let's take it a few steps further.
If us plebs have access to this then what does the upper echelon have to it's disposal... and what is on the drawing table?
which begs even bigger questions..
How long has this tech existed? How much of what we think we know has been broadcasted to us by it?
2012 // HB Garry ::; $0cK puppets::;
Well the collection mechanism for this tech started with Facebook (TIA (Total Information Awareness project) and continued by every other social media company along with most other components of the internet now a days.
Yes. At the time when Q was posting regularly, some speculated it was some kind of advanced AI. I scoffed at the idea back then, but now I see it could easily have been at least some of the time.
Always was. Look up mykhyn on YouTube. Cryptic videos most likely created by AI in which one video it’s thanking Q.
Give it two weeks... 4chins will turn it racist and they'll have to pull it for reprogramming.
4chins.. kek
That's a real specific # of weeks, LOL
No. Don’t worry: AI can generate boring pics as this video involving ChatGPT4 shows, but it cannot inspire itself from reality and realistically answer to prompts like: « show me Big Mike proving the last Fermat Theorem whilst being rammed by a cackling Hillary. »…
It can generate doubt-inducing pictures if prompted to but but vraisemblance still requires a lifelong learning of the source material.
And singularly actually means « which can fuel itself further »: ChatGPT still is not self conscious (you need a sensitive skin/barrier to define what is not yourself).
So, yeah, go on, write stupid fanfic or movie plots that normies will aww at, but it’s what breaking out of these frames that we actually enjoy.
show me Big Mike proving the last Fermat Theorem whilst being rammed by a cackling Hillary. …
That would be quite a sight! Kek
Fermat's Last Theorem was proven in 1995.
Yes, by Andrew Wiles, I read Simon Singh’s related book last week. Really nice, especially Evariste Gallois and the Japanese mathematicians.
I had that on my mind because I'd just watched the Star Trek TNG episode where Picard says the theorem continued to baffle mathematicians even centuries later.
Then, just one year after the show ended, it was proven.
Talk about needing a quick retcon.
Can it dig me out of the foot of snow I woke up to? Can it put on snowshoes, trek out into the bush and bring back firewood? Will it fire up my tractor and plow my road? I could go on.
👍👌
I don't want to live in that world.
Chat GPT, write a movie script that ends with every public official in every country in the world placed in stocks in public spaces.
The French Revolution enters the (gpt) chat
Imagine the mob of the French revolution, armed with hundreds of millions of guns, and hundreds of billions of rounds of ammo (already stockpiled in the hands of the people right now). No force on Earth can disarm us.
If that party gets started, the DS/cabal is totally fucked.
Because its secretly learning what conservatives are asking it and therefore who is an enemy and how you think!
Gotta be stupid to interact with these honeypots. They will be weaponised against you by the same liberal nutjobs.
I asked it similar things, did not have a proper answer when I asked has it always been a gender fluid social just faggot.
You're right, I've seen that myself...
This is completely wrong and fundamentally misunderstands how a Large Language Model actually works. These models simply predict what “sounds right” - they severely lack ACCURACY. On top of that, the models themselves don’t understand what they’re doing, it’s simply following a pattern that it learned from training material. ChatGPT can’t do anything without a prompt.
Ive been using it quite a while to help write code and it's very, very accurate.
Give it a logic puzzle if you think it's smart. It can't reason about difficult coding problems or algorithms, but in my experience so far it has been pretty helpful for syntax questions.
I do, and it works. GPT-4 is pretty ridiculous.
Q: Each of five neighborhood dogs (Saber, Ginger, Nutmeg, Pepper, and Bear) is enjoying one of the following activities: getting its ears scratched, playing catch, taking a nap, burying a chew toy, and going for a walk.
Pepper is either playing catch or burying a chew toy. Neither Ginger nor Saber nor Bear is on a walk. One of the dogs named after a spice is getting its ears scratched. A dog not named for a spice is playing catch. Bear is getting some exercise. Can you figure out what each pooch is doing?
A: Sure! Let's start by organizing the information we have:
Pepper is either playing catch or burying a chew toy. Neither Ginger nor Saber nor Bear is on a walk. One of the dogs named after a spice is getting its ears scratched. A dog not named for a spice is playing catch. Bear is getting some exercise. From (1), we know that Pepper can't be taking a nap, getting its ears scratched, or going for a walk. So, Pepper must be either playing catch or burying a chew toy.
From (2), we know that Ginger, Saber, and Bear are not on a walk. So, they must be doing one of the other activities.
From (3), we know that one of the dogs named after a spice is getting its ears scratched. That means either Nutmeg or Ginger is getting its ears scratched.
From (4), we know that a dog not named for a spice is playing catch. That means either Saber or Bear is playing catch.
From (5), we know that Bear is getting some exercise. So, Bear must be going for a walk.
Putting all this information together, we can conclude:
Pepper is either playing catch or burying a chew toy. Bear is going for a walk. One of the dogs named after a spice is getting its ears scratched. This means either Nutmeg or Ginger is getting its ears scratched. A dog not named for a spice is playing catch. This means either Saber or Bear is playing catch. That leaves Ginger, Saber, and Nutmeg to take naps or bury chew toys. We don't have enough information to determine which dog is doing which activity.
Maybe it's smarter if you pay for it. I haven't even gotten it to reproduce logic problem success stories from reddit. Also interesting, the more I prompt it to consider details carefully and think logically the more unhinged and impossible the answers get.
Maybe we don’t want it getting better 😂
Woth c++ it's about 80 percent accurate
For coding applications, sure. But not for facts.
I didn't mention anything other than codng.
What if it isnt a language model but they are just telling you it is so they can get away with releasing it and so no-one stops them?
Hell, what if its an alien or demonic intelligence pretending to be simple at first before secretly infesting evetything ? How would we know?
The people who study these types of algorithms and frameworks - we know. They publish lots of research and talk about what’s under the hood. These things are pretty complicated and yet the tech is nowhere near sophisticated enough for general intelligence.
Until this shit is made open source and uncensored it's all trash
The whole 100T params thing was bs btw.
What we're actually going to get is an AI that is going to be 1000 times better at being awkward and ridiculous. The promises above will not materialize. 1000 times more parameters will not inherently result in something 1000 times better. It will be interesting in some ways, but it will not be as revolutionary as stated.
Couldn't agree more. Even chatgpt is still low level shit.
Look, an ai beat people at chess 25 years ago. We still haven't gotten much further than that.
Edit: mixed up deep blue and watson
Chess is a comparatively simple problem and well suited to computers. It has very well defined and rigid rules. All that is needed is a lot of processing power to think as many moves ahead as possible.
The kinds of problems that people are good, computers are still really bad at. Things such as determining whether a joke is funny. Or better yet, writing a good joke. Most people can't write good jokes either, but no computer can.
In addition, solving any kind of unstructured problem where the solution can come from many angles. For example: A large family have started to have trouble getting ready in the morning and getting to school/work on time due to limited kitchen and bathroom resources. What should they do? This problem can be approached from many different ways from having them buy a new larger house to coordinating with each other on who gets to use the limited resources and for how long. However, in the end, the solution involves finding out what they want to do and their relevant circumstances. Maybe they're really attached to their current house so the scheduling solution or even renovating their house might work best to them. It's unlikely that the ChatGP AI would consider that, unless it already had a similar problem in its database. It might also miss such factors like their current house being close to the school and/or work of many in the family so getting a new house might actually cause additional problems. In fact, it might really optimize for the stated problem and ignore other factors which would make the solution untenable like suggesting they sell the house and rent 3 apartments which might optimize everyone's situation with respect to crowding and getting to work/school on time but the parents would no longer own their own house and have no equity saved up in their house come retirement.
However, the advantage of a system like ChatGP is if a very similar solution already exists, they can look it up, modify it a bit, and provide the user with a starting point that might even work or be close to working, saving them time. The catch is, a person (user) would still always need to double check and fix any proposed solution as needed. These systems can at times provide ridiculous solutions. They are not reliable. You'd be surprised how often AIs can seem to work on a set of test problems to completely bungle one seemingly out of nowhere. For example: A few decades ago, the US army was trying to train a neural net to spot tanks hidden in a forest. They fed it a bunch of photos with forest which had tanks and with those that didn't appropriately identified for training. They then started testing the neural net. At first, it seemed to work. Then it started to fail occasionally. They were puzzled until someone noticed that they had in fact trained it to identify shadows, not tanks. And that was a simple system. ChatGP and anything similar is so complex, the potential for blunder is far greater due to the complexity and number of inputs. An the reason for any blunders will not be easily identifiable like in the previous example.
Finally, when encountering a new problem for which no previous solution exists, they will not come up with anything useful. They are unable to invent. They are, after all, only as good as the information that is fed into them and the system does not appear to create or infer new knowledge from existing data, even if it sometimes appears clever.
I appreciate you going through that. I sell AI solutions and it's always good to read others thoughts.
I think this great leap forwards is because of all of us who have been using it these past weeks. It has learnt from us, the AI is sucking our brains dry and expanding at an exponential rate.
Skynet by September???
DARPA enters the chat!!!!!!
Where else do you think it came from! NOT good for Humanity!!
I dig it! Lol I like you.
This will literally create memes for us. Advancing the meme wars by a factor of infinity.
Any artificial sentience would have to be demonic in my view. Don’t ask it your future, this is the 21st century digital oujia board
Don’t Skynet me bro!
all these AI are like machine/program MK-Ultra victims. they are force-fed liberal, anti-conservative & "woke" algorithms.
ask it anything of importance "im sorry, i'm still learning" or "im sorry, your question is offensive & i cannot answer such a question"
it's all garbage.
I am so glad the King of kings and Lord of lords is in control. Jesus Christ is my cop out or crutch for sure. I just don't know how people deal with this kind of stuff without Him. I look at World History as God won the war 2,000 years ago when He sacrificed Himself for the sins of the world...defeating satan...defeating sin...defeating death. O' death where is thy victory? Since that time, it's just God allowing sin and the utter depravity of men's hearts to continue to ultimately show where the workings of evil will take us. I believe we are close to God raising His voice and declaring ENOUGH! Then judgement...
<yawn.> ok, maybe we’ll get some new movies snd tv shows great.,
an AI that can understand memes? sounds like the end of 6GW. what's next?
No, we won't. AI is still in its infancy and that AI anime was atrocious. In as soon as five years we could see this, maybe even two or three if we put no brakes on the extinction of a shared reality, but not next week.
At the end of the day, I see AI as a replacement for God. It destroys human creativity. I will not participate. We aren’t meant to know everything.
It can't make you know everything but it can give you instant access to most any Biblical (or other) information you may want. And it's accurate from what I can see (as far as the Bible goes). I agree that it could make everyone lazy and stupid and, TBH, that's what I think may happen eventually. The thing is, it's here, it's huge, and it's not going away. Might as well try to use it as a force for good and trust in the Lord to take care of the evil. "Therfore, do not worry about tomorrow for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble." Matthew 6:34
I'm not ready for Singularity if there is only a single AI capable of this and it is in the hands of a single entity, the NWO, and in answer to every single question, this AI spits out only a single answer acceptable to them.
I think woke AI has been writing scripts, actors are npc now anyway and it all sucks
I can just imagine the quality work this will produce:
"It was the best of times. It was the blurst of times."
Imagine who may have benefited from this tech already.
AI is nothing but parlor tricks. I love a good trick. It's fun, especially when I am caught off guard by them. But at the end of the day, it's not intelligence.
Thats what they want you to think.
No I'm very aware of AI. I sell solutions based on all of this. I know what we can and can't do.
you have n idea what they can and cant do lol especially military applications
What can they do?
That's my point - unless you're in the Q level MIL we'll never know. I'm convinced Q is an AI Quantum computer at this point.
Look, you're convinced of something doesn't mean it's real either. Q is not a quantum ai computer. That doesn't even make sense.
That's what they want you to think!!!
I dunno, I sell this stuff for a living. Its just not as good as people think. I still use it all the time. But it's not near as advanced as it appears to be. Don't get me wrong, it's a really good trick.
Even chatgpt is based heavily on the data behind it. That's the magic more than anything, it's Making sense of lots of data. But even then ut has no clue what it's doing. It's very much an idiot with a lot of data.
I hate this place sometimes fren. Knowledgeable voices are down voted due to people being fucking lemmings.
This CHAT artificial intelligence stuff has little to do with the Singularity.
The Singularity arrives when a human mind can be downloaded into some kind of human made “body”. The idea is life extension.
Mankind going from the hunter gatherers to today’s civilization and technology is but a tiny step towards the grandiose and obscene idea represented by “The Singularity”.
The only “singularity” type event will be the event described by the Apostle Paul in the new testament books of I & II Thessalonians and I Corinthians. And yes I am more than ready for that !
TWO WEEKS
they have been using this tech on us for a VERY LONG TIME
My Computer Just Became Self Aware: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPzJjNQaYEA