3
ILearnedToCode 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wish he pushed that point harder. Biden literally fell asleep (just off the top of my head) dozens of times on camera, like actual, verifiable, holy shit that dude is asleep level moments, and you have this Ted loser who tried to gaslight Americans into believing that Biden was sharp and energetic. He didn't just not say anything - he would very openly during press conferences say that Biden is firing on all cylinders

Its actually insane how stupid the left are, they will just hear Ted say that Trump fell asleep and its taken as unshakable truth by all the people who ignored the ACTUALLY cognitively impaired pedo

1
ILearnedToCode 1 point ago +1 / -0

And now, kids have youtube shorts, where they do the same thing (fast pacing, no attention span required) but now they do it openly, and blatantly!

1
ILearnedToCode 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, whether or not you agree, the rainbow was taken from you. If you post the rainbow or put a rainbow shirt on your kid, society reads that as gay. Its not your fault for that, but it means it was taken. Everyone associates it with gay now

Thats what it means to take something. You can also look at it as being conquered. They conquered that flag, and now it means what they made it mean

1
ILearnedToCode 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dont think its that. The judge said of the light sentence "I dont think ill see her back in court for another crime" which clearly implies she gave the light sentence due to her liberal "empathy"

2
ILearnedToCode 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would absolutely go to jail for 6 months for 500k, as would most people

This is ludicrous. Its anarcho-tyranny, you know DAMN good and well that if a white, generally law abiding citizen did this then itd be a much longer sentence

1
ILearnedToCode 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish my vote was worth that much lol

3
ILearnedToCode 3 points ago +3 / -0

Absolutely nothing feels down though, everything still feels as if its getting more expensive (and it is)

It disappoints me when people push the narrative that prices are actually coming down. I believe that they will, but they objectively are not right now. So it seems entirely disengenious and laughable when Repubs spout that things are becoming more affordable... it cant be helping win people over by apparently gaslighting them

2
ILearnedToCode 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then whyd you try extra hard to make sure only one single comment is visible, and without even showing the votes on it 🤔

/s

Reddit is a shithole that will never wake up so I know exactly why you didnt show anything else (absolutely 0 awakening happening over there)

1
ILearnedToCode 1 point ago +1 / -0

News media's framing always pisses me off

Takes them 60 seconds to finally say the only thing that changed is a requirement to verify legal status.

The first 60 seconds clearly just paints it as some obscene senseless evil to screw poor families out of Healthcare

1
ILearnedToCode 1 point ago +1 / -0

Inb4 doctors start prescribing a pill with the full intention of de-prescribing it 30 days later just to make money from all sides of things

Then skewing statistics and studies, making medicines appear more effective than they actually are (100% of the people who went on this medication were off of it within 3 months!)

Caveats aside this is a great step in the right direction, im just cynical and immediately thought of all the ways this will be abused. For it to be most effective, we need to get rid of the profitably of prescribing meds as well - one step at a time

3
ILearnedToCode 3 points ago +3 / -0

Literally everyone i see is saying that van Allen drank up a 7k bar tab - that makes you guys look fucking retarded

If we are going to engage in an info war, you have to battle in truth and you have to choose those battles carefully

All things aside sure even for 50 people its bad - but its IMPOSSiBLE to actually argue that point when people are fixating on an INCORRECT portion of the facts

Its "Van Allen and his campaign spent 7k for an event where they were day drinking" - thats a TRUTHFUL and accurate condemnation. Everyone can be like "ok thats kinda problematic. Shouldnt be day drinking"

Its not "Van Allen drank a 7k bar tab" - thats a FALSEHOOD that puts you flat on your face. You cant condemn behavior that didnt happen. People can simply counter with "thats a lie, there were 50 people there" which is a TRUTHFUL counter. Why give people a good and truthful counter to your criticisms, when you can avoid exaggerating and criticize accurately, leaving no real room for anyone to excuse the behavior?

I expect more out of this board

4
ILearnedToCode 4 points ago +4 / -0

Especially when its actually not a 7k bar tab - we are better than this

It was an event with 50 people - his campaign paid for the space, food, and drinks for 50 people

1
ILearnedToCode 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am literally a software engineer that uses ai

And the only teams of engineers its better than are teams of subpar engineers

1
ILearnedToCode 1 point ago +1 / -0

We dont need to destroy ai - its not going anywhere

We just need to change how people use and perceive it

3
ILearnedToCode 3 points ago +3 / -0

Reminds me of googles ai overview telling users to add soap to their pizza...

Its source: a reddit post

What it means: AI will literally say anything if it was trained to do so, meaning you cannot actually rely on it for much. Summarizing is really what its best at, if anything

view more: Next ›