While I understand your view I myself don’t like to make a decision based on group think and basing it from plain events. What it looks to me is that the “public view” is the only thing your pointing at of which is the way she voted. Indeed, this is a great indicator in normal times. However, when war is happening, which you should believe is going on. Decisions made can be used as smoke screen.
I don’t believe anything about the decisions made during a war time. Strategy and victory are all that matters with the added necessity of keeping the general population safe (and mostly unaware of the ACTUAL psychological war.)
So personally I don’t attach an absolute judgement on people without full actual knowledge and with my reasoning above in mind I stay reserved on the judgements of the politicians and anyone notable in the limelight until I feel like the situation has been resolved as a whole with Trump and the team winning.
That’s an unconfirmed theory. Q says “darnkess” not darkness. This has been misinterpreted too much followed by the same predictions on the sequence of events and how they unfold. This has happened time and time again and every single time anons are mostly wrong on this site. These “popular predictions” are almost 100% off the mark everytime they play out and then figure out what is really meant
So what you're saying is that it's all one big deep state trick? What's the point of going through all of this and pointing the finger at themselves? It would be much simpler to just do the evil things and continue doing what they were doing because it was working up until Trump came and started calling them out. I just don't get this line of thinking if that's what you're saying.
All he says is he’s running. Doesn’t say 2024. I’d posit a theory that could mean a revote after midterms since we literally got every MAGA endorsed candidate win. He’s preparing the game board for the ultimate presidency.
Bill Curtis. Such a fucktard name lmao. Go fuck yourself. You can’t think on my level sit the fuck down. Try to bring some substance instead of insults to the debate then maybe you can go toe to toe with the big boys faggot.
That’s being dramatic. Applied nihilism to certain narratives is smart. I’m not advocating for nihilism as a whole like you’re trying to imply. I’m saying when it comes to race it’s best to just shut the fuck up about it ignore it. It’s not a narrative that can be won on any front because it’s based on a false belief that there are other races. This isn’t even true. It creates a separation as if it’s two different cultures. When in fact, you can have different “races” that share the same exact culture and thinking behaviors. Really doesn’t do any good to even recognize race in my opinion. But I also think way bigger than probably anyone on this board so you won’t see it my way.
It doesn’t have to be a polarized viewpoint my man. There’s a middle point of not giving a fuck. Just doesn’t need mental energy. The outcome of even saying what you say doesn’t bring unity. That’s the whole point of the movement. Don’t be a moron with retarded narratives think outside your little bubble. I don’t look at anyone differently because that’s the point of WWG1WGA. If something hurts that message it’s instinctively retarded to me. Play the game right.
Tell me the divisive counter programming has worked without telling me it’s worked. Here’s an idea. Just shut the fuck up about it and not give the perpetuation of division it’s power which it seeks. Think not like a rat, but a spiritually awakened individual.
Yes I’ve been pointing that out everytime I see a pro Ron Watkins post. Not only did he do it on HBO but also he did it on VICE. Look it up. The faggot made me cringe from the start. Such a fucking cuck I don’t even care if he is on our side.
Because the timeline negates it. When he flew it was before Epstein had ever been charged with anything. Obviously can’t know if someone is a pervert. Do you go telling all your baggage to people you don’t know well? Ever took a taxi with a stranger? All the same concepts
Q literally said keep up with the news cycle so your argument is null and void. Watch for the shift, which is exactly what this is. If you don’t have the emotional intelligence to watch it and not get affected by it then you won’t understand.