The second half of your list is missing a few entries: Biden, Harris, FEMA, etc

I can see a few reasons for a push for early voting.

1. Trump knows they are going to attempt to stop the election from happening and if enough people have already cast votes, he'll have more leeway to demand that they don't stop the election.
2. He wants to push us to early vote so that the left early votes so that when Big Mike or Cankles replace Cackles, a ton of lefties will have already cast their vote for Cackles.
3. Early voting is one of their largest gauges for how many extra ballots to print, so if Trump can triple or quadruple the number of early votes, suddenly his opponent has flooded the system with hundreds of millions of votes even a 2 year old can see that they're trying to steal the election.

They gained popularity because they were one of the first hot dog carts in the area, if not the first. At some point, they started leaning hard into the whole hollywood thing and started naming dogs after celebs.

That could just be some savvy business moves, cause California is obsessed with celebrity or it could be some sort of front for who knows what. Given the breadth of their customer base, they clearly just sell regular dogs to the average customer. That having been said, savvy business practices and selling regular dogs to customers doesn't mean that they can't have since sold out or sold out on the back end, so to speak.

I will say this, for how well-known and popular Pink's hollywood is, there is very little information online about the original owners or their kids.

Think about how vetted SS agents are, the cabal likely knows which ones to shuffle onto VP Gore while the fellow degenerates are accompanying Clinton on his sexcapades. And I can only imagine that as a member of the SS, you likely know just how much they know about your family, so unless you’ve got concrete proof of highly problematic actions, you know they drag you and your entire family through the mud.

I imagine the higher ups are far more compromised (much like the three letter agencies). On top of that, if Trump and Q have cleared out the SS of the most problematic people, what a huge asset for keeping tabs on the cabal.

My worry for California is that the scales have tipped too far in the past 5 years or so. I hear talk of deporting 10-15 million, but I wouldn’t be surprised if California alone has 10-15 million illegals. So, Trump deporting 10-15 million country-wide would be amazing, but unless that’s just step one, I fear it won’t be enough to save California.

For the record: I do think Trump plans on deporting more than just 10-15 million illegals. So I do fully believe California will be a proper beacon to the world as opposed to a red light, if you catch my drift.

Gearing up to blame Q and us anons. It feels like a glowie take on what they think an a black pilled anon looks like.

The only thing surprising about this is that she didn’t say “I decided to partake of shrimp and grits and in the act of eating those crustaceans and porridge, I did consume shellfish and mush,” cackle cackle

Technically this is just a committee hearing, which means it still has to be votes on by the entire house, which simply means that it won’t happen in May 7th, but rather another date in the near future. The end result is likely the same though.

What haven’t the Republicans in congress betrayed?

This is pretty much what I have come to expect from Reddit. Bots and shills lay the groundwork and the NPCs are too afraid to go against the grain.

Some of this has to be White Hats, right? This is like when you come home to a broken lamp and before you even ask the guilty kid is like “I didn’t knock over the lamp while chasing my brother!”

Unfortunately, the particular case (People V Horton) referenced in that youtube clip is about probable cause. The officer in question pulled the car over because the passengers were young. That is not a probable reason for pulling over a car, so everything after that happening was considered below board. Basically, the right to travel is being applied to the passengers in the car who were young, which is why the cop pulled over the car. He was in the wrong to do so because they have the right to travel.

As for the driving without a license part, that isn't addressed in this specific case, so this specific case does not say whether or not a person can drive without a license on pubic roads. I've not looked into whether there are other cases detailing one's right to drive on public roads without a license, so I can't point to a case that allows for such a thing, nor can I point to a cause that disallows such thing. I can only say that, for this specific case, the right to travel is referring to the passengers, not the driver.

That having been said, according to this case, A police officer could not pull you over for suspicion of not having a license. They can only ding you for not having a license after already having pulled you over for "suspicious", "dangerous" or illegal behavior. I put those two in quotations because the definition varies depending on the police officer or judge who is using said definition. So, driving without a license on its own is not something that a cop can pull you over for, but I wouldn't know which court cases to point to for how to fight that as a secondary charge to say speeding or reckless driving. As with most anything in the US, a good enough lawyer can argue almost anything. So, yea, hypothetically, one could easily drive without a license, especially if they don't break any other laws. Of course, we also currently have a plethora of judges who think that the law and the constitution should bend to their will and unless you can find somebody with the guts to go after said judges (and other authority figures), well, they may well be correct.

I did a deep dive back before the Resident took office and he was claiming the truck driver was drunk. The officer who arrived on the scene was quoted as saying things like “the truck driver was not drunk” and “the driver of the truck was not intoxicated” and one of the other officers on the scene heavily implied that one of the drivers was highly intoxicated. Said article has since been scrubbed from the internet, but I remember reading it back when Joe was going around claiming the truck driver was drunk (among many other blatant lies).

Once you know the playbook, these things become easy to spot. Matching signs, matching outfits, bricks being shipped in, marching in unison with “controversial” flags. The average NPC doesn’t have the leadership ability to organize these things (for the leftie protests) and patriots are too individualistic (we make our own shirts or buy them from our friends who make them or are gifted them, etc, so the shirts [or signs or what have you] are actually clever) to match the way the so-called “alt-right” protests.

I could see that, the forehead reads more Dana Perino to me, but that picture could easily be either of them with some heavy prosthetics applies to look heavier and more bloated.

Let’s not forget that Reddit is now being used to train AIs. Lots of people on Reddit love to RP and troll and act like they are entities from other dimensions or as demons, etc. Not smart to mess with these things, but they do it anyway. Now, I’m not saying that a demonic (or similar entity) can’t possess a program, but it is potentially just copying some creep on Reddit (or maybe even a demon possessed person on Reddit).

This is hilarious, Mar-a-lago hosted an event raising awareness for military and veteran suicide awareness and these morons have such rabid TDS that they can’t even investigate for two seconds and find out that this is why uniformed marines were allowed to attend. Congrats, you idiots, now you’re on the record being concerned about suicide awareness among our armed forces and veterans.

A quick internet search reveals that the America First Gala was held at Mar-a-lago on April 11th by the Grey Team.

Perhaps the most insane part is that, even if you ignore all the perverse aspects of the Biden family, you still end up with an incredibly privileged family whose legal troubles, if applied to you or I, would land a good 30-50% of the family in jail. This is just talking tax evasion, drug issues, etc. Put aside all the worst perversion and you've still got a family that shouldn't even have access to the white house or the president.

Add in what is, at the very least, an insanely creepy and predatory patriarch, a matriarch that cares about nothing other than appearing to be some sort of American royalty, two surviving children whose upbringing has brought them nothing but pain and trouble, one of whom has used said upbringing to fuel a sex and drug filled lifestyle. That's at the very best, one would have to give the largest benefit of the doubt to settle on these conclusions.

It is like the Clintons, how many people, aside from the Clintons, can say that they have a list of over 10 people in their lives that have died under suspicious circumstances? Now multiply that number by another 10, the benefit of the doubt goes out the window. Suddenly you have to look at the Clintons and say, if even 1% of those deaths is not shady, then they are problematic. And lets face it, anyone who has looked into those numbers knows it is more than 1%. Apply the same logic to the Bidens. How many times do you need to hear Biden equate being black with being poor before you start calling him racist? How many times does Biden have to sniff around children before you call him a predator? Even just all the creepy picture of Biden with adult women, like dude, you've got a wife you creep. How many more Biden red flags are people going to ignore?

Technically speaking, the diary mentions that she thought the showers were inappropriate and that she and other female members of the family were sexualized at too young an age, specifically mentioning the relationship between I think a cousin and the men in the family. I do believe said diary was written as part of counseling and it was known the psychiatrist would be able to read said diary, so she likely held some things back. She also speaks of how her current sexual relationships/desires/etc are not normal thanks to her upbringing. Reading between the lines paints a gross picture of Joe and a super messed up picture of Jill.

In the long-run, the numbers are astronomical. How many businesses were destroyed? How many children's educations dashed? How many lives ruined? Yet still so many lefftist act like the all this BS saved us. Wild stuff.

For sure, I'm just wondering if July 2025 is the end of the operation or is it when the operation goes public? With how crazy things have gotten lately, I find it hard to imagine drawing things out until July 2025, but then I am speaking from a standpoint of having my eyes open as opposed to so many NPCs out there.

Can't have the illegal riffraff mingling with their cabal bigwigs.

I wonder if there is a way to tell how close we are by figuring out the approximate size of the cabal and then compare to the sealed indictments. Given that each indictment could hold multiple names, it seems like half a million should be getting close.

More proof that the white hats are in control, if you ask me. Otherwise we'd be seeing either: 1. Headlines all over the news proclaiming: "Dangerous QANON dark internet site raided by Biden's heroic DOJ, thousands arrested" or 2. This site would slowly drop in traffic as the cabal secretly disappears over the course Biden's residency.

I mean, the photo qualify isn't the best, so it could easily be a fake. However, I wouldn't at all be surprised if Simon Cowell was among the predators of the world.