In the Bible the Jews told told the prophet Samuel to ask God to send them a king so that they could be like they kingdoms around them.
Samuel started to get mad but God told him, “it is not you that they have rejected but me. If they want a king I’ll give them one, and that king will raise their taxes through the roof and send their sons off to war to die”
1 Samuel 8 KJV
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Samuel%208&version=KJV
Leaked footage of Trump firing Dillinger
Here’s an example of this from the sitcom “Yes Prime Minister”
We’ve had one Christmas, yes, but what about second Christmas?
Jokes aside, orthodox Christians celebrate Christmas on January 7th instead of December 25th (they use the Julian calendar). But the Ukrainian government has had the Orthodox Church move Christmas from the 7th back to December 25th to reduce Russian influence in Ukraine. About 60% of Ukraine is orthodox Christian.
3 most important bits of evidence:
1: photo from fake id killer used at nyc hotel. Does the photo match Luigi? If so he is at least guilty of forgery, but would prove he was in the area at the time of the shooting proving he had the opportunity to do so.
2: was Luigi arrested with the same caliber gun and suppressor on him (or at his home, not sure which)? If so it is possible he could have killed the ceo because he had the means to do so
3: was Luigi arrested with the manifesto on him (or at his home, not sure which)? If so he would have a motive to kill someone important in the healthcare industry, if not that particular person
Any of the discrepancies can be explained in a way that would seems reasonable to the average person. As an example, if One photo shows him in a jacket that looks similar but different to the jacket he’s wearing in another photo can be explained by him wearing 2 different jackets on different days. Same with backpacks. I’m not saying that’s the case, just giving an example.
Not at all, Canada is completely independent with the monarch of GB no longer ruling over Canada and no longer receiving taxes from canada. But the monarch of GB is also the monarch of canada and receives funding from canada whenever they are acting or traveling as the monarch of canada. Completely separate and independent.
Not to distract from the rest of the weirdness about his arrest, but Him lowering his mask was irrelevant. There was camera footage of him that they used to trace him back to the hotel he was staying at, where they had a copy of the fake id he used on file. The name and address listed on the id were fake, but it had a clear, unobstructed view of his actual face on it. He had no chance of getting away with it after that. They held back the photo from the id and released the one of him lowering the mask, but they could have always released the photo from the id instead, and they likely would have been forced to release it if they didn’t get any tips from the maskless photo.
In the uk, whichever political party gets a majority gets to choose who they want to be PM, as long as that person is currently or is about to become a minister of parliament (MP). After they pick who they want, they go visit the king and everyone allows the king to pretend that he picked the PM to run the government. The king technically has the power to chose whoever they want, but if they ever tried to use that power, parliament would change the constitution to take the power away (just like every power the king has on paper but is not allowed to use in reality)
I doubt it. I think Trump is using his mandate from his landslide election victory as a position of strength to bargain with. He’s asking for way more than he will be able to get (closing the DoE) so when congress makes a counter offer from a position of weakness, it will be a much higher offer (reforms and reduce size) than it would have been if he asked for something reasonable from the start.
This is what’s going on, Cocaine Mitch moves the election forward to force a quick reaction, he puts forward 2 completely unacceptable choices which force you to pick the seemingly tolerable 3rd choice. The 3rd choice ends up being the choice Mitch wanted all along and tricked you into thinking it was your idea. This is not a new concept in politics, it’s been around for a long time.
Here’s an example from the old British comedy show “Yes Prime Minister”
The inside of that home looks like a standard flood damage tear out. People sometimes confuse Red DCert tags with a building being condemned but it is not actually the same thing. I didn’t notice any DCert tags or Condemnation Notices on the doors, which ARE required for EVERY entryway into a building that has been inspected by the state after a disaster (so people don’t enter unsafe buildings unaware of the danger). Haven’t worked with fema though so I’m not sure of their process or what tags or marking they use, but all I noticed was a “No Smoking” sign.
That speech was something called a limited hangout, which is when you have a secret that people have figured out or are about to, so you partially reveal the truth mixed with disinformation in an attempt to distract from the really important parts of the secret that you still want to keep hidden.
If those two towns just now removed fluoride from their water, then they are not the first. Cities across the us have been removing fluoride for years.
Here’s a link to the cdc. Just select your state then county and it has a list of towns/ cities and wether they have fluorinated water
That’s not quite what I mean. I mean that Jeffries and Schumer do not have standing to file the lawsuit because they are not non citizens and thus not affected by the EO. He’s an elected official, but none of the people he was elected to represent are affected either because he only represents American citizens. Not his circus, not his monkeys, not any of his business. So no standing to file the lawsuit.