She said they give it to the military. She did not say how, or who it was given to. That she knew to go through this process, perhaps, was given to her by the White Hats. Who could figure it out on their own? And if they did, perhaps she was given the info of who to give the documents to--surely not Austin. If so, maybe they don't want their activities to be discussed on The View.
No, she did answer it, at around 43, 44 ish, she said that they would turn the documents showing the guilty parties over to the military. The military would come out in white unmarked vehicles, and remove those who were presiding over the court systems. She said this was done in 8 courts. It's not being reported on, but it's happening, and said she could provide witnesses for Nino to interview.
She wouldn't divulge her sources even though fined, so CBS fires her, and keeps her confidential files. Sure they decided to give them back, but what are the odds they peeked into them while they had them. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/cbs-seizes-confidential-files-of-fired-reporter-pursuing-hunter-biden-laptop-story-in-unprecedented-move-sources/ar-BB1iJqVA
The author of this report was David E. Reed according to the longer version posted by ZeKaiser: http://www.icwa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/DER-42.pdf
Here is his information. He was a reporter for US News and World Report and was a roving editor for Reader's Digest: https://peoplepill.com/i/david-e-reed The site lists a lot of interesting looking articles he wrote, which unfortunately, are not hyperlinked.
D.E.I.