1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

From a medical source this is the best book on diabetes management: Dr. Bernstein's Diabetes Solution: The Complete Guide to Achieving Normal Blood Sugars Hardcover – Illustrated, November 1, 2011 by Richard K. Bernstein MD (Author)

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Vivek is not a natural born citizen. He would be 2nd in line to the presidency, but not qualified to be president.

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

And what happens to bills signed by Biden?: General Mike Flynn @GenFlynn What happens to the pardons when they discover Biden didn’t win the 2020 presidential election? 7:53 PM · Dec 17, 2024 · 68.2K Views

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

According to astrophysicist Hugh Ross, space aliens aren't real. Spread the word: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=771xXXhWDnU

2
Knotnow 2 points ago +2 / -0

IF the left can make people think we are under UFO attack, they can activate emergency powers and take over everything > https://banned.video/watch?id=675ca59756227e8713d99b7d

Astrophysicist Hugh Ross gives 3 reasons why there are no space aliens > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=771xXXhWDnU

Don't fall for the space alien scam. Those pushing it are setting us up for total takeover, not by aliens, but by therm.

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, but why do we have to pick one. He can have a different commission for each of them and do them all at once.

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't "we have it all?" It was electronic. Doesn't the NSA collect all of that stuff?

2
Knotnow 2 points ago +2 / -0

It doesn't matter if he had a birth certificate. That's a red herring. His father was a citizen of a foreign country, and his mother was too young to confer citizenship on him. Trump is going to outlaw birthright citizenship because being born here doesn't make you a citizen, and if your parents aren't citizens, then you aren't a "natural born" citizen, which is a requirement to become President.

2
Knotnow 2 points ago +2 / -0

On what charge? Is there a law against killing cats? Or eating cats? How about killing and eating chickens, pigs, sheep, cows? What kind of precedent is this setting?

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

From the introduction: "The Recovery Version follows, for the most part, the Nestle-Aland Greek Text as found in Novum Testamentum Graece (26th edition). "

"The translation of the Old Testament is based on the current scholarly text of the Hebrew Scriptures, Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS; revised 1990 edition)... Frequently the ancient translations of the Old Testament into Aramaic, Greek, Syriac, and Latin were consulted for clarification of the Hebrew text....As much as possible the poetic structure of the Hebrew text, as indicated by BHS, has been preserved."

As you mentioned above, each book gives a distillation of the subject of the whole book in one sentence. Such as Matthew: The Gospel of the Kingdom--Proving that Jesus Christ is the King-Savior.

And amen, first we are one in the Father's name. Then we become one in the Father's word (we are here). Finally, we become one in the Father's glory (Jn. 17). Here's footnote 3 for [Your] "word:" The Father's word carries the reality of the Father with it. When God's word says, "God is light," it carries God as light in it. Hence, God's word is reality, the truth, unlike Satan's word, which is vanity, a lie (8:44).

0
Knotnow 0 points ago +1 / -1

I use the Recovery Version from lsm.com (Living Stream Media). It's a study Bible with excellent footnotes. I have a whole Bible that I purchased, but you can get a free New Testament from bfa.org (Bibles for America). I do word studies also, and this version has the fewest problems I've encountered. I haven't found any, actually.

Here's one example: John 3:16 in KJV says, "...whosoever believeth IN Him..." The RcV says, "...everyone who believes INTO Him..." The Greek word there is "eis" which means to move from one place into another place. KJV substituted that for IN, or Greek "en," which means to be in a place. For instance, we walk INTO the house, then we're IN the house. Paul said that he was "a prisoner IN the Lord (Eph. 4:1)." How did he get IN the Lord? He believed INTO him. The wrong word obscures the meaning.

True, there is a day of vengeance, but that is not God eternal purpose. He has an eternal purpose, you know (Eph. 3:11). He didn't create us in order to save us. That was a side trip to bring us back to His eternal purpose. He wants something. It is for this that all things were created (Rev. 4:11), and it is toward this that He is working all things out (Eph. 1:11).

What brought about the end of the Old Covenant? Do you know what the New Covenant entails? See Jer. 31:31-34 and Ezek. 36:27. What changed the age was the incarnation of God in a man; God and man were joined in the man Jesus. That man became the perfect sacrifice that enabled God to righteously forgive man's sins according to the New Covenant. This cleared the way for God to put His Spirit in man as foretold in Ezekiel. This Spirit was the Spirit of the glorified Jesus, which He foretold in John, 7:37-39, and which occurred in John, 20:22, when He breathed into His disciples and said, Receive the Holy Spirit.

Happy Thanksgiving back atcha.

0
Knotnow 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't use KJV, it has too many discrepancies from the original languages. The word "signified," Strong's concordance (using Olive Tree) says "semaino" means, a mark, sign. To give a public sign or signal. John uses the expression in his gospel also. Jn. 2:11 says, "This beginning of [miracles] Jesus did." The word for miracles is "semeiou" and means "sign, mark, token, miracle with a spiritual purpose."

Correct, the Catholic Church had not come into existence yet. Rev. 1:3 says that the things written are prophecies-"Things which are about to take place after these things (v.19)." It was during the time of the Catholic Church that idolatry was brought into the church (2:20). That hadn't happened at the end of the apostolic age.

I don't know anything about the book, Days of Vengeance, but just the title makes me think he misses the point of Revelation. The main point is not vengeance, it's the bringing forth of the Bride of the Lamb whose "wife has made herself ready (Rev. 19:7)." (Cross reference that to Eph. 5:23-31 to see that the church is the wife of Christ-the Lamb). This Bride is the New Jerusalem (Rev. 21:2). And everything about the New Jerusalem is a sign. The Bible consummates with the Spirit and the Bride speaking as one (22:17). Don't you want to know HOW the Bride makes herself ready? For that you need to understand the signs. The Bible interprets them.

The lampstands are not in the first verse, they're in the first chapter (vv. 1:12,20). The lampstands are the churches (Rev. 1:20). The churches are the wife of Christ (Eph. 5:23-31), and the Bride of the Lamb (Rev. 19:7) and the New Jerusalem (rev. 21:2).

2
Knotnow 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish he'd have security in the room to escort out those who are rude, talk over him, and refuse to let him answer, while pushing their narrative.

2
Knotnow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, it was written to the 7 churches, however, Rev. 1:1 tells us that the things written were "signs." The 7 lampstands were "signs" of the 7 churches. Also, the Lord said that the church in Thyatira would remain until He returns (Rev. 2:25). And the church in Sardis (3:3). The church in Philadelphia will be saved out of the hour of trial that will come on the whole inhabited earth(3:10) and that hasn't happened yet. He said to the church in Laodicea, that he who overcomes will sit with Him on His throne. That didn't happen 2,000 years ago. Also, each letter to the 7 churches ends with, "He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. So, it was not just written to a few churches in Asia. It was written to the whole church.

The 7 churches were, themselves, prophetic signs of the stages of the church through history and their names are prophetic. Ephesus means "desirable." She left her first love, but she was still desirable, Smyrna (from myrrh) signifies suffering and death. This was the time of persecution. Pergamos means marriage (monogamy, polygamy). The church was married to the world at the time of Constantine. Thyatira, means sacrifice of perfume, and is the fully formed Roman Catholic Church. Sardis, means the remainder, restoration, or reformation and includes all Protestantism. Next came Philadelphia, the city of brotherly love--the only approved church. They only need to hold fast what they have. Last is Laodicea, which means "the opinion of the people--the laymen." IOW, they were not led by the Spirit and the word, but by their own opinion.

11
Knotnow 11 points ago +12 / -1

Agreed. So what if the Rothschilds re-established Israel for their own nefarious purpose, Israel had to be established to fulfill the end times prophecies. God uses powerful men of the world to accomplish His purpose, e.g. Nebuchadnezzar, Cyrus, and even Herod who ordered Christ's crucifixion. Ultimately, all things will work together to accomplish God's eternal purpose.

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey, people produce energy, don' t they? Maybe they could convert "useless eaters" into banks of battery packs.

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem for them, in not having soldiers, is that there's no plausible reason for us to send them money. If their army is gone, they must sue for peace and the excuse to send money for laundering ceases. The D's can't have that; they're going to need it while they're in exile.

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

The DOJ was busy prosecuting J6ers and Trump, do you really think a referral to the DOJ from the findings of these hearings would go anywhere? No, certainly not under Biden, and yet, the findings are still there, waiting, for a Trump DOJ and AG to take them up.

2
Knotnow 2 points ago +2 / -0

You have that backwards. The Chronicles of Narnia was the easy read (Lewis). The Rings (Tolkien) was the hard one.

2
Knotnow 2 points ago +2 / -0

On the other hand, trolls are flooding the boards to cause division and distrust. As for me, I voted for Trump because I trust him. He's the captain of the ship. I have no opinion and nothing to say about his nominees.

view more: Next ›