Take it down?
Because you don't like it?
How about trying to debunk it?
Anyone with access to Grok can ask the same questions and see what it says.
BTW, these answers are in complete alignment with what the Talmud teaches, so there is reason to believe it is valid.
Yeah, until the next hail storm destroys it all.
These people are stupid.
Right.
Also, the arabs have nothing to do with the Bible.
Today, they are all muslim anyway, so why would they use New Testament colors for their flags, even if it was green instead of pale?
Just a dumb take by the speaker.
That has nothing to do with the Bible.
The guy in the video is retarded.
A lot of people who are related use similar symbolism in their flags.
These are all arabs, and not surprising they use similar colors, which has meaning to them.
UK and its former colonies often use Red, White and Blue (UK, USA, Australia, NZ).
Scandanavian countries all have the Christian Cross in their flag, just with different color variations.
Former USSR communist flag was similar to communist China.
Japan and South Korea.
Several Central American flags.
Etc.
In 1954, the Rockefellers had financial interest in the United Fruit Company (you won't find this on Wiki).
The company owned most of Guatemala, including large plantations.
The Guatemala government wanted to buy some of their land for the locals to use.
Rockfellers had the US military go in and regime change Guatemala.
United Fruit Company is today known as Chiquita Brands International.
Here's an interesting archived page:
Although Rockefeller is best remembered for his oil money and his political family – his grandson was Vice President, he had interests in other monopolies too, copper, tobacco and perhaps least recalled – bananas.
He was the money in The United Fruit Company ...
At the height of its powers The United Fruit Company owned a staggering 42% of the entire country of Guatemala and paid not one cent in tax on any of it.
The company also owned the railways, the telephone system, the ports and a large fleet of ships build by some of the finest shipyards in the world.
Not unsurprisingly the people of Guatemala took against this foreign domination, and when offered the opportunity in an election in 1951 to voice an opinion – voted in their droves for Jacobo Arbenz. Arbenz had suggested the not overly revolutionary idea of buying out some of the lands that the Company was not actually using so that landless people might grow food to eat. It wasn’t even appropriation. Arbenz said he would pay them the agreed value
The company took umbrage at the utter impertinence of this jumped up peon and aided a coup of disaffected Guatemalan army officers who invaded from Honduras with covert assistance from the CIA in an operation known as PBSUCCESS. They had persuaded Truman and Eisenhower that Arbenz was going to take the country over to the dark side and ally the country to the USSR.
So, who were these business men? Well at the time of the Guatemalan coup we find the following closely connected with the board of United Fruit.
John Foster Dulles and the firm of Sullivan & Cromwell, had been legal council for the UFC for decades and John Foster Dulles was also a major shareholder in UFC. And at the time John Foster Dulles was also the Secretary of State under President Dwight D Eisenhower. Dulles’s grandfather had also been Secretary’s of State in the time of President Ben Harrison.
Allen W Dulles the brother of John Foster Dulles was also a major shareholder of the company and whiled away his empty hours being the Director of the CIA.
General Robert Carter, head of the National Security Council was a former Chairman of the Board of United Fruit.
Thomas G Corcorran, everyone’s “Mr Fixit” – an appalling man whose biography would be a true adventure story- and who was often accused of corrupt behaviour back home, worked for the CIA was a paid consultant for United Fruit.
Senator Henry Cabot Lodge jun. was the son of the Henry Cabot Lodge who had so hated the League of Nations. His family went as far back as President Adams.
Ann Whitman the wife of Edmund Whitman, United Fruit Company’s publicity director was President Eisenhower’s personal secretary.
John Moor Cabot of the same ancient group of Bostonian families that the Dulles’s and the Cabot-Lodges came from, was Assistant Secretary of State for Inter American Affairs and was also a major shareholder in United Fruit. And his brother Thomas Dudley Cabot was a Director of International Security in the State Department who had been -hold on now- a President of United Fruit.
John McCoy the President of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development was a former member of the Board.
Walter Bedell Smith the Director of the CIA until 1953, and Robert Hill an Undersecretary of State, were both given seats on the board when they retired.
A luminary group of men in any context – but all this for a firm selling bananas?
Well no of course not.
The oligarchy had long seen that the route to Political power is having a steady stream of money and made certain that they stood with feet in both camps or had trusted and able members in the money side. Foreign arenas where trust controls were weak appealed. And if the locals objected, then any old tarrydiddle could be invented as an excuse for the oligarchy to wield the might of the United States into supporting these foreign adventures. By 1953 the oligarchy had managed to control entire countries. In Guatemala the American Financial and Commercial interests had tried to swallow a country whole.
Could never happen now could it?
Blackrock, in particular, has pushed companies to follow ESG/DEI objectives, which has nothing to do with investing. It is all about pushing the agenda/fantasy utopia of what Blackrock CEO Larry Fink (a jew) wants. A lot of those companies fell in line and did what they were told, until a recent backlash.
Perhaps a Blackrock says, "Here Elon, take some free money. But clean up that Twatter thing, or there won't be anymore where that came from -- and our friends are thinking the same thing."
That is the issue, not the investment itself. It's the possible influence they have over Twatter, even though indirectly.
OK, we'll see how it goes.
Article says a previous attempt by him didn't go so well.
Looks like he wants to focus on science, and not much else.
No sports, music, or languages.
I'm guessing not much on American history, either.
And its just for his employees.
We'll see how it goes ...
Yes, and this move by this guy seems like he is just another RINO type.
He fucking knows that this legislation will mean nothing.
The 17th has to be repealed or declared unconstitutional by SCOTUS.
Nothing else will give the States back their power over the senators.
Spiritually maybe, but not biological:
No, not spiritual. It's biological. There is a false translation in Genesis 4.
But that is an indepth discussion, and just not into it right now. Maybe we can debate it another time.
That's because Cain fled the family as he murdered his brother Abel, so the patriarchical line then descended through the next son, Seth.
The point is that there is a particular biological branch of the family tree of Adam, which goes through Seth, and ends up as Isrealites, and ultimately to Jesus.
It goes through Seth, not Cain -- as you recognize.
God >> Adam >> Seth >> ... Jesus/God.
Most Christians never really think about what this means.
No, he clearly states that their father, who was a murder from the beginning, was the devil:
Who was the murderer from the beginning?
Cain.
That's because he was the son of Satan.
That's WHY he committed murder.
John 8 --
33 They answered him, We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?
Remember, long ago the Israelites were slaves in Egypt, and then Judahites (a branch of the Israelite family tree) became slaves in Babylon. Some of them returned to Judea after that captivity.
But these people say they were never slaves. Therefore, they could not have been the Israelites/Judahites. They were something else.
They tell Jesus they are Abraham's chlidren. But Jesus knows that is not exactly true.
37 I know that ye are Abraham's seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you.
38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.
So, Jesus' father (God) is not the same as their father (Satan).
39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father.
Here, they are making a claim that is partially true. These people were Edomites (the ancestors to today's jews), living in Judea, where the Edomites controlled the area, subject to higher Roman authority, in the time of Jesus.
It's all right there in the listing of the family tree in Genesis.
Esau/Edom was a grandson of Abraham.
But Esau/Edom also mixed with the non-Semites/non-Hebrews and became a different, mixed race.
They mixed with the Canaanites, Hittites, and Kenites.
Thus, they became a mixed race with some of Abrahams' blood, but also the bloodlines of others.
So, they could make the claim that "Abraham is our father," but Jesus saw right through it. Abraham was a pure blood, as were the Israelites. But these people were not.
Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.
Again, telling them that neither God nor Abraham are their father.
41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.
Now, THIS is where the modern churches all ignore and get wrong this word "fornication."
They want us to believe that it means "sex outside of marriage." But this exchange between Jesus and these Edomites has nothing at all to do with sex outside of marriage.
They are claiming they are children of God (through Abraham), like the Israelites.
But Jesus knows it is a lie.
The respond by saying they are not born of fornication.
But they are.
Because fornication means RACE MIXING.
Due to the race mixing of Esau/Edom, the Edomites became a mixed race, and were never of the Israelite part of the biological family tree.
They were a different branch.
They were the Edomite branch.
Jesus knows this.
42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.
43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.
They cannot hear his word because they are not his people -- they are not of God.
44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
Cain was a murderer from the beginning -- because he was the son of Satan (the "Adversary" in Hebrew).
45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.
46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?
47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.
48 Then answered the Jews, and said unto him, Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil?
49 Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour me.
Who dishonors Jesus and Christianity?
The modern day jews.
These Edomites (ancestors of modern jews -- which the jews themselves acknowledge) were a mixed race: part Abraham (from Seth), part Canaanite and Hittite (from Ham), and part Kenite (from Cain).
This is why they would not, could not, and did not agree with anything Jesus said.
"Satan" in Hebrew means "Adversary."
These people were/are the adversaries of God's people.
This is a BIOLOGICAL bloodline. It comes ultimately from Cain, the murderer from the beginning.
Eve did not eat an apple in the Garden of Eden. That was a euphamism.
It never said apple. It said fruit. And original Hebrew said "Fruit of the Loin."
This was a term used for sex.
The Serpent seduced Eve, and the result was Cain.
As we are later told in Revelation 12:
7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
The Serpent is the Devil or Satan or the Adversary or the Deceiver.
That Serpent was cast out, and was in the Garden of Eden.
Why didn't it say that in Genesis?
Because Jesus said, in Matthew 13:
35 I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.
We cannot understand the OT without the NT, or the NT without the OT.
This is why jews and muslims will never understand.
That Serpent in the Garden of Even could be called Satanic blood (or, "blood of the adversary" or deceiver). It runs through the biological descendants of Cain.
This explains much of the turmoil in the world, for the past many thousands of years.
explained by the dispersal from Babel in Genesis 11:
Babel was long before the eventual migration to Europe and the development of the various European languages.
One has nothing to do with the other.
Gen 10:2-5 explains that the Gentiles (Europe, I believe) were descended tom Japheth:
No.
You have to be careful with certain words. Some of them do not mean what we are told to believe.
"Gentile" is an English word. It comes from the Latin "Gentilus," which meant someone who was not a Roman citizen.
It has nothing to do with jew or non-jew, which is what most people think today.
The Hebrew word "goy" (and "goyim," which is the plural) means "nation." It does not mean "non-jew." It has nothing at all to do with jews.
Likewise, the Greek word "Ethnos" also means "nation."
"Nation" itself comes from the latin word "nacio," and it means "of birth" and refers to a blood relation.
Today, people use the word "nation" but they do not use it in its proper context.
Nation is a group of people, or a society, that are all related by blood.
In Japan, they have a nation. They are all related by blood (not counting the visitors, which they call "gaijin."
It would be accurate to say that in Japan, the Japanese people are "goy" (individual) or "goyim" (all of them), because they are a nation, and the non-Japanese people are "gentiles," because they are non-Japanese.
These are the true meanings of the words. Not just for Japanese, but just using them to demonstrate the point.
In 1930's Germany, the White German people could have been called the goy/goyim (the "nation"), and the jews and others would have been the gentiles.
The jews have just subverted the true meanings of these words.
Regarding Japeth, we know that Noah's 3 sons were all White because Noah and his wife were White. You can't get anything but White from White/White.
God chose Noah to build the ark and carry out this mission BECAUSE he was "perfect in his generations" (or "ancestry") [see: Genesis 6:9].
Shem's ancestors became the Semites, the Hebrews, and the Israelites. Esau/Edom also came from this line, but unlike Jacob/Israel, he did not stay within his own bloodline.
He mixed with Canaanites, who were from Ham.
Canaan was cursed because he was the product of incest (Ham had sex with his own mother).
Some of Japeth's ancestors may have also ended up in Europe, but his is not of the Israelite family tree. That went through Shem. And the Israelites became the Caucasians and Europeans.
Interesting subject.
I get the impression that Elon was a science fiction geek as a child. Now, he has an opportunity to live out his wet dreams about science stuff -- as long as the taxpayer funds it, and he gets to take in the profits.
He has no real principles or values that align with the bedrock ideals of America.
He is in it for the money, and maybe likes to be admired, too. That's why he is so angry when he is challenged. Probably doesn't get challenged much by people who work for him -- surrounded by classic yes men.
If Q taught anything, it was to use critical thinking.
Elon has shown his tyrant side, which he always had.
People don't want to believe he is not MAGA, so they make excuses.
Was he MAGA in 2016? No, he supported Hillary.
Was he MAGA in 2020? No, he supported FJB.
He went pro-Trump in 2024, probably because he sees a business opportunity. That is how he looks at he world.
He has no American values -- and he is shoving it right in the face of anyone who wants to look.
I say, remove Elon and Vivek from DOGE, and put Ron Paul in charge of it.
Found a couple of comments worth considering:
I can tell you a bit about how it really works. When people block or mute you, you get some badboy points. Get enough of those points, and X starts secretly hiding the replies you're posting. They'll look fine to you, but to everyone else, they'll be in the "spam" or "offensive" sections at the bottom of the thread that require click-through. That reduces engagement on them by over 99%.
Soon, the government or employer will use your score against you. Even if you use a fake name, they still know who you are, based on your IP, phone etc. That's why you shouldn't be on social media.
Whatever this social credit thing is, it is not free speech.
If you combine it with DEI and ESG, you get a real social credit score that locks you out of jobs, housing, whatever ... IF YOU DO NOT GO ALONG WITH THE PROGRAM.
Some of you Elon fans need to wake up and consider that you might have been played.
-
He has always been a Democrat, until he jumped on the Trump Train recently.
-
He has always made his money from government handouts.
-
He has never shown any signs of MAGA or conservative or American values.
-
He bought Twatter and ended the censorship. Yay! And now he pulls the rug out and implements censorship. Boo!
-
Trump probably likes him because Trump knows billionaires, but not a lot that are still his friends. Here comes Elon, who Trump sees as someone who is intelligent, has accomplished a lot, and is a fellow billionaire. But, Trump also has shown us that he has blind spots with a lot of people:
-
Jeff Sessions
-
Bill Barr
-
Chris Wray
-
Mike Pompeo
-
Mike Pence
Why is it so hard to believe that he fucked up with Vivek and Elon, too?
Who predicted it would be Elon to bring in the Chinese Social Credit Score to America.
Make America Communist Now !!!
Won't take long for Elon's algo to show higher scoring accounts to everyone and lower scoring accounts to no one.
Trump needs to dump anti-MAGA Elon.
Put Ron Paul in charge of DOGE.
I would bet that there are many companies with IT departments that have maybe 50 employees, and 40 of them are Indian.
That would be a clear violation of discrimination laws, and could be subject for a lawsuit.
A lot of these companies could be set up for massive lawsuits.
What did you come up with?