I just realized why they have been pushing the trans issue so hard. They wanted people to accept Big Mike. Think about it, it was not pushed until Obama’s got into office.
This is why OPs need to ALWAYS copy paste all text from a tweet into the post, so it is archived forever. And so people don't have to visit twitter.
SO PLEASRE PLEASE PLEASE from now on, always copy paste ALL text, and rehost a screenshot onto imgur.com or other image host, since many times tweets are deleted or banned, so we never get to see what WAS posted :(
🚨 Obama Can now be summoned before a Grand Jury, but he CANNOT Plead the 5th because he has immunity from Prosecution
“He HAS TO TELL THE TRUTH… if he lies as a private citizen about what he did as President, he will not longer have that immunity. And that is the TRAP that Obama is potentially facing.
The irony is that on January 5, 2015, Obama presided over a meeting in the White House where the FBI just cleared General Mike Flynn of any wrongdoing.. and they schemed in that meeting how they might jam up @GenFlynn .
That’s when they came up with the idea to lure him into an interview, catch him in a lie, and then prosecute him that way.
Barack Obama now is about to face a similar situation,”
You are a wise person, BUT.....we idiots who do not know how to use a computer need step by step instructions a five year old could understand.. Then post those instructions on the main page of GAW so we have a template we can always fall back on. My kid is a wizard with a computer, but I'm a knuckle dragger who barely knows how to turn it on. Have some mercy for us old geezers who abhore technology. (I should have been born a Luddite)
I mean, copy and paste is something even my 90 year old grandma could do... All you do is highlight the text, CTRL C, come to the post, and hit CTRL V. Copy the text is very easy.
Screenshot ok fine, maybe that takes a 20 second lesson. you screenshot, and hit CTRL V on the website www.imgur.com and then copy the link it gives you and paste it here.
Even if lefties celebrate how "brave" Big Mike was for living as a woman, the more level headed people will eventually realize that he doesn't have a uterus.
Therefore, the abuse and lies Sasha and Malia had to endure being separated from their real parents Anita Blanchett and Martin Nesbitt will help wake them up.
Those don't work. He probably was designated "Barack Obama" at birth. He might have been born in Vancouver or elsewhere (Kenya is a distractor) and the 2008 kerfuffle ensured that for awhile people think that irrelevant. Chester Arthur, who had dual Irish-American citizenship at birth, successfully deflected from this fact all his life, including using false distractor rumors such as his alleged birth in Canada when it was actually Fairfield, Vermont.
How about: "Did your 2007-2008 campaign admit you were a Kenyan citizen indicating you had British citizenship at birth?" The next question, posed instead to a Constitutional scholar like John Eastman or Leo Donofrio, would be "Does Jay's natural-born citizen clause inherit the unencumbered sole-citizenship provisions of de Vattel's 'Law of Nations'?"
Now you are on to something. Place of birth is irrelevant and is simply a distraction. The key question is Who was his father? The senior Obama was a citizen of the British Empire (Kenya did not become an independent nation until 1962, a year after Barack Obama was born). Assuming it was him, and not someone else. If so, who?
This leads into the question of Did he travel to Pakistan as a youth? Under what passport did he travel? (The expectation is that he had an Indonesian passport as an Indonesian citizen. By becoming an Indonesian citizen, his status as a U.S. citizen is erased.) Did he do anything to restore his U.S. citizenship? Evidence? (The suspicion is that the reason he has kept his university records under seal is that they would reveal he was enrolled as a foreign student.)
So many interesting questions in which to entangle him. Is your current wife your former male lover? "Uh...I can't recall."
He had to live in Jakarta, Indonesia, to absorb the spiritual atmosphere of Krakatoa off the coast as prophesied in Revelation 9.
As long as his birth father isn't known, the default is dual citizen at birth, or worse.
I don't recall that the Pakistan connection was that important; it was a speculative trail, but I presumed his mother's connections, CIA if I recall, were sufficient for that. The part about "foreign student" at university was in part deflection because a false ID was posed about that, which eventually was tracked to the correct student's number.
Of all documentation of Obama's life that I've seen, 99% is fake, with one exception, his elementary-school record at St. Francis in Indonesia showing his religion as Islam and his name as Barry Soetoro.
The net has scrubbed the photo I saw of Michael LaVon Robinson with young Barry, which I thought I could find a second time; there's hope. And I like that Trump is asking the right questions at the same time that pleading the fifth is eliminated and grand juries are salivating.
I remember a clip from years ago circulating where big Mike was speaking at an Aids benefit and making a point about something saying her husband was born in Kenya.
Correct, and inadmissible. The campaign documents are a little better because they show knowledge of the citizenship which implies knowledge of the ramifications.
There was a very sketchy situation where in Hawaii only there was a law requiring the candidate to be certified to be a natural-born citizen. Pelosi, as a DNC chair, signed a statement that was supposed to say Obama was natural-born, but the crucial line about natural-born was removed compared to other such forms, leaving a less grammatical sentence, as if it had been an inadvertent file error. Good circumstantial evidence that everybody knew and were avoiding going on the record about it.
You must be new here..... squinting eyes Ah yes, there's the handshake icon.
He "may" have been born here, but he's NOT eligible to be president. A Natural Born Citizen is born on US soil of parents who are both already Naturalized Citizens.
That's pretty funny. Most of us here on this board are 20 years ahead of you. Try to catch up. 😉Or maybe you're just a bot. 🤖
The founders of this country were well studied British subjects that saw that it was their DUTY to gain independence from England and free the new nation and citizens of irrational and oppressive king. They knew that England and the king would try many different ways to infiltrate the USA so they referred to Emer de Vattel's "Law of Nations".
Emer de Vattel’s 1758 treatise The Law of Nations defines "Natural-Born Citizens" (or "natives") strictly as those born within the country's territory to parents who are also citizens.
Key details of this definition include:
🟢 The Principle of Jus Sanguinis: Under Vattel's framework, children "naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights".
🟢 Territorial Birth: To be a natural-born citizen, birth within the sovereign's territory is required, but it is paired with the necessity that the parents themselves are citizens of that same nation.
🟢 Historical Impact: This definition directly influenced early American legal thought and is often cited by constitutional scholars regarding the "natural born Citizen" clause required for the U.S. Presidency.
Vattel detailed these rules in Book 1, Chapter 19, Section 212 of his work. You can explore the full original text and context on the LONANG Institute's Vattel page.
Since Barry has immunity from prosecution while President, I'm sure Q has a way to get around these types of hurdles in order to get him prosecuted. Does treason charges have immunity? What about RICO? Or will the government do the old Al Capone routine and convicted him on some obscure law nobody has ever considered, like tax evasion?
Obama wasn't Constitutionally eligible to be president. Nancy Piglosi knew this and changed the wording on the certification letters to exclude the terms that required him to be a Natural Born Citizen" (requires that BOTH parents are Naturalized Citizens when the child is born in the US).
"Fraud vitiates" is a fundamental legal principle—summarized in Latin as fraus omnia vitiat—meaning that deliberate deception or dishonesty invalidates any contract, agreement, or judgment it touches. Because fraud destroys the foundation of trust and good faith, no binding rights or obligations can be created by a fraudulent act
thanks, everything I read back in 2008 and going forward. I did not hear that the speaker of the house. Change the wording on the certification letters I miss that.
And it is so good that fraud initiates…. Can hardly wait for this to be habbening!
Not dooming just wondering how this would work " many have lied under oath this past year - none of them have been charged , what makes him different ? Honest question !
Yeah, I don't buy this either. The fifth amendment says that a person cannot be compelled to become a witness against themself in high crimes. I don't think that right just evaporates. And as a practical matter, forcing someone to testify against themself is a challenge anyway, typical of regime that torture confessions out of people.
I've seen it repeated here often, but it goes against the plain language written in the Constitution. So I don't believe the assertion, unless you have examples of how it's been done before.
And exactly how do you compel someone to tell the truth under oath when they are unwilling? A person faced with treason would gladly accept contempt of Congress charges as a consequence of not admitting their guilt. The argument seems both unconstitutional on its face, and impossible to carry out.
Good question. For anything to happen, there would have to be strong enough evidence to show the person was lying maliciously. It's hard to do that when someone's answer is "I don't recall." How do you prove to a court that someone actually remembers something or not?
And for the rest of it, if we had strong enough evidence on anything else he's involved in that would stand up in a court of law, then he would have been dealt with years ago.
And then he’ll just lie. Haven’t seen one person charged with perjury or anything in front of these committees. Lots of scolding. Media headline one liners.
That's by design. Q does not want his trap to be sprung before it is ready, thus he let's the dems have their little victories while we sit and stew over that outcome. But while they are rejoicing at their victories, Q is planning a much wider net tossing to catch as many traitors as possible. They will begin turning on each other when the screws are tightened, thus we simply need patience and let the movie play itself out. Do not despair, fren, just think of this as the calm before the storm.
Later on, I was assigned to a Unit that had F-15s, and I was lucky to get a spot on a weapons load crew, and we loaded ALL THOSE VERY FINE MUNITIONS!!!!! That ya'll see once-in-a-while!!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨
He was born in Hawaii to a prostitute and a communist. The Kenya identity was created by the CIA to hide his real birth. They later tried to bury the Kenya identity when they decided they wanted to run him as president. The reason why his Hawaii birth certificate was faked was because they destroyed his original when they created the Kenya identity.
Government was never delegated the power to grant itself immunity.
The Framers explicitly rejected the British rule that "the King can do no wrong." In Federalist No. 69, Hamilton wrote that a President is fully liable to prosecution in the ordinary course of law. Article I, Section 3 confirms that criminal liability survives office. Furthermore, the legal doctrine of ultra vires ("beyond the powers") dictates that public servants only represent the state when they follow the Constitution. The second an official commits an unconstitutional act, they step outside their authority. Legally, they cease to act as the government and become a private individual. You cannot claim government immunity for an act that the Constitution forbids. The servant is never more powerful than the master.
“This Constitution... shall be the Supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby” ~ U.S. Constitution Article VI
“A constitution is not the act of a government, but of a people constituting a government; and government without a constitution is power without a right. All power exercised over a nation, must have some beginning. It must be either delegated, or assumed. There are not other sources. All delegated power is trust, and all assumed power is usurpation. Time does not alter the nature and quality of either.” ~ Thomas Paine (1737-1809) US Founding father, pamphleteer, author
“Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it.” ~ John Adams (1735-1826) Founding Father, 2nd US President Thoughts on Government, 1776
“A constitution defines and limits the powers of the government it creates. It therefore follows, as a natural and also a logical result, that the governmental exercise of any power not authorized by the constitution is an assumed power, and therefore illegal.” ~ Thomas Paine (1737-1809) US Founding father, pamphleteer, author
“It has been thought a considerable advance towards establishing the principles of Freedom, to say, that government is a compact between those who govern and those that are governed: but this cannot be true, because it is putting the effect before the cause; for as man must have existed before governments existed, there necessarily was a time when governments did not exist, and consequently there could originally exist no governors to form such a compact with. The fact therefore must be, that the individuals themselves, each in his own personal and sovereign right, entered into a compact with each other to produce a government: and this is the only mode in which governments have a right to arise, and the only principle on which they have a right to exist.” ~ Thomas Paine (1737-1809) US Founding father, pamphleteer, author
“We may be tossed upon an ocean where we can see no land -- nor, perhaps, the sun or stars. But there is a chart and a compass for us to study, to consult, and to obey. That chart is the Constitution.” ~ Daniel Webster (1782-1852) US Senator
“The fundamental principle is this: No matter how worthwhile an end may be, if there is no constitutional authority to pursue it, then the federal government must step aside and leave the matter to the states or to private parties. The president and Congress can proceed only from constitutional authority, not from good intentions alone. If Congress thinks it necessary to expand its powers, the Framers crafted an amendment process for that purpose. But too often, rather than follow that process, Congress has disregarded the limits set by the Constitution and gutted our frontline defense against overweening federal government.” ~ Robert A. Levy (1941- ) Chairman of Cato Institute, author, lawyer
“I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground that 'all powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are preserved to the states or to the people.' ... To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition." ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“That this privilege of giving or of withholding our monies is an important barrier against the undue exertion of prerogative, which if left altogether without control may be exercised to our great oppression; and all history shews how efficacious is its intercession for redress of grievances and re-establishment of rights, and how improvident would be the surrender of so powerful a mediator.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism, but the theory of necessity on which it is based is false; for the government, within the Constitution, has all the powers granted to it, which are necessary to preserve its existence; as has been happily proved by the result of the great effort to throw off its just authority.” ~ Justice David Davis (1815-1886) U.S. Supreme Court Justice 1862-1877 Ex parte Milligan 71 U.S. 2 (1866) DAVIS, J., Opinion of the Court
“Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency.” ~ Justice Charles Evans Hughes (1862-1948) Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Home Building & Loan Assn v. Blairsdell, 1934
“Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence.” ~ Justice Tom C. Clark (1899-1977) US Attorney General, 1945-1949, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1949-1967 delivering the opinion of the Court in MAPP v. OHIO, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
“There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury The Federalist No. 78.
"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." - Quote by: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Source: Federalist Papers #78, See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762, Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)
"No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it." - Quote by: American Jurisprudence, 2nd Edition Source: 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177, late 2d, Sec 256
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." - Quote by: Marbury vs. Madison Source: 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803)
“Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it.” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Federalist No. 22, December 14, 1787
“Unlike ordinary legislation, a constitution is enacted by the people themselves in their sovereign capacity and is therefore the paramount law.” ~ Justice Frank Cruise Haymond (1887-1972) West Virginia Court of Appeals (1946-1972) Lance v. Board of Education, 170 S.E.2d 783, 793 (1969) (dissent)
“The people are Sovereign. ... at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects... with none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.” ~ John Jay (1745-1829) first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, First President of the United States - preceding George Washington, one of three men most responsible for the US Constitution Chisholm v. Georgia, (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @Dall 1793 pp471-472
“In this country sovereignty resides in the people, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution, entrusted to it: All else is withheld.” ~ U.S. Supreme Court Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884).
“In the United States, Sovereignty resides in the people, who act through the organs established by the Constitution.” ~ Chisholm v. Georgia Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall 419, 471
A great place to start is to release all the records that Barry sealed - the very first thing he did when he assumed power. What was he hiding? Perhaps all that has already been scrubbed. But what about backups?
I just realized why they have been pushing the trans issue so hard. They wanted people to accept Big Mike. Think about it, it was not pushed until Obama’s got into office.
Constantly tearing the very fabric of our society! 🤬
Link is dead.
This is why OPs need to ALWAYS copy paste all text from a tweet into the post, so it is archived forever. And so people don't have to visit twitter.
SO PLEASRE PLEASE PLEASE from now on, always copy paste ALL text, and rehost a screenshot onto imgur.com or other image host, since many times tweets are deleted or banned, so we never get to see what WAS posted :(
Second part:
HOLEE SHIZZLES‼️A TRAP IS SET!
🚨 Obama Can now be summoned before a Grand Jury, but he CANNOT Plead the 5th because he has immunity from Prosecution
“He HAS TO TELL THE TRUTH… if he lies as a private citizen about what he did as President, he will not longer have that immunity. And that is the TRAP that Obama is potentially facing.
The irony is that on January 5, 2015, Obama presided over a meeting in the White House where the FBI just cleared General Mike Flynn of any wrongdoing.. and they schemed in that meeting how they might jam up @GenFlynn .
That’s when they came up with the idea to lure him into an interview, catch him in a lie, and then prosecute him that way.
Barack Obama now is about to face a similar situation,”
BOOMERANG 🪃 💥
First part:
@imPascalNajadi "Is Barack Obama your birth name?" "Where were you born, Kenya or Hawaii?" "So you were never the legal president of America."
Checkmate in 2 moves.
Thank You Mariana!
You are a wise person, BUT.....we idiots who do not know how to use a computer need step by step instructions a five year old could understand.. Then post those instructions on the main page of GAW so we have a template we can always fall back on. My kid is a wizard with a computer, but I'm a knuckle dragger who barely knows how to turn it on. Have some mercy for us old geezers who abhore technology. (I should have been born a Luddite)
I mean, copy and paste is something even my 90 year old grandma could do... All you do is highlight the text, CTRL C, come to the post, and hit CTRL V. Copy the text is very easy.
Screenshot ok fine, maybe that takes a 20 second lesson. you screenshot, and hit CTRL V on the website www.imgur.com and then copy the link it gives you and paste it here.
Wwwwhhhaaattttttt??? This is voodoo magic, NOrds. Thanks for the tips.
Post now deleted/removed.
https://x.com/i/status/2066981148501426337
What account posted this?
It's their religion as well.
True, but they also wanted to mess up children. I think Satanists are more invested in that.
I think you need to go back and look at more of the first ladies. Look at Barbara Bush.
Even if lefties celebrate how "brave" Big Mike was for living as a woman, the more level headed people will eventually realize that he doesn't have a uterus.
Therefore, the abuse and lies Sasha and Malia had to endure being separated from their real parents Anita Blanchett and Martin Nesbitt will help wake them up.
Those don't work. He probably was designated "Barack Obama" at birth. He might have been born in Vancouver or elsewhere (Kenya is a distractor) and the 2008 kerfuffle ensured that for awhile people think that irrelevant. Chester Arthur, who had dual Irish-American citizenship at birth, successfully deflected from this fact all his life, including using false distractor rumors such as his alleged birth in Canada when it was actually Fairfield, Vermont.
How about: "Did your 2007-2008 campaign admit you were a Kenyan citizen indicating you had British citizenship at birth?" The next question, posed instead to a Constitutional scholar like John Eastman or Leo Donofrio, would be "Does Jay's natural-born citizen clause inherit the unencumbered sole-citizenship provisions of de Vattel's 'Law of Nations'?"
Now you are on to something. Place of birth is irrelevant and is simply a distraction. The key question is Who was his father? The senior Obama was a citizen of the British Empire (Kenya did not become an independent nation until 1962, a year after Barack Obama was born). Assuming it was him, and not someone else. If so, who?
This leads into the question of Did he travel to Pakistan as a youth? Under what passport did he travel? (The expectation is that he had an Indonesian passport as an Indonesian citizen. By becoming an Indonesian citizen, his status as a U.S. citizen is erased.) Did he do anything to restore his U.S. citizenship? Evidence? (The suspicion is that the reason he has kept his university records under seal is that they would reveal he was enrolled as a foreign student.)
So many interesting questions in which to entangle him. Is your current wife your former male lover? "Uh...I can't recall."
He had to live in Jakarta, Indonesia, to absorb the spiritual atmosphere of Krakatoa off the coast as prophesied in Revelation 9.
As long as his birth father isn't known, the default is dual citizen at birth, or worse.
I don't recall that the Pakistan connection was that important; it was a speculative trail, but I presumed his mother's connections, CIA if I recall, were sufficient for that. The part about "foreign student" at university was in part deflection because a false ID was posed about that, which eventually was tracked to the correct student's number.
Of all documentation of Obama's life that I've seen, 99% is fake, with one exception, his elementary-school record at St. Francis in Indonesia showing his religion as Islam and his name as Barry Soetoro.
The net has scrubbed the photo I saw of Michael LaVon Robinson with young Barry, which I thought I could find a second time; there's hope. And I like that Trump is asking the right questions at the same time that pleading the fifth is eliminated and grand juries are salivating.
If and when Barry has to testify IN ANY COURT, do you believe those proceedings will be televised?
I remember a clip from years ago circulating where big Mike was speaking at an Aids benefit and making a point about something saying her husband was born in Kenya.
Correct, and inadmissible. The campaign documents are a little better because they show knowledge of the citizenship which implies knowledge of the ramifications.
There was a very sketchy situation where in Hawaii only there was a law requiring the candidate to be certified to be a natural-born citizen. Pelosi, as a DNC chair, signed a statement that was supposed to say Obama was natural-born, but the crucial line about natural-born was removed compared to other such forms, leaving a less grammatical sentence, as if it had been an inadvertent file error. Good circumstantial evidence that everybody knew and were avoiding going on the record about it.
Haul her butt before the grand jury and ask her that question under oath. She will do the old HRC reply, "I can't remember ".
You must be new here..... squinting eyes Ah yes, there's the handshake icon.
He "may" have been born here, but he's NOT eligible to be president. A Natural Born Citizen is born on US soil of parents who are both already Naturalized Citizens.
1.) There's no precedent for this, you are just making it up.
2.) There have been several presidents and vice presidents who had foreign-born parents and it's not clear that all of them ever became American citizens at all: https://usa-green-card.com/get-your-green-card/us-immigration-guide/presidents-and-vps-with-foreign-born-parents
u/#spitcoffee
That's pretty funny. Most of us here on this board are 20 years ahead of you. Try to catch up. 😉Or maybe you're just a bot. 🤖
The founders of this country were well studied British subjects that saw that it was their DUTY to gain independence from England and free the new nation and citizens of irrational and oppressive king. They knew that England and the king would try many different ways to infiltrate the USA so they referred to Emer de Vattel's "Law of Nations".
===============================================================
Emer de Vattel’s 1758 treatise The Law of Nations defines "Natural-Born Citizens" (or "natives") strictly as those born within the country's territory to parents who are also citizens.
Key details of this definition include:
🟢 The Principle of Jus Sanguinis: Under Vattel's framework, children "naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights".
🟢 Territorial Birth: To be a natural-born citizen, birth within the sovereign's territory is required, but it is paired with the necessity that the parents themselves are citizens of that same nation.
🟢 Historical Impact: This definition directly influenced early American legal thought and is often cited by constitutional scholars regarding the "natural born Citizen" clause required for the U.S. Presidency.
Vattel detailed these rules in Book 1, Chapter 19, Section 212 of his work. You can explore the full original text and context on the LONANG Institute's Vattel page.
Neat. Not American law, not binding, no legal precedent for what you say. You don't even have a citation. You are just wrong.
God Bless your heart, you really are a bot and didn't make it to the third bullet:
You provided no citations for this claim and you did not cite any court case or law. You are making up stuff.
Since Barry has immunity from prosecution while President, I'm sure Q has a way to get around these types of hurdles in order to get him prosecuted. Does treason charges have immunity? What about RICO? Or will the government do the old Al Capone routine and convicted him on some obscure law nobody has ever considered, like tax evasion?
KNOWINGLY
great question, looked up some constit. law & Sup. Ct.:
Trump v. United States (& we know it was a deep state fraudulent case) July 1, 2024 decision (6-3)
presidents have absolute immunity from criminal prosecutions for actions taken within their constitutional authority
presidents have presumptive immunity from criminal prosecution for any official acts they undertake
presidents do not have immunity for their unofficial acts
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23-939
So it looks like U1 & any treasonous acts, even if done under color of authority as president (color of law) do not get Barry Obuma off the hook
& with his background, he might not even have been a legitimate president
They also don't have immunity for crimes committed after they leave office,I belive.
great point, this seems to tie in with the idea he has to tell the truth if subpoenad before Congress or other court — looking forward to this!
Obama wasn't Constitutionally eligible to be president. Nancy Piglosi knew this and changed the wording on the certification letters to exclude the terms that required him to be a Natural Born Citizen" (requires that BOTH parents are Naturalized Citizens when the child is born in the US).
thanks, everything I read back in 2008 and going forward. I did not hear that the speaker of the house. Change the wording on the certification letters I miss that.
And it is so good that fraud initiates…. Can hardly wait for this to be habbening!
checkmate,John Solomon!
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116737999128241599
Yes! You have eyes to see ...✨
https://nitter.net/iontecs_pemf/status/2066981148501426337
Not dooming just wondering how this would work " many have lied under oath this past year - none of them have been charged , what makes him different ? Honest question !
We need a new congress first.
Yeah, I don't buy this either. The fifth amendment says that a person cannot be compelled to become a witness against themself in high crimes. I don't think that right just evaporates. And as a practical matter, forcing someone to testify against themself is a challenge anyway, typical of regime that torture confessions out of people.
If you are granted immunity you can not use the fifth amendment to not testify. That is well established.
I've seen it repeated here often, but it goes against the plain language written in the Constitution. So I don't believe the assertion, unless you have examples of how it's been done before.
And exactly how do you compel someone to tell the truth under oath when they are unwilling? A person faced with treason would gladly accept contempt of Congress charges as a consequence of not admitting their guilt. The argument seems both unconstitutional on its face, and impossible to carry out.
Says who or what? Why do you think this is true?
What laws or part of the Constitution says this?
Treason at the highest level
Good question. For anything to happen, there would have to be strong enough evidence to show the person was lying maliciously. It's hard to do that when someone's answer is "I don't recall." How do you prove to a court that someone actually remembers something or not?
And for the rest of it, if we had strong enough evidence on anything else he's involved in that would stand up in a court of law, then he would have been dealt with years ago.
I understand but certain our Wizards & Warriors have a Plan for everything.
And then he’ll just lie. Haven’t seen one person charged with perjury or anything in front of these committees. Lots of scolding. Media headline one liners.
That's by design. Q does not want his trap to be sprung before it is ready, thus he let's the dems have their little victories while we sit and stew over that outcome. But while they are rejoicing at their victories, Q is planning a much wider net tossing to catch as many traitors as possible. They will begin turning on each other when the screws are tightened, thus we simply need patience and let the movie play itself out. Do not despair, fren, just think of this as the calm before the storm.
Classical Guerilla Warfare Tactics...Just like the ones I used in a faraway land!!!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Apologize Tynyyn...BUT the opportunity presented itself!!!!!!! Great screed you have written!!!!
ED, did you fly F-15's?
OOHHH HELL NO!!!!! DAMN DOOR GUNNER, COMBAT SEARCH & RESCUE!!!!!!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨
Later on, I was assigned to a Unit that had F-15s, and I was lucky to get a spot on a weapons load crew, and we loaded ALL THOSE VERY FINE MUNITIONS!!!!! That ya'll see once-in-a-while!!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨
Anyone remember when the Big O's brother said he has the original birth certificate in Kenya he reported it back then but nobody paid attention.
That plus the name change and the social security scandal etc says a lot.
Yes, I do!
He was born in Hawaii to a prostitute and a communist. The Kenya identity was created by the CIA to hide his real birth. They later tried to bury the Kenya identity when they decided they wanted to run him as president. The reason why his Hawaii birth certificate was faked was because they destroyed his original when they created the Kenya identity.
Government was never delegated the power to grant itself immunity.
The Framers explicitly rejected the British rule that "the King can do no wrong." In Federalist No. 69, Hamilton wrote that a President is fully liable to prosecution in the ordinary course of law. Article I, Section 3 confirms that criminal liability survives office. Furthermore, the legal doctrine of ultra vires ("beyond the powers") dictates that public servants only represent the state when they follow the Constitution. The second an official commits an unconstitutional act, they step outside their authority. Legally, they cease to act as the government and become a private individual. You cannot claim government immunity for an act that the Constitution forbids. The servant is never more powerful than the master.
“This Constitution... shall be the Supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby” ~ U.S. Constitution Article VI
“A constitution is not the act of a government, but of a people constituting a government; and government without a constitution is power without a right. All power exercised over a nation, must have some beginning. It must be either delegated, or assumed. There are not other sources. All delegated power is trust, and all assumed power is usurpation. Time does not alter the nature and quality of either.” ~ Thomas Paine (1737-1809) US Founding father, pamphleteer, author
“Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it.” ~ John Adams (1735-1826) Founding Father, 2nd US President Thoughts on Government, 1776
“A constitution defines and limits the powers of the government it creates. It therefore follows, as a natural and also a logical result, that the governmental exercise of any power not authorized by the constitution is an assumed power, and therefore illegal.” ~ Thomas Paine (1737-1809) US Founding father, pamphleteer, author
“It has been thought a considerable advance towards establishing the principles of Freedom, to say, that government is a compact between those who govern and those that are governed: but this cannot be true, because it is putting the effect before the cause; for as man must have existed before governments existed, there necessarily was a time when governments did not exist, and consequently there could originally exist no governors to form such a compact with. The fact therefore must be, that the individuals themselves, each in his own personal and sovereign right, entered into a compact with each other to produce a government: and this is the only mode in which governments have a right to arise, and the only principle on which they have a right to exist.” ~ Thomas Paine (1737-1809) US Founding father, pamphleteer, author
“We may be tossed upon an ocean where we can see no land -- nor, perhaps, the sun or stars. But there is a chart and a compass for us to study, to consult, and to obey. That chart is the Constitution.” ~ Daniel Webster (1782-1852) US Senator
“The fundamental principle is this: No matter how worthwhile an end may be, if there is no constitutional authority to pursue it, then the federal government must step aside and leave the matter to the states or to private parties. The president and Congress can proceed only from constitutional authority, not from good intentions alone. If Congress thinks it necessary to expand its powers, the Framers crafted an amendment process for that purpose. But too often, rather than follow that process, Congress has disregarded the limits set by the Constitution and gutted our frontline defense against overweening federal government.” ~ Robert A. Levy (1941- ) Chairman of Cato Institute, author, lawyer
“I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground that 'all powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are preserved to the states or to the people.' ... To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition." ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“That this privilege of giving or of withholding our monies is an important barrier against the undue exertion of prerogative, which if left altogether without control may be exercised to our great oppression; and all history shews how efficacious is its intercession for redress of grievances and re-establishment of rights, and how improvident would be the surrender of so powerful a mediator.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism, but the theory of necessity on which it is based is false; for the government, within the Constitution, has all the powers granted to it, which are necessary to preserve its existence; as has been happily proved by the result of the great effort to throw off its just authority.” ~ Justice David Davis (1815-1886) U.S. Supreme Court Justice 1862-1877 Ex parte Milligan 71 U.S. 2 (1866) DAVIS, J., Opinion of the Court
“Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency.” ~ Justice Charles Evans Hughes (1862-1948) Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Home Building & Loan Assn v. Blairsdell, 1934
“Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence.” ~ Justice Tom C. Clark (1899-1977) US Attorney General, 1945-1949, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1949-1967 delivering the opinion of the Court in MAPP v. OHIO, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
“There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury The Federalist No. 78.
"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." - Quote by: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Source: Federalist Papers #78, See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762, Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)
"No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it." - Quote by: American Jurisprudence, 2nd Edition Source: 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177, late 2d, Sec 256
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." - Quote by: Marbury vs. Madison Source: 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803)
“Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it.” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Federalist No. 22, December 14, 1787
“Unlike ordinary legislation, a constitution is enacted by the people themselves in their sovereign capacity and is therefore the paramount law.” ~ Justice Frank Cruise Haymond (1887-1972) West Virginia Court of Appeals (1946-1972) Lance v. Board of Education, 170 S.E.2d 783, 793 (1969) (dissent)
“The people are Sovereign. ... at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects... with none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.” ~ John Jay (1745-1829) first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, First President of the United States - preceding George Washington, one of three men most responsible for the US Constitution Chisholm v. Georgia, (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @Dall 1793 pp471-472
“In this country sovereignty resides in the people, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution, entrusted to it: All else is withheld.” ~ U.S. Supreme Court Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884).
“In the United States, Sovereignty resides in the people, who act through the organs established by the Constitution.” ~ Chisholm v. Georgia Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall 419, 471
A great place to start is to release all the records that Barry sealed - the very first thing he did when he assumed power. What was he hiding? Perhaps all that has already been scrubbed. But what about backups?