2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

A great historical digest. Trump knew what would happen in the election of 2020.

A major time gap between June, 2019 and January, 2021 should be filled with Trump's statement made in August 2020 "This May be the Last Time You’ll See Me for a While”- https://summit.news/2020/08/07/trump-this-may-be-the-last-time-youll-see-me-for-a-while/

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

Plan B: defund the DOJ management. Handcuff what money that has been allocated can be spent on. Funding and paychecks stop. Cooperation begins.

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, I saw that from 2015 too, but this thread needs to post the sauce.

4
My2SonsAreMarines 4 points ago +4 / -0

Does anyone have sauce on this? Daily Mail perhaps? 76 politicialns dragnetted in the UK as pedos should be screaming headlines

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually your "well educated" rabbi would agree with me. The Old Testament is not the Talmud and you were an ignorant Kabbalist fool to make such an inept posting in the first place.

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're stuttering, Little Miltie. Having trouble with completing a coherent thought in a single post?

If you knew anything about the Old Testament, you would know that OT is the law AND the prophets, as well as the history of the Creation of the World, the Fall of Man, judgment of the World with The Flood, God's covenant with Abraham, the freeing of Israel from Egypt, the rise and fall of the pre-Christian era Hebrew peoples, as well as Psalms and poetry, all of which point to the coming Messiah.

Talmudics are those about whom God speaks when He says: "I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.." (Rev 2:9) Christ rebuked them to their face: "“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the door of the kingdom of heaven in people’s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to” (Matthew 23:13)

Talmudics made their own extra bibilcal law in order to assert their power over the Jewish people. They are with us today.

Learn the difference between the Old Testament and the Talmud. You will hopefully post more intelligently next time, and, perhaps for your sake, absent the mal-intentioned ignorance borne of your own likely Talmudic inclinations.

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +3 / -1

"For those who are not super familiar with Old Testament endorsements of pedophilia."

The Talmud is not the Old Testament, and the Old Testament does not endorse pedophilia. The Old Testament is foundational doctrine for both Judaism and Christianity and is considered to be God-breathed instructon for life and personal salvation from sin.

The Talmud by contrast is an extra biblical set of contrivances and "laws" in part derived from Babylonian paganism, intended by some "scholars" and elites within the Jewish community to justify their sin, and adopted by some of those same people who parade themslves around as Jewish intelligensia having exploitative inclinations.

Learn the difference,

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the Federal Reserve itself isn't a contrivance? It's an Act of Congress that can be repealed.

BIS is a contrivance. I agree. Fuck 'em.

The US Constitution solves this debt cycle. Is that "legal" enough?

Ownership of anything is only enforce-able in law. The "Cabal" you say - yeah, them and what army?

The "Cabal" doesn't exist when/if US government crawls back their dough and disposes the Cabal of their wealth using EO 13848.

Why do you suppose Trump says we'll all be happy?

We just need to get Trump back in to pull the trigger on EO 13848

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

Congress has the Constitutional power to coin money and regulate the value thereof.

Congress can authorize the minting of 12 Plainum coins denominated in $2.58T units.

Send the coins to the 12 Federal Reserve Banks and payment in full of all outstanding US debt.

After debt is paid, demonetize the 12 coins.

Start over, this time without the Fed.

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

OK so it was obviously against the law, right? No brainer.

OK then what happens? Throw out the election, right?

(R)'s have majority in the Senate. - "super majority" after Tuesday night.

Will they act? Will the House act?

if not, why not?

Where's Ronna McDaniel? Cunting away about "bad messagining?

Where's the likes of Scott Walker? What about the still currently sitting WI supreme court justices?

If even Tucker knows this where is the emergency appeal?

To hell with the RNC

5
My2SonsAreMarines 5 points ago +5 / -0

Who PERSONALLY authored it? Get to the core of the problem and purge these people from power. Hawley champions legislation to ban TikToc and it comes out looking like this? This is not Hawley's work. The process has been hijacked - a wolf in sheep's clothing. Expose the fuckers who authored this bill, dox them, shame them. Shine the lights on them. "Handle" them in unpleasant and painful ways - drive them from all influence and power.

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your arrogance assumes YOU have all the facts and insights. You don't, nor do I. I asked a simple question and you replied with one of the longer intellectual flatulations uttered on these boards in a while. At this time I choose to believe Lindell, Lake, and Trump and their representations on this issue, in part because I believe they know more than I do, and far more than pathological doomers like you do.

For some reason you are transfixed with those rubber unicorns and plastic rainbows dangling above your head in your crib, as you wallow around in a pile of self-important fetid musings of you own making. In the end It appears that you are merely a pedestrian know-it-all style doomer in need of diaper change.

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

TL/DR: You think Lake and Lindell are blowing smoke and you think you know more than they do. Your opinion would have more weight if you actually had $$skin$$ in this game.

Lindell is clear that if this fails at the State level they will take it to the USSC. I would actually welcome that in order to set national corrective precedents that could force a paper ballots only system in the end.

If it fails at the USSC, you are free to doom. Until then, domming is your cup to savor alone.

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

The requirement for the demonstration of safe and effective medications came about as a result of the Thalidomide debacle in Europe. FDA's Frances Kelsey refused to approve Thalidomide for marketing in the US, and the tragedy was avioded in the US. Experts estimate that thalidomide led to the death of approximately 2,000 children and serious birth defects in more than 10,000 children, about 5,000 of them in West Germany. Frances Kelsey received the President's Award for Distinguished Federal Civilian Service from President John F. Kennedy, 1962.

The Kefauver Amendments (1962) to the US Food Drug and Cosmetic Act today requires 2 well-controlled clinical trials demonstrating safety and effeciveness of new drugs seeking approval for marketing.

Sadly today's FDA is a far cry from Kelsey's - even as it has chosen to ignore demonstrated safety concerns for CV-19 jabs

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

The AZ court system is not the last redress available, and elctions in AZ at the governor's level have been challenged and overturned in the past. The path is difficult but not unassailable or impossible.

The 2020-2022 time frame was a learning process for us and folks like Shiva laid down a pathway for verification that does not have to be re-invented. In 2020 we did not have the tech at our fingertips like we do now. The reason 100000 sigs are in question is becuase they have already been vetted and found wanting.

If you think Lake and Lindell are spreading falsehood by emphasizing the importance of this ruling paticualrly where signature verification is involved, I challenge you here and now to say so bluntly.

Since they are the one's who have invested the millions in prosecuting this case and they contiue to be hopeful about the ultimate outcome, I choose to believe that they have more insight than either of us, and have sound reason to believe as they do. They have visibility to information that neither you nor I have, and I choose to share their optimism rather than your doom.

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Lincoln cent was minted beginning in 1909 to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Lincoln's birth - hardly an attempt demean.

Prior to Lincoln issues the US minted the Indian Head cent from 1959-1909.

Concurrently with minting Indian Head pennies for a time the US also minted Indian Head GOLD $2-1/2 quarter Eagles (1908-1929), $5 1/2 Eagles (1908-1916), and $10 Eagles (1907-1933).

Indians were featured on the lowest and higher denominations. I don't think the US Mint ever intended to demean Indians during the time they were featured on pennies any more than was Lincoln.

Instead of seeing the wheat stalks featured on the reverse of pre-1959 Lincolns as some sort of cabalist symbology think of "amber waves of grain." It is likely to be a more accurate interpretation.

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is more than just "reported," Are you saying that Lindell and Lake's claims to the contrary are incorrect in their assertion that signature verification will need to be done on > 100000 cast votesin question?

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

To demean him? I am a coin collector of > 60 years' time and I have never heard that. Did they put Washington on thr $1 bill to demean him too? What's the sauce?

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

The video has to have been made before the recent political victory of Dutch farmers whose partf "BBB" won a majority of seats in Parliament in part based on the threats this farmer describes

5
My2SonsAreMarines 5 points ago +5 / -0

Transcribed? Is that all? How about testimony in public that hits the Warroom video?

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was hoping for him to propose monetization of a set of 12 Platinum coins minted by the Treasury with the authoriztion of Congress that are denominated to add up to a sum of $31T, pay off the bonds of each of the Federal Reserve Banks, and erase the National Debt.

Now THAT would be a Great Reset wouldn't it?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›